Chiefs DVOA Rankings – Week 17

by Chiefs

The Kansas City Chiefs concluded an otherwise encouraging regular season by failing to achieve a perfect record at home, bestowing upon the Raiders a perfect record within the division, and failing, by any and every reasonable measure, to use the last game of the season as a tune up or for positive momentum going into the playoffs.

I shall do my best to keep this short and sweet. Updated rankings and other goodies await you beyond the jump.

As always, please refer to Football Outsiders for more insight into the methods behind their madness.

Now for the final regular season rankings:

The other slice –

In truth, there was nothing encouraging about what took place last Sunday and the Chiefs appear to be falling completely apart as the season comes to an end. More importantly, when you look at the weighted DVOA stats, you quickly realize that overall trend for this in the last half of the season is that of a team that has played progressively worse to where it finds itself among the lower half of the league in several important categories. Haley’s goal of improving this team a little more each week has been a clear failure in the latter part of the season, even with the whole team healthy. I am happy we are in the playoffs but I wish there was better story to tell when it comes to the progress and direction of the 2010 Chiefs.

How match up against the other AFC playoff teams:

Clearly a case of the haves and the have nots. Nuff said.

This is how we match up against our first playoff opponent:

This is a game that does not favor the Chiefs in any meaningful way. The Ravens are, in my mind, the toughest opponent the Chiefs will face this season and it is hard to see how they can overcome the Ravens power, talent, and depth. However, as a basic strategy, I think the Chiefs should attack this game essentially the same way they did against the Titans. Rather than foolishly attempting to impose our will upon their very solid defensive interior, our best bet is to use our youthful speed and take the ball outside early and often via screens, toss plays, reverses, and the like. Establishing a fast tempo from the outset might catch the Ravens defense off guard and allow us to get up on them with a couple of quick scores.

In the final analysis though, I believe the Ravens will have to play their worst game of the year and the Chiefs play their best game of the year for the home team to eke out a win. Even though I will be there cheering on my Chiefs, I don’t imagine it will go down that way. To borrow from the late, great T.S. Eliot, the way I see this season ending is “not with a bang, but with a whimper.”

That’s my Double Take. What are your takes Addicts?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Nice writeup DD! That ranking against the rest of the AFC playoff field is a bit of an eyeopener. It's good to see the stats that back up my feelings.

The Chiefs is gunna win thisun no matter whut them 40 drinkin pipe smokin, rap listenin Ravens do! Let's just hope that Dwayne Bowe don't pull a Ray Lewis and go celebrate by stabbin some one. Here's to hoping that the Chiefs have their BEST game of the year while the Ravens have their WORST!

I had a feeling the DVOA was not going to be on our side. :-(

Just got an email on some good seats available at face value (whatever that is) - let me know if anyone is interested. I assume they will go fast - let me know if there is any interst. Two are in Section 119, FIELD CLUB 50. They are on the 50 YD line, Lower Level with access to the VIP CLUB - buffet, climate control, full bar. And the other four are in Section 135, FIELD SIDELINE SELECT. They are on the 30 YD line, Row 22. They are great seats as well.

One additional on the games is that, while I have not researched it, my recollection is that Wild Card games are often stinkers in terms of turning out one sided. The odds don't anticipate that being the case. I also agree that the Chiefs ought to try to exploit their speed and see what happens (hook and ladder plays all day long). But my guess is that the NFL coaches typical conservative mindset will take hold and we will be disappointed (unless it works).

"You play to win the game." HERM MAKES HIS RE-APPEARANCE. THIS TEAM JUST CAN'T SHAKE HIM. More seriously, great post. While I don't fully undersand the stats, they paint a bleak story and about the one that an outside observer probably would paint. The Vegas line is Ravens minus 3, which with 3 points for home field, is roughly a 6 point differential. The odds for all games would make for some interesting plays by a betting man: 1/8 4:30 ET New Orleans -10.5 At Seattle 44.5 1/8 8:00 ET At Indianapolis -2.5 NY Jets 44.5 1/9 1:00 ET Baltimore -3 At Kansas City 40.5 1/9 4:30 ET At Philadelphia -3 Green Bay 46 I'd bet Seahawks, Colts, Ravens and Pakers, with no real confidence in any bet.

Oracle, You are either a wise man, or experienced bettor, or quite possibly both. Few betting men earn their gravy on early playoff rounds notwithstanding a few notable exceptions. I really do appreciate your insight though. you have an uncanny ability to zero in on crucial factors most of us miss. Any insight into how the halves will play out, or who scores first?

As Big Matt said, I'll discount the possibility of sarcasm and take it as a compliment. Not wise, not an experienced better, more canny than uncanny, and with no insight whatsoever about halves or who scores first. Although I do find it interesting that more coaches seem to be deferring after they win the toss. I have not heard the explanation. My guess is they feel it is an opportunity to seize a first half momentum/advantage with a stop of the first possession by the opponent, and there is only one chance to seize that mementum/advantage in a game. Unless I had a lot of confidence in being able to make a first stop, I would take the ball. But I can see how if you make a first stop, then you effectively get the first shot at scoring in each half.

It was a sincere compliment.

To be "on record", if I had to bet these games I'd put my money on: Saints Colts Ravens Eagles I also agree with no real confidence on any of the games.

I have made picks on all games against the spread a few times, and found it a humbling experience. I'd be surprised if many people could go four for four this weekend, although I guess just by random chance you would have a 6.25% chance of hitting all four.

I think either way it goes, being in the playoffs this year is going to give our boys a taste of some of the schedule they are going to have to compete with next year. Its going to be a smash mouth year for the chiefs next year for sure. Lets go deep in the playoffs and warm em up :)

Double D, Well I agree that the Ravens are a very rock solid team, and I agree that the Chief's will need to play their best game to win of the year to win this one. I disagree with your assumption that the Chief's will need the Ravens to play their worst game to match our best game to win. If the Ravens falter at all, and we are on our game and score early..... we have a legit. shot at winning this one. I don't really believe deep down we are close to being a championship caliber team yet. But who knows what fate awaits us, maybe the coaching staff will get amnesia and feature Charles all game, and maybe just maybe the whole world aligns with us and we start getting lucky breaks much like the Cards and G-Men of recent years. Doesn't look good though. But the journey will be invaluable

Hey, it is totally cliche' but I'll go ahead and say it anyway - we are in the playoffs and anything is possible. The biggest x factor is probably our young players who don't know what the hell to do other than play like a bunch of maniacs. Maybe somebody who hasn't done too much all season lights it up for us in the playoffs - Jackie Battle maybe? Verran Tucker possibly? Dexter McCluster even? Even though I may not have a ton of faith I will always hold out hope.

Actually some insiders are now saying we have a real shot at winning, IF we are able to wear the Ravens down with our kids running wild. The Ravens D is solid, but hey they are getting older too. I think the real key is not getting way behind early, otherwise it's going to be lights out in Arrowhead for the Chiefs.

I agree we need to get off to a hot start. No falling behind.

Lyle, Thanks for taking the time to put all that together and I agree that DVOA does not tell the whole story. However . . . (you knew this was coming too didn't you?) The most important stat that you left out is the caliber of teams the Ravens and Chiefs each faced this season. DVOA strength of schedule final rankings - Chiefs: 28 Ravens: 6 The Chiefs racked up respectable yards and points against the weakest teams in the league while the Ravens racked up comparable numbers against the league's strongest teams.

A very valid point, and I agree that it should be taken into consideration. I just believe that after 16 games in the NFL, regardless of your strength of schedule you are what you are. You can find examples every week where a "bad" team beat or went toe to toe with a "good" team. You can find cases where a "great" passing team went up against a "bad" pass defense but didn't put up great numbers, etc. I still stand by the examples I gave as areas I think the DVOA are "weighting" too heavily. One more case in point. The Chiefs and Ravens both played Buffalo at home and had to go to overtime to beat them. The Chiefs "bad" defense held them to 10 points. The Ravens "good" defense gave up over 30. The Chiefs rushed for 274 yards against them the Ravens only rushed for 135. Now I don't think the Chiefs D is better then the Ravens or that the Chiefs rushing attack is twice as good. I know the "any given Sunday" argument has become cliche, but there is truth to it. When a team rushes for over 160 yards per game and 4.7 YPC they are better then the 9th best rushing offense, I don't care who they did it against. I think the concrete results on the field hold more value then the weighting and speculation of what a team may have done against other opponents.

Any given Sunday. You play to win the game. If stats were all that mattered, there wouldn't be any reason for a postseason.

Great post as usual DD. I really appreciate the time you put in to put these together. I think the DVOA are a great tool to look at to help shape ones opinion on different areas of the team. (You know its coming don't you) But....... Sometimes I think the DVOA rankings are just flat out off the mark. Not that anything you are doing is wrong, but the Football Outsiders method (in my opinion) falls short at times. I'll use three examples from our match up with the Ravens to prove my point. First, they have our Rush Offense ranked 9th and the Ravens ranked 13th. That makes it appear that our rush offenses are pretty even. However, when I look at the actual numbers: KC Rushing YPG: 164.2 Balt. Rushing YPG: 114.4 KC Rush Avg.: 4.7 Balt Rush Avg.: 3.8 KC 20+ yard runs: 15 Balt 20+ yard runs: 7 KC Rushing TDs: 13 Balt Rushing TDs: 11 KC averages 50 yards more a game, a yard more per carry, and has twice the big runs. The only major area they are close is TDs. I know FO looks at more then that but I think in this case they are off the mark. Next the Pass Defense, we are ranked 18, they are ranked 6. KC Pass D YPG: 219.9 Bal Pass D YPG: 224.9 KC Comp. % against: 54.9% Bal Comp. % against: 58.6% KC Yards/attempt allowed: 6.5 Bal Yards/attempt allowed: 6.4 KC TD/Int ratio allowed: 23 to 14 Bal TD/Int ratio allowed: 22 to 19 KC QB sacks: 39 Bal QB sacks: 27 So Baltimore gets more interceptions and we sack the QB more. The rest is close, yet we are well below in the DVOA. Last #1 WR. Bowe is 18. Boldin is 14. Bowe: 72 receptions Boldin: 64 receptions Bowe: 72.6 YPG Boldin: 52.3 YPG Bowe: 16.1 yard avg Boldin: 13.1 yard avg Bowe: 19 20+ yard rec. Boldin: 10 20+ yard rec. Bowe: 15 TDs Boldin: 7 TDs Bowe: 54% comp when targeted Boldin: 59% comp when targeted So Boldin catches 5% more passes that are thrown to him but Bowe beats him in every other major category. Sorry to write a novel on this, but I just wanted to point out that (in my opinion) these DVOA rankings are not law. They are a good tool to look at, but sometimes your eye and the good old fashioned stats tell a different story.

Nice writeup DD! That ranking against the rest of the AFC playoff field is a bit of an eyeopener. It's good to see the stats that back up my feelings.

The Chiefs is gunna win thisun no matter whut them 40 drinkin pipe smokin, rap listenin Ravens do! Let's just hope that Dwayne Bowe don't pull a Ray Lewis and go celebrate by stabbin some one.

Here's to hoping that the Chiefs have their BEST game of the year while the Ravens have their WORST!

I had a feeling the DVOA was not going to be on our side. :-(

Just got an email on some good seats available at face value (whatever that is) - let me know if anyone is interested. I assume they will go fast - let me know if there is any interst.

Two are in Section 119, FIELD CLUB 50. They are on the 50 YD line, Lower Level with access to the VIP CLUB - buffet, climate control, full bar.

And the other four are in Section 135, FIELD SIDELINE SELECT. They are on the 30 YD line, Row 22. They are great seats as well.

One additional on the games is that, while I have not researched it, my recollection is that Wild Card games are often stinkers in terms of turning out one sided. The odds don't anticipate that being the case.

I also agree that the Chiefs ought to try to exploit their speed and see what happens (hook and ladder plays all day long). But my guess is that the NFL coaches typical conservative mindset will take hold and we will be disappointed (unless it works).

"You play to win the game."

HERM MAKES HIS RE-APPEARANCE. THIS TEAM JUST CAN'T SHAKE HIM.

More seriously, great post. While I don't fully undersand the stats, they paint a bleak story and about the one that an outside observer probably would paint. The Vegas line is Ravens minus 3, which with 3 points for home field, is roughly a 6 point differential.

The odds for all games would make for some interesting plays by a betting man:

1/8 4:30 ET New Orleans -10.5 At Seattle 44.5
1/8 8:00 ET At Indianapolis -2.5 NY Jets 44.5
1/9 1:00 ET Baltimore -3 At Kansas City 40.5
1/9 4:30 ET At Philadelphia -3 Green Bay 46

I'd bet Seahawks, Colts, Ravens and Pakers, with no real confidence in any bet.

Oracle,

You are either a wise man, or experienced bettor, or quite possibly both. Few betting men earn their gravy on early playoff rounds notwithstanding a few notable exceptions.

I really do appreciate your insight though. you have an uncanny ability to zero in on crucial factors most of us miss. Any insight into how the halves will play out, or who scores first?

As Big Matt said, I'll discount the possibility of sarcasm and take it as a compliment.

Not wise, not an experienced better, more canny than uncanny, and with no insight whatsoever about halves or who scores first.

Although I do find it interesting that more coaches seem to be deferring after they win the toss. I have not heard the explanation. My guess is they feel it is an opportunity to seize a first half momentum/advantage with a stop of the first possession by the opponent, and there is only one chance to seize that mementum/advantage in a game. Unless I had a lot of confidence in being able to make a first stop, I would take the ball. But I can see how if you make a first stop, then you effectively get the first shot at scoring in each half.

It was a sincere compliment.

To be "on record", if I had to bet these games I'd put my money on:

Saints
Colts
Ravens
Eagles

I also agree with no real confidence on any of the games.

I have made picks on all games against the spread a few times, and found it a humbling experience. I'd be surprised if many people could go four for four this weekend, although I guess just by random chance you would have a 6.25% chance of hitting all four.

I think either way it goes, being in the playoffs this year is going to give our boys a taste of some of the schedule they are going to have to compete with next year. Its going to be a smash mouth year for the chiefs next year for sure. Lets go deep in the playoffs and warm em up :)

Double D,

Well I agree that the Ravens are a very rock solid team, and I agree that the Chief's will need to play their best game to win of the year to win this one. I disagree with your assumption that the Chief's will need the Ravens to play their worst game to match our best game to win. If the Ravens falter at all, and we are on our game and score early..... we have a legit. shot at winning this one. I don't really believe deep down we are close to being a championship caliber team yet. But who knows what fate awaits us, maybe the coaching staff will get amnesia and feature Charles all game, and maybe just maybe the whole world aligns with us and we start getting lucky breaks much like the Cards and G-Men of recent years. Doesn't look good though. But the journey will be invaluable

Hey, it is totally cliche' but I'll go ahead and say it anyway - we are in the playoffs and anything is possible.

The biggest x factor is probably our young players who don't know what the hell to do other than play like a bunch of maniacs. Maybe somebody who hasn't done too much all season lights it up for us in the playoffs - Jackie Battle maybe? Verran Tucker possibly? Dexter McCluster even?

Even though I may not have a ton of faith I will always hold out hope.

Actually some insiders are now saying we have a real shot at winning, IF we are able to wear the Ravens down with our kids running wild. The Ravens D is solid, but hey they are getting older too. I think the real key is not getting way behind early, otherwise it's going to be lights out in Arrowhead for the Chiefs.

I agree we need to get off to a hot start. No falling behind.

