Chiefs DVOA Analysis: Week 8

by Chiefs

What an incredible, emotional, unforgettable game Monday night was. As happy and excited as everyone was, still is, and should be about that win, a loss would have been equally emotional, just in an extremely negative way. More devastating actually and we came very, very close to experiencing just that. Fate, as it has done for four games in a row now, smiled on the Chiefs once again. Be glad and rejoice.

I now must ask you to ask yourself some questions. By winning four consecutive games against otherwise flawed or unlucky teams, are you now feeling just a little bit like the Chiefs might be on the verge of “unstoppable force” class? Are you looking more forward to the games against New England and Pittsburgh because you’re totally convinced that the Chiefs will simply roll over the 0-7 Dolphins and the Tebowing Donkeys?

Not so fast.

Ground Control to Major Tom Tom, a dose of anti-homerish, unemotional, myth busting, courtesy Football Outsiders statistics, assuming you are up to hearing it, awaits beyond the jump.

Let’s be brutally honest here. The Chiefs rank in the bottom half, the lower bottom in some respects, of the league in many of the most important categories. Worse, they haven’t really shown significant progress, on paper anyway, since the season began.

It’s time to take off the blinders because we are simply not that good and playing the way we are, odds are that the extreme good fortune we’ve been witnessing is not very likely to continue. The Chiefs are basically a stagnant, sloppy team that’s managed to somehow slop out four wins. Frankly, I’m not entirely convinced that these four wins might not be the grand total of our wins for the entire season.

There is a little good news to report. For the first time this season, Jackie Battle makes it into the rankings and what an impressive entry it was. He arrives, statistically, as the #2 RB in DVOA. My boy’s looking pretty good so far. Special teams also continues its upward progress – I’m loving that.

On the down side though, our offensive efficiency, especially with Matt Cassel at the helm leaves much to be desired. We have weapons, we have certain strengths, but Matt Cassel needs to do more, in a more consistent fashion, to take this offense to the next level. That said, I don’t believe our lackluster offense is 100% Cassel’s fault – but more on that a little later.

This week, I’m introducing another statistical slant, Weighted DVOA (see chart below), to better gauge recent trending.

What this chart essentially shows me is that our recent wins have more to do with good fortune (along with a big play here and there), than overall improving, consistent play, especially on the offensive side of the ball. In other words, the way we are playing now is about the same as we’ve playing all season long. Put another way, we will need to get better if we expect to continue winning games.

We continue to show major weakness in the trenches. On the offensive side of the ball, as I hinted at earlier, this is something that has to be hampering Cassel both in the passing and running game. Outside of a couple of key series, our defensive line, generally speaking, is just not getting the job done. In terms of generating pressure on opposing QBs, our DL in fact ranks last in the league. We can’t sustain that and expect to win many games.

There is at least one optimistic aspect to our victory over the Chargers that I think is worth noting. Our past schedule got harder and in turn, our future schedule got a little easier. Ugly or not, beating San Diego was without question, a valuable accomplishment in light of our post season hopes and aspirations.

Against Miami, expect a tough game. In major ways, the Dolphins match up fairly evenly with the Chiefs. They are generally better than the Chiefs in the trenches. What they seem to lack is an abundance of dominant offensive weapons. Even though their offensive line is last in the league at pass protection, one can’t simply overlook the fact that our defensive line is also last in the league at rushing the passer. In all other aspects their OL and DL is better than the Chiefs OL and DL.

I think the way we beat Miami when they have the ball is to bring more CB and S blitzes against them. We should be able to contain their receivers by going man-to-man. Kelly Gregg will also need to be in top form to keep the Dolphins from running straight at us, which is what they do best and something we haven’t shown a consistent ability to defend against.

When we have the ball, because Miami’s secondary is their weakest link, Cassel needs to be crisp, and we need to continue to see the involvement and improvement of Jonathon Baldwin along with Bowe and Breaston. When we run, we should avoid the outsides and center, and focus mainly on the B gaps, the two weakest points in their run defense. Oh, and keep the ball out of Thom Thumb’s hands.

That’s my Double Take.

