Trent McDuffie trade puts Brett Veach's legacy on the line

The Chiefs GM chose a path that led to McDuffie's departure. Now those choices will help to define his legacy, for better or worse.
Kansas City Chiefs general manager Brett Veach.
Kansas City Chiefs general manager Brett Veach. | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Kansas City Chiefs general manager Brett Veach just made a move that could define his career.

In a deal reminiscent of the Tyreek Hill-to-the-Miami Dolphins trade almost four years ago, the Chiefs are sending star cornerback Trent McDuffie to the Los Angeles Rams, receiving a handful of draft picks, including a first-rounder in this year’s draft, in return.

It’s a bold move that has not only drastically increased the pressure on Veach to nail this year’s draft but also put his reputation as one of the NFL’s top GMs on the line.

Trading away the pillar of your secondary and arguably the best defensive player on your team is a huge risk, even if it is a calculated one. Whether it was the right move or not will rest entirely on what Veach and the Chiefs do with the picks they swapped McDuffie for.

Now Brett Veach has to deliver

Kansas City got a great return from the Rams—the 29th overall pick, a fifth- and sixth-rounder in this year’s draft, as well as a third-rounder in 2027—but getting a good deal is only half the job. Now, Veach and the Chiefs need to turn those picks into gold. There can be no Felix Anudike-Uzomah or Clyde Edwards-Helaire whiffs this time.

At a minimum, the Chiefs need to get two quality, starter-level players from those four selections, and pick 29 has to turn into someone who can be an important piece on either side of the ball. Anything less would make it tough to see how the Chiefs got better by trading away McDuffie, even with the new salary-cap freedom down the road.

The Chiefs currently have nine selections for next month’s draft in Pittsburgh, and they’ll need to use them to replenish a roster that, especially without McDuffie on it, is startlingly bare of young, top-end talent.

If they don’t, what was supposed to be a retooling opportunity after an awful season could force the Chiefs into a full-blown rebuild down the track and hinder hopes of a return to the Super Bowl in the near future.

This trade could also be a defining moment in Veach’s legacy as a general manager. He is, rightfully so, considered one of the top GMs in the league. His blockbuster Hill trade helped the Chiefs win two Super Bowls, and, generally speaking, he’s drafted fairly well, too. But if this move backfires, it could entirely change that perception.

If the Chiefs whiff on this draft class, Veach’s draft history could suddenly be made up of more misses than hits, especially in the first round. The Hill trade will be seen as a one-hit wonder, and the encore of trading away McDuffie will be seen as a reckless attempt to catch lightning in a bottle twice.

A legacy built on choices

McDuffie’s departure from Kansas City felt increasingly inevitable. He wanted more money than the Chiefs were willing or able to give him, reportedly in the area of $30 million a year. But it was Veach’s own decisions that meant the Chiefs weren’t able to pay him that kind of money, even if they wanted to.

Roster construction is a game of choices. You choose who to draft, who to pay, and who to let walk. Veach and the Chiefs chose to make Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith the NFL’s highest-paid center and guard. They chose to give big extensions to Nick Bolton and George Karlaftis.

Veach chose not to pay McDuffie, and that meant there was no option but to trade him. Now the pressure is on for Veach to choose the right players on draft night. If he chooses right, the Chiefs could reload instantly for another Super Bowl run. If not, the team could be left in a huge roster hole that will be tough to climb out of.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations