Is The “Franchise QB” Window Closed For Matt Cassel And Kyle Orton?

by Armchair Addict

Confession: I wrote this post on December 21st before embarking on my families’ 6 Christmas celebrations in 7 days multi-state road trip extravaganza. Therefore, if Kyle Orton did anything to raise or lower his stock drastically vs. the Raiders you’ll understand why it isn’t mentioned in the post. Happy Hollidays!

As I mentioned in my piece last week, I think the most vital and interesting dilemma facing the Chiefs going into next season has got to be what they do with the QB position. Yes, the head coach is important, but as I stated a couple weeks ago, in today’s NFL it’s really all about scoring points and throwing the football is the easiest way to do that.

I have been on the “draft a franchise QB” bandwagon for a while now. The Chiefs haven’t made a serious investment in a QB draft pick since Todd Blackledge. There is a strong class of QBs in this year’s draft so if the Chiefs wanted to go get one, they could. The real question is wether or not Scott Pioli WILL do it. Most people, despite how much they wish he would, don’t seem to think that he will.

So for the sake of this piece, let’s pretend Pioli has gone on the record as saying the Chiefs WILL NOT be drafting a QB in the early rounds of this draft. Also, for arguments sake, let’s say that the Colts have decided to keep Manning around for another season, so he is off the table. Finally, let’s assume that whomever is the new coach doesn’t want to go into the season with the unproven Ricky Stanzi as a possible starter.

That leaves us, in all likelihood, with a choice between Matt Cassel and Kyle Orton.

Now I understand that most, not all, but most are ready to move on from Matt Cassel (myself included). Romeo Crennel, when talking about the switch from Tyler Palko to Kyle Orton, talked about how in the NFL sometimes if a guy isn’t getting it done you have to try starting a new guy even if you don’t know how it will go simply to see if it will be any better. I agree, after all, if the current guy wasn’t good, what do you have to lose? I think that is where most of us are with Cassel and Orton. We think Orton looks better, but frankly we don’t know. We’re just ready to try something new because we don’t feel like Cassel was getting the job done.

Now, Orton and Cassel’s career numbers are VERY similar. So statistically speaking, Orton isn’t really an upgrade. The real question is can either of these QBs become something more than what we’ve seen so far in their careers? Has the book already been written on Cassel and Orton? Has their window to develop into a Super Bowl caliber QB already closed?

I’ll try to find an answer after the break.

Both Matt Cassel and Kyle Orton have four seasons under their belt where they were the team’s main starter. Cassel had one with NE and then three in KC ,and Orton had two with both the Bears and Broncos. As I stated before, their stats are eerily similar. In those four seasons, here are their stats.

Cassel: 1,020 of 1,728 (59.0%) for 11,446 yards (6.6 YPA) with 74 TDs and 43 INTs

Orton: 1,091 of 1,872 (58.3%) for 12,296 yards (6.6 YPA) with 68 TDs and 46 INTs

Even the records of their teams in those seasons are deadlocked (FYI, I didn’t take the time to factor out games during those seasons when they weren’t able to start). With Orton’s Bears and Broncos going 32-32 in those four seasons and Cassel’s Patriots and Chiefs teams going 31-31 (add a W or L for yesterday’s game) in his four seasons.

So the numbers say it’s a toss up. The Chiefs have more invested in Cassel, but most of us would rather see what Orton can do since we’ve seen Cassel for the better part of three seasons already.

Regardless, if the Chiefs want to win the Super Bowl and plan on either of these guys being the QB to do it they would need them to up their game. The question is, can that be done? Or, after four seasons as a starting QB, are these guys already defined in terms of what they are capable of?

What I’d like to do is take a look at a couple of other NFL QBs to see if they were defined by their stats in their first four seasons as starters in the NFL. I’ll leave their names out for now to avoid any bias. Here are the stats for QB “A” and “B” for their first four seasons as a starter.

