The End Is Nigh

by Chiefs

It appears Lockout 2K11 is finally drawing to a close.  Its been quite a journey.  So many memories.  Like the time Clark Hunt showed up to that meeting.  Or when he and Art Rooney went to that other meeting.  Or when he said “process” all those times.

Eventually most of us will forget this offseason.  Even bitter, owner-hating nerds like your boy Big Matt will move on come week one.  We’ll have no choice.  It’ll be impossible to think about those slugs in their owner’s boxes when there is actual football being played.  I mean sure, the cameras will show them multiple times every game, and the announcers will lavish praise.  But we’ll be obsessed with the next play, or the previous play, or possible future plays.  Clark Hunt?  Who the hell is that?

Are there any lessons to be learned from the past six months?  Maybe not.  This ended much as everyone thought it would, with a new agreement in place and no games lost.  But at the very least, the owners’ cards are on the table now.  We know who these guys are, we know what they care about.  Hopefully a few more eyes will roll next time one of them is deified by one of their apologists in the announce booth (or Beast Nation).  Even a small victory like that is a worth a lot to me.  A hell of a lot.

more after le jump:

This latest tactic by the owners was a final reminder of who and what they really are.  In case you hadn’t heard, they unanimously approved a new CBA Friday…..that they wrote.  And then Goodell called a press conference to announce it.  #facepalm.

By all accounts the deal is about done, and it seems to be something both sides can agree on.  I’m no lawyer, to pour over the minutiae and say who got the better of it.  I’m hopelessly biased against the owners in any case.  But, I mean, shouldn’t it be a given that you’re going to unanimously approve a plan you wrote?  I would guess all the disagreement pretty much gets weeded out during authorship, right?  Was a “we did it!” press conference before the players had even seen the proposal really necessary?

Of course not.  Friday’s press conference was yet another PR ploy from a group of billionaires who clearly have no shame.  In case anyone has forgotten, they did this exact same thing when the lockout first started.  “The players left a very good deal on the table today.”  Remember that?  Five months later, all that bitterness, and they didn’t even change tactics.  They fell back on what they always fall back on: shameless PR tricks.  Pathetic.

There was no reason for that press conference.  The owners could’ve approved their own proposal, given it to the players, and waited for them to vote.  Instead they patted themselves on the back in front of the world and tried to push the players into a corner.  Thank The Holy Spirit that didn’t set the negotiations back further.  It very well could have.

Luckily, it didn’t.  And now, according to our fearless leader, its time for everyone to “get on the same page.”  For whatever reason, that quote was reported as an actual story across the interwebs.  Here are a few more choice cuts from the same interview:

“Ideally we would all like to open training camp next week. In order for us to do that we are going to need the players to move along on a fairly high timed schedule.”- Hey, the owners have done all they can.  If these players would just be a little more high-timed, everything would be hunky-dorey.  Except, wait……can’t you get fined for being high-timed?

“It’s a great day for the National Football League and most importantly for our fans.”- Just to be clear, he’s talking about the day the owners approved their own proposal.  The players hadn’t even seen it yet.  But yeah, great day for everyone.  The fans most importantly.  These owners really care about us.  Just the other day Jerry Jones helped me up after I’d skinned my knee.

“It’s been a very long process. It’s been a tedious process….”- You dance with the girl that brought ya.  And in this case, that girl is the word “process.”

“We are very eager to get back to football.”- So, so eager.  Now that they’ve got that extra 1.5% coming their way, of course.  Hey, these guys have families to feed.  And dodo eggs don’t come cheap these days.

“We felt it was important for the owners to approve the deal today, which would set the table for the players to come along and approve it as well.”- Hunt later added, “we also felt it was important to announce our approval with a full-scale media blitz.  For the fans.  God, I love those f*#king fans.”

You can’t buy charisma like that, folks (no word yet on whether you can inherit it).  The man is a quote machine.  But it doesn’t stop there.  Our boy was busy this week.  Check him out at his homepage (my one complaint is that Josh Looney is too hard-hitting):

“For the Kansas City Chiefs and the fans of the Chiefs, this is a deal that will allow us to compete,” Hunt explained late Thursday night. “Whether you are in a small, big or medium sized market does not matter. This deal will allow everyone to compete.”

It’s been so hard for these small-market clubs to compete.  The deck was stacked against them!  That’s why we’ve had those low payrolls.  It makes perfect sense.  The Hunt family is just trying to compete.  It’s not like they’ve been pocketing boatloads of cash, right?  Oops.

