Predicting The Kansas City Chiefs 2012 Draft Position

by Chiefs

Location? Location? Location? With three weeks to go in the season, many teams at the bottom of the league’s pecking order are beginning to wonder exactly where they might end up selecting in the draft come April.

With three games to go, some absolutely solid speculations can be made. Dang, I’m even learning to speak pioliosis (a rare strain of Greek and country two-step). Let the predicting commence.

With the first pick in the 2012 NFL Draft, the…

1. Indy Colts

At 0-14 the Colts appear to have a firm lock on the first position in the draft. They finish the season at home against the 7-6 Titans and the 10-3 Texans, then travel to the 4-9 Jags for their finale. While they don’t look to have much of a chance against the Titans or the Texans they could have a shot against the Jags but, it won’t matter unless they can win all three of their remaining games and the 2-11 Rams lose their last three. Otherwise, the Colts have a death grip on last place and a real shot at taking infamy by the balls… if they can manage to lose-out. 0-16.

2. St. Louis Rams
2-11 is not the direction the Rams thought they’d be headed before the season began. But, here they are again, in worse shape than the Chiefs, if you can believe that. The Rams complete this messy affair hosting the 7-6 Bengals, on the road against the 10-3 Steelers and home against the 10-3 49ers. The Rams schedule looks tough enough that if the Colts can win their last three games, there’s a better than 50% chance the Rams will be selecting first in April. The odds are that the Colts will be more than lucky to win one and so, even if the Rams lose the rest of their games the Colts will stay at “lucky” number 1. 2-14.

More Predicting after the jump.

3. Minnesota Vikings
The 2-11 Vikes finish at home against the 10-3 Saints, a probable loss, on the road against the  4-9 Redskins, a possible win, and home against the 7-6 Bears. a who-knows-for-sure affair. If you give the Vikings one victory down the stretch they finish 3-13.

Neither the Vikings, Rams or the Colts appear dangerous enough to win enough games to tie or pass the Chiefs on the draft order board. Mathematically, it’s not out of the question but, very unlikely since the Chiefs are 2 games ahead of the Vikes and 3 ahead of the Rams and 5 games ahead of the Colts.

That leaves 5 teams at 4-9 before this weekend began.

4. Miami Dolphins
The 4-9 Dolphins finish at the 5-8 Bills, at the 10-3 Pats and home against the 8-5 Jets. The Dolphins beat the Bills badly earlier this year 35-8 and no one should count on that happening again but, this is the one game Miami could win. I think it’s more likely they end on a 4 game losing streak now that they have let their coach go. 4-12.

5. Cleveland Browns
The 4-9 Browns finish with the 6-7 Cardinals in Arizona, who’ve won 5 of their last 6, the 10-3 Ravens in Baltimore and the 10-3 Steelers in Cleveland. They are on a 4 game losing streak and I predict they keep that going until the end of the year. 4-12.

6. Jacksonville Jags
However, the Jags lost Thursday night to the Falcons, badly, and are now 4-10 with two games left on their schedule. The Jags travel to play the Titans in 10 days then finish the season at home against the Colts. So, it looks likely that the Jags will finish 5-11. Unless of course the mighty Colts rise up and streak down the powerful Jags.

7. Washington Redskins
The 4-9 Redskins travel to the 7-6 NY Giants this weekend, then play the 2-11 Viking at home and end the season on the road against the 5-8 Eagles. The Skins could win a couple of those games and end up 6-10. Though it’s probably more likely they will be 5-11.

8. Carolina Panthers
The 4-9 Panthers are at the 10-3 Texans this Sunday then play the 4-9 Bucs at home and close on the road against the 10-3 Saints. If the Panthers win one more game it will be against the Bucs at home and could possibly finish 5-11.

9. Tampa Bay Bucs
The 4-9 Bucs bring the season to a close by hosting the 7-6 Cowboys, then finishing on the road at both the 4-9 Panthers and the 9-5 Falcons. The Bucs could beat the Panthers and finish 5-11. If the Bucs beat the Cowboys it will change the fortunes of a number of teams and they could even possibly climb behind the Chiefs in draft order.

One of those teams, the Bucs or the Panthers, are probably not going to make it to 5-11 because the one game they are likely to win is against each other. Either way, it leaves them ahead of the Chiefs in the selection order.

