<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arrowhead Addict &#187; salary cap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/tag/salary-cap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Albert Is Not Worth Overpaying For</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2013/05/20/albert-is-not-worth-overpaying-for/</link>
		<comments>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2013/05/20/albert-is-not-worth-overpaying-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Alan Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branden Albert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary cap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=45095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We are smack in the middle of the offseason dead zone and I know we’re all going to be writing a lot of sentences like: “the complex LT Branden Albert situation” or “the team’s dealings with Albert have yet to play out” etc., etc. Sam Mellinger summed it up pretty well: This is an inherently [...]</p><p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2013/05/20/albert-is-not-worth-overpaying-for/">Albert Is Not Worth Overpaying For</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict - A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2013/05/20/albert-is-not-worth-overpaying-for/smokesignals-75/" rel="attachment wp-att-45096"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-45096" title="SmokeSignals" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2013/05/SmokeSignals.jpg" alt="" width="534" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>We are smack in the middle of the offseason dead zone and I know we’re all going to be writing a lot of sentences like: “the complex LT Branden Albert situation” or “the team’s dealings with Albert have yet to play out” etc., etc.</p>
<p>Sam Mellinger <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2013/05/16/4240286/albert-situation-major-test-for.html">summed it up</a> pretty well:</p>
<blockquote><p>This is an inherently combustible situation — a good player who wants to be paid like a great one, working on a one-year contract on the other side of the line from a younger and better player who was just the first overall draft pick. If Albert was uneasy before, now he will be playing with his obvious replacement. If nothing changes, a season like this will be one filled with land mines.</p></blockquote>
<p>I’m going to make this much easier.</p>
<p>Albert, take $6 million a year or we’re letting you walk.</p>
<div id="attachment_45097" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 375px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2013/05/7348788.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-45097" title="NFL: Kansas City Chiefs-OTA" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2013/05/7348788.jpg" alt="" width="365" height="550" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports</p></div>
<p>Don’t get me wrong, I think Albert is a good player and I’m also not as offended as most fans by his “attitude” – i.e. negotiating hard by sitting out of one voluntary camp. I also think that we may have the best set of bookend tackles in the league this year.</p>
<p>Even so, unless the Chiefs have far and away the world’s best offensive line in 2013 and it’s clear that it will be seriously harmed if Albert is not a part of it in 2014, it is simply not worth it to overpay for him.</p>
<p>Let’s be clear about what Albert is for us long-term – a right tackle. It’s a luxury that we have both Albert, an experienced above average left tackle, and 1<sup>st</sup>-round pick Eric Fisher, a versatile, team-first guy that is willing to play right tackle this year. But, beyond this season, we really need to put guys in the positions where they can fully realize their potential. Fisher is a left tackle; that’s what he excelled at in college, that’s what we drafted him to be.</p>
<p>So far, Albert has shown no particular interest in being a right tackle, and I imagine that if push came to shove he would prefer to make left tackle money somewhere else than play for the Chiefs. Left tackles get paid significantly more in this league and that’s the position he wants to play. I don’t blame him for wanting out after this season.</p>
<p>Another variable in all of this is that we’re not entirely sure Albert would play right tackle well once Fisher takes over on the left side. Still, if we want to keep him, we have to offer him a right tackle contract – a generous one, granted – and call it good.</p>
<p>In the thick of the haggling between the Chiefs and the Dolphins over possibly trading Albert came <a href="http://tracking.si.com/2013/04/22/branden-albert-dolphins-trade-contract-demands-chiefs/">a report</a> that Miami was willing to offer Albert the contract he wanted as a part of the deal – a six-year, $53.4 million extension similar to what Texans LT Duane Brown got. That averages to $8.9 million a year, just a bit less than the franchise tag number and would make him the fourth-highest paid player on the team after OLB Tamba Hali, WR Dwayne Bowe and DE Tyson Jackson (if he comes back with that salary in 2014, a questionable prospect).</p>
