The Chiefs Must Unleash Matt Cassel

by Armchair Addict

I can’t begin to tell you how much better it feels to be sitting down to write about the Chiefs following their latest game and not have to talk about another loss. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying that the win against the now 0-4 Vikings erases the first three games of the season. I’m not saying that I think this team will win nine of its last 12 games and make the playoffs. I will say that it now appears that the Chiefs of 2010 have resurfaced.

I know what some of you are thinking: “Lyle, one win does not mean we’re back in our division winning form from last year!”

However, I would argue that for the last six quarters, the Chiefs have played on par with their overall performance from last season. Especially when you factor in that they are without three MAJOR players from that 2010 team in Jamaal Charles, Eric Berry and Tony Moeaki. I mean, stop and think about what those last six quarters would have looked like if those three players were healthy and playing. To me it seems clear that there were two major problems with the Chiefs to start the season. The first is that Todd Haley’s “outside the box” preseason approach was an EPIC failure that didn’t have the team physically ready for full contact football. The other is that for whatever reason Matt Cassel was playing with training wheels on to start the season that weren’t there in 2010.

Why those training wheels were there is up for debate. Perhaps it was just Cassel not being ready like the rest of the team, and it was all in his head. Maybe it was the loss of Charlie Weis. Maybe it was new offensive coordinator Bill Muir. Maybe new QB coach Jim Zorn has drastically changed Cassel’s approach. Maybe Haley was insisting that he “play it safe” because he lacked faith in the QB. Or maybe, as I’ve already hypothesized, Cassel was much more physically handicapped by the 350-lb Packer that pancaked his ribs at the start of the season than the team let on (note that his YPA has gotten better each week since it happened: 3.3, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0). I don’t know. I do know that in the second half of the SD game where Cassel had to throw the ball deep, he looked better (up until that whole game-losing interception thing), and this week after Haley laid into him for throwing the ball in the grass on third and goal, Cassel once again looked like a completely different QB than in the first 2 1/2 games.

Now I understand that even at his best, Cassel is not an elite QB. Ladner wrote a fantastic piece last week that broke down his inconsistency and weaknesses. I don’t dispute any of that. And yet, I 100-percent believe that as the Chiefs move forward this season, the best thing that they could do is unleash Matt Cassel. Make him the centerpiece of the offense and throw the ball all over the field.

I’ll explain this “crazy talk” after the break.

Todd Haley has been clear since he arrived in Kansas City that his offensive game plan is to establish the run. He believes in controlling the clock, avoiding turnovers, and keeping his defense off the field. His strategy has stayed consistent through multiple offensive coordinators. Use the run to set up the pass and if running the ball isn’t working just keep after it until it does or the Chiefs lose. I believe that the only hope that the Chiefs can salvage the 2011 season is for Haley to change this philosophy.

When the Chiefs put Jamaal Charles on IR the odds of this philosophy providing positive results became very slim. Thomas Jones is horrible; Dexter McCluster is the size of an 8th grader; and Jackie Battle is a third-string special teamer. Yes, the Chiefs can keep this current philosophy and probably eek out 4-5 wins (Indy, Miami, Denver, another home game somewhere along the way). The best case scenario there is 5-11. That is a massive let down after last season, and yet not bad enough to appease the “Suck for Luck” crowd.

So here is what I propose: the Chiefs need to change their offensive philosophy from running to set up the pass to passing to set up the run. If the Chiefs are going to run the ball at all this year they have to stretch defenses out and keep them on their heels. The Chiefs simply do not have the backs or the power O-line to cram the ball down a defense’s throat. The only time the Chiefs have looked even competent on offense has been when Cassel is throwing the ball down the field. Assuming that Jon Baldwin comes back soon, that will mean that three of the Chiefs top four offensive play makers will be WRs (Bowe, Breaston and Baldwin) with the fourth being the shifty change-of-pace back Dexter McCluster who is most effective in a spread attack.

So, it’s time to put the team on Cassel’s back and see what happens. I believe this team has the defensive and offensive play makers to play .500 ball the rest of the way if their QB will just get the ball out to the play makers. So instead of hiding Cassel behind an ineffective run game, let’s turn him loose and see what happens. Is there a good chance that he’ll crumble under the pressure? Maybe, and if so then the Chiefs will finally have an indisputable answer to the question “Can Matt Cassel be our franchise QB?” If it’s REALLY bad then maybe before the year is out they can try out Ricky Stanzi and see how he looks. It seems to me that both Cassel’s few remaining supporters and his harshest critics should be in favor of this game plan. After all, the alternative is more one-yard runs right up the middle on first and second down.

