Re-A-Lining The Chiefs Title Hopes

by Feature From The Bleachers

Long before the Chiefs make a title run, they will have to make some changes along the offensive line. Their inability to run the ball without Jamaal Charles in the line-up points to issues that need to be dealt with before Charles returns. With only ten teams in the league giving up more sacks than the Chiefs, it shows their problems protecting the passer are both prevalent and pervasive.

The Chiefs offensive line played really well on Sunday evening against the Steelers but, the times they play inspired like that are too few and far between. Especially if they want to see themselves as title contenders.

The Chiefs have most of the skill position pieces in place to make a run for a title. Yes, they may need to address the QB situation, which is no small feat, before they can make a run for the roses but, I think most would agree that the Chiefs aren’t going anywhere, even with a new QB, until they start competing, consistently, up front.

Most would also agree that the Chiefs aren’t going to be able to “compete up front” until they make some changes and I’m not talking about coaching changes.

So, what’s good, and what’s not so good, about the players that the Chiefs have along the current offensive line?

LT Brandon Albert is above average but, not great.  Khaled Elsayed at Pro Football Focus (PFF) says that Albert is “maddeningly inconsistent” and I would agree. While I have been of the opinion that left tackles have a similarly fragile ego to that of quarterbacks, and need stability to continue to produce in a pro-style offense, it’s time to put egos aside and make the moves that are necessary along the Chiefs offensive front. So, Albert may need to move to either left guard or right tackle, depending upon what direction the Chiefs take in acquiring or promoting other talents.

I have heard many suggest that Albert needs to be moved inside, to LG, each year, every time the draft rolls around, with the idea that the Chiefs would select his replacement. In the past I thought it was premature to even consider such a move with all the other positions that have needed addressing but now, enough time and opportunity have played out for the Chiefs to consider other alternatives. Mainly because what they have isn’t working.

In the 2012 draft, there looks to be a few prospects who could fill the bill but, one who looks to be available when the Chiefs are expected to pick, and that could be Riley Reiff from Iowa.

Pointing to Reiff at this early date may sound arbitrary but, if you consider: that Scotty Pioli keeps beaming up captain Kirk Ferentz’ Iowa players to the NFL, that Pioli has a propensity for drafting players from the same university in successive years, and that once OT Matt Kalil from USC is drafted then Reiff should be the top OT prospect available.

As you may be aware, Scott Pioli seemingly has a vacation home on the Iowa campus, or he should. The Chiefs drafted QB Ricky Stanzi from Iowa last year and that only increases the likelihood that Pioli will be doing business there again this year.

If the Chiefs were to move Albert inside and then draft Reiff, they would have the choice of playing David Mimms and/or Steve Maneri at RT. Or, they could play Reiff or Albert at LT and/or RT and deal separately with one of the guard positions. While moving Mimms to RT may improve the size of the line, I’m not sure it will help to improve the skill level. In the preseason, Mimms’ foot speed was way below average, and he often could be seen lunging at defenders.

If the Chiefs draft Reiff, move Albert inside, keep Asamoah at RG, and advance Rodney Hudson to the starting center position then they would immediately get bigger, stronger, faster, more talented and more athletic. Still, they would have to address the RT position.

It’s hard to see a scenario in which the Chiefs bring back Casey Wiegmann for another season. Is it possible? Yes, but Wiegmann took time this past off season to think things over and many were surprised when he decided to return then. I believe Haley was happy to have him back to help stabilize a group that was already dealing with a short off season. Wiegmann’s performance has suffered this year and when the Chiefs do their year-end evaluations, it should be clear it’s time for the Chiefs to move on without him. Wiegmann has had an outstanding career but doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame or even in the Hall of Fame conversation. As good as he has been in years past, it is a negative for the overall state of the offensive line, simply because the 2011 Chiefs have a 38-year-old starting center who obviously doesn’t fit into the future plans that the Chiefs have for the team.

Hudson has been getting reps at the guard positions and, much as Asamoah did the previous season, his experience is preparing him for a starting role in 2012. If the Chiefs don’t see Hudson as being capable then they will need to move swiftly in the off season to sign a free agent who can fill that void. I don’t think the Chiefs will go that route because they wouldn’t continue giving Hudson reps if they didn’t see his potential, progress and eventually have plans for him.

Either way, if the Chiefs do draft Reiff (or someone of his caliber like Jonathan Martin), move Albert inside, start Maneri and Asamoah, then the weakest position would probably be the center position. Why? Because we don’t actually know yet whether or not Hudson can hold down the fort there. And, at 6-2, 299, he would be the smallest offensive lineman by far.

I have not been a supporter of moving Albert in the past, but I think that ship has sailed and it’s time to move on from expecting him to perform at a position he is probably not best suited to perform at.

With an OL line-up of: LT Reiff, LG Albert, C Hudson, RG Asamoah and RT Maneri, the Chiefs would have a strong unit that would not only be very good in pass protection, but give Jamaal Charles all the run blocking he needs to return to the top of the league in rushing.

Offensive tackles Matt Khalil and Jonathan Martin both often rate out higher than Reiff, but both will most likely be off the board by the time the Chiefs pick, simply because we can’t take victories off the board. Some draft boards rate Reiff higher than Martin.

Reiff may turn out to be the best OT out of all of them in the long run. He has a nasty streak and has three years of starting experience at Iowa against some of the best competition in the nation. When Riley was a sophomore, he matched up well against Cameron Heyward who is now being developed by the Steelers. The only player I have seen that gave Reiff a challenge is Aldon Smith from Missouri whose long arms kept Reiff from locking him up consistently. But that was when Reiff was a sophomore.

If the Chiefs can draft Riley Reiff he would be an impact player who is able to step in immediately and make a big difference in the way the Chiefs reconstruct their offensive line. If that happens, the offense would take one giant leap forward.

Jon Asamoah has become a solid addition to the line-up. I’m not going to spend time evaluating Asamoah except to say he is in the Chiefs’ future plans at guard and should continue to be for years to come.

It’s time for the Chiefs to move on without Barry Richardson. I would rather that Scott Pioli makes some moves to secure a journeyman back-up for the tackle positions instead of keeping BRich to do that job. Almost every time I isolate Richardson to evaluate him, I find negatives. Too many to re-hash now. His time is done. I hope the Chiefs let him go at the end of this year.

I broke down some tape from Sunday night’s game with the Steelers and the news for Barry Richardson is not good. It was difficult for me to find plays that I would rate him as having a positive result instead of a negative one. It’s time to say good-bye to Barry.

And so, I project Steve Maneri as having a better chance to succeed than Richardson.

Steve Maneri? I know what you’re thinking. I’m moving Maneri into a starting role without knowing anything about him. Actually, I know that he was an undrafted free agent out of Temple who signed with the Houston Texans in 2010, later picked up by the Patriots and plucked by the Chiefs off of their practice squad earlier this year.

Steve Maneri represents an option. He’s the option we have available this offseason. So, he may possibly end up being the best option.

If he is the option the Chiefs go with, then there will be another unproven player along the line.

If not, then the Chiefs will likely be fishing in the free agent pool. An important move for the Chiefs to make this offseason is to find an offensive lineman who can be an impact player. Not necessarily one that’s better than every other OL they now employ, but one that’s very good and can come in and make a difference in both the running game and pass protection.

Simply replacing their worst lineman (Richardson) with one who is very good… could be huge for the team’s development. Can you imagine what the Chiefs RBs and WRs could accomplish with good run blocking and solid pass protection?

It looks like the Chiefs need two such impact players along the offensive line. Especially if they intend on competing for an NFL title at some point during this decade.

If the Chiefs get two, it’s probable that one of those will come via free agency. In the past three years, the kind of free agents that the Chiefs have signed have been low profile or could be characterized as “on a shoestring” type of players. After all, the Chiefs continue to massage some of the biggest cap muscles of any team in the NFL. Muscles they, so far, refuse to use.