10. Kansas City Chiefs 6-10. (see below)

11. Buffalo Bills
The 5-8 Bills close with games at home against Miami and the Broncos and then travel to New England. They’ll finish by winning either 1 or 2 games even though they’ve been on a horrible 6 game losing streak. 6-10.

12. Philadelphia Eagles
The 5-8 Eagles finish at the 8-5 Jets, home against the 7-6 Cowboys and on the road against the 4-9 Redskins. The Eagles have been one of the most unpredictable teams this season. I’m sure they’d love nothing more than to put a crimp in some other teams playoff plans so I’d say the Eagles could come away with as many as two wins down the stretch. 7-9.

13. Arizona Cardinals
The 6-7 Cardinals finish against the Browns, the Bengals and the Seahawks and could certainly end up winning all three of those games. But, I’ll give them two wins because the Browns and the Seahawks are at home. 8-8.

14. Oakland Raiders

The 7-6 Raiders host the 8-5 Lion this weekend then come to KC and then finish the season off hosting the Chargers. The Raiders have already beaten the Jets, Bears, Texans and the Chargers in San Diego so, they’re very capable of winning one more game this year. 8-8.

 

15.San Diego Chargers
While the Chargers are ending with the Ravens, the Lions and the Raiders, they are also one game ahead of the Chiefs. They’d have lose two, which is possible, while the Chiefs win two, which doesn’t seems likely. 8-8.

____________________

All of the other 7-6 teams in the league including the Giants, Cowboys, Bengals, and Titans look good to win at least one more game this season landing each of them at 8-8 or better. All teams with better records than 7-6 aren’t included in this discussion because of the extremely low mathematical probability that they could finish with a worse record than the Chiefs which is also based on the strength, or in this case weakness, of their remaining schedules.

Kansas City Chiefs 6-10.

The Chiefs can beat either the Raiders or the Broncos or both. Not to say they can’t beat the Packers. It’s just not likely. I’m giving them one victory, at least, based on their games with the Raiders and Broncos and that it’s also likely the players will want to rally around their interim head coach, Romeo Crennel, and pull out all the stops to get at least one win. If the Chiefs win no more games this year, they’ll complete the season at 5-11, and finish in a dead heat with a number of other 5-11 teams. At that point a number of tie breakers will kick in. The tie breakers for three or more teams are as follows:

Three or More Clubs

  1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the clubs).
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
  5. Strength of victory.
  6. Strength of schedule.
  7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  9. Best net points in common games.
  10. Best net points in all games.
  11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  12. Coin toss

 

Based upon the tie breakers, if the Chiefs, for some reason, ended the year tied with either the Lions or the Bills, then the Chiefs would be drafting ahead of them because of the head-to-head losses in each case.

This shows that the Chiefs will very likely pick somewhere between 6 and 11. However, if both Cleveland and the Dolphins begin to win multiple games and the Chiefs lose out, the Chiefs could draft as early as the 4th pick.

I’m not hoping for that of course but, the math is there.

Assuming the Chiefs don’t trade out… and there’s absolutely no guarantee of that not happening… where do you think the Chiefs will be selecting?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Everyone is making some good points. Let's watch the name calling. It's uncalled for.

Here's a darkhorse in the equation....with the 8th pick in the 2012 NFL draft the Kansas City Chiefs draft Trent Richardson RB Alabama. Face it, Matt Cassel is not gonna lose his job next year unless the Chiefs have a chance to draft one of the top 3 QBs and that is not gonna happen. Cassel can be a decent game manager and the threat of a absolutely disgustingly scary 2 headed monster at RB is gonna open a world of options thru the air . Any QB not named Tyler Palko -to whom I want to fight, really- can be successful in a system with a strong running game and the animals we have at disposal at receiver. As painful as it sounds...Cassel gets another year. The Tackle class is deep this coming draft and you don't burn 1st rd picks on right tacklers. Albert is fine at LT. Its really difficult to pass protect when you have no threat of running the ball and futility at QB....as we have learned. Defenses just pin their ears back and go balls out at us...what can we do -I tell you what we don't do Palko....we go down...we don't run 15 yards back and then fall...JERKOFF- Here's the plan...resign our stars....acquire RT thru FA or the draft....switch to a 4-3 and let Jackson & Dorsey shine like they did at LSU....let Tamba & Justin smash QBs from the edge...DJ run the D from the middle...sign a pro bowl OLB thru FA and get some depth thru the draft. This defense is good enough to hold almost any offense or should I say slow any offense especially if our O is moving the ball and controlling the clock.

why is everyone acting like kyle orton doesn't exist. he hasn't even started a game yet. JRam1113 is a dumbass. Not one person has mentioned orton.