Now just in case anyone still isn’t on board yet, I’ve got the stats to back it up. Since Matt Cassel became the starter in KC, his YPA have been a perfect indicator of the team’s success. Take a look at these numbers. When Cassel averages 7.0 YPA and up the team is 8-3 (72.7 winning percent). When he averages between 6.0-6.9 the team is 5-6 (45.5 winning percent). When he averages under 6.0 YPA the team is 2-11 (15.4 winning percent). So the play-it-safe, dink-and-dunk game doesn’t work. If the team wants to win they have to throw the ball and not just 3-yard check down passes. Throw the ball down the field and see what happens. It’s as simple as that.

I just don’t see an upside to our current offensive approach. I mean, I understand that when you have quick three and outs and turnovers you set up the defense for failure. I just don’t think spreading the ball around the field will lead to more three and outs than running Jones up the middle on first and second down for a total of three yards. Baldwin should be back soon, and Breaston is finding a place in this offense. You combine them with Bowe and you have the weapons for a great passing attack. If that happens, then McCluster will have more space to take advantage of his quickness and be more effective. Even McClain, Jones and Battle will look a little better if defenses are playing back to stop the pass.

Now since I highly doubt that the Chiefs are going to bring me on as an offensive consultant anytime soon it really comes down to Todd Haley. Is he willing to adapt his philosophy and trust Matt Cassel with the ball? And if he does, will Matt Cassel trust himself enough to get the job done. Just in case I think Haley should make a point to yell at Cassel to get him fired up early in each game when Cassel makes a mistake.

I mean who knew that when Matt Cassel said “Come at me, bro!” he was talking to Todd Haley about opening up the offense?

I think its time that Todd Haley did just that.

As always, thanks for reading and GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Okay Lyle, I'm buying into the idea that the Chiefs can win 4-5 games this year if they become a "pass-first" team. Cassel may get the snot knocked from his nose a few times more this way and although I don't think it will make him a better QB I don think it'll make for a much more interesting game to watch. Nice piece.

I... DO... think it will make for a more interesting game to watch.

I have to say I really like this article. In my opinion Matt Cassel is not a top tier quarterback, but I think he could be, and I hope does evolve into that position. The general strategy of being a run oriented offense in our current state is just not possible with no Charles. I mean lets be honest we have Thomas "run up the middle for 2 yards" Jones, and then there is Dexter "I look just like Jamal if you don't make me change direction or touch me and I'll fall over" McCluster. And also the offensive line may generally be the same as last year... but it is not the same line that was the #1 running offense. For this season the only way I can see this team being productive is by going to a spread offense. Go in and pass often use short screens and quick out pass patterns to make up for your running that just isn't there with the current roster. Do I like this strategy...NO, but I DO think it's possible with how effective Cassel has been in the second half of the last two games. Are we going to throw for 500 yards every game and 4 touchdowns....probably not...are there going to be sacks and interceptions....you betcha, but I would rather see them try something like that rather than rely on a 7th round pick to kick upper 40 to mid 50 yard field goals and making next to no offense with multiple 3 and outs. And if all else fails we continue to keep running the ball we could always re-sign Larry Johnson at least that way we have someone new for Thomas Jones to beat up in the locker room, and another person to run up the middle for 2 yards.

I found this to be a very interesting article and you made very valid points, our running game is horrendous right now. I could've sworn I saw Thom Jones just lay down on a play. Once baldwin lines up they might as well spread it out and keep defenses on their heels. Pass heavy teams rarely win it all, but we wont even make it to the postseason this year. (hopefully I'll be proven wrong).

@agent187 Again, I'm not saying don't have a running game. I'm saying don't make it the focal point. Instead of having Cassel throw to compliment the run game, have Cassel be the main focus and the run game compliments the pass. No different then how teams like GB, NE, and NO do it. I'm not even saying they shouldn't go back to running next year when JC is healthy. I'm just saying it makes the most sense for the rest of this season.

You make some good points. I agree to an extent. I would point out that teams that throw a lot don't win superbowls, the Rams and their greatest shiw on turf would be the exception. Look at the Colts and the 2000's Chiefs. Both threw all over the yard and scored a lot of points. The problem is they scored fast and had lopsided time of possession which results in a tired defense and a lot of points given up. They mainly need to remember Charles isn't on the field so 15 middle draws per game aren't going to work. Cassel has looked like he was playing scared until Haley chewed his ass sunday. If he plays with passion and confidence he looks pretty good. He will never be Joe Montana, I think we all know that but he can win with a balanced offense and a strong defense. They found some of both on sunday and they got a win. Let's give the defense some credit. Containing Adrian Peterson is no small task and they played great against him. The O-line also finally let Cassel stand up long enough to throw with Jared Allen on the field. I think if his team plays well enough for him to play confident they can do well.

