Major Pass Rush Problems

by Armchair Addict

U. G. L. Y. You ain’t got no alibi, you ugly, yeah yeah you UGLY! Look it would be easy to take a total doom and gloom approach after that game because it was in fact very, very, ugly. Was it horrible? Yes. Did it look WAY too much like the first two games of the season at times? Yes. Does it mean that the Chiefs are back to being one of the worst teams in the NFL again? No. Just last week the Saints lost to the winless Rams. It happens. It is definitely a disappointment though and makes the odds of the Chiefs pulling off a playoff birth or division title that much smaller.

Can you come up with reasons (excuses) as to why the Chiefs lost? Sure. The Chiefs were on a short week. The Chiefs were coming off a very emotional overtime win. The Chiefs were coming off back to back physical division games. The Chiefs were missing two DBs in Arenas and McGraw and their replacements were exploited. Are all of those things true? Yes.

So that means this loss was the result of a one time set of circumstances and we don’t need to worry about this happening again, right? Ummm….No.

I would guess that the title of this piece is probably a pretty big clue that I think there is a larger problem (or problems) at play. In my opinion this loss was not about short weeks or the huge hole left by an injured Jon McGraw (yes, that was sarcasm). See on paper (not looking at records) the Chiefs and Dolphins actually looked like a pretty even match up. The difference between the two had been that the Dolphins had found ways to lose games and the Chiefs had found ways to win some.

So how were the Dolphins able to dominate the Chiefs on their own home field?

Simple, the Dolphins sacked, pressured, knocked down, and harassed Matt Cassel all day long and Matt Moore’s jersey probably didn’t even need washed after the game. That was the difference.

Don’t think it’s that cut and dry? More after the break.

Coming into the game the Dolphins only had 15 sacks in 7 games (that’s 2.1 per game). On the other side of the ball the Chiefs had only given up 13 sacks in 7 games (1.9 per game). So it wouldn’t have taken a master of statistical data to predict that Miami would sack Cassel a couple of times in this game. The Dolphins didn’t total 2 sacks against KC, they totaled 5. That’s over double what the numbers say they should have done. And that 5 sacks doesn’t even begin to show how many times they pressured Cassel. At the time I’m typing this I can’t find anywhere that has the totals of hurries and knock downs for the game, but they were numerous. Cassel had 9 rushes on the day. That’s 9 more plays where Cassel bailed on the called pass play right there.

The pressure clearly got into Cassel’s head. After being hit enough times he lost the composure in the pocket that we had seen in previous weeks. He bailed on some plays before he needed to. His accuracy regressed. The cool and calm leader that we had started to trust again disappeared and the jittery, happy feet Cassel of old returned. Now it would have been great if Cassel would have been able to not let the constant pressure get to him, but one can’t really blame him considering how terrible the protection was.

I place the blame here more on the offensive line and the offensive play callers. The offensive line just got flat out embarrassed by an 0-7 defense. They couldn’t handle the speed or power of the Dolphins defense. The other problem was that the KC offensive staff seemed unwilling to adjust their play calling and protections even after it was clear that the offensive line couldn’t keep Cassel clean. My worry is that Miami has given the rest of the league a blue print as to how to shut down the KC offense, blitz them, a lot.

If KC can’t find a better way to handle the blitz they are in for a long season.

I wish I could say that was the only pass rush problem that this game exposed. KC’s own pass rush was pitiful on Sunday. The worst part about it is that Miami had given up 27 sacks in the seven games leading up to this one. That’s almost 4 per game. The Chiefs got ZERO. Tamba Hali has been the ONLY pass rush presence all season. This week he was matched up with one of the best LTs in the game in Jake Long. Long did a good job against Hali and when they moved Hali to the opposite side the Dolphins almost always had a TE or RB assigned to help out so that the RT wasn’t on his own. With Tamba controlled the Chiefs had no answer and Matt Moore had all day long to pick apart the KC secondary. The result was that Moore had far and away his best game of the season and maybe of his career.

Prior to Sunday, Moore had completed 59.1% of his passes at 6.1 yards/attempt with 1 TD and 4 INTs.

Against the Chiefs he completed 73.9% of his passes at 10.6 yards/attempt with 3 TDs and 0 INTs.