As it turns out, after the 2009 season the Chiefs had the 6th highest operating revenue in the league.  I believe their payroll was 31st that year?  Seems to me like Clark Hunt has been competing just fine.  As long as he spends less than almost everyone else, he’ll make more than almost everyone else.  Kansas City might be a “small market”, but that doesn’t stop Hunt from collecting a big-market share of the television revenue and making huge profits.  The only thing small market about the Chiefs is the amount of money our owner is willing to spend on them.  But yeah, he just wants to compete.  That’s all he’s ever asked for.  That, and millions of dollars of our tax money.  And $27 for parking.  And $25 from the firemen participating in a pre-game 9/11 ceremony.  And for parking attendants to get the hell off his property once their shift is over*.  But mainly just to compete.

*These last two gaffes were eventually rectified due to the public outrage they created, leading Joel Thorman at Arrowheadpride to say the Chiefs had “righted a couple wrongs.”  Yeah, that’s what they did.  Like knights in shining armor.  I’d give $100 for footage of the meeting where they decided to charge those firemen. 

Move on, Addicts, but never forget.  And now, finally, lets talk football….

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags:

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

You know what the best part of this whole thing is Matt? This thread is about to go to page 2 because we're talking FOOTBALL again buddy! Honestly I'm just freakin stoked and ready for some more healthy debate in 2011! Go CHIEFS and GO BIG MATT. I do love reading your articles.. you know that right?

@TrappedInDonkeyland I'm fine with the deal. It was the press conference that pissed me off. Also, I clicked "like" on your first comment initially. I laughed. Its the internet, this stuff is all in good fun, but its also what provoked me to mention/clarify my job. Otherwise I'd never bring something like that up, but its important to me that people don't read this stuf and think I'm some sort of basement anarchist or whatever. I suppose most billionaires are probably pretty similar in how they'd run a sports franchise (though some do stand out). To me Clark is worse than the others though, and as this lockout creeped on stories started to emerge that confrmed that. Also, I mean, him having a major hand in the new deal (i don't know that he helped resolve anything) was just to improve his own finances, like everything else he does. The revenue sharing provisions affect him personally. Its not like he had altruistic motives here.

insert don't between you and think (damn I need to re read before i post) @Big Matt

@Big Matt I dont think you're a loser Matt. Not at all. I don't think your career is any less significant than mine. My job doesn't mean jack shit in the grand scheme of things, I'm simply a cog in the big wheel of industry. If Clark did sell the Chiefs do you think it would be to a good billionaire this time? Come on, they all make their money pretty much the same way. Where we differ if in the fact that you think Clunt is the devil and I disagree. In fact I think it's pretty awesome that he had a major hand in resolving this disagreement that both sides benefited from. If you think the players gained some things in this new deal otherwise why would they vote unanimously to approve it?

@TrappedInDonkeyland no, you said "I read this and thought of you" then posted the quote. Then when I responded trying to point out that i do, in fact, understand capitalsim and participate in it, you offered a sarcastic congratulations. And come on man, you obviously weren't just saying you wished you could be greed-free like me. Lets at least be honest here, we owe each other that much after all this time. How many offers do you think Clark Hunt would get if he put the Chiefs on the market? I'm sorry I corrected your spelling. Admittedly, that was lame. I spell things wrong all the time.

@Arowhead_AddictSeriously though, I'm not trying to differ with Matt on everything. In real life we probably would be best friends because deep down we are probably a lot alike. (not joking either). He does have great taste in NFL teams. This is if I could get past his weird homoerotic obsession with the lord of the rings characters.

I never called you a loser or underachiever, i simply posted a quote written by someone else and you drew those lines of comparison. You're right, I know nothing about your dog walking career. I wasn't making fun of it simply stating that I wish I could be greed free like you. You seem to act like that you are above anyone that wants to further their business by making more money. Then I congratulated you on being head dog walker. Sorry for the misspelled word, didn't catch that but trust me I know the difference between capitol and capital. If it makes you feel smarter than me.. awesome. I was trying to make the point that it takes billions of dollars to operate the NFL and these billionaires are pretty much the only ones that can do it. I sure as hell can't afford to buy one of these franchises, can you? Without these billionaire owners there would be no NFL. How is that funny?

@TrappedInDonkeyland You don't know me personally either, Tittle, but that didn't stop you from calling me a loser, an underacheiver, and insulting my career (that you know jack shit about). Why? Because you've read the words I write, and you disagree with them. Tell me again about how my logic baffles you, and then look at where the other fingers on your hand are pointing. "Without their huge sums of money there would be no capitol (sp) to fund the NFL. It wouldn't exist" I don't even know where to begin with that. I think the "it wouldn't exist" is the funniest part.