QB “A” – 987 of 1,805 (54.7%) for 11,385 yards (6.3 YPA) with 77 TDs and 64 INTs

QB “B” – 1,110 of 1,782 (62.3%) for 12,127 yards (6.8 YPA) with 79 TDs and 53 INTs

Now, take a moment and really compare these two QBs to Cassel and Orton. If you had to rank these two QBs along with Cassel and Orton in terms of their numbers over four seasons as a starter. I think you would have to go:

QB “B”
Cassel and Orton (tie)
QB “A”

QB “B” has the best completion percentage and YPA as well as the most TD passes. Both Cassel and Orton are between the two in both completion percentage and YPA with less TD passes but also less INTs then both of our mystery QBs.

So who are these test subjects?

QB “A” is Eli Manning. Manning didn’t set the world on fire right out of the gate. Those numbers even include the 2007 season when the Giants won the Super Bowl. This season Eli has already thrown for well over 4,000 yards with a completion percentage of over 60% and a YPA over 8. So he seems to have overcome his slow start.

QB “B” is Drew Brees. His first four seasons as a starter were with San Diego. Although his numbers are slightly better than Cassel and Orton, it wasn’t until he got a change of scenery in New Orleans that his numbers and career took off. This season Brees will become the new record holder for passing yards in a season and has thrown for at least 4,300 yards and 30 TDs in each of his last four seasons.

So, if you just go by the numbers (I know, numbers don’t tell the whole story), it’s possible that either Cassel or Orton could still have an upside somewhere between Eli and Brees. I think we’d all take that. Now, to be fair, both Cassel and Orton are a little older then either Eli or Brees. Eli and Brees were both 27 when they began their 5th season as a starting QB. Next season Cassel will be 30 and Orton will be 29.

Look, I’m not saying that either of these two will become perennial Pro Bowl QBs that can lead the Chiefs to a Super Bowl. I would still like to draft a QB in the first round. Unfortunately, I don’t know if that is likely to happen. If I was a betting man, I’d put money on the Chiefs starting QB next year being either Cassel or Orton. So I think Chiefs fans need to at least prepare themselves for that.

So what do you think? Are either (or both) of these QBs capable of continuing to develop into something more then what they are now? Could Cassel be the next Eli Manning who just needed a lot of time to develop into a top tier QB? Could Kyle Orton be like Drew Brees (they both went to Purdue!) in that he just needed a change of scenery and the right system around him for his career to take off? Or are these guys just mediocre starting QBs who will never take the next step?

That is the most important question for GM Scott Pioli to figure out before next season.

I’d love to hear your thoughts.

As always, thanks for reading and GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Although their numbers are near the same the last 4 years, you didnt point out the talent around these quarterbacks. Orton in Chicago had nothing, zero, squat for receivers...he had a young Matt Forte...Devin Hester...not exactly Randy Moss and Wes Welker...oh wait that's what Cassel had and arguably one of the greatest QB friendly systems ever orchestrated. Brady is great and deserves a lot of credit, but seeing Cassel throw up Brady numbers and going 10-5 as a stater in NE with splinters in his ass convinces me that system can make a guy look really good. Orton had Brandon Lloyd...decent numbers...a bad coach....bad defense....no running game....Cassel was given plenty of opportunity to shine with talent around him but facts are facts....he doesn't have a strong arm....his long ball is not accurate...he stares down receivers....his instincts are average....he is an average QB. We need that in KC....as our back up. Orton isn't the answer, but he's a more viable solution as a starter. Surround Orton with a healthy team and I think he's miles ahead of Cassel....unfortunately I don't think he wants to be here. We have the money to pay both....I think Orton, Cassel, & Stanzi is a nice depth chart for the next 3 years while we decide to either develop Stanzi or bring "The" guy in. Orton Last 37 Games 764/1262 60.5% 9033 yds 7.2 YPA 11.8 YPR 50td 30int 6 fumbles Cassel Last 39 Games 693/1212 57.2% 7753 yds 6.4 YPA 11.2 YPR 53td 32int 11 fumbles Where the stats look similar that talent wasn't...Orton statistically is a better QB than Cassel with less talent around him. Orton has clearly outperformed Cassel in the last 3 seasons. I loves Cassel leadership and command...but that doesn't get it done in todays NFL. Orton can be our Trent Green with the ridiculous talent we have onb this team. We need O-line help and a bruiser back to complete this offense. Hire Norv as OC...bring in a guy to be an extension of Romeos defense hand and let Romeo run the team....not only do I think we win the West next year...we contend for the SB barring more injury catastrophes. Go Chiefs

