Skip to main content

Darius Slayton is the wrong answer to the Chiefs wide receiver problem

The Giants released Slayton on Sunday, but he's not a fit for the Chiefs.
ByMatt Conner
Dallas Cowboys v New York Giants - NFL 2025
Dallas Cowboys v New York Giants - NFL 2025 | Al Bello/GettyImages

The Kansas City Chiefs have a need. The free-agent market has a new arrival. But when it comes to Darius Slayton, a marriage doesn't seem to be in the cards.

It's not hard to find Chiefs fans connecting such hopeful dots. After the New York Giants released the veteran wide receiver on Monday—an odd choice, by the way, to wait until one week after roster cuts to make a fairly obvious move—a number of "next destination" columns sprang up all around. But those wanting to wedge Kansas City into the mix aren't taking the full picture into account.

Yes, the Chiefs have a need at wide receiver. The scenario has been hashed and rehashed already, but suffice it to say that a fairly uninspired group of pass catchers from 2025 has been copied and pasted onto the 2026 roster. It seems the Chiefs' front office and coaching staff are simply hoping that injuries go away, coaches do their jobs, and young players develop. That's not the worst idea at all, but it's concerning when it's the only idea.

Jalen Royals hasn't proven a thing. Cyrus Allen is a rookie without even the option to prove a thing. Rashee Rice needs to prove several things, while Xavier Worthy is hoping to stay healthy enough to prove something more. Tyquan Thornton literally begged the Chiefs to allow him to prove something more. Nikko Remigio is hanging onto a roster spot despite having never proven—you get it.

The Chiefs need to find out what their young WRs can do

No one should be deluded into thinking that Slayton is a real difference maker. At this stage of his career, he's a reliable set of hands for a team that's ailing from injuries or an unproven talent pool. The latter might somewhat describe the picture for Kansas City, but NFL math doesn't work like it does in elementary school. Addition isn't such a straightforward equation, where Slayton plus need equals signing.

The truth is that the Chiefs need to let the kids play. They can't go another year without taking the training wheels off of Royals. Thornton asked for guarantees of greater target share before re-signing a two-year deal. Giving Allen some immediate reps is far more appealing than chasing Slayton to fill a void that someone else could step into.

Darius Slayton offers no special teams value

The equation would also look very different if Slayton played special teams, but he does not. Remigio is the easiest tooth to wiggle free at the position, but Slayton hasn't returned kicks in the NFL since his rookie campaign in 2019, and even then, he only handled 9 kickoffs and zero punts. He hasn't played on a single coverage unit since Terrell Suggs and LeSean McCoy were on the Chiefs' roster.

It's also true that Slayton was never going to play for the Giants in 2026 without injuries opening a spot. He was a healthy scratch taking up a roster spot with no usefulness anywhere if he wasn't slated for special teams.

The Giants are paying $16M in dead cap money in 2026-27 to set Slayton free, so he's going to come at a cheap price point for any interested teams. His four-year average of 43 catches for 650 yards from 2022-25 has value, but the fit there is only as a veteran target for a younger team trying to find stability (Miami or Tennessee) or dealing with injuries (Indianapolis).

A wide receiver addition makes sense for the Chiefs if that player is a true difference-maker. Slayton would also enter the picture if one of the aforementioned players suffered an injury. But unless Slayton is willing to sit on a practice squad waiting for his number to be called, the Chiefs aren't a realistic fit for the newly released receiver—at least this one in particular.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations