The G-Men: The Should-Be Blueprint For The Chiefs

by Draft

G-Men: The Blueprint (AA)

The Kansas City Chiefs aren’t going to wake up this year, next or the one after that and discover that they have become the New England Patriots. Not going to happen. That’s why they need to adopt a New York state of mind, and quick. No, Herm Edwards, not your former J-E-T-S–the G-Men. The Chiefs need to examine the New York Giants‘ roster that Jerry Reese and Tom Coughlin built in The Big Apple, and use that blueprint as a guide to success back in K.C.

The Giants have become a hard-nosed team that successfully both runs the football and rushes the passer week in, week out. Because of those highly desired gridiron traits, the G-Men were road warriors. That’s how you get it done in the NFL–protect your own backyard, give ‘em hell on the road.

If you compare the Chiefs’ and Giants’ rosters, you’ll see that the two teams have a lot in common. Bookend defensive ends? Check. Smash-mouth feature running back? Check. Perennial All-Pro tight end? Check. Bona fide No. 1 WR? Check. Rangy linebackers? Check. Somewhat spotty secondary? Check.

The Giants’ offensive line is solid, but not spectacular. Where they really have us beat is at the defensive tackle and quarterback positions. That’s why I fully believe that if the Chiefs adopt my NFL Draft plan they will put themselves on a trajectory similar to the one the Giants have enjoyed. I’m not saying we’ll win a Super Bowl, I’m saying we’ll put ourselves in position to compete for the Super Bowl.

  • Step One – Draft DT Sedrick Ellis, USC

There is at least a handful of can’t-miss prospects in this year’s draft class. What does that mean? It means that picking fifth we can’t afford to walk away from NFL Draft weekend without one of the five best players from the draft. It also means that we shouldn’t trade down. The top players in this draft blow the rest of this class away, but it’s deep because of underclassmen. That means that we’d be foolish to trade back to draft two players in the first round similar to the talents we can pick up in the second and third rounds.

Ellis will be a star. His addition to our defensive line will give us one of the most ferocious units in the league by far. We all witnessed how the Super Bowl was won. Ellis will make our D-line G-Menesque. I recommend picking him over even Darren McFadden, Jake Long and Matt Ryan. I’d give Glenn Dorsey the same recommendation if he passes our injury screenings. We also cannot give in to temptation and draft either Chris Long or Vernon Gholston–we have our defensive ends. Two great ones at that.

  • Step Two – Draft an Offensive Tackle in Round Two

I hear the meat-and-potatoes Chiefs fans out there collectively groaning, but I don’t give a damn. Sure, Jake Long could be the best tackle to come along in some time. He could also be a poor man’s Joe Thomas. Wouldn’t we be better off drafting the best second round tackle in recent memory? After all, this is possibly the greatest draft class of tackles ever. Teams fail in the draft when they fail to adapt to the draft and its talent.

There are two unique forces at defensive tackle, but about seven or eight very solid offensive tackle prospects out there. I think going with Ellis or even Dorsey in round one, followed by someone like Gosder Cherilus, Ryan Collins or Sam Baker in round two is the way to go. I know how much Chiefs fans like Long, and how much Mel Kiper likes Ryan Clady, but I think a starting left tackle will be available with the fourth pick in round two. Remember Redbeard’s personal salvation project Tony Ugoh, the rookie who protected Peyton Manning’s blind side last year? He was the 42nd pick. Joe Staley went 28th overall. A very good tackle will be there.

  • Step Three – Trade up and Draft A Quarterback

I like Brodie Croyle, I really do. But given his durability issues it would be ignorant for us to put all of our eggs in the Brodie basket. Remember what Woody Allen said?

“80 percent of success is just showing up” — Woody Allen

That alone could doom us during the Brodie Croyle era. That’s why we need to use our plethora of picks and move up to get a second second-round pick and draft a quarterback. Either Brian Brohm, Chad Henne or Joe Flacco will be there. And all three are underrated. Alex Smith went No. 1 and none of these three studs can crack the first round? Something’s not right here, not with the players but with the scouting. Remember John Beck and Trent Edwards–who both look like they are on their way to becoming good quarterbacks–they were there in round two last year. Brady Quinn damn near was.