What’s your take, Addicts?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Great analysis, as usual. However, I do have one issue. I agree that the Chiefs are certainly not a great team right now. They might not even be very good. But our offense continues to predicate itself on "run first." I don't know how many times in the first 3 quarters they ran on first down on Monday night only to get 2 or fewer yards. Cassel was routinely in a 2nd or 3rd an long situation. San Diego was keying on the run all night and there were several instances where the play calling could have taken advantage of that. The biggest coup was the pass on third down to McClain that drew the personal foul. Beyond that, rushing McCluster on 3rd and 2 up the middle was ridiculous. My point is that the play calling is still putting the breaks on Cassel. It seemed, specifically Monday, that his opportunities were limited. Therefore, every time he makes a mistake, it seems more glaring. His first interception should have been a REception. He threw the ball a little high, yes. But he also put it exactly where Baldwin - and none of the defenders - could snag it. Baldwin's a rookie and can be forgiven drops like that, but in general that ball should have been caught. Interceptions off of catchable tipped balls should have an asterisk next to them in the stat box, almost like an error in baseball. Cassel's second was with 13 seconds left and mostly a desperation throw. It was put to the sideline where a receiver would necessarily have to step out of bounds after the catch. This is why the defender went out of bounds after the interception. I'm not a Cassel apologist. But I am a Cassel fan because he doesn't give up. Some of what he does is maddening. But, just like last year, the more he's allowed to throw, the better he gets. Hopefully he'll get into mid-season 2010 form in the next few weeks just in time to go to New England. I think in order to make Jackie Battle more effective, we're going to have to go pass first more often and let our Bs take it to the defense.

"Frankly, I’m not entirely convinced that these four wins might not be the grand total of our wins for the entire season." You had to know there was going to be some backlash with that one. And the DVOA has us projected for 7, right? I think we'll get there, at least. We'd only have to go 3-6. I love the DVOA stuff. Its good to look at things objectively, even if it stings. That DL against the pass rating confirms the eyeball test in this case, too. Dorsey and Jackson are both total liabilities on passing plays. So, basically, these two top five picks are awful on like 60% of defensive plays. but hey, occupy those blockers, fellas! Thats your only job!

This is very good stuff. It confirms what an objective eye would see. It is true that with only 16 games, a few lucky breaks can put a team into the playoffs, e.g., 2010 Chiefs, but this statistical analysis seems to represent a pretty accurate view of what has happened in the past and what is likey to happen in the future. A lucky team getting into the playoffs is unlikely to last long or look very good, i.e., 2010 Chiefs. But we are at a great point in the season. In first place, with two winnable home games coming up. So let's enjoy it before the likely hard times come.

@KC Oracle I don't think that's a fair assessment of the 2010 Chiefs. I am not sure of the luck to which you refer, unless you are implying that their strength of schedule was lucky. They were a good team whose, in my opinion, aging O line (specifically Weigmann and Lilja) wore down toward the end of the year, had play calling issues associated with Weis' impending departure and had safety and inside linebacker issues with covering TEs. The Ravens were and are a good team, and the better team won, but the Chiefs earned their spot in the playoffs. As for this year, they are a better than average team (I'm not sure if they're good without Berry and Charles) that is playing well as a TEAM. Who do you give the MNF gameball to: Breaston for his RAC 1st down? Baldwin for his sweet TD catch? Hali for the sack in OT? Studebaker for digging out the fumble? Colquitt for his punting them out of a whole? They are playing good team football, have some confidence and are becoming more and more dangerous offensively (if only the play calling would get out of the way). If this were last year, I don't think we fare well against NYJ, PIT, NE or GB (I do think Chi was overrated last year, too). But it's not and the Jets and Pit are vulnerable (NY more so than Pit). Finally, while how good SD is is debatable, the win Mon should not be discounted just because of Rivers' fumble. For 3 quarters, SD played some of the best football that they probably have all season, and while KC didn't look good, they hung with them. And a Charger team clicking like that is considered one of the best in the NFL.

@sidibeke All pretty subjective stuff -- "better than average," "playing good football, have some confidence and are becoming more and more dangerous." Lucky last year? Sure, they beat a number of bad teams in very close games, e.g., 13 to 10 over Buffalo in OT after Buffalo kicker doinked the upright with a winning field goal (after making it on the first kick). Beating SD in the rain based on punt return? I'm all for jumpitng on the bandwagon this year and seeing where it takes us. I just don't think we should ignore the reality about how the team has played.

@KC Oracle Would numbers help: better than average means top 16 team. Playing good football: won 4 games in a row. Becoming more and more dangerous: 1) I don't think Cassel had many long passes during the first few games. Now he has Baldwin as a legitimate threat, has been throwing to Breaston and even scans the field! 2) We have a potentially legitimate runner in Battle. 3) Jones only got 5 carries Mon night. (Still 5 too many). As for the missed FG; by that standard, SD beat KC in SD by luck since Succop missed a 35 yrd fg Beating SD in the rain: you play in the weather that comes and I don't remember anyone saying Oakland's wins this season (or Chi historically) were lucky because of Ford (or Hester). It's all perception. If you think a team is inferior, they win by luck. If you think they're better, then the better team won. Reality is subjected. Reality is that there are still glaring weaknesses on both sides of the ball, but there is also some pretty exciting play making going on both sides of the ball. Reality is that KC has won 4 in a row, and bad teams just don't win 4 games in a row, no matter who you are playing.