Lyle,

Thanks for taking the time to put all that together and I agree that DVOA does not tell the whole story.

However . . .

(you knew this was coming too didn't you?)

The most important stat that you left out is the caliber of teams the Ravens and Chiefs each faced this season.

DVOA strength of schedule final rankings -
Chiefs: 28
Ravens: 6

The Chiefs racked up respectable yards and points against the weakest teams in the league while the Ravens racked up comparable numbers against the league's strongest teams.

A very valid point, and I agree that it should be taken into consideration. I just believe that after 16 games in the NFL, regardless of your strength of schedule you are what you are. You can find examples every week where a "bad" team beat or went toe to toe with a "good" team. You can find cases where a "great" passing team went up against a "bad" pass defense but didn't put up great numbers, etc. I still stand by the examples I gave as areas I think the DVOA are "weighting" too heavily.

One more case in point. The Chiefs and Ravens both played Buffalo at home and had to go to overtime to beat them. The Chiefs "bad" defense held them to 10 points. The Ravens "good" defense gave up over 30. The Chiefs rushed for 274 yards against them the Ravens only rushed for 135. Now I don't think the Chiefs D is better then the Ravens or that the Chiefs rushing attack is twice as good. I know the "any given Sunday" argument has become cliche, but there is truth to it. When a team rushes for over 160 yards per game and 4.7 YPC they are better then the 9th best rushing offense, I don't care who they did it against. I think the concrete results on the field hold more value then the weighting and speculation of what a team may have done against other opponents.

Any given Sunday.

You play to win the game.

If stats were all that mattered, there wouldn't be any reason for a postseason.

Great post as usual DD. I really appreciate the time you put in to put these together. I think the DVOA are a great tool to look at to help shape ones opinion on different areas of the team.

(You know its coming don't you)

But.......

Sometimes I think the DVOA rankings are just flat out off the mark. Not that anything you are doing is wrong, but the Football Outsiders method (in my opinion) falls short at times. I'll use three examples from our match up with the Ravens to prove my point.

First, they have our Rush Offense ranked 9th and the Ravens ranked 13th. That makes it appear that our rush offenses are pretty even. However, when I look at the actual numbers:

KC Rushing YPG: 164.2
Balt. Rushing YPG: 114.4

KC Rush Avg.: 4.7
Balt Rush Avg.: 3.8

KC 20+ yard runs: 15
Balt 20+ yard runs: 7

KC Rushing TDs: 13
Balt Rushing TDs: 11

KC averages 50 yards more a game, a yard more per carry, and has twice the big runs. The only major area they are close is TDs. I know FO looks at more then that but I think in this case they are off the mark.

Next the Pass Defense, we are ranked 18, they are ranked 6.

KC Pass D YPG: 219.9
Bal Pass D YPG: 224.9

KC Comp. % against: 54.9%
Bal Comp. % against: 58.6%

KC Yards/attempt allowed: 6.5
Bal Yards/attempt allowed: 6.4

KC TD/Int ratio allowed: 23 to 14
Bal TD/Int ratio allowed: 22 to 19

KC QB sacks: 39
Bal QB sacks: 27

So Baltimore gets more interceptions and we sack the QB more. The rest is close, yet we are well below in the DVOA.

Last #1 WR. Bowe is 18. Boldin is 14.

Bowe: 72 receptions
Boldin: 64 receptions

Bowe: 72.6 YPG
Boldin: 52.3 YPG

Bowe: 16.1 yard avg
Boldin: 13.1 yard avg

Bowe: 19 20+ yard rec.
Boldin: 10 20+ yard rec.

Bowe: 15 TDs
Boldin: 7 TDs

Bowe: 54% comp when targeted
Boldin: 59% comp when targeted

So Boldin catches 5% more passes that are thrown to him but Bowe beats him in every other major category.

Sorry to write a novel on this, but I just wanted to point out that (in my opinion) these DVOA rankings are not law. They are a good tool to look at, but sometimes your eye and the good old fashioned stats tell a different story.