I agree that O-line help is needed. The bruiser back I think we can get in FA (Ray Rice, Matt Forte, Peyton Hillis, Mike Tolbert, and Michael Bush are just a few names in this FA class). With no names creating buzz around the league to take over the coaching vacancies, I would look for Norv Turner to fill one of those vacancies as head coach. Becoming an OC would be a step back that I don't see him making. @Tribalrage

@Ehud Rice and Forte are gonna be off the table...I do not think Hillis, Bush or Tolbert want to be the #2 guy to Jones *cough I mean Charles...although it would be nice. Norv to be HC elsewhere? Maybe...but what situation would he really want to be in....I think OC would be a step back for him but KC would be the best situation considering the talent....2 years with us and he can get the job he wants rather than the job that's only offered. He took over a good SD team after Marty...I don't think he wants to live the Redskins senario over again...

Exactly, word for word, my own thoughts. Orton has done at least as well, with far less talent around him. Cassel has phenomenal leadership, but a weak arm and fewer skills. The problem is Pioli likes Cassel, and Orton likes Chicago. Orton is clearly the better option, with more upside. Unfortunately, I suspect we're going to let him gannon, and we're going to grbac Cassel. @Tribalrage

I think they both still have room to grow. I thought before he got hurt Cassel seemed to be developing a better presence in the pocket and was making smarter decisions but running for his lief those last few games he couldn't show much. There is a question mark there though. Just how bad is that injury? They've been very hush hush about the specifics. It it possible his throwing hand might never be the same? Either way you slice it I'd bet money we see one of the two starting in 2012. I personally would like it if they competed for the spot but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.

It will b Cassel @ QB. Cassel has 3 yrs left on his contract and Orton is a free agent. Orton will want more money than chiefs will want to pay. Carr, Bowe, Belcher, are free agents. Thank god weigman is retiring, he shud take Lilja wit him! Richardson GONE!!! K.Gegg will b 136 yrs old lol! Charles & Berry wont b able to play full time just for next yr. So we hav more pressing needs than signing Orton or trading away waaaaay too many draft picks to get RG3 or Luck!

Kyle Orton was in the top ten in most of the NFL passing stats and was leading the league in passing yards for most of the season before getting injured . Although the career numbers are similar mostly because Orton started as a rookie the fact is that Orton has played at a higher level individually than Cassel while Cassel has been surrounded by the better talent.

I keep reading about how we should trade up in the draft to get a franchise, elite quarterback this year. What always is suggested is we package future draft picks but in reality we would have to package a combination of players and draft picks to make it attractive for any team to deal with us. Teams like future draft picks no doubt, but they also want players that address current needs and can make an impact. So the question is, which players do we package to make a deal that would get us into position to make a trade for a player like Luck? Dwayne Bowe? Derrick Johnson? Tamba Hali? Moeaki? Charles? I mean it's not like we would get much interest in a package including Richardson or Piscatelli. So what are the Chiefs able to package together to make a play for Luck? Your thoughts?