@KC Oracle Damn I'm long-winded.

@sidibeke Its all good. You make some good points. Can't to see how it plays out. No one expected the season to be so enjoyable and interesting at this point, after the 0 and 3 start.

@KC Oracle No doubt about that. They're playing competitive football that sure doesn't lack excitement. After the Lions game, I thought I was going to have a lot more free time on my hands this fall.

How do you reconcile Cassel's DVOA with his TQBRm(which was like 7 last week and is around 15 for the season)? Not trying to be a smart ass; I'm really asking.

I'm dumb Wats TQBR@sidibeke

@JustinRGroth@sidibeke It's ESPNs new Total Quarterback Rank or Rating. I'm actually not sure how it's calculated, but it's an alternative to the Passer Rating. I don't think Cassel is a great QB. I do think he's a better-than-average to good QB who is doing enough to help us win.

@sidibeke I'm just happy football is played on a grass field and not on paper

I hear they are using DVOA to decide the superbowl winner this year.. Seriously though, does anyone really care what this site says or think it's a useful tool in determining how we perform in the future? All that matters are wins and losses.

@TrappedInDonkeyland Hey, if you don't like what you see, you know what to do. I consider this to be valuable, insightful information. If you don't, then don't bother. In the meantime, enjoy that sandhole you've put your head in.

@Double D I understand that you, being a lawyer, have no soul and therefore no way of having optimism but come on dd.. Others still enjoy their lives and chose to look on the bright side. Have a great day buddy!

@TrappedInDonkeyland@double Don't be a d%*k TIDL.

@Double D right back at ya!

Great analysis buddy! I hope to see you at the game. I am going to have butterflies in my stomach Sunday morning, still I think its a game we can win. On the opposite side of the coin , San Diego goes into a short rest week battling the unstoppable Packers. HAHHHAHA!

@Arrowhead Adventurer Oh I agree, the best team that SD has beaten is still KC and they also have plenty of schedule yet to play. The AFC West in general has a long way to go towards becoming a significant division this year.

So I can 100% agree that we haven't looked really good in all aspects of the game in a single game yet. If we don't continue to improve we will have a hard time against some of the better teams, no doubt. However, this is crazy talk: "Frankly, I’m not entirely convinced that these 4 wins might not be the grand total of our wins for the entire season." Come on DD, I know you're not a big "rah rah" kind of guy, but this seems like over the top pessimism even for you. So with a game against the winless Dolphins at home, two games against Denver, and a home game against Oakland you don't think we can get even one win? Here's my take: We started off HORRIBLE, but found a way to fight through it and over come some devastating injuries. Despite the fact that we haven't played our best football yet, especially on offense, We've found a way to gut out 4 wins. I think if we don't improve at all we could still get to 6-7 wins and with some improvement along the way I think 10 wins is still possible.

But wasn't it the same last year kind of we had games we blasted games we got blasted and ugly close ones we should of won/lost but didn't I agree Lyle 10 wins is not beyond us at all so DD I respect you and your opinion but right or wrong enjoy our wins when they come (and the last month they have come) and don't morn the losses until the game is over @LyleGraversen

@JustinRGroth@LyleGraversen I'm mostly concerned about overconfidence at this point. All of our wins have come against weak, wounded or self-inflicting opponents. I thought Cassel looked good against Indy but come on. Miami is a total trap game.

I agree that the Miami game has the potential to be a trap game but according to the cognitive theory what u thin you say, and what you say you do... right now its clear no matter the situation the chiefs believe they can win they talk about this belief (proof being mcclains tweet) they have shown that they can win it may not be pretty but they can and have won. don't get me wrong I'm nervous but I'm not counting them out till until its all zeros and we don't nave more points. I would take them playing ugly and winning ugly than not winning especially when your talking about this season. @Double D @LyleGraversen

also the chiefs are wounded and sadly self inflicting themselves the good thing about the latter is it can be fixed. The food thing about the former is people are stepping up @Double D @LyleGraversen

@Double D@JustinRGroth@LyleGraversen I think the only overconfidence is with the fans. I'm not too worried about that with the players. In fact, I think confidence is what's pulling them through.