While you’d hope they will sign a top talent lineman, like they did in Willie Roaf, it doesn’t seem likely if you’ve taken Chiefs History 101. Aside from Roaf, the Chiefs OL FA history book has very few pages in it.

The challenge is, there’s a very small list of high quality free agent offensive linemen who will be available starting around March 1st, 2012.

G Carl Nicks (27) Saints
G Ben Grubbs (28) Ravens
C Nick Hardwick (30) Chargers
OT Kareem McKenzie (33) Giants
G Bobbie Williams (34) Bengals

McKenzie and Williams don’t appear to be likely choices based upon their age. Players from division foes usually don’t sign with division opponents so, Hardwick doesn’t seem like much of a possibility (although, the Chargers are expected to make some changes this off season). That leaves Grubbs and Nicks. Nicks is considered one of the prize free agents this coming offseason and to sign him, it will take more than a bushel and a peck and a hug around the neck. Forget the Patriot way. That’s just never been Pioli’s way.

The Chiefs have become very comfortable signing ex-Ravens so, if there’s any way they can lock up Ben Grubbs, he’s the man. But, that’s a pretty big if.

Improving the offensive line doesn’t exclusively improve the run game and the passing game, it also improves game planning and defensive performance. Ask anyone who plays defense for the Colts if Peyton Manning’s presence has an effect on their side of the ball. By “pimping” the OL the Chiefs will sustain more drives, create more first downs, increase time of possession and generate more trust from the defensive players. I was wondering last Sunday how many of the Chiefs defensive players trusted the Chiefs offense to hold on to the ball… make a first down… and give them the least little break… not to mention put some points on the board.  The “I’ve got your back” feeling should not only apply to the defense but the offense too. Over the course of a season, that can make a big difference in team cohesion and consequently, team success.

In the draft, considering the Chiefs’ other needs, they could select a player like CB Morris Claiborne or QB Robert Griffin III or NT Alameda Ta’amu. Each of these players could instantly make the Chiefs better. However, I think it’s an offensive lineman who could have the biggest impact of all.

If the Chiefs want to make the moves that are needed to create a championship-caliber crew on the offensive front, they’ll have their work cut out for them this offseason.

Clearly, choices are needing to be made.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

My sentiments exactly it all starts in the trenches and both Cassel and Orton are capable of doing well with protection.

Yes... and that's precisely the premise this post was based upon. Go max protection... and either one of those QB's could flourish. Then, at some future date they can address the quarterback situation. However, the line has to come first. I know... it's a chicken or the egg debate... but, the line has to be the chicken because what's getting hatched right now... doesn't even taste like chicken.. @kcfanintx

Sold! You win on the line; draft an o lineman 1st round. We still need to address QB, but a better o line would allow KC more time to address that and probably succeed with a Cassel/Orton for another year. I am also hopeful that D line may not be as big a need if Gordon and Bailey continue to play well (they are playing well, aren't they?). Last season was nice; I wasn't chomping at the bit for 2011 the whole time. I hope to repeat that feeling in 2012.

@sidibeke There is still hope for Mimms in my opinion. Sometimes you can find a diamond in the rough. Maneri on the other hand has been with a couple of teams already and been cut. I think Albert can hold down the fort. I would kill for Matt Barkely to be a Chief or any of the top five for that matter. Draft a QB then a tight end who can stay healthy.

I'm interested to see the progression of Gordon, Bailey and Houston as well... and the Spring of 2011 could turn out to be a very good off season for the Chiefs. @sidibeke

This was an interesting piece. I def agree we need to draft an O lineman in the first round of the draft and I have hope we will land a spot in the first 5 picks. Cassel will be acceptable with a good line and the Chiefs will def be in the playoffs with a better line and resigned free agents. We have a really good team besides our O and D lines. Nobody wants to admit it but Haley is a great coach. He always makes it exciting and goes for it on 4th and short, but he wisely did not against the Steelers and took the field goal. He knows what his team can and can't do. I think Pioli needs to go in order to ensure no Tyson Jacksons are picked this year...

@chiefarrohead88 I dont like Pioli either but Haley isnt all that solid especially in his decision making. The guy is too stuborn. kan.scout.com has an article right now on Haley's situation its a good read.

I don't know for sure but, I have long thought that Tyson Jackson was a product of the old regime's scouting department failures. The idea is... Pioli can only make decisions based upon the information he is handed by the scouting department. It's hard to say for sure because... the previous draft was a very good one for the Chiefs. @chiefarrohead88

Very informative chat with Mellinger at link below, including "Pioli and Haley don't get along, we all understand that, but I also don't get the feeling (from talking to folks on the inside) that it's necessarily untenable...." and that RG3 might be the guy. http://www.kansascity.com/coveritlive/

I think you were being generous in your judging Albert to be above average. I would say he is avg at times, but below average too much of the time. But it is nice to see many folks coming around to my way of thinking at last. I have been a proponent of putting Albert in his old position ever since he was drafted. If you are really serious about a super bowl there are a few positions where you just can't settle for average. QB, LT, NT a speed rusher and at least one shut down corner has to be above average and the farther above the better. I have been wondering if anyone else has been watching Wisconsin this year. I kinda like the Wagner kid for the RT position. I don't know much about Maneri kid, but he weighs less than 300 and that pretty much seals the deal for me that he isn't a RT. I would rather have one at least 320 or bigger. He has been in the league for awhile so I think his playing weight has pretty much settled at where he is at today. I don't really have much faith in Hudson at a guard position for the same reason. He bulked up for the combine to 300, but now that he is practicing and playing an NFL level he has fallen below 300 again.

Your article said that Albert is above average. So you leave that position alone. If you grab Rief you have to put him on the right side. Albert Lilja Hudson Asamoua Rief. Thats a good line with out any Steve Maneri's in there. Steve Maneri is more of the same. Stop gaps. Albert is fine at Left Tackle. If Rief were to out perform him then so be it let them switch but putting Albert in at guard is counter productive at this point.

I didn't address the Lilja situation in my post but, I'm hoping he's not part of the Chiefs long term solution and I don't see how he can be. At 6-2 and 290 he's not only smallish even for a Guard but, he consistently gets pushed back into the QB on passing downs. In Indy, all he had to do was keep a DT off of Manning for 2.5 seconds. Not the case in K.C.. He does some things well but, he'll never be part of a stellar line. The point I was making about Maneri is that he would be the best choice if the Chiefs refuse to replace him... and I thought I made it clear that I'm hoping they do. Plus... Maneri... or almost anyone... would be better than Richardson. If you spend any time at all tracking Barry Richardson's performances... or lack thereof... you'll be convinced. @Danny W

Yea... below... Dorman suggests the Chiefs could start Reiff out at RT which I think is a terrific idea. If that works out then he could move over to LT at some point. @Danny W

I love the Reiff pick. I think Pioli will as well. It offers great value, three upgrades for the price of one. Reiff>Albert, Albert>Lilja, Anyone>Richardson. Reiff-Albert-Hudson-Asamoah-Lin Elliot Despite RT still a huge upgrade!

It offers great intangibles as well! Having a great blocker like Albert inside will greatly help a young center out. Having him next to Reiff will also give him support, as well as on the field coaching from a guy who's been there.

And again, anyone not named Barry next to Asamoah will help him tremendously!