<p>Simply put, a smart organization doesn’t lock up that kind of money in an RT. With that kind of contract, the Chiefs would be paying out $13 million to $14 million a year on our three tackles. To put that number in perspective, the Chiefs <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/interactive/2013/jan/30/nfl-salaries-team-position#arizona-cardinals,baltimore-ravens">spent $5,873,835</a> on the contacts of all six of the team’s interior offensive linemen. Only six teams spent more than $12 million on their tackles last year – Carolina, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Miami, Washington and Tennessee. Obviously this wasn’t the only factor, but you will notice that only two of those teams had a winning record last year. The two teams in the Super Bowl each had less than $7 million locked up in the tackle position.</p>
<div id="attachment_45098" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 377px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2013/05/5469006.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-45098" title="NFL: Kansas City Chiefs-Training Camp" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2013/05/5469006.jpg" alt="" width="367" height="550" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports</p></div>
<p>So, if Albert wants to stay and be the one of the best-paid right tackles in football, great. He made $4,192,500 last year, so $6 million is a 43% percent pay increase. Not too bad. But, the Chiefs should not offer a dollar more. This saves us more than$3 million this year and we can use that to bring in another good player or two at a different position. Our new #2 WR Donnie Avery is averaging less than $3 million a year. So is NT Dontari Poe, WR Dexter McCluster and OLB Justin Houston</p>
<p>If Albert thinks he can get more on the open market, the Chiefs should allow him to give it a shot. If he does get more, then that contract offer will guarantee that the Chiefs will get at least a 4<sup>th</sup>-round, but probably a 3<sup>rd</sup>-round compensatory pick for him, which is essentially all the team would have gotten for him in the trade to Miami.</p>
<p>Either way, everyone wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2013/05/20/albert-is-not-worth-overpaying-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading At QB: What It Will Cost The Chiefs</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/</link>
		<comments>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Alan Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chiefs Draft Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyle orton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGIII4KC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Griffin III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=34543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We’re now headed into what will be one of the more interesting Chiefs’ offseasons we’ve had in a while. As we’ve already discussed up and down on this site, the biggest question the Chiefs now face is what to do with the quarterback position. Matt Cassel has not looked like a franchise quarterback and we [...]</p><p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/">Upgrading At QB: What It Will Cost The Chiefs</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict - A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/smokesignals-21/" rel="attachment wp-att-34544"><img class="size-full wp-image-34544 aligncenter" title="SmokeSignals" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2012/01/SmokeSignals2.jpg" alt="" width="534" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>We’re now headed into what will be one of the more interesting Chiefs’ offseasons we’ve had in a while.</p>
<p>As we’ve already discussed up and down on this site, the biggest question the Chiefs now face is what to do with the quarterback position. Matt Cassel has not looked like a franchise quarterback and we need a reliable backup 13 months ago.</p>
<p>While the backup market is going to be workable, it is not going to be easy to get a better starter. Another important point is that, while the Chiefs are making strides in certain areas of the team, we still have a lot of holes to fill on the roster and if we go all in toward one of the bigger name players out there, we automatically hurt our ability to improve the rest of the team &#8212; possibly for years.</p>
<p>So here are some of the notable options and what they would likely cost us after the jump. <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/#more-34543" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/22/upgrading-at-qb-what-it-will-cost-the-chiefs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Look At The Chiefs&#8217; AFC West Rivals Going Into Free Agency</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2011/07/24/a-look-at-the-chiefs-afc-west-rivals-going-into-free-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2011/07/24/a-look-at-the-chiefs-afc-west-rivals-going-into-free-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lyle Graversen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas city chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland Raiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=25806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody else sick and tired of talking about the NFL lockout and new CBA agreement? Me too, that’s why I am promising not to use the words “lockout” or “CBA” for the rest of this piece. If I absolutely feel the need to reference them I will simply refer to them as the &#8220;situation”. [...]</p><p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2011/07/24/a-look-at-the-chiefs-afc-west-rivals-going-into-free-agency/">A Look At The Chiefs&#8217; AFC West Rivals Going Into Free Agency</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict - A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2011/07/ArmchairAddict2.jpg"><img src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/130/files/2011/07/ArmchairAddict2.jpg" alt="" title="ArmchairAddict" width="534" height="200" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25807" /></a></p>
