Make Peyton Manning A Kansas City Chief

by Chiefs

Upon their epic stomping of the Packers, and throughout a turbulent 2011 season that has left all of us dispirited at one time or another, it’s incredibly easy to miss one thing: these Kansas City Chiefs are Super Bowl ready in too many phases to ignore.

They have the opportunistic defense with the elite pass rusher.  They have the solid WR receiving corps with some outstanding talent.  They have one of the game’s best rushers in Jamaal Charles, and decent blocking across the offensive line (with one glaring exception).

As always, the Chiefs will need several things this offseason, but as far as I’m concerned, all of them are attainable in your average offseason.  The one area of need the Chiefs have above all others is, of course, the quarterback position.  And with all our other elements in place, landing a primo QB could turn this team into a contender overnight.

As of December 28th, 2011, I am publicly leading the charge on AA and across the Chiefs blogosphere for the franchise to heavily consider going the Joe Montana route.  They should opt to bring in future Hall of Famer Peyton Manning, who will be formerly of the Indianapolis Colts, through any means necessary.  (Assuming, as we must, that his neck checks out.)

It’s a  huge gamble.  But come March 2012, he will command a $28 million roster bonus for the worst team in the NFL.  The Colts, by this point, will have either the #1 or #2 pick, and their QB of choice (either Andrew Luck or Robert Griffin III) will have been zeroed in on this point.  The rebuild will be commencing, and with an untradeable contract, Peyton Manning, once the face of the franchise, will be cut.

Free agency starts right after this cut date, and at that point, Peyton Manning will be commanding a big pay day for an immediate contender.  The Chiefs have more pieces in place than any other team on the market for a Super Bowl run (excluding, perhaps, the Cowboys or Jets, should either team elect to make an incredibly unlikely run for him), and oh yeah, they have more cap space than any other team with Manning in their radar.

Signing Peyton Manning to a contract on Day One of the offseason is an imperative.  It allows him maximum time to build a rapport with all the non-Dwayne Bowe receivers on the team (Bowe will likely be franchised by the team for the summer and be deep in hold-out mode).

It also allows us to bring in a ton of free agents who will literally line the streets outside of One Arrowhead Drive to play with Manning.  My favorite Chiefs-specific free agents I have targeted:

RB Jason Snelling, Falcons
C Chris Myers, Texans
TE David Nelson, Bills
WR Antony Gonzalez, Colts

All of thsese folks are likely to hit the market, and would be a brilliant fit for our Manning-led offense.  They would all come easier and cheaper with Manning under center, as well.

Did I also mention that the guy is a natural locker room leader, is a brilliant contributor to the community, and would guarantee the Chiefs 10 sold-out home games, perhaps restoring Arrowhead to its past glory and netting the team several primetime games throughout the 2012 and 2013 seasons?

Acquiring Manning wouldn’t prevent this team from pursuing its QB of the future, either.  This team will still end up with something like the 12th overall pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.  It’s possible to use that pick on a franchise QB like Landry Jones or Ryan Tannehill who could use the next two to three years to sit out and let Manning do his thing.  By the time Manning’s window closes, we’ll have a supremely understudied QB of the future in the wings.

The stars are aligning for history to repeat itself in Kansas City.  But ask yourself what this sport and what this team is worth to you if not a chance to do something so interesting, so immensely fun, and so incredibly aggressive as landing a Hall of Famer in his twilight years to finish off this roster.

I’m ready for it.  Are you?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Another thing, why aren't we talking about possibly trading up to get someone like Griffin 3??

I'm just so darn sick of watching Cassel and Orton (nice endzone pick against the Raiders, jerk) looking like jokes on Sunday. We have to rely almost COMPLETELY on our defense... what do they have to play for other than their salary!? I wouldn't want to take the field knowing I'm about three to four minutes away from having to buckle up again because we had ANOTHER three and out or because we threw an INT. It's old and it's tired. If we get Manning, I'd shout from the rooftops that we've done something smart.... just really gets old saying next year, every year. Cute game against the Bills, Cassel... really you just outshone yourself. And your time in KC needs to come to a close. Thank you.

@pilotsley Sadly, I wouldn't expect any more out of Manning (3 neck surgeries in 19 months, one year away from NFL, aging, over-the-hill) than an Orton or Cassel. Please don't be that Chiefs fan who thinks signing a washed-up QB will 'take us all the way'.