@Double D@JustinRGroth@LyleGraversen I personally am not concerned with overconfidence. After the way we started out, yes two teams that were supposed to be mediocre ended up being much more, but using that, the growing leadership, and Haley seems to do a dang good job of motivating when needed. I guess we'll see though. That all being said, I know im contradicting myself here, but I do worry about being blindsided by another blowout, since we have had a few this year, and it happened last year by Denver too. It all amounts to if they can learn and grow after every play, they had trouble doing that with Denver, Oakland, SD, and the Ravens last year, so we'lls ee

@LyleGraversen Lyle, I like the wins but I don't really like what I'm seeing in the way we got them. If we keep playing this kind of status quo crap ball, this good feeling will be short-lived. We're not really getting better, we're just winning.

@Double D that should be your thesis statement for your new report on "how to miss the forest for the trees" by DD

@Double D Not getting better? I would argue that everything looks better. The defense looks better, the special teams looks better, the passing game now has three real targets in Bowe, Breaston, and Baldwin and Cassel no longer has to just lock in on Bowe and then check down if he's covered. On Monday night they even showed how he was going through progressions. When have we seen that before? Now Battle is coming on and becoming a factor. But I'm sure you're right and we're just as bad as we were against the Bills and Lions.

@Double D I would also just point out that we don't have to be a great team to win the division. We just have to be "less flawed" then San Diego and Oakland. So even if we aren't in the same league as the so called "Big Dogs" we can still make the playoffs and then you never no what can happen.

ntrwriter 6 pts

Great analysis, as usual. However, I do have one issue. I agree that the Chiefs are certainly not a great team right now. They might not even be very good. But our offense continues to predicate itself on "run first." I don't know how many times in the first 3 quarters they ran on first down on Monday night only to get 2 or fewer yards. Cassel was routinely in a 2nd or 3rd an long situation. San Diego was keying on the run all night and there were several instances where the play calling could have taken advantage of that. The biggest coup was the pass on third down to McClain that drew the personal foul. Beyond that, rushing McCluster on 3rd and 2 up the middle was ridiculous. My point is that the play calling is still putting the breaks on Cassel. It seemed, specifically Monday, that his opportunities were limited. Therefore, every time he makes a mistake, it seems more glaring.

His first interception should have been a REception. He threw the ball a little high, yes. But he also put it exactly where Baldwin - and none of the defenders - could snag it. Baldwin's a rookie and can be forgiven drops like that, but in general that ball should have been caught. Interceptions off of catchable tipped balls should have an asterisk next to them in the stat box, almost like an error in baseball. Cassel's second was with 13 seconds left and mostly a desperation throw. It was put to the sideline where a receiver would necessarily have to step out of bounds after the catch. This is why the defender went out of bounds after the interception.

I'm not a Cassel apologist. But I am a Cassel fan because he doesn't give up. Some of what he does is maddening. But, just like last year, the more he's allowed to throw, the better he gets. Hopefully he'll get into mid-season 2010 form in the next few weeks just in time to go to New England. I think in order to make Jackie Battle more effective, we're going to have to go pass first more often and let our Bs take it to the defense.

Big Matt 199 pts

"Frankly, I’m not entirely convinced that these four wins might not be the grand total of our wins for the entire season."

You had to know there was going to be some backlash with that one. And the DVOA has us projected for 7, right? I think we'll get there, at least. We'd only have to go 3-6.

I love the DVOA stuff. Its good to look at things objectively, even if it stings. That DL against the pass rating confirms the eyeball test in this case, too. Dorsey and Jackson are both total liabilities on passing plays. So, basically, these two top five picks are awful on like 60% of defensive plays. but hey, occupy those blockers, fellas! Thats your only job!

KC Oracle 68 pts

This is very good stuff. It confirms what an objective eye would see. It is true that with only 16 games, a few lucky breaks can put a team into the playoffs, e.g., 2010 Chiefs, but this statistical analysis seems to represent a pretty accurate view of what has happened in the past and what is likey to happen in the future. A lucky team getting into the playoffs is unlikely to last long or look very good, i.e., 2010 Chiefs.

But we are at a great point in the season. In first place, with two winnable home games coming up. So let's enjoy it before the likely hard times come.

sidibeke 259 pts

KC Oracle I don't think that's a fair assessment of the 2010 Chiefs. I am not sure of the luck to which you refer, unless you are implying that their strength of schedule was lucky.

They were a good team whose, in my opinion, aging O line (specifically Weigmann and Lilja) wore down toward the end of the year, had play calling issues associated with Weis' impending departure and had safety and inside linebacker issues with covering TEs. The Ravens were and are a good team, and the better team won, but the Chiefs earned their spot in the playoffs.