@CUTTY aka Logan Wow you need to check your language and show a little class on these forums. Orton has developed into a good QB and game manager. He is great for a backup but the words "franchise quarterback" have never been spoken before Kyle Orton unless th

@CUTTY aka Logan Wow you need to check your language and show a little class on these forums. Orton has developed into a good QB and game manager. He is great for a backup but the words "franchise quarterback" have never been spoken before "Kyle Orton" unless they were preceded by "he will never be a".

@DavidFritch@cutty He is great for a backup but the words "franchise quarterback" have never been spoken before "Kyle Orton" unless they were preceded by "he will never be a" Thats gold

DavidFritch is a dumbass

@CUTTY aka Logan to be honest...your rhetoric suggests as your pointing the finger in one direction realize you have 3 pointing back at you. DF made a great statement and only reminded you what these forums are for....opinions

too many dumbasses for one day. out

I don't believe these tie breakers apply. The only tie breakers for draft position are strength of schedule, where the lowest strength of schedule picks first, and then a coin toss. Anyway, the chiefs are set to pick12th at the moment, not tenth.

10th or 12th so what? Do the words nit pick mean anything to you?

The point of the post was to predict them to finish 10th. @Chief Concerns

[...] … [visit site to read more] [...]

The chiefs need a franchise qb if we want to get to the next level of play, because i mean look at all of the team that have went to the superbowl over the past 10 years they all have some kind of qb. obviously Matt Cassel can not work out for us he is to inconsistant so i agree with Big Jim we need to do whatever to get RGIII in with the kc chiefs. so here is what i predict the chiefs doing if they lose the next 3 games. 1) RGIII 2) some sort of tackle to protect our newly found qb 3) a defensive lineman

Our problem is .....who will be our new HC and will he use Haley's offense or will he go another direction? Zone blocking and light mobile OL has not worked here, and we need a center, guard and RT at the very least. Even when the new HC is named, who will his OC be and how long will it take to get his kind of player in place? Will Pioli ride a dead horse or will he allow the HC to go a new direction? I say the first pick should be the best, the very best player available. Other than kickers and WRs, CBs and Ss, what position does not need upgrading? Of course, not in the first round, we need a TE who has some hope of playing in 14 of 16 games each year.

Based on this draft order I think draft goes something like this 1st Ind-Luck 2nd STL-wr J.Blackmon 3rd Viks-LT Kalil 4th Mia-Barkley 5th Cle- RG3 or CB M.Claiborne 6th jags-RG3 or wr A.Jeffery 7th reds-RG3 or L.Jones(grossman is 31 & beck 30,both trash) 8th panthers-a wr for Newton or CB 9th TB-LB L.Kuechly 10th KC LT J.Martin or LT Riley Reiff. This upgrades 2 spots, allowing chiefs to replace "Scary" Richichardson @ RT. If chiefs really do the right thing the find a young RT to pair with the rookie, moving Albert to LG, Hudson C, Asomoah RG, this repairs this sorry oline and givse u a solid line for 7-10 yrs.

I completely agree but I know there are those who believe we must draft a franchise a QB. To me... if we don't repair the OL... then having an all world super fantastic QB won't matter.@MicahStephenson

@laddiemorse well if we can trade up for Luck or RG3 that wud b really nice. But Trading down and still get a LT while picking up another pick is more likely. If we cant get one of the top 3 QBs id jus stick wit cassel for now and draft a QB next yr. I think its more important to get a OT, NT, LG or C(whicheva one hudon dosnt play), TE right now than drafting a QB that prolly cant beat out Cassel.

I want RG3 just as much as everyone else do. But sinse the end of the college season RG3 and Barkley hav shot up the draft boards while L.Jones has slid down. 4 teams ahead of chiefs get the top 3 QBs and leaves kc wit possibly L.Jones, who i dont think can beat out M.Cassel. If anyone of us are picking 1st Colts 2nd mia 3rd cle 4th jags 5th reds wud we pass up Luck, RG3 or Barkley? Yea i know Cle got Mcoy and jac Gabbert but dus anyone really want those 2 over RG3 or Barkley? Keep it real. So all of you that want a QB, is a L.Jones better than cassel and worth a 1st rd pick wen we need RT, NT, LG or C, TE, depth at RB, QB & safety?