Exactly. Excellent point. @Gjrchief

Laddie, first I just want to say that I always look forward to your articles - they are always well thought out and very cohesive. Okay, now onto my thoughts of your article. I agree that our offense's stagnancy is the main cause of our inconsistency this season, and that it all goes back to the OL. Having a consistent offense absolutely requires having a consistent offensive line. Just look at the Eagles. They are full of offensive weapons: Desean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, Lesean McCoy, and of course, Mike Vick (who is a Hokie I might add), and yet their offense often falls flat because of Andy Reid's reluctance in making the OL a priority. The best offenses have the best offensive lines, it is just a fact. Pioli needs to start making this a priority and draft offensive linemen rather than using free agency to pluck old, over the hill rentals to quick fix our OL's needs. The fact that RIchardson is still our starting RT proves in itself that Pioli has neglected the OL since he has been the GM. That entire second round of the draft two years ago when we drafted McCluster and Arenas still boggles me to this day. We should have drafted an offensive lineman and maybe traded one of those second round picks to nab Boldin from the Cards, who was in fact available for that price. Instead, Pioli chose to "draft for the future" by drafting two luxury pick return men, which seems very contradictory. In a period of rebuilding, Pioli should have focused on filling our teams needs from the ground up, and that means drafting linemen. But that's in the past, and Pioli still has time to make up for this. This article also raises an intriguing question about what we should do with Cassel. If Cassel had a fantastic OL, could he be our answer? I've been off the Cassel bandwagon for some time now, but the thought has recently crept back into my mind after realizing that our OL is the cause of most of our problems. Cassel had a great OL back when he was with the Pats and he lead them to an 11-5 season. You might argue that Cassel never has and never will carry this team on his back, but wouldn't a fortified OL make this possible?With all of that said, I still think we should try to draft a franchise QB with our first pick. But if the top tier QB's are gone by the time it is our turn to pick, I am all for drafting an OT such as Reiff and then using the other picks to add to the depth of our team, while keeping our OL and DL the main priority.

@Chief Hokie Mentioning Pioli boggling minds, how about trading for Cassel/Vrabel and then ignorring offensive needs (2 years to get a second starter at WR - then chosing one free agent and top draft pick??). He double tapped DE, Jackson and Magee also. Richardson protecting whatever QBs right side. Considering he was the hotest thing at the time of his hiring, his thought processes mystify me.

Thanks for the props. I get the feeling that Pioli has been compromising with Haley on some of these choices. Two years ago the Chiefs had a horrible return game so I can see how Haley would have tried to influence Pioli to pull in Arenas who was one of the best return guys in the history of the college game. Plus, Pioli was going to go for him because he could do more than just return kicks. I don't think it bad, on one hand, for Pioli to compromise with Haley now and then but, it may dilute the identity of he team. Sometimes one vision is better than 10. @Chief Hokie

I agree with most of what you say. The only thing i would add is go after Grubbs like you argue for and draft Reiff but i would put up front as Albert, Grubbs, Hudson, Asamoah, Reiff. I think that this gives Reiff his rookie year to get used to the NFL and makes our line young and dominate. I think that with time that will help the running game with Jamaal and Jackie as well as give Matt time to throw. I think that Matt still could be a good QB for us as well as Orton. Matt put up good numbers in NE while i know the NE system is one of the best with a dominate running game, a game changing TE, and a good group of WR's I think that he could push us into the playoffs.

Starting Reiff out on the Right side is a great idea. Either way... it all hinges upon the Chiefs getting two top talents. We'll be in good shape if we can accomplish that much this off season.@Dorman34

kcfanintx 72 pts

My sentiments exactly it all starts in the trenches and both Cassel and Orton are capable of doing well with protection.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Yes... and that's precisely the premise this post was based upon. Go max protection... and either one of those QB's could flourish. Then, at some future date they can address the quarterback situation. However, the line has to come first. I know... it's a chicken or the egg debate... but, the line has to be the chicken because what's getting hatched right now... doesn't even taste like chicken.. kcfanintx

sidibeke 259 pts

Sold! You win on the line; draft an o lineman 1st round. We still need to address QB, but a better o line would allow KC more time to address that and probably succeed with a Cassel/Orton for another year.

I am also hopeful that D line may not be as big a need if Gordon and Bailey continue to play well (they are playing well, aren't they?).

Last season was nice; I wasn't chomping at the bit for 2011 the whole time. I hope to repeat that feeling in 2012.