As for this year, they are a better than average team (I'm not sure if they're good without Berry and Charles) that is playing well as a TEAM. Who do you give the MNF gameball to: Breaston for his RAC 1st down? Baldwin for his sweet TD catch? Hali for the sack in OT? Studebaker for digging out the fumble? Colquitt for his punting them out of a whole?

They are playing good team football, have some confidence and are becoming more and more dangerous offensively (if only the play calling would get out of the way).

If this were last year, I don't think we fare well against NYJ, PIT, NE or GB (I do think Chi was overrated last year, too). But it's not and the Jets and Pit are vulnerable (NY more so than Pit).

Finally, while how good SD is is debatable, the win Mon should not be discounted just because of Rivers' fumble. For 3 quarters, SD played some of the best football that they probably have all season, and while KC didn't look good, they hung with them. And a Charger team clicking like that is considered one of the best in the NFL.

KC Oracle 68 pts

sidibeke All pretty subjective stuff -- "better than average," "playing good football, have some confidence and are becoming more and more dangerous."

Lucky last year? Sure, they beat a number of bad teams in very close games, e.g., 13 to 10 over Buffalo in OT after Buffalo kicker doinked the upright with a winning field goal (after making it on the first kick). Beating SD in the rain based on punt return?

I'm all for jumpitng on the bandwagon this year and seeing where it takes us. I just don't think we should ignore the reality about how the team has played.

sidibeke 259 pts

KC Oracle Would numbers help: better than average means top 16 team.

Playing good football: won 4 games in a row.

Becoming more and more dangerous: 1) I don't think Cassel had many long passes during the first few games. Now he has Baldwin as a legitimate threat, has been throwing to Breaston and even scans the field!

2) We have a potentially legitimate runner in Battle.

3) Jones only got 5 carries Mon night. (Still 5 too many).

As for the missed FG; by that standard, SD beat KC in SD by luck since Succop missed a 35 yrd fg

Beating SD in the rain: you play in the weather that comes and I don't remember anyone saying Oakland's wins this season (or Chi historically) were lucky because of Ford (or Hester).

It's all perception. If you think a team is inferior, they win by luck. If you think they're better, then the better team won.

Reality is subjected. Reality is that there are still glaring weaknesses on both sides of the ball, but there is also some pretty exciting play making going on both sides of the ball. Reality is that KC has won 4 in a row, and bad teams just don't win 4 games in a row, no matter who you are playing.

sidibeke 259 pts

KC Oracle Damn I'm long-winded.

KC Oracle 68 pts

sidibeke Its all good. You make some good points. Can't to see how it plays out. No one expected the season to be so enjoyable and interesting at this point, after the 0 and 3 start.

sidibeke 259 pts

KC Oracle No doubt about that. They're playing competitive football that sure doesn't lack excitement. After the Lions game, I thought I was going to have a lot more free time on my hands this fall.

sidibeke 259 pts

How do you reconcile Cassel's DVOA with his TQBRm(which was like 7 last week and is around 15 for the season)? Not trying to be a smart ass; I'm really asking.

sidibeke 259 pts

JustinRGrothsidibeke It's ESPNs new Total Quarterback Rank or Rating. I'm actually not sure how it's calculated, but it's an alternative to the Passer Rating.

I don't think Cassel is a great QB. I do think he's a better-than-average to good QB who is doing enough to help us win.

TrappedInDonkeyland 245 pts

sidibeke I'm just happy football is played on a grass field and not on paper

TrappedInDonkeyland 245 pts

I hear they are using DVOA to decide the superbowl winner this year..

Seriously though, does anyone really care what this site says or think it's a useful tool in determining how we perform in the future? All that matters are wins and losses.

Double D 43 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland Hey, if you don't like what you see, you know what to do. I consider this to be valuable, insightful information. If you don't, then don't bother. In the meantime, enjoy that sandhole you've put your head in.

TrappedInDonkeyland 245 pts

@Double D I understand that you, being a lawyer, have no soul and therefore no way of having optimism but come on dd.. Others still enjoy their lives and chose to look on the bright side. Have a great day buddy!

Double D 43 pts

TrappedInDonkeyland@double Don't be a d%*k TIDL.

Arrowhead Adventurer 97 pts

Great analysis buddy! I hope to see you at the game. I am going to have butterflies in my stomach Sunday morning, still I think its a game we can win. On the opposite side of the coin , San Diego goes into a short rest week battling the unstoppable Packers. HAHHHAHA!