Based on an article by Jason LaCanfora over at NFL.com the GMs he has talked to currently place the worth of the #1 pick at 3 1st round picks as well as1 or 2 mid-round picks. I figure that is probably about right. I think the pick will only be open for trades if it is St. Louis who has the pick. If Indy does then they keep it and go Luck. Assuming it is St. Louis, I might be open to dealing Dwayne Bowe to them with some draft picks. Of course we would have to re-sign him first. St Louis could use a WR and we have the cash in free agency to get someone like Reggie Wayne. However, that is just one scenario. I'm sure having to give a player up is not required, Draft picks should be enough. Where a player trade could come into play is that it would help us beat out a team like Cleveland who has an extra first rounder this year for the #1 pick.@BluMax

I don't think the Chiefs have given up on Cassel yet, he's one year out of a pro bowl and though the team struggled with him, they struggled a lot more once he went down. Between the two I'm also leaning towards Orton, I love Cassel's attitude and leadership but I just don't see the elite QB developing out of him. Don't think there is anyway we're trading up for luck, no one is going to trade out of #1 unless it's a huge deal. Weeden I haven't seen play enough to make an accurate determination on him, RG3 is exciting not sure the chiefs are the best fit for them though. If we're not using our first on a QB (which I doubt we are) I think we should look at Kellen Moore from Boise, he doesn't have the typical size but he's very very smart has a pretty good arm and he's a winner, he's going to be a steal in this draft in my opinion.

Pick your poison pretty much. Journeyman A or JourneymanB. Are either of them franchise? Short answer, NO

I personally would rather have Orton than Cassel next year. When watching the Raiders game someone commented that Orton was putting up "Cassel-esque" numbers. People agreed, although, some pointed out that Orton (just a month with the Chiefs) was putting up Cassel (Year 3) numbers. I figure if he actually had an offseason to get to know his offense he would do better. I thank Matt Cassel for his service. I appreciate what he did for us, but unless he is willing to adjust his contract and become a backup, I think his time at Arrowhead should probably come to a close. As far as the franchise QB bandwagon goes, I'm with you Lyle. In fact, I think, at this point in the NFL a Franchise QB is a must for consistent winning and especially if you want a Super Bowl ring. That's why, if I were the GM of the Chiefs, I would seriously consider trading all the way to the #1 spot and take Andrew Luck. Is it a gamble? Yes. Will my job forever be linked to that pick? Yes. If it fails I will lose my job but, if it works then I have job security for 10 years. If the analysts, scouts, and experts are to be believed, Luck is as close to a sure franchise QB to come a long in a while. The Chiefs should go for it and hopefully be set at QB for the next 10-15 years. Yes, it will cost a lot. I'm talking (approximately): 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round in 2012, 1st and 2nd in 2013, and a 2nd in 2014. But in this day and age in the NFL an elite franchise QB (which they say Luck could be) is a rare commodity. This is a pretty good time to take this chance, too. A coaching change is occurring for the Chiefs, the new CBA rules will require the Chiefs to spend a lot of money in Free Agency, and the Free Agent market this year is looking to be one of the best in a while. The lack of draft picks could be made up by being aggressive and/or smart in Free Agency. Yes it is a risk but, one I might take. Provided, of course, trading up to get Luck is even possible. Something that seems more possible if it is the Rams at the top rather than the Colts. The other option I've been tossing around is Texas A&M QB Ryan Tannehill in the 2nd or so round. He is very raw but, hopefully Jim Zorn could mold him into a great QB. However it gets done, the Chiefs need a franchise QB.

@Ehud I am onboard the Weeden bandwagon. I happen to think he is more ready than Luck. Fiesta Bowl is coming up Jan 2nd and luck and Weeden will be going head to head and we will be able to judge for ourselves who is the most mature and ready QB. I have watched him go head to head with Jones and Griffin and i think he is more ready than either one of them. Tannehill was also pretty much beaten badly by Weeden, but I didn'y see that game. Am looking forward to the game.

I have trouble getting on the bandwagon of a 29 year old rookie QB. Perhaps as a Day 3 pick but not sooner than that. Weeden should be more pro-ready. Unlike the other QBs he is already a full grown man. However, that also means he has most likely hit his physical peak unlike the other potential QBs. Just to clarify, I'm not saying you're wrong in liking him. I'm just telling you why I, as a GM, would have concerns about him.@jimfromkc

Pioli is all about the safe approach and his own comfort zone. Not sure he has any idea what "taking a chance" means. Heck throw in "due diligence" also, if it is not tied to NE, forget it. If Orton can put together a good game, win or lose, I doubt he boards the flight back to KC. He hopes another NFL team will give him a shot at starting. Free agent, means never having to sign with the Chiefs. Cassel is the man, Pioli says so and that is good enough for Hunt. QB of the future, if there exists such a thing, is probably a Soph or Jr in college, maybe a freshman, figure Pioli will be gone by them.

Nice piece Lyle. I suspect the Chiefs will roll with either Cassel or Orton starting next year. They are who they are, middle of the road quarterbacks. It would not shock me if the Chiefs invest another mid-round draft pick on a quarterback to compete with Stanzi as the QB of the future.

Tribalrage 57 pts

Although their numbers are near the same the last 4 years, you didnt point out the talent around these quarterbacks. Orton in Chicago had nothing, zero, squat for receivers...he had a young Matt Forte...Devin Hester...not exactly Randy Moss and Wes Welker...oh wait that's what Cassel had and arguably one of the greatest QB friendly systems ever orchestrated. Brady is great and deserves a lot of credit, but seeing Cassel throw up Brady numbers and going 10-5 as a stater in NE with splinters in his ass convinces me that system can make a guy look really good. Orton had Brandon Lloyd...decent numbers...a bad coach....bad defense....no running game....Cassel was given plenty of opportunity to shine with talent around him but facts are facts....he doesn't have a strong arm....his long ball is not accurate...he stares down receivers....his instincts are average....he is an average QB. We need that in KC....as our back up. Orton isn't the answer, but he's a more viable solution as a starter. Surround Orton with a healthy team and I think he's miles ahead of Cassel....unfortunately I don't think he wants to be here. We have the money to pay both....I think Orton, Cassel, & Stanzi is a nice depth chart for the next 3 years while we decide to either develop Stanzi or bring "The" guy in.

Orton Last 37 Games 764/1262 60.5% 9033 yds 7.2 YPA 11.8 YPR 50td 30int 6 fumbles

Cassel Last 39 Games 693/1212 57.2% 7753 yds 6.4 YPA 11.2 YPR 53td 32int 11 fumbles

Where the stats look similar that talent wasn't...Orton statistically is a better QB than Cassel with less talent around him. Orton has clearly outperformed Cassel in the last 3 seasons. I loves Cassel leadership and command...but that doesn't get it done in todays NFL. Orton can be our Trent Green with the ridiculous talent we have onb this team. We need O-line help and a bruiser back to complete this offense.

Hire Norv as OC...bring in a guy to be an extension of Romeos defense hand and let Romeo run the team....not only do I think we win the West next year...we contend for the SB barring more injury catastrophes.

Go Chiefs

Ehud 147 pts

I agree that O-line help is needed. The bruiser back I think we can get in FA (Ray Rice, Matt Forte, Peyton Hillis, Mike Tolbert, and Michael Bush are just a few names in this FA class).

With no names creating buzz around the league to take over the coaching vacancies, I would look for Norv Turner to fill one of those vacancies as head coach. Becoming an OC would be a step back that I don't see him making. Tribalrage

Tribalrage 57 pts

Ehud Rice and Forte are gonna be off the table...I do not think Hillis, Bush or Tolbert want to be the #2 guy to Jones *cough I mean Charles...although it would be nice. Norv to be HC elsewhere? Maybe...but what situation would he really want to be in....I think OC would be a step back for him but KC would be the best situation considering the talent....2 years with us and he can get the job he wants rather than the job that's only offered. He took over a good SD team after Marty...I don't think he wants to live the Redskins senario over again...

flyingcabbage 13 pts

Exactly, word for word, my own thoughts. Orton has done at least as well, with far less talent around him. Cassel has phenomenal leadership, but a weak arm and fewer skills. The problem is Pioli likes Cassel, and Orton likes Chicago.

Orton is clearly the better option, with more upside. Unfortunately, I suspect we're going to let him gannon, and we're going to grbac Cassel.

Tribalrage

kcfanintx 72 pts

I think they both still have room to grow. I thought before he got hurt Cassel seemed to be developing a better presence in the pocket and was making smarter decisions but running for his lief those last few games he couldn't show much.

There is a question mark there though. Just how bad is that injury? They've been very hush hush about the specifics. It it possible his throwing hand might never be the same?

Either way you slice it I'd bet money we see one of the two starting in 2012. I personally would like it if they competed for the spot but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.

MicahStephenson 78 pts

It will b Cassel @ QB. Cassel has 3 yrs left on his contract and Orton is a free agent. Orton will want more money than chiefs will want to pay. Carr, Bowe, Belcher, are free agents. Thank god weigman is retiring, he shud take Lilja wit him! Richardson GONE!!! K.Gegg will b 136 yrs old lol! Charles & Berry wont b able to play full time just for next yr. So we hav more pressing needs than signing Orton or trading away waaaaay too many draft picks to get RG3 or Luck!

BigKen472 8 pts

Kyle Orton was in the top ten in most of the NFL passing stats and was leading the league in passing yards for most of the season before getting injured . Although the career numbers are similar mostly because Orton started as a rookie the fact is that Orton has played at a higher level individually than Cassel while Cassel has been surrounded by the better talent.

BluMax 135 pts

I keep reading about how we should trade up in the draft to get a franchise, elite quarterback this year. What always is suggested is we package future draft picks but in reality we would have to package a combination of players and draft picks to make it attractive for any team to deal with us. Teams like future draft picks no doubt, but they also want players that address current needs and can make an impact.

So the question is, which players do we package to make a deal that would get us into position to make a trade for a player like Luck?

Dwayne Bowe? Derrick Johnson? Tamba Hali? Moeaki? Charles? I mean it's not like we would get much interest in a package including Richardson or Piscatelli. So what are the Chiefs able to package together to make a play for Luck? Your thoughts?

Ehud 147 pts

Based on an article by Jason LaCanfora over at NFL.com the GMs he has talked to currently place the worth of the #1 pick at 3 1st round picks as well as1 or 2 mid-round picks. I figure that is probably about right. I think the pick will only be open for trades if it is St. Louis who has the pick. If Indy does then they keep it and go Luck. Assuming it is St. Louis, I might be open to dealing Dwayne Bowe to them with some draft picks. Of course we would have to re-sign him first. St Louis could use a WR and we have the cash in free agency to get someone like Reggie Wayne. However, that is just one scenario. I'm sure having to give a player up is not required, Draft picks should be enough.

Where a player trade could come into play is that it would help us beat out a team like Cleveland who has an extra first rounder this year for the #1 pick.BluMax

Krans 8 pts

I don't think the Chiefs have given up on Cassel yet, he's one year out of a pro bowl and though the team struggled with him, they struggled a lot more once he went down. Between the two I'm also leaning towards Orton, I love Cassel's attitude and leadership but I just don't see the elite QB developing out of him.

Don't think there is anyway we're trading up for luck, no one is going to trade out of #1 unless it's a huge deal. Weeden I haven't seen play enough to make an accurate determination on him, RG3 is exciting not sure the chiefs are the best fit for them though. If we're not using our first on a QB (which I doubt we are) I think we should look at Kellen Moore from Boise, he doesn't have the typical size but he's very very smart has a pretty good arm and he's a winner, he's going to be a steal in this draft in my opinion.

Danny W 137 pts

Pick your poison pretty much. Journeyman A or JourneymanB. Are either of them franchise? Short answer, NO

Ehud 147 pts

I personally would rather have Orton than Cassel next year. When watching the Raiders game someone commented that Orton was putting up "Cassel-esque" numbers. People agreed, although, some pointed out that Orton (just a month with the Chiefs) was putting up Cassel (Year 3) numbers. I figure if he actually had an offseason to get to know his offense he would do better.

I thank Matt Cassel for his service. I appreciate what he did for us, but unless he is willing to adjust his contract and become a backup, I think his time at Arrowhead should probably come to a close.

As far as the franchise QB bandwagon goes, I'm with you Lyle. In fact, I think, at this point in the NFL a Franchise QB is a must for consistent winning and especially if you want a Super Bowl ring. That's why, if I were the GM of the Chiefs, I would seriously consider trading all the way to the #1 spot and take Andrew Luck. Is it a gamble? Yes. Will my job forever be linked to that pick? Yes. If it fails I will lose my job but, if it works then I have job security for 10 years.

If the analysts, scouts, and experts are to be believed, Luck is as close to a sure franchise QB to come a long in a while. The Chiefs should go for it and hopefully be set at QB for the next 10-15 years. Yes, it will cost a lot. I'm talking (approximately): 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round in 2012, 1st and 2nd in 2013, and a 2nd in 2014. But in this day and age in the NFL an elite franchise QB (which they say Luck could be) is a rare commodity.

This is a pretty good time to take this chance, too. A coaching change is occurring for the Chiefs, the new CBA rules will require the Chiefs to spend a lot of money in Free Agency, and the Free Agent market this year is looking to be one of the best in a while. The lack of draft picks could be made up by being aggressive and/or smart in Free Agency. Yes it is a risk but, one I might take. Provided, of course, trading up to get Luck is even possible. Something that seems more possible if it is the Rams at the top rather than the Colts.

The other option I've been tossing around is Texas A&M QB Ryan Tannehill in the 2nd or so round. He is very raw but, hopefully Jim Zorn could mold him into a great QB.

However it gets done, the Chiefs need a franchise QB.

jimfromkc 45 pts

Ehud I am onboard the Weeden bandwagon. I happen to think he is more ready than Luck. Fiesta Bowl is coming up Jan 2nd and luck and Weeden will be going head to head and we will be able to judge for ourselves who is the most mature and ready QB. I have watched him go head to head with Jones and Griffin and i think he is more ready than either one of them. Tannehill was also pretty much beaten badly by Weeden, but I didn'y see that game. Am looking forward to the game.

Ehud 147 pts

I have trouble getting on the bandwagon of a 29 year old rookie QB. Perhaps as a Day 3 pick but not sooner than that. Weeden should be more pro-ready. Unlike the other QBs he is already a full grown man. However, that also means he has most likely hit his physical peak unlike the other potential QBs. Just to clarify, I'm not saying you're wrong in liking him. I'm just telling you why I, as a GM, would have concerns about him.jimfromkc

tm1946 183 pts

Pioli is all about the safe approach and his own comfort zone. Not sure he has any idea what "taking a chance" means. Heck throw in "due diligence" also, if it is not tied to NE, forget it.

If Orton can put together a good game, win or lose, I doubt he boards the flight back to KC. He hopes another NFL team will give him a shot at starting. Free agent, means never having to sign with the Chiefs.

Cassel is the man, Pioli says so and that is good enough for Hunt.

QB of the future, if there exists such a thing, is probably a Soph or Jr in college, maybe a freshman, figure Pioli will be gone by them.

merlin_AA 191 pts

Nice piece Lyle. I suspect the Chiefs will roll with either Cassel or Orton starting next year. They are who they are, middle of the road quarterbacks. It would not shock me if the Chiefs invest another mid-round draft pick on a quarterback to compete with Stanzi as the QB of the future.