@MicahStephenson If Crennel wants to, he should start Stanzi the last three games to see if he can be "The Guy". If not, then we know where we need to go. He has said that Orton will start vs. the Pack, but I think that is the wrong move. We don't win that game with either and Orton probably is not here next season. As far as the draft, I agree that if the last of the four QBs is Jones, then we pass and look at other needs. We still get a starter in round one,(if we can keep him away from T. Jones).

You're right MJ. At best we'd get the 3rd or 4th best Qb. We're better off going with tackles and guards the with 3 of the 1st 4 picks. One of them needs to be NT. @MicahStephenson

Personally I'd still take Luck over RGIII but the colts will likely get him. If we can't get either then I'd prefer Barkley, Jones just doesn't seem to have the "it" factor and no one else has been impressive. I really just want a new qb to get excited about, but if Stanzi plays and shows some serious potential then I wouldn't mind passing on a qb to give him a shot and focus on other needs.

Nice breakdown Laddie! Now here is what I think ABSOLUTELY HAS TO HAPPEN.. We need the 3rd pick. Period no debate. Colts are not going to trade and Luck is gone. The Rams have other needs and already have their franchise QB. I think the Vikings are happy with Ponder and would be the perfect trade partner other than of course the Rams. All Pioli has to do is trade #1 picks and whatever else they want and I truly mean WHATEVER ELSE THEY WANT. This franchise has the golden opportunity to get RGIII and begin building our Super Bowl team which I think could be ready to go in 3 years. We will get our tackles. This draft is full of quality tackles. I would also take Barkley, but why when you can have RGIII? I want nothing to do with Landry Jones. Don't want another Todd Blackledge. This should be the easiet trade up in the history of the draft. Please don't Frick this up Pioli.

I'd like RGIII too and even wrote a post on that but, he seems to be climbing boards and probably will continue to do that... the problem is... Pioli would... I'm guessing... trade down... before he trades up. His War Room draft day training shows that by trading down and picking up more picks you have a greater chance to select more players and that allows you to get it wrong more times until you get it right. IOW... you can make more mistakes that way and still guarantee yourself of improving the franchise....... by... trading down. If it were me... I'd jump at RGIII. @Big Jim

@laddiemorse@Big Jim I suspect you are right, but I am hoping against hope that Pioli recognizes RGIII is a very special player and only slightly less of a sure thing than Luck and an opportunity like this may not ever appear again during his tenure. Pioli has a chance here to solidify his legacy as a great GM. This seems to me a low risk/high reward situation. With a great surrounding cast in his offense RGIII could do great things. Look what he has done with not much around himself at Baylor. I hope Pioli sees that, but like you, I suspect he will play it safe, stay put, and draft a tackle, and then try to prove again that Cassel was not a mistake. Pioli dodged the bullet this time by making Haley the fall guy. He won't get another chance to get it right before Clark gives him the ole Peterson shuffle. We can dream though, right?

Right. RGIII is to dream for. He's teh one QB that I think could work out and give the Chiefs time to correct the OL on the fly. Otherwise... I think the OL must be fixed first or else anyone who's back there is going to get murdered. @Big Jim @laddiemorse

@laddiemorse@Big Jim We are tied for 13th in sacks surrendered so we aren't that bad at protection. Add to that the facts that Cassel/Palko held the ball too long, that we have had to pass even more than we have run due to being behind so much and we have have made changes with Asmoah and Hudson. Finally and most critically, just getting rid of Richardson and getting a quality RT would cut our 33 sacks in half.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Everyone is making some good points. Let's watch the name calling. It's uncalled for.