@mikhel@pilotsley Before Manning got hurt he was still the best quarterback in the league. The whole team deteriorated around him as evidenced by their horrendous play once he was out. I don't know if he'll ever be healthy enough to play again, that remains to be seen. But if he comes back anywhere near what he was he would be a huge improvement over what we currently have.

Gosh no, but I know that Orton and Cassel won't "take us all the way" either. Cassel couldn't even get us past round one at home last year. I just really am anti-Cassel and Orton. Have been since we paid him out the tail (Cassel). I understand that he got the Patriots to the playoffs, but I could get them to the playoffs and I'm a girl. I just want Cassel out. Nothing against the guy personally, just as a fan, it's painful to watch us waste money on him. And a LOT of it.

@pilotsley I'm with you on Cassel. To me Orton looked a lot better than Cassel though I don't think Orton is our long term answer either,(or Peyton for that matter). If healthy, a big IF, I think Manning could get us there, Super Bowl, if we added a RT and a quality interior lineman. Then keep looking for our long term answer. I just don't think we have any shot at Luck or RG3 and the rest of the draft looks pretty weak.

Montana didn't get us to the Bowl playing with one of the best Chief's squads in our history... I have my doubts Manning would do better. 2 or 3 years ago I would've loved to get Manning but getting an elite QB past his prime hasn't worked before. If we could get over our fear of drafting 1st round QBs it would help more. We got burned once and then gave up... where has that gotten us.

You made the best case for getting Peyton yet. To your credit you did mention the risk factor. Him being an aging injury prone flop would be the worst case. If he worked out well though it could be awesome. It would be a shame to waste the prime years of Charles and all the young defensive studs by waiting on a rookie to be ready so it makes some sense to bring him in. You also mentioned Landry Jones. I'm as much of an OU fan as I am a KC fan so I've seen every ball this kid has thrown and he's the most accurate and pro-ready qb in college football with all due respect to Griffin and Luck. That could be an ideal situation if they drafted him to learn behind Manning for a season or two. Maybe I'll get on board the Peyton express with you. My gut tells me he could be leaning toward retirement though. Regardless of what happens I'm ready for a great season without ridiculous injuries and coaching changes. Those of us who bleed red and gold need some stability and greatness for a change.

would we give four to five first round draft picks to land........... Tom Brady? and then get his buddy mcd to coordinate the offense.

Neither Brady or Manning is worth 4 first round picks. The only way you justify that price is a rookie who could possibly be a franchise guy for 10-15 years.. Maybe. Idk if I'd pull the trigger even then.... And McD is an idiot.

@Erich Brady, like Manning, could have won us a SB . . . 3-5 years ago. I hope to hell we don't trade/spend our future on an aging QB who's best days are behind him. Bite the bullet and draft/sign a young QB and give him an entire offseason & preseason to see whether he is good enough to start. If not, then play Cassel/Orton another year. With our D and our returning players, we should easily win this horrible division.

First off I don't believe Manning will be going anywhere. With the new collective bargain in effect, even the #1 pick no longer costs you the farm. They can afford both for a couple of years and Luck is the type of player that would love to learn from Manning and then hit the ground running when Peyton retires. Irsay has shown his loyalty over and over to Manning and he would not cut him unless Peyton could no longer play and even then Peyton would retire before that happened. He is not the kind of guy that would stay too long.. The Colts are getting close to losing that pick anyway. With the Colts possibly beating the Jags and a Ram loss to the 49'ers then the Rams would get the first pick which they would ransom to the highest bidder. Then what the Chiefs NEED to do is pay them WHATEVER the Rams want and get either one. I think I would personally prefer RGIII but Luck would do as well. We can pick up a tackle later. Besides which I definitely do not want Manning to come in here for a couple of years and then retire as a Colt when he goes into the Hall.

Yes, the #1 pick no longer costs the farm but, Manning has gone on record saying that if the Colts draft Luck then Manning wants Luck to start. That would mean paying Manning $35 million to ride the bench, assuming Manning sticks to his word. To avoid the whole mess, if they are going to draft Luck they need to release Manning. I do support your opinion that the Chiefs should pay the picks to the Rams (although I would choose Luck). 3 1st round picks for a franchise QB for 10-15 years is worth it. A good time to lose the picks too since the free agent class is looking to be pretty good. @Big Jim

@Ehud@Big Jim To ride the bench or to train the rookie? Is Manning a Brady or a Favre I wonder.

I wake in the morning with a smile on my face remembering this exact scenario in my dream the night before. Let it be.

[...] one thing: these Kansas City Chiefs are Super Bowl ready in too many phases to … Read more on Arrowhead Addict (function() {var s = document.createElement('SCRIPT'), s1 = [...]

