With the 2026 NFL Draft fast approaching, it's time to take a look at the top prospects for the Kansas City Chiefs.
You’ll notice this Big Board differs from many national rankings. That’s intentional. We’ve built it around the Chiefs’ current roster makeup and positional needs. As a result, you won’t find many quarterbacks listed here, as Kansas City remains well-established at that position. Instead, we’ve placed greater emphasis on positions that could make a more immediate impact, such as defensive tackle, running back, and edge.
At the moment, the Chiefs are projected to hold six picks in the 2026 NFL Draft. While our board presents players in a ranked order, we encourage readers to view them in tiers, as talent gaps within each tier can be fluid.
Because our 2026 NFL Draft Big Board is constructed with the Chiefs’ draft tendencies in mind, we’ve also factored in their historical preferences and athletic thresholds. For example, undersized edge rushers, offensive tackles with sub-34-inch arms, or smaller corners who shy away from contact typically don’t align with Kansas City’s profile, and our rankings reflect that. We’ve designed this board to fit what the Chiefs actually value, not just what draft analysts project.
Before we get to the board, here's a reminder of the Chiefs draft choices:
- Round 1: Pick 9
- Round 1: Pick 29
- Round 2: Pick 40
- Round 3: Pick 74
- Round 4: Pick 109
- Round 5: Pick 147
- Round 5: Pick 168
- Round 5: Pick 177
- Round 6: Pick 210
New this year: Click on each player's name to open an 800+ word scouting report and film cut up on the prospect!
Arrowhead Addict's 2026 NFL Draft Big Board for the Chiefs
Blue Chip Prospects
This is our smallest bucket of players for good reason. We view these players as instant-impact talents who can be plugged into the starting lineup in Week 1 and perform at a potential Pro Bowl level. You’ll notice that what makes this class interesting is the lack of premium positions among our blue chips. This draft, more than some previous ones, may lead teams to disregard positional value and focus on overall talent.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | RB | Notre Dame | |
2 | ED | Texas Tech | |
3 | LB | Ohio State | |
4 | S | Ohio State | |
5 | ED | Miami (Fl.) |
First Round Grades
This collection of players represents who we view as true top-end talent worthy of a first-round pick. You’ll notice there are fewer than 32 players in our top two categories. This is pretty normal for NFL draft boards; most drafts don’t have that many “true first-round picks.” With that being said, if the Chiefs are able to end up with two players from our top two categories, it could be a home-run draft.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
6 | WR | Ohio State | |
7 | WR | USC | |
8 | CB | Tennessee | |
9 | OL | Miami (Fl.) | |
10 | S | Oregon | |
11 | DL | Texas Tech | |
12 | CB | LSU | |
13 | WR | Arizona State | |
14 | ED | Clemson | |
15 | ED | Ohio State | |
16 | ED | Auburn |
Second Round Grades
This category gets much larger than some of our previous ones. This is where this draft is at its best. There might not be a huge difference between pick 20 and pick 40. Expect there to be some real surprises in the back half of the first round, as teams might prioritize their boards knowing that the player they like won’t be there the next time they are on the clock.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
17 | TE | Oregon | |
18 | CB | Tennessee | |
19 | OT | Alabama | |
20 | Olaivavega Ioane | IOL | Penn State |
21 | WR | Indiana | |
22 | DL | Florida | |
23 | ED | Missouri | |
24 | OT | Clemson | |
25 | Monroe Freeling | OT | Georgia |
26 | DL | Clemson | |
27 | ED | Miami (Fl.) | |
28 | CB | Clemson | |
29 | OT | Utah | |
30 | WR | Texas A&M | |
31 | CB | South Carolina | |
32 | CB | Indiana | |
33 | DL | Ohio State | |
34 | S | Toledo | |
35 | WR | Washington | |
36 | ED | Illinois | |
37 | LB | Texas |
Third Round Grades
These players should be expected to come in and be contributors at some point during their rookie contracts. Ideally, they find the field in their rookie year. Another large bucket of players here once again speaks to this class not being rich in top-end talent but showing quite a bit of Day 2 depth.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
38 | WR | Indiana | |
39 | Max Iheanachor | OT | Arizona State |
40 | DL | Oklahoma | |
41 | WR | Alabama | |
42 | WR | Tennessee | |
43 | OT | Utah | |
44 | LB | Georiga | |
45 | Keith Abney II | CB | Arizona State |
46 | S | LSU | |
47 | ED | UCF | |
48 | ED | Oklahoma | |
49 | LB | Texas Tech | |
50 | CB | SDSU | |
51 | Jake Golday | LB | Cincinnati |
52 | Emmanuel Pregnon | OL | Oregon |
53 | Chase Bisontis | OL | Texas A&M |
54 | WR | Louisville | |
55 | WR | Georgia | |
56 | TE | Ohio State | |
57 | Cashius Howell | ED | Texas A&M |
58 | CB | Miami (Fl.) | |
59 | Gennings Dunker | IOL | Iowa |
60 | WR | Notre Dame | |
61 | WR | Georgia State | |
62 | Josiah Trotter | LB | Missouri |
63 | Davis Igbinosun | CB | Ohio State |
Fourth & Fifth Round Grades
Here is where we start to see teams prioritize traits over production, as well as players with possible injury or off-field concerns. While these players could still end up as high-level contributors, they likely project as role players or special teams contributors early in their careers.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
64 | TE | Vanderbilt | |
65 | RB | Arkansas | |
66 | ED | Michigan | |
67 | Kamari Ramsay | S | USC |
68 | Romello Height | ED | Texas Tech |
69 | DL | Florida State | |
70 | Dominique Orange | DL | Iowa State |
71 | CB | Arkansas | |
72 | Antonio Williams | WR | Clemson |
73 | DL | Georgia | |
74 | Treydan Stukes | CB | Arizona |
75 | LT Overton | DL | Alabama |
76 | Caleb Tiernan | OL | Northwestern |
77 | Dani Dennis-Sutton | ED | Penn State |
78 | Chandler Rivers | CB | Duke |
79 | RB | Nebraska | |
80 | Zakee Wheatley | S | Penn State |
81 | Kyle Louis | LB | Pittsburgh |
82 | Genesis Smith | S | Arizona |
83 | RB | Washington | |
84 | RB | Notre Dame | |
85 | Keyron Crawford | CB | Auburn |
86 | Devin Moore | CB | Florida |
87 | Justin Joly | TE | NC State |
88 | Malik Muhammad | CB | Texas |
89 | TE | Baylor | |
90 | Chris McClellan | DL | Missouri |
Priority Late Round Grades
The range of outcomes for these players is pretty wide. While they could be a Day 2 pick, they could also fall to late Day 3. We like to use the back end of our top 100 for players we are higher on than consensus or feel might be a strong fit for the Chiefs’ needs.
No. | Player | Position | School |
|---|---|---|---|
91 | Bryce Lance | WR | NDSU |
92 | Rayshaun Benny | DL | Michigan |
93 | Jake Slaughter | IOL | Florida |
94 | Jaishawn Barham | DL | Michigan |
95 | Dametrious Crownover | OL | Texas A&M |
96 | Sam Roush | TE | Stanford |
97 | RB | Penn State | |
98 | TE | Notre Dame | |
99 | Anthony Lucas | ED | UCLA |
100 | Oscar Delp | TE | Georgia |