We draft a rookie to sit for a year or two while Croyle gets his shot. If Croyle stumbles, they step in. If Croyle succeeds, we are in the same predicament the Browns now find themselves in, which is a good pickle to be in if you ask me. Research shows that quarterbacks who are slowly groomed typically succeed. I’m confident that if we had both Croyle and one of the three above-mentioned rookie QBs, that we would finally be successfully in developing a QB of our own. Don’t we all want that?

  • Step Four – Draft Corners, More Hogs and A Return Man in the Later Rounds

Bill Kuharich, Herm and Ray Farmer have actually been pretty good in the later rounds of the draft. Jarrad Page. Kolby Smith. Some good finds. They need that trend to continue. We need two solid corners–which Herm always says he can find late–a guard and a return specialist. If a receiver slips into round three or four and has no business being there, we also should look at him, especially if he doubles as a return guy.

I truly believe that if the Chiefs follow this blueprint, that Herm Edwards’ bold prediction to Eric Casillias will be right –the Chiefs will end up being like the Giants two-three years from now.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Adam,  how is this for an irony.  DeAngelo Hall has refuted reports that he is definitely headed to Oakland.  Do you think it would be possible for the Chiefs to send Greg Wesley and a late round pick to Atlanta for Hall?  Or do you think that is "too high of a price in the Chiefs eyes"?

Adam, totally agree with you about Jared.  Until he proves with out a shadow of a doubt that he can not get another DUI, then he needs the franchise tag nailed on him unitl he does.  Great player but needs to just shut up and play.  I agree that the players need to watch themselves, but I am an avid believer that if LJ plays through training camp and the preseason, then we see a different side to him during the regular season.  The money situation always works out AND he had a year left on his current deal.  You say he needs to protect himself, but do you honestly beleive he helped himself and the team by holding out?  He was not ready for the season to begin because he did not work out with the team.  BTW, don't you find it the least bit ironic that as soon as Priest announced his intentions to come back, LJ suddently finds what the Chiefs were offering him to be good enough for him to sign?  Again let me reiterate, I like LJ except for the way he did business last year.  He is going to break some more records before he is done.

I have not seen greatness yet out of Tamba Hali. Just my opinion

Race has nothing to do with it either.  I'm sure most would rather pay Priest in his prime than LJ in his prime.  It's all about personality, and for whatever reason LJ just rubs fans the wrong way.  Not sure why, but thats the way it is.  Regardless.  He's good, he's one of the best backs we could hope to have, and as long as he is a chief, I'm on the LJ train.

Good point about how we should be more concerned if LJ wasn't upset at our shittyness last year.  Put's a nice perspective spin on things.  About Allen though, I'm not sure people were jacked about him getting a DUI, or that happy with him after it had happened, it's how he handled it afterwards that really sets him apart.  He showed super committment.  I mean stopping drinking completely?  That pretty admirable.  Not many guys can get a suspension cut in half.  He sure ain't Koren Robinson.

Michael San Diego, I'll hold you to that. If Jared Allen holds out then it isn't Carl's fault by your logic either. If a guy plays at an All Pro level for more than one year, then you must pay him like one. Period. L.J. Would have been crazy not to have gotten paid after rushing 416 times. Earl Campbell told him get paid before your body crumbles in five years. Chiefs fans need to understand that players have to look out for themselves sometimes, too.

LOL at him being scared. That's complete bullshit. The guy ran as well as Jim Brown could have been that albatross of a line and Solari's playcalling. Stop blaming L.J. for our futility just because you don't like him, Chiefs fans. Getting sick of it. As you long-time A.A. readers can vouch, bashing L.J. is the one way to get me pissed in a jiffy.

And Jarrad Page is not the answer.

Anyway, Michael, friendly debate about these things is good and we welcome that. I just get a little angry about Chiefs fans and L.J. Jared Allen goes DUI crazy and the town loves him. L.J. has some rap ties and is a little too demonstrative sometimes and he's public enemy number one. Contract-wise, if you call L.J. selfish than you have to call Jared selfish, too. I hate to go here, but sometimes I can't help but think it's  a racial thing.

I actually think that it's just that East Coast L.J.--tats, Roc chain and all--doesn't sell that well in middle America. He doesn't have an attitude problem. I'd be questioning him if he didn't get pissed about the atrocious playcalling and blocking last year. That's how I feel, anyway. Chiefs fans need to chill on L.J. The other myth that needs to be busted among Chiefs fans is that running backs grow on trees. Maybe in Denver with their old system, but that's just not the way it works in the NFL.

Last year i went on a bit of a tangent when the LJ contract situation was going on, and honestly my opinion hasn't changed so much.  I think that as the O-Line and play calling go, so does the RB.  I'm not always so sure it is nessesary to spend that much on a running back, espessially one that at times can seem extremely selfish.  But, that being said, if there was an RB to spend money on based on potential and past production, it would have to be LJ.  I think the problem most people have with him is that it is taking him a while to mature.  What can you do about that though, thats just who he is.  He has talent, he's proven he can put up numbers, lets get an o-line and offensive co-ordinator and make it happen. 

Charles Davis from Nfl.com has KC taking Jake Long with the 5th pick (Chris Long, Glen Dorsey, Matt Ryan, and D-Mac). http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80738d50

Adam, not sure how old you are, but I have been a fan of the Chiefs since I knew what football was.  So we'll say the early to mid eighties.  Let's put it this way.  I remember the the Blackledge years.  Our last dedicated attempt to groom our own QB.  I am an avid fan so therefore I can bash LJ.  He wanted LT money, got it and then came in scared like a school girl.  Don't blame Carl for him holding out.  That is the players decision, er right, however you want to look at it.  If he was a team player he would have been in camp.  Carl has a TEAM to worry about and I agree with him not killing the teams chances by drowning one player, no matter how good he is, with 70% of the cap money.  Have you ever seen LT on TV while his teammates are fighting it out in preseason.  I think not, he is a team player.  LJ looks after himself.  That is why he and Dick didn't get along at first.  He learned a little humility from Priest but not much.  As for the pollard and page talk,  I think they will be another Kevin Ross/Deron Cherry combo given time and the correct coaching.  But we as fans usually aren't too patient are we?  LOL!!

Pollard did block three kicks in a year, and one last year.

As for DRC, he might have top five talent, but he won't go that high because of where he played. It's not about talent, but where the market has these guys going. You don't want to use a top five pick on a guy you could trade to get at 10-15 for sure.

Dave, at this point we need talent. So if someone who has no business slips to us in round two we almost have to take him. Two Pro Bowlers from this draft would be a coup. Except TE and LB. I don't think we could go there with who we already have. It also depends if we go OT in round one or not. If we don't, we almost have to in round two.

im telling you guys DRC is the guy for us and if J.Long is gone thats where we need to go im not stupid im PRAYING for J.LONG but he'll probably be gone and i see such an upside to DRC look at cromartie in SD he was raw coming out only played at FSU one good year and look now. he went just ahead of us i wish we got him now we might be able to make amends  

Adam, post 57.  Perfectly put.  And yeah, i seriously, seriously doubt ellis or dorsey would amount to a simms.  not even close.   I also thought pollard was a better ST player.  Didn't he block like 3 kicks in his rookie year?

By the way Adam - you brought this up, not me......I have been wondering what to do if Phillips is there for us in the 2nd round.....think of the people that "could" be there for us.......QB Brohm/Flacco, OT Baker, ILB Connor, SS Phillips, CB Talib, WR Hardy/Manningham, TE Davis......I could keep going......point is - we will have a tough decision to make - I think we need to talk about the 2nd round more

Don't get me wrong Adam, (I) like you have been trying to correct all Chiefs fans that the Cover 2 does infact need top CB's......frankly I get really upset at this idea that it can be found in the last round of a draft......what I am trying to say in the earlier post is that I really like the WR's in this years draft and would love to find a way to get one in the early rounds.....but, I am evidently the only Chiefs fan who does not think Darling is a #2 so I will quietly pray for a better wideout - and if they draft a CB instead I will be OK because we need better corners aswell....are we good?

I always thought Pollard was better on special teams by far. And while I saw No. 49 bring the wood, I saw No. 44 bring the whiff. As you can tell, I'm not a very big Page fan. If Kenny Phillips or Reggie Smith are there in round two, we'd have to think about it. Especially with Smith (he can also play corner) if we go OT in round one. It might be time to turn the Page.

Dave, you're never going to get me to concede this point. Our CBs were awful last year, and when you are rebuilding you take what the draft gives you and the best players available. You do not reach under any circumstances, and you don't pick a lesser player just because a certain position is at a slightly higher premium. That's stupidity and not being patient. Jake Long might go No. 1 orf 2, and Clady is a reach. We have to draft one of the two DTs or Matt Ryan if Long is long gone. Period. And we have to get a corner by no later than round four or we are in deep shit. Cover 2 will be Cover 187 with the talent we have back right there. If it was such a magic coverage scheme everybody would be running it. Right?And neither Ellis or Dorsey will be Ryan Sims. I guarantee that. You sound like a scorned lover with that comment, kcrob69.

I can never tell them apart. All I remember of the safeties (as a unit)from the season were some great TD saving tackles that would have been averted had either one been decent in pass coverage. That's one of my biggest beefs with sports news by the way, somebody talks about a team they know nothing about and the talking heads adopt what he says and spout it constantly as it quickly becomes assimilated into the "common knowledge" database. They're probably a fan of Page because of his ST impact, which he should remain a ST star without being a defensive starter.

Adam - The one thing I trust Herm to do is find, develop, & utilize defensive talent from the later rounds. Our defense played pretty well last year. Because of our crappy offense, they spent way more on the field than they ever should have and by the middle of the season, they were worn down. By week 12, if not sooner, everybody in the league knew that our offense was not going to score points and as a result, every team we faced thereafter abused our defense with the run. Last season's defensive stats are skewed because of the offense, not because of the defense.

The defense can certainly stand a little tweaking but to say it's okay for 2 of our first 3 picks to go to defense is nothing short of being in denial.

I think OT gives us a better chance to win more games now. DT is too risky, to big of a chance at getting another Ryan Sims. I know the chances of taking one in the second round is good, but we pick high enough in rd 2 to steal a player that was supposed to go in rd 1.

Cornelius, great points. Even though on Page, no, he can't tackle. It drives me crazy that other pundits are higher on page than Pollard. I watch the games, do they? A free safety who can't cover or tackle is worthless. At least Pollard brings the boom against the run.

Michael San Diego, L.J. was a little timid and slow coming out of the gate, but wouldn't you have been as well with no O-line and our playcalling, not to mention no training camp (thanks, Carl). Then he played against one stout defense after another, most notably Minnesota, Jacksonville and San Diego. By the time we got to San Diego, he was rolling. Same with Green Bay before his injury. Those defense were stout against the run, too. Did you see how physical he was in that game out there in San Diego? I'm guessing you did, given your user name. That last run to end the game was awesome.

Also, don't know if you are new, but bashing or even going after L.J. on this site will get you nowhere. That's my guy.

And the Giants are and aren't that  good. What they do is a fabulous job masking their decencies. And just like teams get to pick, players have some right to try and determine their destination. Looks like it was the right call for both franchises.

Amen Adam- Amen!......The only (and I repeat only) thing the we are differing on is what to do in round three - I really want one of the top wideouts......but I guess it comes down to who is there.....if king is there in round three, I would take him - maybe a few others.....my problem is when I look at the Wideouts in this draft I want one......not the 5th/6th rounder but the 2nd/3rd round wideout.....since we ignored the WR position in FA (Darling doesn't count in my book because he is a backup and nothing more) we have to adress it in the Draft.

Double D, I hear you, but disagree. Some thought Joe Staley would sneak into the top 15 last year, and he was there at 28. Tony Ugoh was there at 42. I'd say it depends on WRs, CBs, hell, even QBs and LBs which tackle we get, but a damn good one will be there at 35. I guarantee that.

As far as taking a DT later than round three--I don't even trust us taking one later than round one. If we don't take Ellis or Dorsey I want us to stay the hell away. We've botched too many DT picks. And I'd have no problem with us going DT-OT-CB in the first three rounds. Our defense needs work, too, and if we also address those needs it can keep us in games this year.

First off, D Thomas, Andre' Woodsen is not the guy. Not sure if you are a Kentucky fan or what, but that would be a huge mistake. Also, Boone would be a great No. 2 DT, but he is too inconsistent to be a No. 1. As far as drafting an OT, getting one of the top eight will be like getting a top three one most years...

First off, love the article.

Secondly, to borrow from the political arena, "it's the offense stupid."

My biggest concern about waiting to draft an OT until the 2nd round is that I think it's entirely possible that will be a run on OTs in the 1st round and all the guys we're thinking/hoping will be there in the 2nd round, won't be. Yikes! For that reason alone, I absolutely believe that our 1st pick out of the gate has to be the best LT available. How we get there, trading down, picking outright, whatever, is less important to me than the fact that we just do it. Waiting until round 2 is a risk we cannot afford to take.

Reality - 1) our defense is in good hands and not really that bad, 2) our offense possesses talent but does not score points - bottom line, it is abysmal, 3) special teams, both in terms of field position gained and field position yielded is abysmal.

Rebuilding and improving the offense must be priority numero uno in this draft and improving ST needs has to be 2nd. As I said above, our 1st pick cannot be anything other than the best available LT. Our 2nd pick should be either OG, CB, or WR and if its CB or WR, he better be fast and able to step in immediately as our return guy. Depending on what we do with our 2nd pick, our 3rd pick can be either OG, CB, WR, C, or maybe even QB.

Regardless of how many picks we have, I would be extremely pissed if we selected more than 1 defensive player before the 4th round.

4th pick same as 3rd pick but add DT and if it's the 4th round we can not pass on FB Owen Schmitt if he's there. 5th pick/round, same as 4th, but start thinking more about fast, hard hitting wild men to put on ST. 6th round same as 5th. 7th round, add PK to the mix.

Drafting a CB:  I think RD 3 is perfect for a Corner this year.  Either way, it is unlikely that whoever we get will play as poorly as Law did for us last year.  Plus don't we still have Brackenridge, Barksdale, and Patterson?  One of those guys has to emerge as something.  Also if we keep Sapp (covered very well at times last year) that position really isn't THAT bad.  At least we do have some young prospects.

We need an offesive lineman worse than we need a defensive lineman.  Not to mention we have three good players on the D=line already, yes Boone is a balla.Not shuring up our offensive line will hurt LJ ,Brodie (scrub-bucket) croyle, and cause Tony to become more of blocking tight-end .  We need a top 3  O-lineman!!!Also we should look at woodson QB, because Brodie hasen't let us to victory, and is built like a school-boy. Please put on some weight Bro-Cro!!!

Yeah, Adam, I'm pretty sick of hearing that Cover 2 doesn't require good corners. First off, it's plain wrong. Second, when you have weak safety help (Pollard and Page are far better against the run and as tacklers than covering passes), your corners need to be that much better. Third, when Gunther "Kill The Quarterback" Cunningham is your D-coordinator, your LB's are going to be blitzing, and there's no dancing around that fact.

BTW, I REALLY don't think the Giants are that good.  The best team really did not win the SB this year.  Shame too.  Would have been great to see.  They got lucky and Eli should be bagging groceries for what he did to SD.  Not a Charger fan, but that was just down right wrong!  Shows he, and his father, don't have the character his brother has.

Wow!  Didn't realize that last post was that long winded.  Sorry folks!

Ok gotta admit.  I have not seen DRC.  Don't know anything other than he has done well in the combine and Kiper likes him.  As for LJ, let me put it this way.  He ran like a kid afraid to get hit.  Take a look at the supposed good 4-4 stretch and if you watch closely and compare it to his performance a year prior, he was NOT lowering his head to deliver hits.  After getting his big contract he started taking hits NOT dishing them out like he says he likes to do.  Don't believe me, then check the game footage again and watch how he hit the line MOST of the time, not PART of the time.  Now that could have been about his injury, but we will have to see.  I personally thought after his 06 performance that we would see him breaking tons of records, but now.........I want to think that, but.....Maybe a couple of stud OL's in this year's draft (I would say free agency, but unfortunately the Herm and Carl show are against hiring the Shane Oliviea's of the NFL.  Besides didn't he sign with someone this week?) and he will be back to form.  I like him let's make that clear!!!  I am just worried about the way he went into the line this past year as opposed to the 06 season.  As for Aquib Talib, since I am unfortunately in SD, CA I didn't get to see anything but what the "experts" were saying on ESPN.  That and the VTech stomping KU gave in the bowl game.   God that was nice to see, FINALLY!!!!.....Dave....I would rather have Ellis than Dorsey.  Something doesn't feel right about the kid.  Either way, I think they are the reason KC gets Jake Long.  I know Atlanta, St. Louis, heck even Miami, all need OL help, but they need D help more than OL help.  Plus they have all signed some good free agents so far.  Wish we could do that, Williams and Darling notwithstanding.  As for trading out of #5 slot, I think that is a mistake.  There are too many good players we could take in this position to be giving the pick up to the likes of Dallas, screw the cowboys.  They have gotten a ring or two since 70 (our LAST appearance I believe), we haven't.  Come to think of it, were any of the posters here alive for that one?  I know I wasn't!  I want OUR Chiefs there again.  I know we need a younger team and agree that it needs to be built in the draft, but not at the cost of being another Chiefs team of the 80's.  I would rather have a team that gets to the playoffs ten years in a row and loses then a team that gets worse than 500, like this year.  Odds are if they start a run like they had in the 90's, they will end up getting to a SB.  Just need Carl to take some legitimate chances.  Like getting a better backup/starter at QB.  There are plenty out there we could use.  Unfortunately, I think Damon has had the best run he can and if Brody can't stay on the field, then he does us no good as a "franchise" QB.  Like his arm and gunslinger mentality, but not sure it goes with a run first offense?!

