Nov 1, 2012; San Diego, CA, USA; Kansas City Chiefs tackle Branden Albert (76) walks to the locker room after the San Diego Chargers beat the Chiefs 31-13 at Qualcomm Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jake Roth-USA TODAY Sports

A Case for Trading Branden Albert

This week has been very interesting in regards to Branden Albert. The Chiefs left tackle signed his franchise tender, but there is no guarantee that means he will suit up for the Chiefs next season.

It was on Monday when Peter King of Sports Illustrated wrote in his weekly Monday Morning QB piece that Branden Albert could be available in a trade, or at least, the Chiefs would “listen to offers for him.” Later, John Clayton from ESPN, while at the owners meeting on Tuesday, tweeted out that the Dolphins could offer a second round pick to Kansas City to land Albert. After all, they did lose out on free agent Jake Long, who finally decided to join the Rams. Then on Thursday, the USA Today reported the Chiefs weren’t just listening to offers for Albert, the team was “seeking out suitors.” While I think it would take more than a second round pick to acquire Albert from the Chiefs, it certainly seems that the Chiefs are using the media effectively to test the market for Albert’s services, and the Dolphins want it known that they could be a potential suitor.

I know Albert is popular among Chiefs fans, and it was considered a victory when the team slapped the franchise tag on him to avoid losing him to free agency. But that is exactly what could happen next season, when his franchise tag expires and we go through this whole song and dance once more. If the Chiefs don’t think that a long-term deal for the right amount of money is possible with Albert, then they might as well get value out of him – besides a compensatory pick – by trading him to a team that is offering draft picks. And as Nick Jacobs from KC Metro Sports pointed out, Miami has the cap space to pay Albert what he wants, and he would fit their offensive scheme quite nicely.

Dealing in hypothetical’s, of course, let me expand upon the implications of trading Albert and let’s use the target team as Miami. The Chiefs sit currently at an estimated $119.8 million against the cap, which is $123 million this season. Considering the addition of rookie contracts, the Chiefs are likely done in the free agent market. That is, unless, they free up Albert’s franchise tag, which sits at a base salary of $9.828 million. With the extra space, the Chiefs, if they so chose, could address the lack of depth at the inside linebacker position. Heck, if Rolando McClain is ever released by the Raiders after they fail to find a trade partner, the team could even bring in that head case to fill Jovan Belcher’s old role. I know that guy has issues, but so did Aqib Talib, and plenty of Chiefs fans were wanting him brought on before free agency officially began. Plus, his talent can’t be denied, but, like I said, these are all hypothetical situations.

If Albert is indeed traded, that means Luke Joeckel can officially begin looking for houses in Kansas City because there would be little doubt of his selection at #1. With Joeckel replacing Albert on the left side, the Chiefs can use the 2nd round pick the Dolphins spent to get Albert, say the 42nd pick in the draft, on Kyle Long, the offensive tackle prospect from Oregon, as the right tackle of the future. Sure, there are a lot of question marks regarding Long, especially since he only had four starts in 2012 and they all came at guard, but Long also has the athleticism and size (6’6” and 313 lbs) to be a tackle in the NFL. Will he be a project? Absolutely; but he’s got the kind of upside that the second round was meant for.

So, by losing Branden Albert, the Chiefs could also potentially be gaining left and right tackles for the future, both of which would come cheaper than the contract Albert assumedly wants. While I think that Albert is a VERY good left tackle, I also think the Chiefs could be better off with the alternative I outlined above, or a similar one. But I want to know your thoughts Chiefs fans! What do you think?

Next Chiefs Game View full schedule »
Thursday, Aug 2828 Aug6:00at Green Bay PackersBuy Tickets

Tags: Kansas City Chiefs

  • Jim Harper

    Funny….this morning I posted a simular stance on today’s morning fix. I agree with you with the exception that I would be inclined to move Stephenson to RT, and Long to understudy. My personal preference would be to sign Vollmer. He is only 28 and at 6’8″ and 320lbs he is huge. He has logged time at both tackle positions. Also his phone has not been ringing so he might be had for a reasonable price. I believe the Chiefs would like to keep Albert, but not at the price he is asking.

    • dominicscarlatti

      We could get a deal on Vollmer, given the way the FA market is shaping up. Menelik or Kyle Long might be interesting early 2nd round OT picks. Hey, wasn’t Kyle’s dad a pretty fair player in the NFL, once upon a time?!!

    • Nathan Bramwell

      Vollmer signed with Pats this morning.

  • Chris Tarrants

    Ok I have made it well known where I stand on the whole Smith vs Joeckel thing but it does appear that I will not get my way in this matter but I will agree with half of your assessment but if he is traded we should sign that big monster that just left the pats! Then we could use the second round pick to draft our linebacker. Could you imagine Teo suiting up next to Johnson, Hali, and Houston? Just nasty and no folks it wouldn’t be hoax we truly would have the most dominant backer corp

    • Danny W

      I’d rather get Vollmer than Long too. If Teo doesn’t make it to the second then Minter could. He’s going to be outstanding as a LB.

  • Danny W

    I like the idea of trading Albert and getting a second but I’m totally not sold on Long. I’d rather they spend the money on Vollmer and pick up Teo or Minter if they fall. Better right tackles than an Long out there.

  • sidibeke

    I think Reid and Dorsey have played it this way. As of now, trading Albert would allow KC 3 positions: LT (if Joeckel turns out to be the slam dunk he is supposed to be…big if but less so at the tackle, not quite as many busts here as say, DE), and then depth from a 2nd round pick and the cap space to add depth at a 3rd position. I like Albert. I loved when he said, “run behind me” two seasons ago. He is a solid to 8 LT and seems like a good guy. It makes the most sense to trade him if we can.

  • Stacy D. Smith

    If the Chiefs aren’t planning on a new contract for Albert, I hope they lower their asking price and trade him. Franchising him again next year makes no sense. It will mean 120% of the $9.8 million he’s getting this year. That’ll be more than $20m guaranteed (over two seasons) with no long-term rights. If you’re going to do that, you might as well get the new deal done. That’s probably 95% of what he would’ve gotten on the new contract anyway. As an example, Duane Brown got $22m from Houston. Get the deal done. Either the trade or his contract.

  • jimfromkcj

    I kinda like Faulk from LSU to play RT. He will probably be available in the 3rd or 4th rd. He is coming off an ACL tear, but should be alright by the start of season. He is 6’5″ 331 lbs and was a really good LT for LSU before the knee injury. I like Long too but I think he might go earl;y in the second, so could be out of our reach. I also like Scwenke or Jones at center in the third. If we keep Albert we could end up with LT Joeckel, LG Albert, OC Asamoah, RG Schwartz, and Faulk at RT. If we trade Albert we might have a line of lt Joeckel, LG Hudson, OC Jones or Schwenke, RG Schwartz and either Faulk or Long at Rt. Either lineup would be a great Offensive line, probably a top 5.