<p>Is anybody else sick and tired of talking about the NFL lockout and new CBA agreement?  Me too, that’s why I am promising not to use the words “lockout” or “CBA” for the rest of this piece.  If I absolutely feel the need to reference them I will simply refer to them as the &#8220;situation”.  Otherwise this post will stick to some good old-fashioned NFL offseason talk.  With free agency about to begin most of us have a pretty good grasp of where the Chiefs stand.  If you feel behind, I’ll catch you up.  We have a ton of money to spend, we need to resign Tamba Hali, and we still need a nose tackle (and depending on who you talk to, maybe a RT or WR too).  There, you’re good to go.</p>
<p>The rest of this post will give you a look at where our AFC West rivals stand.  I’ll show you how much cap space they have to work with, what players they have that are free agents, and what their top needs currently are.  The goal of every team is to win the Super Bowl.  The first step to meeting that goal is making the playoffs and the only way you can insure that you do that is to win your division.  Last year the Chiefs were able to do that despite the fact that the Chargers were seen as the “better” team and the Raiders went undefeated in the division.  Then there were the Broncos (insert Tebow/Elway/McDaniels joke of your choice here).  So will the Chiefs be able to maintain their hold on the division now that the other teams will be gunning for them?  Obviously there will be many factors that determine the answer to that question, but how each team handles the upcoming free agent frenzy will have a major impact for sure.</p>
<p>A look at each of the Chiefs’ rivals after the break.</p>
<p> <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2011/07/24/a-look-at-the-chiefs-afc-west-rivals-going-into-free-agency/#more-25806" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2011/07/24/a-look-at-the-chiefs-afc-west-rivals-going-into-free-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stray Arrows: The Law/Surtain Debate</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Best</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas city chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick surtain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ty law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting stuff Zach dug up on the Chiefs cap situation&#8230; Kansas City Chiefs projected 2008 salary cap: $91.657 Possible cap casualties: Greg Wesley: Salary &#8211; 2.800, Cap &#8211; 4.067, Running Bonus &#8211; 400,000 Eddie Kennison: Salary &#8211; 2.500, Cap &#8211; 4.033, Running Bonus &#8211; 1,000,000 Kendrell Bell: Salary &#8211; 3.250, Cap &#8211; 4.650, Running [...]</p><p><a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/">Stray Arrows: The Law/Surtain Debate</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict</a> - <a href="http://arrowheadaddict.com">Arrowhead Addict - A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting stuff Zach dug up on the Chiefs cap situation&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Kansas City Chiefs projected 2008 salary cap</strong>:  <em>$91.657</em></p>
<p><strong>Possible cap casualties</strong>:</p>
<p><em><strong>Greg Wesley</strong>:               Salary &#8211; 2.800,                   Cap &#8211; 4.067,          Running Bonus &#8211; 400,000<br />
</em><br />
<em><strong>Eddie Kennison</strong>:          Salary &#8211; 2.500,                   Cap &#8211; 4.033,          Running Bonus &#8211; 1,000,000<br />
</em><strong><br />
</strong> <em><strong>Kendrell Bell</strong>:               Salary &#8211; 3.250,                   Cap &#8211; 4.650,          Running Bonus &#8211; 0<br />
</em><br />
<em><strong>Ty Law</strong>:                       Salary &#8211; 6.500,                   Cap &#8211; 7.550,           Running Bonus &#8211; 0<br />
</em><strong><br />
</strong> <em><strong>Patrick Surtain</strong>:           Salary &#8211;  5.650,                   Cap &#8211; 8.400,          Running Bonus &#8211; 350,000 </em></p></blockquote>
<p>We believe that we only get the savings of their salaries, not their cap number. So, it actually looks like we would save more by cutting Law than Surtain, because he does not have a running bonus.</p>
<p>I think we should probably cut both, but if it came down to either Law or Surtain, I&#8217;d definitely keep Law. The guys at <a href="http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2007/12/21/ramblings/stat-analysis/5920/" target="_blank">Football Outsiders</a> show just how bad Surtain&#8217;s been this year, revealing that he allows 9.3 yards per pass, seventh worst among all defensive backs. That article also shows that <strong>Asante Samuel</strong> is the free agent cornerback to target, but we&#8217;ll tackle that on another day.</p>
<p>(salary cap hat tip: <a href="http://www.ianwhetstone.com/football/cap.html" target="_blank">ianwhetstone.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 7/19 queries in 0.045 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 727/788 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2013-05-22 01:43:57 by W3 Total Cache -->