Moore didn’t suddenly become Aaron Rodgers, he just had time to find the holes in KC’s coverage. Look, I get it. When you have guys that aren’t great in one on one coverage like Piscatelli, Washington, etc. you need to drop more guys back to help get the job done. That’s what KC has been doing. Drop a ton of guys back into coverage and only blitz 3-4 guys. This has worked when Tamba has single handedly been able to hurry the QB. When Hali forced the QB to throw in a hurry the Chiefs were able to take advantage of all those players dropped into coverage and create some turnovers. The Dolphins have now showed that if you contain Hali your QB will have time to expose the poor coverage of some of KC’s DBs. Yes Arenas and McGraw might have made a few more stops then Washington and Piscatelli, but let’s not pretend those guys are great in coverage. The Chiefs would have still been picked apart even with those guys on the field.

Going forward, if the Chiefs run up against a team that either has an elite LT or is willing to commit multiple blockers to Hali then Romeo Crennel HAS to come up with some blitz packages that can disrupt the opposing QB. If you look at teams like the Steelers they get to the QB not by “sending the house” but by confusing the offense. They may only send 5 guys but the offense doesn’t know where those 5 guys are coming from. It seems like the few times the Chiefs have blitzed they just send multiple guys right at the line and just hope that someone beats their guy or the o-line blows the coverage.

It would also be SO helpful if KC had a real pass rush threat opposite of Hali. That was suppose to be Justin Houston. I think we all thought that he may struggle in coverage or not be comfortable with all the schemes, but I don’t think I was alone in thinking that he would be able to contribute on clear passing downs where they could line him up outside and turn him loose. This hasn’t happened at all. He’s been a non factor. I don’t know if that’s because Houston isn’t the pass rusher we thought he was or if the Chiefs aren’t using him correctly. Either way its been a disappointment.

Now my fellow blogger Big Matt would lead you to believe that the main problem the Chiefs are having is that the base defensive line is not getting enough of a pass rush. While I agree that these guys are weak in that area, I don’t believe that is our main problem. The real problem, skill or scheme wise, is that all the Chiefs LBs not named Tamba Hali have done a terrible job of getting to the QB. Derrick Johnson, Jevon Belcher, Justin Houston, Andy Studebaker, and Cameron Sheffield have a total of 1 sack between them. For a 3-4 scheme that is TERRIBLE. Yes, it would be nice to get more pass rush (or even just some push) from the defensive line, but in a 3-4 scheme the pressure should come from the LBs. The problem with Matt’s stance (in my humble opinion) is that it implies that our base 3-4 defensive line is useless on passing downs. That couldn’t be less true. The idea is that those base d-linemen engage the offensive line so that the LBs can break through and hit the QB. Look at teams like the Steelers and Ravens, their d-lines may have a couple more sacks then ours but the real difference is that all their LBs have a few sacks. That’s not happening in KC. I’m just not sure who is to blame. I think part of it is the ability of the LBs to get to the QB, part of it is that our “block eaters” may not be occupying as many linemen as they should, but I also think part of it is that Romeo just isn’t sending these guys. I think he’s so worried about the bad safety coverage that he feels he has to drop the LBs in passing situations to help fill the voids and clog up the passing lanes. As I already mentioned, this works when Tamba can get pressure, but when he is neutralized even those extra LBs can’t stop the opponents passing game. In those cases I think they might as well send one more LB (not always the same one, switch it up and keep the offense guessing) to try and knock the QB off his rhythm.

I really hope that KC can address these two issues before the Denver game next week. Denver has some good pass rushers on their roster and since I’m pretty sure they’ll take a look at the Miami game footage I would assume that they’ll come after Cassel, I would. The Chiefs better have an answer.

I would like to say that the Chiefs won’t have to worry about Tebow picking them apart, since Tebow has struggled so far, but would Tebow having a big day against KC really be that much more of a surprise then Matt Moore doing it? Don’t get me wrong, I think that KC will win next week. I still believe in this team. I think they have enough play makers on both sides of the ball to get the job done. I just think that the KC staff has some work to do to deal with these pass rush problems. For all Haley’s talk about not having a let down this week I think the biggest let down was that the coaching staff didn’t make adjustments at half time of this game to fix the problems that were more then evident in the first half. They were able to turn this team around from an 0-3 start, so I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they’ll get this fixed too.

Let’s sure hope so.