Tribalrage 57 pts

Here's a darkhorse in the equation....with the 8th pick in the 2012 NFL draft the Kansas City Chiefs draft Trent Richardson RB Alabama. Face it, Matt Cassel is not gonna lose his job next year unless the Chiefs have a chance to draft one of the top 3 QBs and that is not gonna happen. Cassel can be a decent game manager and the threat of a absolutely disgustingly scary 2 headed monster at RB is gonna open a world of options thru the air . Any QB not named Tyler Palko -to whom I want to fight, really- can be successful in a system with a strong running game and the animals we have at disposal at receiver. As painful as it sounds...Cassel gets another year. The Tackle class is deep this coming draft and you don't burn 1st rd picks on right tacklers. Albert is fine at LT. Its really difficult to pass protect when you have no threat of running the ball and futility at QB....as we have learned. Defenses just pin their ears back and go balls out at us...what can we do -I tell you what we don't do Palko....we go down...we don't run 15 yards back and then fall...JERKOFF-

Here's the plan...resign our stars....acquire RT thru FA or the draft....switch to a 4-3 and let Jackson & Dorsey shine like they did at LSU....let Tamba & Justin smash QBs from the edge...DJ run the D from the middle...sign a pro bowl OLB thru FA and get some depth thru the draft. This defense is good enough to hold almost any offense or should I say slow any offense especially if our O is moving the ball and controlling the clock.

CUTTY aka Logan 8 pts

why is everyone acting like kyle orton doesn't exist. he hasn't even started a game yet. JRam1113 is a dumbass. Not one person has mentioned orton.

DavidFritch 36 pts

@CUTTY aka Logan Wow you need to check your language and show a little class on these forums. Orton has developed into a good QB and game manager. He is great for a backup but the words "franchise quarterback" have never been spoken before "Kyle Orton" unless they were preceded by "he will never be a".

Tribalrage 57 pts

DavidFritch@cutty He is great for a backup but the words "franchise quarterback" have never been spoken before "Kyle Orton" unless they were preceded by "he will never be a"

Thats gold

Tribalrage 57 pts

CUTTY aka Logan to be honest...your rhetoric suggests as your pointing the finger in one direction realize you have 3 pointing back at you. DF made a great statement and only reminded you what these forums are for....opinions

CUTTY aka Logan 8 pts

too many dumbasses for one day. out

Chief Concerns 21 pts

I don't believe these tie breakers apply. The only tie breakers for draft position are strength of schedule, where the lowest strength of schedule picks first, and then a coin toss. Anyway, the chiefs are set to pick12th at the moment, not tenth.

Big Jim 234 pts

10th or 12th so what? Do the words nit pick mean anything to you?

laddiemorse 205 pts

The point of the post was to predict them to finish 10th. Chief Concerns

JRam1113 10 pts

The chiefs need a franchise qb if we want to get to the next level of play, because i mean look at all of the team that have went to the superbowl over the past 10 years they all have some kind of qb. obviously Matt Cassel can not work out for us he is to inconsistant so i agree with Big Jim we need to do whatever to get RGIII in with the kc chiefs. so here is what i predict the chiefs doing if they lose the next 3 games.

1) RGIII

2) some sort of tackle to protect our newly found qb

3) a defensive lineman

tm1946 183 pts

Our problem is .....who will be our new HC and will he use Haley's offense or will he go another direction? Zone blocking and light mobile OL has not worked here, and we need a center, guard and RT at the very least. Even when the new HC is named, who will his OC be and how long will it take to get his kind of player in place? Will Pioli ride a dead horse or will he allow the HC to go a new direction?

I say the first pick should be the best, the very best player available. Other than kickers and WRs, CBs and Ss, what position does not need upgrading? Of course, not in the first round, we need a TE who has some hope of playing in 14 of 16 games each year.

MicahStephenson 78 pts

Based on this draft order I think draft goes something like this 1st Ind-Luck 2nd STL-wr J.Blackmon 3rd Viks-LT Kalil 4th Mia-Barkley 5th Cle- RG3 or CB M.Claiborne 6th jags-RG3 or wr A.Jeffery 7th reds-RG3 or L.Jones(grossman is 31 & beck 30,both trash) 8th panthers-a wr for Newton or CB 9th TB-LB L.Kuechly 10th KC LT J.Martin or LT Riley Reiff. This upgrades 2 spots, allowing chiefs to replace "Scary" Richichardson @ RT. If chiefs really do the right thing the find a young RT to pair with the rookie, moving Albert to LG, Hudson C, Asomoah RG, this repairs this sorry oline and givse u a solid line for 7-10 yrs.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I completely agree but I know there are those who believe we must draft a franchise a QB. To me... if we don't repair the OL... then having an all world super fantastic QB won't matter.MicahStephenson

MicahStephenson 78 pts

laddiemorse well if we can trade up for Luck or RG3 that wud b really nice. But Trading down and still get a LT while picking up another pick is more likely. If we cant get one of the top 3 QBs id jus stick wit cassel for now and draft a QB next yr. I think its more important to get a OT, NT, LG or C(whicheva one hudon dosnt play), TE right now than drafting a QB that prolly cant beat out Cassel.