"By the time Manning’s window closes, we’ll have a supremely understudied QB of the future in the wings." If this was possible the current Colt's QB (Curtis Painter) would be way better than he is. He has been learning behind Manning for 3 years. Rumor has it, Manning took all of the snaps in every practices and that resulted in the backup QB being vastly unprepared for when he was needed. Also Manning will retire before he allowed himself to be traded. I would rather have Cassel & Orten battling for the Quarterback position. If one goes down the other could step in with minimal team disruption. Could we afford Manning and a reasonable backup. Manning would consume most of the cap space and limit the free agents we could actually afford. To me this would be a desperate move mortgaging the future for today. We are a team on the rise, we are not that desperate yet. Are we??? I remember how Montana scared me every time he fell down and how my hart would stop when they zoomed in on his elbow. Manning is now that one great quarterback who could go down for the season on any hit he takes. I don't know if i want to go through that again.

@kcintx First thing's first: Manning will not be traded, because he cannot be traded. Nobody is suggesting that he is tradeable. I certainly wasn't. It's not Peyton's job to coach up the backups behind him. It's the backups job. Curtis Painter is just one of the countless awful players the Colts have selected in the past three or four years. He is awful, and that terrible drafting is the reason why the Colts are the worst team in football without Manning. The Polian magic has worn off. Acquiring players like Manning at this point is not desperation. We've drafted so well the past four years (2009 excluded), that we have the core we need. Now we just need to add a couple parts via free agency. This is how the best teams in the NFL are built and maintained. It just so happens our position is QB. If that's what this team is missing, I suggest we invest very, very heavily in solving it. Go with the best, or go all the way.

@Andrew Crocker@kcintx I understand the need at QB. But I still think Manning would be a desperate move. If we have to pay anywhere close to the $ Manning expects to make. We should go after a younger proven QB. Rogers, Big Ben, Breeze, Schaub. Any of them could be acquired for what Manning would cost. All I'm saying is used with wear is better that old and busted. Manning is definitely busted. It was his neck and he is a QB in the NFL. How long was PH back in the game? need I say more.

@kcintx@Andrew Crocker PH is a running back. Peyton is a QB, and based upon our blocking, shouldn't have to pick himself up off the turf too much (he has a quicker release than Cassel you might know). The flip side of this argument is: we don't have a QB on the roster right now to take us deep into the playoffs and likely won't be able to get one in the draft that can start day one. We have a great corps, but in a few years, some of those players might be at the end of their primes (I'm thinking Johnson in particular). Let's not be has beens that never were because we were too scared to take a chance on a QB.

@kcintx@Andrew Crocker Actually, no. Rodgers, Big Ben, Brees, Schaub... none of these guys can be acquired. Their teams will not release them or trade them. If Manning is a free agent, that is a once-every-few-years opportunity to scoop up a Super Bowl caliber QB. We have the team for it. We have the money for it. We have the opportunity for it. Let's do this thing.

@sidibeke @kcintx @Andrew Crocker Quick release is worthless if we don't have speed off the line at WR. Manning' modality makes Cassel look like a Olympic runner.

@sidibeke @Andrew Crocker The quick release is good but who do we have at WR that can get open quickly?

@kcintx@Andrew Really? Who do we have at WR? And the quick release was written as a jab at Cassel.

@kcintx@sidibeke@Andrew Our WR's can get open just fine. It's Cassel that either never saw them or since he doesn't have a quick release couldn't get the ball to them while that short window as open. Our receivers would look a whole lot better with Manning throwing to them. There's absolutely no doubt about that.

@calchiefsfan@kcintx@sidibeke@Andrew Actiually they do not get open just fine. Our WRs are big targets with good hands (except for Bowe who may play with half a mind). None can stretch the field but can run after the catch. Sorry but that is why Pioli/whomever chose to sign that type.

@tm1946 @calchiefsfan @sidibeke @Andrew Our receivers only run Receiver screens close to the line. Verry seldom do they even try to run a slant or out. They would run more slants and outs if they had the speed off the line. We all know how well the receiver screens are working for us. Hell we run the receiver screens so often a think a delayed slant would probably go to the house.

@kcintx@Andrew Crocker I have to say I doubt any of them can be acquired at all except possibly Schaub and even he's not close to a sure bet.

