Super Bowl Limbo

by Chiefs

The reputation of the Super Bowl is in limbo. It’s vulnerable to becoming just the next game on the calendar. Just another game.

How many of you Chiefs fans were sitting at home watching the big game and saying to yourself, the Chiefs could beat either of these teamsMe too. Now, the current Chiefs are still Not-Ready-For-Primetime-Contention so, that’s not so much a statement for the Chiefs as it is a commentary against the premise that the “best team in the NFL” is the one who’s won the Super Bowl.

Hmmm? Thebest team in the NFL” is not the winner of the Super Bowl?

Could that be true? Well yea. And: if the Super Bowl can’t produce a meaningful champion, then the game is in limbo, as far as I’m concerned.

So many times I’d say… Flowers could have made that play… Bowe would have made that catch.

This is not sour grapes. It’s actually what I was thinking. This is not so much about parity as it is that the game came across to me as… just another game.

Beyond that, the NFL and the Super Bowl have other problems to deal with. Like, what has this game of football really become about anyway?

Maybe it should be renamed!

Perhaps it should be called the Duper Bowl because I feel like I have been duped to a degree. Obviously pro football is the only major league sport to hold a postseason tournament that does not give teams multiple chances to prove they are better than an opponent before moving on to the next level. The one-and-done structure in the NFL postseason has produced a number of “streak” winners who aren’t nearly the best team in the league but, still, they’ll eternally be referred to as “champions,” hollow though it may be.

Perhaps it should be called the Hyper Bowl because the 60 minutes of football seems to have gotten buried beneath the rubble of a five hour long extravaganza that more resembles a “Fourth of July/New Year’s Eve/Elton John’s Oscar Party trapeze act. It’s gotten so far out of hand that I can see the that someday the Monday after, will be declared a national Holiday. They’ll probably call it, “Hangover’s Day.” The three days of the NFL draft have become a greater celebration of the game of football than the Super Bowl has been in years.

Perhaps they could call it the Plugger’s Bowl because the commercial “plugs” have taken over. I know the league has become increasingly about money and I’ve heard the phrase “it’s a business” enough times to know they mean it, but it shouldn’t take away from the football game and it has. If the American dream is to “capitalize” for profit, then the Super Bowl has maxed its potential and there should be 32 people — owners — sitting at home today saying to themselves, “I’m livin’ the dream.” Aren’t you glad you could assist them in fulfilling their economic growth potential and help them accumulate so much swelling wealth that they could turn the game you grew up loving to play every day after school, into a Donald Trump reality show played by money grubbing vultures. A commercial now costs… are you ready for this… $100,000.00… per second! Of course, that’s pocket change to me. I’m just sayin’.

What really concerns me is the viability of an NFL champion being accepted legitimately as the best team in the league, in any given year.

 

Ask yourself, are the Giants the best team in the league this season?

If you’re from NYC, I feel ya. However, I would speculate that the vast majority of fans across our fair nation would not concur. Yes, Eli Manning is great. But, look at the shoddy body of work the Giants have shown during this season.

  • A 28-14 loss to the 5-11 Redskins.
  • A 36-25 loss to the 7-9 Seahawks.
  • A 49-24 loss to the Saints.
  • Another loss to the Redskins 23-10 at home late in the season.

It was ugly. Plus, the Giants were streaky all season long. They had two 3-game winning streaks and a 4-game losing streak.

Seven teams beat the Super Bowl champions this season. Seven. There ought to be a rule against that: if you lose seven or more games then your team is eliminated from playoff contention.

The 2010 Seattle Seahawks only won 7 games and made the playoffs. 7 and 9. Wow. Do you realize, for them to end up with a winning record that year they would have had to win up to and including the Super Bowl? Would you want to celebrate that kind of champion and that kind of championship? Not me.

However, I don’t think the Patriots were the best team in the league this year either, but that just goes to prove my point even more. What we may have this season is a default champion.

Growing up as a kid outside of L.A. in the late fifties and early sixties, there were times I “wanted” my Lakers to be better than the Celtics. The reality is they weren’t, and after one seven game series after another, who could argue.

So, just wanting the NFL champion to be the best team in a given year, does not make it so.