As always, thanks for reading and GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

As for Casel, he is inconsistent, he's only at his best when he's protected and when he's desperate to win the game in the final moments, sorry it's just not good enough, as much as I like his leadership its not enough to win the big game, everyone in the NFL puts KC down, and we keep giving them the list of why there right, we need to stop being tight and spend the money necessary to get the personnel we need to win the big games, I don't mean go crazy and grab every old out of shape free agent we see, they don't even have to be great, just considerably good at what they do and let the stars do their job better, I believe we need a clean slate, get rid of the front OL line altogether save for the good one we have unite them with rookies and rookie free agents who can work now, so that they can gel, working out a system that works for them, in order to become more solid, they can grow to know each others weaknesses and make up for each other, I remember a former Chiefs OL front that performed just like that, Ok i'm done!

How can you blame Cassel for this loss??? The guy did everything he could. I don't understand how the d not doing well the oline not getting in the way of defenders is Cassel fault, or what about the play calling??? As for scrapping the o line notice asamougha is starting now Hudson is in the class room and will probably start next year Albert is doing good. lija will probably be back one more year I do agree him (because of age) and B rich (because is a better swing backup) need replaced but they are in that process at the moment. @med8tr0n

@JustinRGroth Your misunderstood what I said, Casel can be as good as any QB, but the oline has to protect him in order for him to be good, if there not doing there job, he can't do his, no QB could unless there able to carry the team, now listen, Casel cannot carry this team he is not that good, that's all I'm saying, he can be good if protected, but he can carry the team, or hasn't shown it enough times for me to believe he can, that all.

Absolutely, "Cindy", and if you notice teams are starting to go after Casel more he's our major weakness, we do have a strong offensive team, we just need to utilize them right, the timing between QB and receiver is to long, we often run on 1st, 2nd and 3rd, in which reveals all, we shouldn't be a running team we should be a balanced team, Kansas city ( at the risk of sounding like I'm reaching to high) should be as big a threat if not bigger as the Steelers were last year to the packers. its kinda like having a sword when the enemy shows up but we pickup a butter knife to battle with, we are not using the personnel we have the right way.

The answere, Pioli needs to get is @$$ on a plane to Japan and sign some Sumo's! They have great speed for big dudes, they train their hands to prevent the other guy from holding them, and I guarrentee they could get great push on almost every pass play. Pluss they would be TRUE block eaters! I atleast think this would be a great idea someday for a NT project!

You are right on the money. I was saying on Facebook with the Chiefs Nation that our OL and DL are not doing their job. Moore was not really touched, and he had all day long to throw the ball. Our OL could not block a fly. We have had this problem now for almost 3 years. Our play calling was so predictable, you do not need eyesight to know what the Chiefs were going to do. For example, Battle had a good 1st down run. So what does our coaches call for, the same play and we lost yards or was at the line. I see we lost a mentor on the OL, Brian Waters, and it is showing. If our OL cannot change and be better players, we need to get 2 OL players who will step up to the plate. The Chiefs have a great team but our coaches are giving the opposing team the play calls even before the game starts. For the rest of the year, each game we need to have different plays continously mix it up and NEVER let the Defense know what we will do. It will be somewhat a challenge for the Chiefs players but these players want to make millions and claim to be professionals so lets see the professionalism by being complex instead of simplex.

Like I said Casel can be as good or as bad as any QB in the NFL, but only when protecting him will the Chiefs succeed in winning games. our offensive front is too weak, and that's why we loose and struggle against low ranked teams, which we shouldn't be doing at all, not to mention Casel doesn't have confidence in himself, and therefore has ceased to be aggressive, the coordinator is too slow in play calling and relies on running when he should be using our three receivers and then alternating with the run quickly and aggressively. it seems to work near the end of the fourth quarter, when they get desperate!, why not start the game that way!

I need to go read Big Matt's column now. I just asked Bill W over at ESPN if he thought this next offseason KC should address the abysmal pass rush with upgrading at OLB or give Houston another year and upgrade at DE. BTW, where has Gilberry been? He was 2nd in sacks last year. A one hit wonder?

I was also wondering why we didn't try something like with the Colts. I mean the colts corners weren't that good, but to keep the colts pass rush in check we threw a lot of quick slants to relieve the pressure off of Cassel and keep the the blitz in check. Good article though really enjoyed it.