I agree that Long will be gone as well, and I also think that Ellis and Dorsey (if healthy) are possibly the best two DTs we've seen in the past five years. I'm serious. The only way I'm cool with Gholston is if we've traded or are in the process of trading J.A., after he forces our hand. If all those option are off the board and J.A. is still a Chief, we go Matt Ryan if he's there. No doubt about it. That's my next post. Stay tuned...

Red Eye, those red eyes of yours must be really bugging you if you couldn't see that Brian Waters was good enough to start for Kansas. Same with Damion McIntosh when he was healthy, which wasn't often.

I do agree with you about not drafting a first-round corner, but this myth that you can just pick any bum out of the crowd and plug him into the Cover 2 needs to be busted. Two ex-Pro Bowlers didn't play well in the system last year. With the new rules you need speed and talent at corner. Period. We better draft a corner in the first four rounds. If not, there will be more BBQ in our secondary than our parking lot.

I dont know why people get all wrapped up about J Long, he will not make it to 5.

I will take a bet with anyone that is willing!

Unless we trade up for Jake Long, he will not be a Chief, FACE IT PEOPLE :)

I like the point of the article, it's just a weak argument in the first round.  We need J. Long if he is available period.  That line will take time to develop, and we want a superbowl ASAP.  If we can't address need why throw out the DE's?  The Giants did it with three awesome DE's!  Plus DE is a position you commonly take high and pay high.  Plus, will Allen be here when we are ready to contend?  No one knows.  If the DT's are much better players, then take one, but we can afford to give our two young DT's a chance to grow, and take a top ten DT next year if they continue to disapoint.      

If we can trade down for muliple picks 08 and 09 then I say we take Brandon and turn him into LT.  He will be better than Long in NFl after 1 year

We have a couple of young promising cover two corners on our roster.  If we didn't, we could absolutely draft two studs on day two.  If the Chiefs draft a first round CB, I'll move.  Our secondary was spotty?  None of out OL's would start for Kansas! 

I agree with Nathan--Boone was only good for about eight of the ten games. Tank and Turk might not be Ryan Sims, but they aren't Henderson and Stroud (or Rogers and Williams for an example that actually plays together).

Five is way too early to pick any CB in this draft. Doing so would be a bigger reach than Clady, Otah or Williams. If Jake, Glenn and Sedrick are all gone and Matt Ryan is there, we'd be absolute fools not to take him. I might actually do the Blueprint 2 just about that.

If Jake Long is gone and either Ellis or Dorsey are on the board, we need to pick one of them; doing so would improve our D-line and help give us the push up the middle that we've been lacking for awhile now. Boone was a force, but he ran out of gas midseason. If we take one of the top Defensive Tackle's in round one we can still solidify the offensive line in round.

DRC excels at the cover 2 (which we play)we have NO cornersistill wish for J.LONG but we really need as back up plan if we could cover downfield maybe our pass rush would be a little better tank boone and turk + a later rounder would solidify the d for possibly years

most corner rankings have DRC either #1 or #2

MOST people said tom brady should'nt go before 6           jared allen a 4 come on Most people may not be rightmaybe the senior bowl was INDICATIVE of how DRC would be in a game situation

Most people rate McKelvin and Jenkins above Rogers-Cromartie

Jason, I said that for ellis, the senior bowl performance was more indicive as to how ellis will be in the nfl, than his combine performance.  That does not change the fact that Rogers-Cromartie should not go at #5.  Ellis had been rated high even before the senior bowl.   

oh and sorry roc27 but DRC wont be there for dallas' pick(either one) 

You might be right about herm but DRC might be the biggest  raw talent in the draft and if we dont get him the PATS probably will

And I honestly think that we can get almost just as good of a tackle in round two as round one. I really do. The Colts did last year with a later pick in a weaker class of OTs.

I want to reiterate that regardless of what you think about DRC, he will likely be a top ten pick. Aqib Talib will likely not.