In the playoff football arena, the multiple game format vs. another team isn’t a possibility, not in the NFL. The only other major tournament that reminds me of the one-and-done NFL format is the NCAA Men’s basketball tournament.

On the big pass play from Manning to Manningham, I was telling myself that Brandon Carr could have broken that pass up. Of course, I hope Carr doesn’t sign with the Patriots this off-season, so he can do just that… break up passes for them.

After watching this… this… whatever you want to call it… Bowl, if these same Giants and Patriots were to play again next week, who do you think would win?

Could the Patriots win? I’d give them better than a 50% chance.

That’s another reason why this Super Bowl was… just the next game. In other words, if the season didn’t end on Sunday night, would the outcome be different next weekend, or the weekend after. Yea, I think it would.

I didn’t feel that way last season. I thought the Packers were the best team and if the season had continued, then they would have continued to prove they were the best. Just as they did throughout this past season.

Two years ago, yes, the Saints were the best team in the league. Over the past two seasons Drew Brees and the Saints have proven they are one of the elite teams in the league.

However, three years ago the Steelers had to beat the Cardinals on the final drive to over take a Curt Warner led team that could score readily. Continuing that season… the outcomes would not always be the same. Those teams were part of another season with a default champion.

When the Giants beat the Patriots four years ago the Giants came to the championship game in the same way, by getting hot late in the season. The next season the Giants lost four of their last five games and needed overtime against the Panthers to get that victory. In other words… there was never any extended period of time when the Giants dominated their foes… not like the Packers did this season.

And… I don’t expect these Giants to do that this next year either. It’s laughable that they’re talking about a “repeat” in next year’s Super Bowl. They’ll likely finish third in their division next season.

This season, when the Giants lost 4 out of 5 from November 13 to December 18 no one thought they were a team of destiny. Not even them. Especially not any New Yorkers. That was just 7 weeks ago. The lone game they won in that stretch was a 37-34 victory over the Cowboys in Cowboys stadium.

Consequently, the Cowboys are sitting at home right now thinking, we could have been in the Super Bowl. We could have won the Super Bowl. And they might be right.

The current structure of the NFL regular season, post season and championship game… allows teams to get hot and then go win it all. I’m not sure anything can be done about that.

However, I’m not sure I want to see that possibility remain a possibility any longer.

To paraphrase Michael Lombardi who was interviewed Tuesday morning, on 1310 The Ticket, about these Super Bowl results, Michael said,

Look, the ball could have bounced either way. This particular game was up for grabs and it literally could have gone either way. It just so happened to go the Giants way this time but, it probably won’t next time.

 

Once again, this doesn’t point to parity. It points more to happenstance. Chance. Luck. Kismet.

The NFL champ is a precarious prize winner. Some years the Super Bowl winner clearly shows, they are the superior team. Other seasons, the winner is the winner because of an unheard of rule, a slippery ball, a blown refs call, an incredibly rare dropped pass, or a freak accident injury to a key player.

In any event, it can turn the Super Bowl into, just another game.

Especially if my Chiefs aren’t in it.

 

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Normally love your stuff, but I felt this opinion seemed extremely short sighted. Whoever said the super bowl champion should be the best team? I've never heard that, I don't think "best team" is etched on the lombardi trophy. This is not the much maligned BCS national champion where we have people vote the best two teams and let them play, and we have an undefeated team that sits at 3rd. Every team in the nfl knows that the champion is the team that makes the playoffs, and then wins out. Its simple, it has been that way since the dawn of the game. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. The fastest man does not deserve to be declare the winner of the marathan just because he is the fastest man. He has to run the best race, pace himself, make a move at the right time, save something for the end etc and then be the first person to cross the finish line. The nfl is the same, the best team does not deserve the trophy if they managed the team poorly all season. You said the packers were the best team this year... if they went 15-0, then let rodgers play in the last regular season game, and he broke his neck, would the deserve to be super bowk champion because they were the best team?? No because they did not manage the season well, they did not plan for a super bowl run. What you are saying is that the car that crosses the finish line first at daytona does not deserve the checkered flag... give it to the car that led for the most laps, even if he finished dead last. Your logic is flawed.... every team starts the season knowing the goal is to win a super bowl, not 19 games, not a division, the goal is not to lead the league in any statistical categories... the goal is to get to the playoffs... and then win out. The team that does that, is the team that wins marathons, not the team that has the fastest 40 time. Those teams are champions and deserve to have their name listed with all the other super bowl champions... hats off to the Giants!

@Gjrchief I think everything you have said is true... But only serves to prove that a Super Bowl victory is NOT that meaningful. It's become a rabbit and the hare race and the hare zooms in at the end and everyone is mesmerized. Not I. It's the b bully who shows up late and cuts to the front of the lunch line and the whole lunch room applauds. Not I. It's a celebration for Johnny Come Lately... and I don't like it. But you can't understand that? Okay. We just disagree... but it doesn't change the way I have come to feel about the event and the champion over the course of witnessing all 46 post seasons and Super Bowls. It's hard for me to buy your premise that the Super Bowl champion is not the best team when all I hear out of every players mouth is they want to be"the best." Maybe you should inform them they can become the Super Bowl champion but that doesn't mean anything in terms of becoming the best. You're right. On all counts but, it means the playoffs are an extra tournament after the season that has next to nothing to do with that season except qualify you for it. For some reason every player wants to be part of it. Isn't that because they want to be called "the best" for that season?

@laddiemorse every team wants a super bowl championship, that's the goal. Being the best is defined by what it takes to win the superbowl. The fastest man isn't the best racer... the most skill football team isn't the best at winning superbowls. Football greatness is defined by winning superbowls, which is a marathon and not a sprint. Everyone knows to be the "best" you must make the playoffs and win out. Being the best is not about being the fastest in a race, it is about pacing yourself, about drafting, strategy etc. How cares who leads the team in rushing... that's like being the fastest runner, who cares who has the top rated defense, that's like being the best at pacing your self. In the end the team is the "best" the one that does the things necessary to win a championship... the Giants did that, it was no secret every team in the league knows what it takes to win the superbowl. The giants did that better than everyone in the league.

@Gjrchief It's just too bad... that... doesn't make them the best team in the league. I heard a radio commentator say it today, "Winning a championship is not about being the best... it's about who gets "hot"... at the right time of the year." IOW... if the season went on... that would in all likelihood NOT be the team that was hot. It's just a championship of hotness. That's all it is. Hey... we caught you in the middle of a hot streak... here... have the Lombardi trophy. You deserve it. I'm not buying into that. You can if you like. I love the game. It's my favorite. I love the Chiefs. They're my favorite. But, the playoffs are flawed and because of that, the Super Bowl means less than it used to mean.

It can't be all that easy other wise every body would be winning one. You still need to make the playoffs that alone separates the good from the bad or mediocre or unlucky. It is so hard to win the Super Bowl and yes the best team on paper doesn’t always win. You are right about the Giants they just kind of figured things out at the right time. One could say that the Chiefs almost figured things out at the right time. One field goal and it could have been us defending our position that the Chiefs did deserve to win the Super Bowl. Wait a minute didn’t that happen before to us was his name Nick something:) You are right when it is not the Chiefs the game just isn’t the same.

@ArrowFan It's not that it's easy... but, let me play devils advocate for a second... let's assume every team has the same ability... same quality of players (low or high or whatever)... then some team still has to win it, right? So, just because a team "survives" the playoffs, to win the Super Bowl, doesn't make them the best team in the league... or more importantly... one that is worthy of being compared to champions of past years. Yes, I'm biased "for" the Chiefs... and tired of not seeing the Red and Gold in the highlights... but honestly, the Giants just don't impress me and these are not the best version of Patriots I've ever seen either. I keep thinking about the Giants... 32nd in the league in rushing and 27th in defense? Last and almost last... in two of the most hallowed team stats and yet they make a run and everyone wants to call them a champion worthy of comparison to past champs? Not by me.

@laddiemorse I would say that the Super Bowl is a little over rated. I mean that in two lucky passes Eli is a hero and Tom is just really good. If the two lucky passes went the other way then Tom is a God and Eli would just be an ugly Manning that got close. The only time I was impressed by any of the teams was NE on the second half opening drive. After their TD I thought this is going to be a long half for New York. Was I wrong.