Lyle you are right on target as usual. I was astonished that Romeo made no halftime adjustments, because it was crystal clear what they were doing. Now Moore is not, repeat NOT, a quality QB, but if you give ANY QB in this league enough time he will hit some receivers, and then the worst possible thing happened. Moore began to believe in himself and then he was off to the races. I have zero answers to this one. The Chargers rang up 38 points on Green Bay and we held them to 20? Where the hell was that team at? Good grief if we are not careful we may find ourselves back in the Luck Sweekstakes! (and not by design) Cassel went back to his happy feet impressions, but the play calling was horrific. Draws & screens will stop blitz packages and we did not do it. It was like watching the worlds largest brain fart in slow motion, and the stink lingered all day. We played so bad I could not even get mad! The idea of Tebow running rampant will definitely piss me off though. They still have a chance to win the division, but a win against Denver is a must or we are done, because without winning the division there will be no playoffs for KC.

@Big Jim I agree with you and Lyle completely! Why no adjustments?? Just more of the same in the 2nd half - where the sense in that? Where is the "risk" in blitzing Moore more? Certainly didn't have to worry about him burning us for a big one as he already was. Cassel's drops should have been shortened and what the hell was the big dose of DMC vs. Battle, especially when we were inside the 10 yard line. Was Battle hurt? I didn't see him carry the ball hardly at all as the game progressed. Plus can we please stop running DMC up the middle? Plus why did we force a balanced run/pass ratio when the fins were 13th vs run and 31st vs pass? I am at a loss for the answers which fortunately is keeping me from slipping into a depression after that cluster.

How dare you contradict me! LB pressure would be nice. Justin Houston in particular has been disappointing there. But I'm with you on one thing: I honestly don't think Romeo is sending them much. Hali, sure, but nobody else, unless its Houston in the nickel set. I mentioned this in my post, but Dorsey said last year that on passing plays his job was to get the QB. I really don't think they're being taught to "occupy space" when the QB drops back. That'd be pretty crazy.

@Big Matt Not a game goes by that I don't watch our defense and think "what if Berry was playing". I know that doesn't do any good, but I can't help but think his loss has had a major impact on everything we do on defense. If he was there for both coverage and run support how much more comfortable would Romeo be sending the LBs after the QB?

med8tr0n 6 pts

As for Casel, he is inconsistent, he's only at his best when he's protected and when he's desperate to win the game in the final moments, sorry it's just not good enough, as much as I like his leadership its not enough to win the big game, everyone in the NFL puts KC down, and we keep giving them the list of why there right, we need to stop being tight and spend the money necessary to get the personnel we need to win the big games, I don't mean go crazy and grab every old out of shape free agent we see, they don't even have to be great, just considerably good at what they do and let the stars do their job better, I believe we need a clean slate, get rid of the front OL line altogether save for the good one we have unite them with rookies and rookie free agents who can work now, so that they can gel, working out a system that works for them, in order to become more solid, they can grow to know each others weaknesses and make up for each other, I remember a former Chiefs OL front that performed just like that, Ok i'm done!

JustinRGroth 28 pts

How can you blame Cassel for this loss??? The guy did everything he could. I don't understand how the d not doing well the oline not getting in the way of defenders is Cassel fault, or what about the play calling??? As for scrapping the o line notice asamougha is starting now Hudson is in the class room and will probably start next year Albert is doing good. lija will probably be back one more year I do agree him (because of age) and B rich (because is a better swing backup) need replaced but they are in that process at the moment. med8tr0n

med8tr0n 6 pts

JustinRGroth Your misunderstood what I said, Casel can be as good as any QB, but the oline has to protect him in order for him to be good, if there not doing there job, he can't do his, no QB could unless there able to carry the team, now listen, Casel cannot carry this team he is not that good, that's all I'm saying, he can be good if protected, but he can carry the team, or hasn't shown it enough times for me to believe he can, that all.

med8tr0n 6 pts

Absolutely, "Cindy", and if you notice teams are starting to go after Casel more he's our major weakness, we do have a strong offensive team, we just need to utilize them right, the timing between QB and receiver is to long, we often run on 1st, 2nd and 3rd, in which reveals all, we shouldn't be a running team we should be a balanced team, Kansas city ( at the risk of sounding like I'm reaching to high) should be as big a threat if not bigger as the Steelers were last year to the packers. its kinda like having a sword when the enemy shows up but we pickup a butter knife to battle with, we are not using the personnel we have the right way.

ShannonThompson 22 pts

The answere, Pioli needs to get is @$$ on a plane to Japan and sign some Sumo's! They have great speed for big dudes, they train their hands to prevent the other guy from holding them, and I guarrentee they could get great push on almost every pass play. Pluss they would be TRUE block eaters! I atleast think this would be a great idea someday for a NT project!