MicahStephenson 78 pts

I want RG3 just as much as everyone else do. But sinse the end of the college season RG3 and Barkley hav shot up the draft boards while L.Jones has slid down. 4 teams ahead of chiefs get the top 3 QBs and leaves kc wit possibly L.Jones, who i dont think can beat out M.Cassel. If anyone of us are picking 1st Colts 2nd mia 3rd cle 4th jags 5th reds wud we pass up Luck, RG3 or Barkley? Yea i know Cle got Mcoy and jac Gabbert but dus anyone really want those 2 over RG3 or Barkley? Keep it real. So all of you that want a QB, is a L.Jones better than cassel and worth a 1st rd pick wen we need RT, NT, LG or C, TE, depth at RB, QB & safety?

RICK TORREY 52 pts

MicahStephenson If Crennel wants to, he should start Stanzi the last three games to see if he can be "The Guy". If not, then we know where we need to go. He has said that Orton will start vs. the Pack, but I think that is the wrong move. We don't win that game with either and Orton probably is not here next season. As far as the draft, I agree that if the last of the four QBs is Jones, then we pass and look at other needs. We still get a starter in round one,(if we can keep him away from T. Jones).

dongtogolo 42 pts

You're right MJ. At best we'd get the 3rd or 4th best Qb. We're better off going with tackles and guards the with 3 of the 1st 4 picks. One of them needs to be NT. MicahStephenson

Chieftan 10 pts

Personally I'd still take Luck over RGIII but the colts will likely get him. If we can't get either then I'd prefer Barkley, Jones just doesn't seem to have the "it" factor and no one else has been impressive. I really just want a new qb to get excited about, but if Stanzi plays and shows some serious potential then I wouldn't mind passing on a qb to give him a shot and focus on other needs.

Big Jim 234 pts

Nice breakdown Laddie! Now here is what I think ABSOLUTELY HAS TO HAPPEN.. We need the 3rd pick. Period no debate. Colts are not going to trade and Luck is gone. The Rams have other needs and already have their franchise QB. I think the Vikings are happy with Ponder and would be the perfect trade partner other than of course the Rams. All Pioli has to do is trade #1 picks and whatever else they want and I truly mean WHATEVER ELSE THEY WANT. This franchise has the golden opportunity to get RGIII and begin building our Super Bowl team which I think could be ready to go in 3 years. We will get our tackles. This draft is full of quality tackles. I would also take Barkley, but why when you can have RGIII? I want nothing to do with Landry Jones. Don't want another Todd Blackledge. This should be the easiet trade up in the history of the draft. Please don't Frick this up Pioli.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I'd like RGIII too and even wrote a post on that but, he seems to be climbing boards and probably will continue to do that... the problem is... Pioli would... I'm guessing... trade down... before he trades up. His War Room draft day training shows that by trading down and picking up more picks you have a greater chance to select more players and that allows you to get it wrong more times until you get it right. IOW... you can make more mistakes that way and still guarantee yourself of improving the franchise....... by... trading down. If it were me... I'd jump at RGIII. Big Jim

Big Jim 234 pts

laddiemorseBig Jim I suspect you are right, but I am hoping against hope that Pioli recognizes RGIII is a very special player and only slightly less of a sure thing than Luck and an opportunity like this may not ever appear again during his tenure. Pioli has a chance here to solidify his legacy as a great GM. This seems to me a low risk/high reward situation. With a great surrounding cast in his offense RGIII could do great things. Look what he has done with not much around himself at Baylor. I hope Pioli sees that, but like you, I suspect he will play it safe, stay put, and draft a tackle, and then try to prove again that Cassel was not a mistake. Pioli dodged the bullet this time by making Haley the fall guy. He won't get another chance to get it right before Clark gives him the ole Peterson shuffle. We can dream though, right?