@ArrowFan Yes... and there are many more examples... if the Buffalo field goal is not wide right then Bill Parcells is not Bill Parcells. We're talking about Marv Levy instead. The reality is, Marv Levy was a hell of a coach.

I always like your stuff laddie but I couldn't disagree more. I think the fact that every single play is so important, is exactly what makes football the greatest sport in the world. Most sports call for a clutch performance or play just on occasion; maybe once or twice a game. Football calls for clutch plays so many times by so many players at once. Several times in a single drive even.

@blacksheep57 Every play would be important even if we took the two last place teams and called them champions... if they're playing in the Super Bowl with 111 Million people looking in... sure every play is going to be high impact. But, that alone does not make the teams competing, the best teams in the league. Superior performance distinguish themselves. This game was not filled with superior performances.

@laddiemorse I'm mainly saying that adding something like a double-elimination playoff would remove the significance (and excitement) of each play just a bit.

@blacksheep57 I'm not really suggesting a double-elimination tourney but, some adjustments could be made to the way the tournament is structured. I've often wondered why the league couldn't re-seed the teams after each round... to keep the lowest seeded teams playing the highest seeded teams first... to improve the likelihood that we'll get the highest seeded teams in the conference championships. The way it structured now... the seasonal records don't mean as much. A team works all year to secure a home field advantage and they can lose that in 60 minutes. There's something wrong with the system... but, I'm not sure how to fix it.

9 times out of 10 i agree with you laddie in fact you're in my top three contributers here at AA but I disagree here. the Superbowl while i think the weeklong espn takeover it cause is stupid and frustrating i did see some things in the game that made me think this is more than just another game like the patriots dbs did you see how hard they were hitting they were laying it all down out there. but beyond that i would say that you cant think like that because isnt one of the biggest nfl monikers "Any given Sunday" to say that just because one team isn't necessarily the best or most talented it can't be the true champion is a bit ridiculous maybe one team showed up when it counted and the "best" team didnt

@kctenn44 Doesn't that "moniker" make the Lombardi trophy a bit of a mockery? If any given team can beat any other given team on any given Sunday... then what does it mean to be a good team? Or a great team? And, does it matter if you are? If any team can "any" their way through the playoffs then wouldn't that create a paper champion? Thin and flimsy. The league has doctored up and dressed up the event so much so that no one is noticing that the game is not that outstanding (aside from one good pass to Manningham) and the result of the game is not that meaningful... except to the city and team that won it. Right now... we have the Packers and the Saints... they're both great teams but got hit on an "any" Sunday and were forced out of the playoffs because the format is one-and-done. It's too bad too... because their presence in the Super Bowl would have legitimized the event for me. The "survivors" played in the Super Bowl this year... not the best teams.

@kctenn44 BTW... that's the first time in years that I have seen the Pats dbs hitting like that... not since Rodney Harrison, Ty Law and Lawyer Milloy. Just because they do it for one game doesn't make that game a great one.

@laddiemorse true and you're right the game overall wasn't ThAt great but my point was that saying a team that showed up when it counted even if they weren't the best team on the field invalidates the win or their journey to the big game is a bit harsh especially when you consider if and when the chiefs make it to the Superbowl in the near future i'm almost certain that we won't be the "best" team but i would say our team shows up when it counts most

@kctenn44 You may be right... but I'm not going to know how that feels until that day arrives. I probably won't care if we backed into that game on a safety.

Gjrchief 138 pts

Normally love your stuff, but I felt this opinion seemed extremely short sighted. Whoever said the super bowl champion should be the best team? I've never heard that, I don't think "best team" is etched on the lombardi trophy. This is not the much maligned BCS national champion where we have people vote the best two teams and let them play, and we have an undefeated team that sits at 3rd. Every team in the nfl knows that the champion is the team that makes the playoffs, and then wins out. Its simple, it has been that way since the dawn of the game. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. The fastest man does not deserve to be declare the winner of the marathan just because he is the fastest man. He has to run the best race, pace himself, make a move at the right time, save something for the end etc and then be the first person to cross the finish line. The nfl is the same, the best team does not deserve the trophy if they managed the team poorly all season. You said the packers were the best team this year... if they went 15-0, then let rodgers play in the last regular season game, and he broke his neck, would the deserve to be super bowk champion because they were the best team?? No because they did not manage the season well, they did not plan for a super bowl run. What you are saying is that the car that crosses the finish line first at daytona does not deserve the checkered flag... give it to the car that led for the most laps, even if he finished dead last. Your logic is flawed.... every team starts the season knowing the goal is to win a super bowl, not 19 games, not a division, the goal is not to lead the league in any statistical categories... the goal is to get to the playoffs... and then win out. The team that does that, is the team that wins marathons, not the team that has the fastest 40 time. Those teams are champions and deserve to have their name listed with all the other super bowl champions... hats off to the Giants!