Anyone catch that awkward hug between Saturday and Kraft? Uhhhh...inappropriate!

I for one and looking forward to another season of epic clashes between Big Matt and TIDL. What new things will you guys find to argue about now that the CBA is done? Something, I am sure. Perhaps whether Haley should shave or not? =) @TrappedInDonkeyland

@link15 @Nick i think we can agree here to disagree. I think the way this was handled by them was rather slimy, but I can see where you are coming from. Great thing about America we can have opposing points of view.

And i think that is always the definition of greed, people just dont always realize it until they are the ones getting screwed, my own philosophical position.

@Big Matt I'm not sure when the quote I used was written. I wish I had wrote it but I aint so good with the words

but you can assume all owners are lying, shaming themselves, screwing people over, and are basically horrible people? Your logic baffles me. You don't know these owners. You make generalizations that paint these people as the scum of the earth. Without their huge sums of money there would be no capitol to fund the NFL. It wouldn't exist. You can't have it both ways buddy.



Congrats on being head dog walker btw

@link15 Look, this isn't a political issue to me. it never has been. Free market. Fine. "Advanced civilization" could be interpreted any # of ways, but I'll do us both a favor and not contest that (Incans!). What turns me against these guys is who they are and what they do. Thats what this is about for me. I could give a shit about political implications when a group of men behaves this way. It isn't about where the money goes for me, and it isn't even really about legality (although I play that card when I have to). Its about these particular guys in this particular situation.

@TrappedInDonkeyland PS Anti-capitalist? What is this, the 50s?

@TrappedInDonkeyland You know TIDL, the funny thing is, I'm management now. Have been for the last nine months. I was a walker, worked hard, got promoted. I'm currently in the midst of negotiotions to become a part-owner of the company. I like money. I make as much of it as I can, and I enjoy using it to purchase goods and services. I want more of it, just like anyone else. I'm just not interested in shaming myself, lying or screwing people over for it. There are many, many people like me. None of them are NFL owners. You can't just assume everyone who thinks differently from you is a loser, low acheiver, or anti-capitalist.

@Nick Rodgers Hey Nick, if the definition of greed is "I'm getting mine, *&^^% you" then I'm with you. I disagree that this was ever the case with the NFL owners. Also safe to say we disagree on that but at least we understand the aurgument. My point is that the owners are accountable to us fans (more so than the players anyway). In general they take a longer view and have the best interest of the whole league in mind because that will make them money. Do they want to keep more of the money that their business has yielded? You bet.

@Nick Rodgers But for the power of free markets. If the owners do anything to cause us fans to spend our $$$ elswhere they lose. They make money by providing value. Yes, the owners understand this better than the players and this is why I'm most likely to support their position. Lets see how this plays out. If the Chiefs stay more competitive than the Royals then the owners got it right.

@link15 so if a fireman told you he would pull you out of a burning building only if you paid him $10,000 that would be fine? Sure it's illegal but so was what the owners did with the tv contracts. I mean the guys providing you a valuable service right? He initially agreed to do it for a certain wage, but now he has opted out of that agreement and is striking another one. You can't be upset with his greed, because greed - good - natural motivation to build and accomplish. I believe that actually describes motivation and desire. Greed is when those things drive a person to benefit themselves with no regard for how their gain negatively impacts anyone else. That's the point matt is making, the owners had a "I'm gonna get mine no matter what it takes so f%ck you" attitude. This wasn't about making a hard decision for the health of the sport. This was about banking more money for themselves even if it hurt their working class people in the front offices. Screw them, I'm gonna get paid. Was the mantra for the owners.

With this line of thinking from the owners, how long til the Super Bowl is pay per view? How long til you go to the stadium and before you sit down you hear "Seat 14, row PP, in section 314 is brought to you by Preparation H, available in the concourse! (you'll need it after spending three hours in this cheap plastic seat u just spent $100 to sit in)" On a brighter note TIDL is back! Ding ding ding "Let's get ready to rumble!!!"

Matt is great on football, and a good writer. He is completely blind to how free markets have built advanced civilization. Greed - Good - Natural motivation to build and accomplish The owners have built and wish to maintain what us fans have grown to love. If Matt prefers the players approach he should follow the Royals. Will they make money doing it? I hope so. Otherwise they will pull out and use their capital elswhere.