CindyTx65 5 pts

You are right on the money. I was saying on Facebook with the Chiefs Nation that our OL and DL are not doing their job. Moore was not really touched, and he had all day long to throw the ball. Our OL could not block a fly. We have had this problem now for almost 3 years.

Our play calling was so predictable, you do not need eyesight to know what the Chiefs were going to do. For example, Battle had a good 1st down run. So what does our coaches call for, the same play and we lost yards or was at the line.

I see we lost a mentor on the OL, Brian Waters, and it is showing. If our OL cannot change and be better players, we need to get 2 OL players who will step up to the plate.

The Chiefs have a great team but our coaches are giving the opposing team the play calls even before the game starts.

For the rest of the year, each game we need to have different plays continously mix it up and NEVER let the Defense know what we will do. It will be somewhat a challenge for the Chiefs players but these players want to make millions and claim to be professionals so lets see the professionalism by being complex instead of simplex.

med8tr0n 6 pts

Like I said Casel can be as good or as bad as any QB in the NFL, but only when protecting him will the Chiefs succeed in winning games. our offensive front is too weak, and that's why we loose and struggle against low ranked teams, which we shouldn't be doing at all, not to mention Casel doesn't have confidence in himself, and therefore has ceased to be aggressive, the coordinator is too slow in play calling and relies on running when he should be using our three receivers and then alternating with the run quickly and aggressively. it seems to work near the end of the fourth quarter, when they get desperate!, why not start the game that way!

sidibeke 259 pts

I need to go read Big Matt's column now. I just asked Bill W over at ESPN if he thought this next offseason KC should address the abysmal pass rush with upgrading at OLB or give Houston another year and upgrade at DE.

BTW, where has Gilberry been? He was 2nd in sacks last year. A one hit wonder?

awastevenson 21 pts

I was also wondering why we didn't try something like with the Colts. I mean the colts corners weren't that good, but to keep the colts pass rush in check we threw a lot of quick slants to relieve the pressure off of Cassel and keep the the blitz in check. Good article though really enjoyed it.

Big Jim 234 pts

Lyle you are right on target as usual. I was astonished that Romeo made no halftime adjustments, because it was crystal clear what they were doing. Now Moore is not, repeat NOT, a quality QB, but if you give ANY QB in this league enough time he will hit some receivers, and then the worst possible thing happened. Moore began to believe in himself and then he was off to the races. I have zero answers to this one. The Chargers rang up 38 points on Green Bay and we held them to 20? Where the hell was that team at? Good grief if we are not careful we may find ourselves back in the Luck Sweekstakes! (and not by design) Cassel went back to his happy feet impressions, but the play calling was horrific. Draws & screens will stop blitz packages and we did not do it. It was like watching the worlds largest brain fart in slow motion, and the stink lingered all day. We played so bad I could not even get mad! The idea of Tebow running rampant will definitely piss me off though. They still have a chance to win the division, but a win against Denver is a must or we are done, because without winning the division there will be no playoffs for KC.

KC MikeG 320 pts

Big Jim

I agree with you and Lyle completely! Why no adjustments?? Just more of the same in the 2nd half - where the sense in that? Where is the "risk" in blitzing Moore more? Certainly didn't have to worry about him burning us for a big one as he already was. Cassel's drops should have been shortened and what the hell was the big dose of DMC vs. Battle, especially when we were inside the 10 yard line. Was Battle hurt? I didn't see him carry the ball hardly at all as the game progressed. Plus can we please stop running DMC up the middle? Plus why did we force a balanced run/pass ratio when the fins were 13th vs run and 31st vs pass? I am at a loss for the answers which fortunately is keeping me from slipping into a depression after that cluster.

Big Matt 199 pts

How dare you contradict me!

LB pressure would be nice. Justin Houston in particular has been disappointing there. But I'm with you on one thing: I honestly don't think Romeo is sending them much. Hali, sure, but nobody else, unless its Houston in the nickel set.

I mentioned this in my post, but Dorsey said last year that on passing plays his job was to get the QB. I really don't think they're being taught to "occupy space" when the QB drops back. That'd be pretty crazy.

LyleGraversen 313 pts

Big Matt Not a game goes by that I don't watch our defense and think "what if Berry was playing". I know that doesn't do any good, but I can't help but think his loss has had a major impact on everything we do on defense. If he was there for both coverage and run support how much more comfortable would Romeo be sending the LBs after the QB?