laddiemorse 205 pts

Gjrchief I think everything you have said is true... But only serves to prove that a Super Bowl victory is NOT that meaningful. It's become a rabbit and the hare race and the hare zooms in at the end and everyone is mesmerized. Not I. It's the b bully who shows up late and cuts to the front of the lunch line and the whole lunch room applauds. Not I. It's a celebration for Johnny Come Lately... and I don't like it. But you can't understand that? Okay. We just disagree... but it doesn't change the way I have come to feel about the event and the champion over the course of witnessing all 46 post seasons and Super Bowls. It's hard for me to buy your premise that the Super Bowl champion is not the best team when all I hear out of every players mouth is they want to be"the best." Maybe you should inform them they can become the Super Bowl champion but that doesn't mean anything in terms of becoming the best. You're right. On all counts but, it means the playoffs are an extra tournament after the season that has next to nothing to do with that season except qualify you for it. For some reason every player wants to be part of it. Isn't that because they want to be called "the best" for that season?

Gjrchief 138 pts

laddiemorse every team wants a super bowl championship, that's the goal. Being the best is defined by what it takes to win the superbowl. The fastest man isn't the best racer... the most skill football team isn't the best at winning superbowls. Football greatness is defined by winning superbowls, which is a marathon and not a sprint. Everyone knows to be the "best" you must make the playoffs and win out. Being the best is not about being the fastest in a race, it is about pacing yourself, about drafting, strategy etc. How cares who leads the team in rushing... that's like being the fastest runner, who cares who has the top rated defense, that's like being the best at pacing your self. In the end the team is the "best" the one that does the things necessary to win a championship... the Giants did that, it was no secret every team in the league knows what it takes to win the superbowl. The giants did that better than everyone in the league.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Gjrchief It's just too bad... that... doesn't make them the best team in the league. I heard a radio commentator say it today, "Winning a championship is not about being the best... it's about who gets "hot"... at the right time of the year."

IOW... if the season went on... that would in all likelihood NOT be the team that was hot. It's just a championship of hotness. That's all it is. Hey... we caught you in the middle of a hot streak... here... have the Lombardi trophy. You deserve it.

I'm not buying into that. You can if you like.

I love the game. It's my favorite. I love the Chiefs. They're my favorite. But, the playoffs are flawed and because of that, the Super Bowl means less than it used to mean.

ArrowFan 205 pts

It can't be all that easy other wise every body would be winning one. You still need to make the playoffs that alone separates the good from the bad or mediocre or unlucky. It is so hard to win the Super Bowl and yes the best team on paper doesn’t always win. You are right about the Giants they just kind of figured things out at the right time. One could say that the Chiefs almost figured things out at the right time. One field goal and it could have been us defending our position that the Chiefs did deserve to win the Super Bowl. Wait a minute didn’t that happen before to us was his name Nick something:) You are right when it is not the Chiefs the game just isn’t the same.

laddiemorse 205 pts

ArrowFan It's not that it's easy... but, let me play devils advocate for a second... let's assume every team has the same ability... same quality of players (low or high or whatever)... then some team still has to win it, right? So, just because a team "survives" the playoffs, to win the Super Bowl, doesn't make them the best team in the league... or more importantly... one that is worthy of being compared to champions of past years.

Yes, I'm biased "for" the Chiefs... and tired of not seeing the Red and Gold in the highlights... but honestly, the Giants just don't impress me and these are not the best version of Patriots I've ever seen either. I keep thinking about the Giants... 32nd in the league in rushing and 27th in defense? Last and almost last... in two of the most hallowed team stats and yet they make a run and everyone wants to call them a champion worthy of comparison to past champs? Not by me.