@kcintx I think you give Cassel and Orton too much credit. Yes, if one were to get hurt, the other could step in with minimal team disruption. That's because both are equally underwhelming. I seriously doubt both will be on the roster next season. Orton wants to start. He'll demand a trade if he isn't the starter, and I'm not sure he'll even sign an extension if he isn't assured he'll get the starting spot (or if he will sign an extention even if he is. He didn't want to come to KC in the first place). Cassel probably has similar feelings. Manning or not, we need a starting QB next season that isn't Cassel or Orton. Unfortunately, we will most likely end up with one or the other.

@Erich I personally don't want to keep Orton or Cassel. Just saying I would prefer to have them 2 over Manning at this point in Manning's career. We do need a real qb but not one for only a short run.

@kcintx I agree. Which is why I'm only on board with this Idea if we draft a QB early this off season. A stop gap is okay if you're prepared for when it's run its coarse.

@Erich@kcintx Interesting but you are aware Orton has no ties to the Chiefs after the season ends. NO CONTRACT. He is a free agent, FREE AGENT. I though after all you posts on the subject about QB you knew that.

@tm1946 @Erich Yes Orton could go and probably should. But he is currently on the Chiefs roster so we can speak with him or his agent directly. That is way more of an advantage than we have in acquiring Manning. Was it Eli or Paton who was drafted by the Chargers and refused to play for them? I’m thinking Paton will have a big say in, where when and whom he is traded to.

So if we end up getting Peyton because we have so much money left under the cap and he leads us to the promised land then will Hunt still be a tightwad and Pioli a clown??

@KC MikeG I would guess those perceptions would change. Call it a hunch.

@KC MikeG Will they both be clowns if we pay him a mint and he's off the field more than on or he's past his time? He wasn't exactly his stellar self last season.

Absolutely and for the record I don't think Peyton is the right choice for us because if he is healthy there's no way Indy lets him go and if he's not then we don't want their damaged goods.

@KC MikeG ;Will everyone please read the above. Mike, in one long sentence, said every thing you need to evaluate for Manning and him coming to the Chiefs.

Hey Crock you really got everyone going on this post. Awesome job!

I think this thread is just evidence that everybody is ready for something truly dramatic to happen, if nothing else just to cleanse ourselves of this incredibly frustrating season. But thanks, bro. ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??

@Andrew Crocker AbsolutelyI I love this.

I was against Manning the first time you mentioned it, Crock. Very, very against it. This time you were too presuasive. I may be convinced. IF the stars do align the way you described I would be all for it. If he is cut and KC still drafts a high round QB this off season I'm cool with it. If it requires a trade or if Pioli would decide that made grabbing a QB wasn't necessary then it's a horrible move IMO.

@Erich No team will trade for Manning. He has an untradeable contract.

There were an awful lot of "ifs" in there

I want our OWN legend, not Indy's. Nothing against Peyton.. gotta love the laser-rocket arm and all. He will still have some years left in him for sure, and could be great and win some games with the Chiefs. But after watching so many other teams' QB's come in here, I want our OWN legend!! Montana, Grbac, Bono, Gannon, Cassel, even the beloved Trent Green... all from outside. What Montana is to SF, Elway is to the donkeys, Marino to the Fins, Staubach to the Cowchips.... Lenny to us, though it was so very long ago. It is time I agree, with so many of the pieces in place, for a franchise QB. But to sustain, as Brady and the Pats or Peyton and the Colts have done, we must not sign him - especially at the price it will take to get him. We must find our own legend!!

I agree that we must find our own legend, but until he comes along I can certainly live with Manning. @huckdaddy

@Ehud True, he would be a great tutor to whoever is next in line, like he was to, say, Curtis Painter (sorry for the sarcasm man). He will demand such a high price that Mr. tightwad Clark Hunt will then do something redonkilous like not signing Carr or Bowe or both, or trade one of our core players away, which I am NOT ok with. Don't get me wrong, I think he could win some games with us, but I am looking more in the dynasty direction... not a couple of good seasons.

It's not Peyton's job to tutor the next QB, although I hope he would. As far as the price goes, it is going to be harder for tightwad Hunt to show up due to the new CBA rules. Not to mention, the addition of Manning would help ticket sales. I've said it before but, getting Peyton is only one step. I see getting a Draft Day 1 or Day 2 QB pick to groom behind Manning (Tannehill is my current thought). I understand the need to maintain ownership of a franchise QB. @huckdaddy

For what it's worth, picking up Manning doesn't cost the Chiefs any draft picks, this year or next. You want to draft the QB of the future? You still can.

@huckdaddy@Ehud And Painter was a 6th round draft pick. Manning would be tutoring a 1st rounder with the Chiefs.