Danny W 137 pts

sidibeke There is still hope for Mimms in my opinion. Sometimes you can find a diamond in the rough. Maneri on the other hand has been with a couple of teams already and been cut. I think Albert can hold down the fort. I would kill for Matt Barkely to be a Chief or any of the top five for that matter. Draft a QB then a tight end who can stay healthy.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I'm interested to see the progression of Gordon, Bailey and Houston as well... and the Spring of 2011 could turn out to be a very good off season for the Chiefs. sidibeke

chiefarrohead88 7 pts

This was an interesting piece. I def agree we need to draft an O lineman in the first round of the draft and I have hope we will land a spot in the first 5 picks. Cassel will be acceptable with a good line and the Chiefs will def be in the playoffs with a better line and resigned free agents. We have a really good team besides our O and D lines. Nobody wants to admit it but Haley is a great coach. He always makes it exciting and goes for it on 4th and short, but he wisely did not against the Steelers and took the field goal. He knows what his team can and can't do. I think Pioli needs to go in order to ensure no Tyson Jacksons are picked this year...

Danny W 137 pts

chiefarrohead88 I dont like Pioli either but Haley isnt all that solid especially in his decision making. The guy is too stuborn. kan.scout.com has an article right now on Haley's situation its a good read.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I don't know for sure but, I have long thought that Tyson Jackson was a product of the old regime's scouting department failures. The idea is... Pioli can only make decisions based upon the information he is handed by the scouting department. It's hard to say for sure because... the previous draft was a very good one for the Chiefs.

chiefarrohead88

KC Oracle 68 pts

Very informative chat with Mellinger at link below, including "Pioli and Haley don't get along, we all understand that, but I also don't get the feeling (from talking to folks on the inside) that it's necessarily untenable...." and that RG3 might be the guy.

http://www.kansascity.com/coveritlive/

jimfromkc 45 pts

I think you were being generous in your judging Albert to be above average. I would say he is avg at times, but below average too much of the time. But it is nice to see many folks coming around to my way of thinking at last. I have been a proponent of putting Albert in his old position ever since he was drafted. If you are really serious about a super bowl there are a few positions where you just can't settle for average. QB, LT, NT a speed rusher and at least one shut down corner has to be above average and the farther above the better. I have been wondering if anyone else has been watching Wisconsin this year. I kinda like the Wagner kid for the RT position. I don't know much about Maneri kid, but he weighs less than 300 and that pretty much seals the deal for me that he isn't a RT. I would rather have one at least 320 or bigger. He has been in the league for awhile so I think his playing weight has pretty much settled at where he is at today. I don't really have much faith in Hudson at a guard position for the same reason. He bulked up for the combine to 300, but now that he is practicing and playing an NFL level he has fallen below 300 again.

Danny W 137 pts

Your article said that Albert is above average. So you leave that position alone. If you grab Rief you have to put him on the right side. Albert Lilja Hudson Asamoua Rief. Thats a good line with out any Steve Maneri's in there. Steve Maneri is more of the same. Stop gaps. Albert is fine at Left Tackle. If Rief were to out perform him then so be it let them switch but putting Albert in at guard is counter productive at this point.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I didn't address the Lilja situation in my post but, I'm hoping he's not part of the Chiefs long term solution and I don't see how he can be. At 6-2 and 290 he's not only smallish even for a Guard but, he consistently gets pushed back into the QB on passing downs. In Indy, all he had to do was keep a DT off of Manning for 2.5 seconds. Not the case in K.C.. He does some things well but, he'll never be part of a stellar line. The point I was making about Maneri is that he would be the best choice if the Chiefs refuse to replace him... and I thought I made it clear that I'm hoping they do. Plus... Maneri... or almost anyone... would be better than Richardson. If you spend any time at all tracking Barry Richardson's performances... or lack thereof... you'll be convinced. Danny W

laddiemorse 205 pts

Yea... below... Dorman suggests the Chiefs could start Reiff out at RT which I think is a terrific idea. If that works out then he could move over to LT at some point. Danny W

Gjrchief 138 pts

I love the Reiff pick. I think Pioli will as well. It offers great value, three upgrades for the price of one.
Reiff>Albert, Albert>Lilja, Anyone>Richardson.
Reiff-Albert-Hudson-Asamoah-Lin Elliot
Despite RT still a huge upgrade!