Oh cynical Matt.. I came upon a quote earlier this week and thought of you. “Greed: A word commonly used by low achievers, anti-capitalists and society's losers to denigrate, shame and discredit those who have acquired superior job skills and decision-making capabilities and who, through the application of those job” I wish i was greed free like you Matt. There must be something to that whole dog walking thing. With Love, TIDL

Sesame Cake 6 pts

Anyone catch that awkward hug between Saturday and Kraft? Uhhhh...inappropriate!

Nick Rodgers 62 pts

With this line of thinking from the owners, how long til the Super Bowl is pay per view? How long til you go to the stadium and before you sit down you hear "Seat 14, row PP, in section 314 is brought to you by Preparation H, available in the concourse! (you'll need it after spending three hours in this cheap plastic seat u just spent $100 to sit in)"

On a brighter note TIDL is back!

Ding ding ding "Let's get ready to rumble!!!"

link15 7 pts

Nick Rodgers
But for the power of free markets. If the owners do anything to cause us fans to spend our $$$ elswhere they lose. They make money by providing value. Yes, the owners understand this better than the players and this is why I'm most likely to support their position.

Lets see how this plays out. If the Chiefs stay more competitive than the Royals then the owners got it right.

link15 7 pts

Matt is great on football, and a good writer. He is completely blind to how free markets have built advanced civilization.

Greed - Good - Natural motivation to build and accomplish

The owners have built and wish to maintain what us fans have grown to love. If Matt prefers the players approach he should follow the Royals. Will they make money doing it? I hope so. Otherwise they will pull out and use their capital elswhere.

Nick Rodgers 62 pts

link15 so if a fireman told you he would pull you out of a burning building only if you paid him $10,000 that would be fine? Sure it's illegal but so was what the owners did with the tv contracts. I mean the guys providing you a valuable service right? He initially agreed to do it for a certain wage, but now he has opted out of that agreement and is striking another one. You can't be upset with his greed, because greed - good - natural motivation to build and accomplish.

I believe that actually describes motivation and desire. Greed is when those things drive a person to benefit themselves with no regard for how their gain negatively impacts anyone else. That's the point matt is making, the owners had a "I'm gonna get mine no matter what it takes so f%ck you" attitude. This wasn't about making a hard decision for the health of the sport. This was about banking more money for themselves even if it hurt their working class people in the front offices. Screw them, I'm gonna get paid. Was the mantra for the owners.

link15 7 pts

Nick Rodgers

Hey Nick, if the definition of greed is "I'm getting mine, *&^^% you" then I'm with you.

I disagree that this was ever the case with the NFL owners. Also safe to say we disagree on that but at least we understand the aurgument. My point is that the owners are accountable to us fans (more so than the players anyway). In general they take a longer view and have the best interest of the whole league in mind because that will make them money. Do they want to keep more of the money that their business has yielded? You bet.

Nick Rodgers 62 pts

link15 Nick i think we can agree here to disagree. I think the way this was handled by them was rather slimy, but I can see where you are coming from. Great thing about America we can have opposing points of view.

And i think that is always the definition of greed, people just dont always realize it until they are the ones getting screwed, my own philosophical position.

Big Matt 199 pts

link15

Look, this isn't a political issue to me. it never has been. Free market. Fine. "Advanced civilization" could be interpreted any # of ways, but I'll do us both a favor and not contest that (Incans!).

What turns me against these guys is who they are and what they do. Thats what this is about for me. I could give a shit about political implications when a group of men behaves this way. It isn't about where the money goes for me, and it isn't even really about legality (although I play that card when I have to). Its about these particular guys in this particular situation.

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

Oh cynical Matt.. I came upon a quote earlier this week and thought of you.

“Greed: A word commonly used by low achievers, anti-capitalists and society's losers to denigrate, shame and discredit those who have acquired superior job skills and decision-making capabilities and who, through the application of those job”

I wish i was greed free like you Matt. There must be something to that whole dog walking thing.

With Love,

TIDL

Big Matt 199 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland

You know TIDL, the funny thing is, I'm management now. Have been for the last nine months. I was a walker, worked hard, got promoted. I'm currently in the midst of negotiotions to become a part-owner of the company. I like money. I make as much of it as I can, and I enjoy using it to purchase goods and services. I want more of it, just like anyone else. I'm just not interested in shaming myself, lying or screwing people over for it. There are many, many people like me. None of them are NFL owners.

You can't just assume everyone who thinks differently from you is a loser, low acheiver, or anti-capitalist.

Big Matt 199 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland

PS Anti-capitalist? What is this, the 50s?

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

Big Matt I'm not sure when the quote I used was written. I wish I had wrote it but I aint so good with the words

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

but you can assume all owners are lying, shaming themselves, screwing people over, and are basically horrible people? Your logic baffles me. You don't know these owners. You make generalizations that paint these people as the scum of the earth. Without their huge sums of money there would be no capitol to fund the NFL. It wouldn't exist. You can't have it both ways buddy.

Congrats on being head dog walker btw

Arowhead_Addict 491 pts

I for one and looking forward to another season of epic clashes between Big Matt and TIDL. What new things will you guys find to argue about now that the CBA is done? Something, I am sure. Perhaps whether Haley should shave or not? =)

TrappedInDonkeyland

Big Matt 199 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland

You don't know me personally either, Tittle, but that didn't stop you from calling me a loser, an underacheiver, and insulting my career (that you know jack shit about). Why? Because you've read the words I write, and you disagree with them. Tell me again about how my logic baffles you, and then look at where the other fingers on your hand are pointing.

"Without their huge sums of money there would be no capitol (sp) to fund the NFL. It wouldn't exist"

I don't even know where to begin with that. I think the "it wouldn't exist" is the funniest part.

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

I never called you a loser or underachiever, i simply posted a quote written by someone else and you drew those lines of comparison. You're right, I know nothing about your dog walking career. I wasn't making fun of it simply stating that I wish I could be greed free like you. You seem to act like that you are above anyone that wants to further their business by making more money. Then I congratulated you on being head dog walker.

Sorry for the misspelled word, didn't catch that but trust me I know the difference between capitol and capital. If it makes you feel smarter than me.. awesome. I was trying to make the point that it takes billions of dollars to operate the NFL and these billionaires are pretty much the only ones that can do it. I sure as hell can't afford to buy one of these franchises, can you? Without these billionaire owners there would be no NFL. How is that funny?

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

Arowhead_AddictSeriously though, I'm not trying to differ with Matt on everything. In real life we probably would be best friends because deep down we are probably a lot alike. (not joking either). He does have great taste in NFL teams.

This is if I could get past his weird homoerotic obsession with the lord of the rings characters.

Big Matt 199 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland

no, you said "I read this and thought of you" then posted the quote. Then when I responded trying to point out that i do, in fact, understand capitalsim and participate in it, you offered a sarcastic congratulations. And come on man, you obviously weren't just saying you wished you could be greed-free like me. Lets at least be honest here, we owe each other that much after all this time.

How many offers do you think Clark Hunt would get if he put the Chiefs on the market?

I'm sorry I corrected your spelling. Admittedly, that was lame. I spell things wrong all the time.

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

Big Matt I dont think you're a loser Matt. Not at all. I don't think your career is any less significant than mine. My job doesn't mean jack shit in the grand scheme of things, I'm simply a cog in the big wheel of industry.

If Clark did sell the Chiefs do you think it would be to a good billionaire this time? Come on, they all make their money pretty much the same way.

Where we differ if in the fact that you think Clunt is the devil and I disagree. In fact I think it's pretty awesome that he had a major hand in resolving this disagreement that both sides benefited from. If you think the players gained some things in this new deal otherwise why would they vote unanimously to approve it?

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

insert don't between you and think (damn I need to re read before i post) Big Matt

Big Matt 199 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland

I'm fine with the deal. It was the press conference that pissed me off.

Also, I clicked "like" on your first comment initially. I laughed. Its the internet, this stuff is all in good fun, but its also what provoked me to mention/clarify my job. Otherwise I'd never bring something like that up, but its important to me that people don't read this stuf and think I'm some sort of basement anarchist or whatever.

I suppose most billionaires are probably pretty similar in how they'd run a sports franchise (though some do stand out). To me Clark is worse than the others though, and as this lockout creeped on stories started to emerge that confrmed that.

Also, I mean, him having a major hand in the new deal (i don't know that he helped resolve anything) was just to improve his own finances, like everything else he does. The revenue sharing provisions affect him personally. Its not like he had altruistic motives here.

TrappedInDonkeyland 243 pts

You know what the best part of this whole thing is Matt? This thread is about to go to page 2 because we're talking FOOTBALL again buddy! Honestly I'm just freakin stoked and ready for some more healthy debate in 2011! Go CHIEFS and GO BIG MATT. I do love reading your articles.. you know that right?