ArrowFan 205 pts

laddiemorse I would say that the Super Bowl is a little over rated. I mean that in two lucky passes Eli is a hero and Tom is just really good. If the two lucky passes went the other way then Tom is a God and Eli would just be an ugly Manning that got close. The only time I was impressed by any of the teams was NE on the second half opening drive. After their TD I thought this is going to be a long half for New York. Was I wrong.

laddiemorse 205 pts

ArrowFan Yes... and there are many more examples... if the Buffalo field goal is not wide right then Bill Parcells is not Bill Parcells. We're talking about Marv Levy instead. The reality is, Marv Levy was a hell of a coach.

blacksheep57 17 pts

I always like your stuff laddie but I couldn't disagree more. I think the fact that every single play is so important, is exactly what makes football the greatest sport in the world. Most sports call for a clutch performance or play just on occasion; maybe once or twice a game. Football calls for clutch plays so many times by so many players at once. Several times in a single drive even.

laddiemorse 205 pts

blacksheep57

Every play would be important even if we took the two last place teams and called them champions... if they're playing in the Super Bowl with 111 Million people looking in... sure every play is going to be high impact. But, that alone does not make the teams competing, the best teams in the league. Superior performance distinguish themselves. This game was not filled with superior performances.

blacksheep57 17 pts

laddiemorse I'm mainly saying that adding something like a double-elimination playoff would remove the significance (and excitement) of each play just a bit.

laddiemorse 205 pts

blacksheep57 I'm not really suggesting a double-elimination tourney but, some adjustments could be made to the way the tournament is structured. I've often wondered why the league couldn't re-seed the teams after each round... to keep the lowest seeded teams playing the highest seeded teams first... to improve the likelihood that we'll get the highest seeded teams in the conference championships. The way it structured now... the seasonal records don't mean as much. A team works all year to secure a home field advantage and they can lose that in 60 minutes. There's something wrong with the system... but, I'm not sure how to fix it.

kctenn44 47 pts

9 times out of 10 i agree with you laddie in fact you're in my top three contributers here at AA but I disagree here. the Superbowl while i think the weeklong espn takeover it cause is stupid and frustrating i did see some things in the game that made me think this is more than just another game like the patriots dbs did you see how hard they were hitting they were laying it all down out there. but beyond that i would say that you cant think like that because isnt one of the biggest nfl monikers "Any given Sunday" to say that just because one team isn't necessarily the best or most talented it can't be the true champion is a bit ridiculous maybe one team showed up when it counted and the "best" team didnt

laddiemorse 205 pts

kctenn44 Doesn't that "moniker" make the Lombardi trophy a bit of a mockery? If any given team can beat any other given team on any given Sunday... then what does it mean to be a good team? Or a great team? And, does it matter if you are? If any team can "any" their way through the playoffs then wouldn't that create a paper champion? Thin and flimsy. The league has doctored up and dressed up the event so much so that no one is noticing that the game is not that outstanding (aside from one good pass to Manningham) and the result of the game is not that meaningful... except to the city and team that won it. Right now... we have the Packers and the Saints... they're both great teams but got hit on an "any" Sunday and were forced out of the playoffs because the format is one-and-done. It's too bad too... because their presence in the Super Bowl would have legitimized the event for me. The "survivors" played in the Super Bowl this year... not the best teams.

laddiemorse 205 pts

kctenn44 BTW... that's the first time in years that I have seen the Pats dbs hitting like that... not since Rodney Harrison, Ty Law and Lawyer Milloy. Just because they do it for one game doesn't make that game a great one.

kctenn44 47 pts

laddiemorse true and you're right the game overall wasn't ThAt great but my point was that saying a team that showed up when it counted even if they weren't the best team on the field invalidates the win or their journey to the big game is a bit harsh especially when you consider if and when the chiefs make it to the Superbowl in the near future i'm almost certain that we won't be the "best" team but i would say our team shows up when it counts most

laddiemorse 205 pts

kctenn44 You may be right... but I'm not going to know how that feels until that day arrives. I probably won't care if we backed into that game on a safety.