Gjrchief 138 pts

It offers great intangibles as well! Having a great blocker like Albert inside will greatly help a young center out. Having him next to Reiff will also give him support, as well as on the field coaching from a guy who's been there.

Gjrchief 138 pts

And again, anyone not named Barry next to Asamoah will help him tremendously!

laddiemorse 205 pts

Exactly. Excellent point. Gjrchief

Chief Hokie 87 pts

Laddie, first I just want to say that I always look forward to your articles - they are always well thought out and very cohesive.

Okay, now onto my thoughts of your article. I agree that our offense's stagnancy is the main cause of our inconsistency this season, and that it all goes back to the OL. Having a consistent offense absolutely requires having a consistent offensive line. Just look at the Eagles. They are full of offensive weapons: Desean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, Lesean McCoy, and of course, Mike Vick (who is a Hokie I might add), and yet their offense often falls flat because of Andy Reid's reluctance in making the OL a priority. The best offenses have the best offensive lines, it is just a fact. Pioli needs to start making this a priority and draft offensive linemen rather than using free agency to pluck old, over the hill rentals to quick fix our OL's needs. The fact that RIchardson is still our starting RT proves in itself that Pioli has neglected the OL since he has been the GM. That entire second round of the draft two years ago when we drafted McCluster and Arenas still boggles me to this day. We should have drafted an offensive lineman and maybe traded one of those second round picks to nab Boldin from the Cards, who was in fact available for that price. Instead, Pioli chose to "draft for the future" by drafting two luxury pick return men, which seems very contradictory. In a period of rebuilding, Pioli should have focused on filling our teams needs from the ground up, and that means drafting linemen. But that's in the past, and Pioli still has time to make up for this.

This article also raises an intriguing question about what we should do with Cassel. If Cassel had a fantastic OL, could he be our answer? I've been off the Cassel bandwagon for some time now, but the thought has recently crept back into my mind after realizing that our OL is the cause of most of our problems. Cassel had a great OL back when he was with the Pats and he lead them to an 11-5 season. You might argue that Cassel never has and never will carry this team on his back, but wouldn't a fortified OL make this possible?With all of that said, I still think we should try to draft a franchise QB with our first pick. But if the top tier QB's are gone by the time it is our turn to pick, I am all for drafting an OT such as Reiff and then using the other picks to add to the depth of our team, while keeping our OL and DL the main priority.

tm1946 183 pts

Chief Hokie

Mentioning Pioli boggling minds, how about trading for Cassel/Vrabel and then ignorring offensive needs (2 years to get a second starter at WR - then chosing one free agent and top draft pick??). He double tapped DE, Jackson and Magee also. Richardson protecting whatever QBs right side. Considering he was the hotest thing at the time of his hiring, his thought processes mystify me.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Thanks for the props.

I get the feeling that Pioli has been compromising with Haley on some of these choices. Two years ago the Chiefs had a horrible return game so I can see how Haley would have tried to influence Pioli to pull in Arenas who was one of the best return guys in the history of the college game. Plus, Pioli was going to go for him because he could do more than just return kicks. I don't think it bad, on one hand, for Pioli to compromise with Haley now and then but, it may dilute the identity of he team. Sometimes one vision is better than 10. Chief Hokie

Dorman34 8 pts

I agree with most of what you say. The only thing i would add is go after Grubbs like you argue for and draft Reiff but i would put up front as Albert, Grubbs, Hudson, Asamoah, Reiff. I think that this gives Reiff his rookie year to get used to the NFL and makes our line young and dominate. I think that with time that will help the running game with Jamaal and Jackie as well as give Matt time to throw. I think that Matt still could be a good QB for us as well as Orton. Matt put up good numbers in NE while i know the NE system is one of the best with a dominate running game, a game changing TE, and a good group of WR's I think that he could push us into the playoffs.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Starting Reiff out on the Right side is a great idea. Either way... it all hinges upon the Chiefs getting two top talents. We'll be in good shape if we can accomplish that much this off season.Dorman34