@big chief "teams that throw a lot don't win superbowls" Ummmmm, aren't the last three Super Bowl winners the Packers, Saints, and Colts? All teams that's offenses are set up where the pass sets up the run. I'm not saying they don't run, but the pass clearly is the focal point and then they ran the ball as a compliment to their passing attack. That's what I'm saying the Chiefs should do. Second, the Chiefs aren't going to sniff the Super Bowl this year anyway so that's not really an issue. My point is that if their offensive gameplan continues to be to establish the run first and then throw safe dink and dunk passes they will win less games then if they open things up and use their playmakers at WR. I don't disagree with what you said about the defense and o-line. I just see Cassel throwing the ball down field effectively as THE number one "make or break" part of our team that will define how well we do as the year goes on.

Excellent post Lyle. I could not agree more. Especially about how nice it tells to talk about the Chiefs today.

laddiemorse 205 pts

Okay Lyle, I'm buying into the idea that the Chiefs can win 4-5 games this year if they become a "pass-first" team. Cassel may get the snot knocked from his nose a few times more this way and although I don't think it will make him a better QB I don think it'll make for a much more interesting game to watch. Nice piece.

laddiemorse 205 pts

I... DO... think it will make for a more interesting game to watch.

wyatt09 14 pts

I have to say I really like this article. In my opinion Matt Cassel is not a top tier quarterback, but I think he could be, and I hope does evolve into that position. The general strategy of being a run oriented offense in our current state is just not possible with no Charles. I mean lets be honest we have Thomas "run up the middle for 2 yards" Jones, and then there is Dexter "I look just like Jamal if you don't make me change direction or touch me and I'll fall over" McCluster. And also the offensive line may generally be the same as last year... but it is not the same line that was the #1 running offense. For this season the only way I can see this team being productive is by going to a spread offense. Go in and pass often use short screens and quick out pass patterns to make up for your running that just isn't there with the current roster. Do I like this strategy...NO, but I DO think it's possible with how effective Cassel has been in the second half of the last two games. Are we going to throw for 500 yards every game and 4 touchdowns....probably not...are there going to be sacks and interceptions....you betcha, but I would rather see them try something like that rather than rely on a 7th round pick to kick upper 40 to mid 50 yard field goals and making next to no offense with multiple 3 and outs. And if all else fails we continue to keep running the ball we could always re-sign Larry Johnson at least that way we have someone new for Thomas Jones to beat up in the locker room, and another person to run up the middle for 2 yards.

agent187 12 pts

I found this to be a very interesting article and you made very valid points, our running game is horrendous right now. I could've sworn I saw Thom Jones just lay down on a play. Once baldwin lines up they might as well spread it out and keep defenses on their heels. Pass heavy teams rarely win it all, but we wont even make it to the postseason this year. (hopefully I'll be proven wrong).

LyleGraversen 313 pts

agent187 Again, I'm not saying don't have a running game. I'm saying don't make it the focal point. Instead of having Cassel throw to compliment the run game, have Cassel be the main focus and the run game compliments the pass. No different then how teams like GB, NE, and NO do it. I'm not even saying they shouldn't go back to running next year when JC is healthy. I'm just saying it makes the most sense for the rest of this season.

big chief 150 pts

You make some good points. I agree to an extent. I would point out that teams that throw a lot don't win superbowls, the Rams and their greatest shiw on turf would be the exception. Look at the Colts and the 2000's Chiefs. Both threw all over the yard and scored a lot of points. The problem is they scored fast and had lopsided time of possession which results in a tired defense and a lot of points given up. They mainly need to remember Charles isn't on the field so 15 middle draws per game aren't going to work. Cassel has looked like he was playing scared until Haley chewed his ass sunday. If he plays with passion and confidence he looks pretty good. He will never be Joe Montana, I think we all know that but he can win with a balanced offense and a strong defense. They found some of both on sunday and they got a win. Let's give the defense some credit. Containing Adrian Peterson is no small task and they played great against him. The O-line also finally let Cassel stand up long enough to throw with Jared Allen on the field. I think if his team plays well enough for him to play confident they can do well.

LyleGraversen 313 pts

big chief "teams that throw a lot don't win superbowls"

Ummmmm, aren't the last three Super Bowl winners the Packers, Saints, and Colts? All teams that's offenses are set up where the pass sets up the run. I'm not saying they don't run, but the pass clearly is the focal point and then they ran the ball as a compliment to their passing attack. That's what I'm saying the Chiefs should do.

Second, the Chiefs aren't going to sniff the Super Bowl this year anyway so that's not really an issue. My point is that if their offensive gameplan continues to be to establish the run first and then throw safe dink and dunk passes they will win less games then if they open things up and use their playmakers at WR.

I don't disagree with what you said about the defense and o-line. I just see Cassel throwing the ball down field effectively as THE number one "make or break" part of our team that will define how well we do as the year goes on.

Arrowhead Adventurer 97 pts

Excellent post Lyle. I could not agree more. Especially about how nice it tells to talk about the Chiefs today.