Options for Replacing Thomas Jones

by Chiefs

Kenny Powers: "Kill that (expletive) Patrick Willis!"

First off, I should say that I’m not sure this will happen this year. Jones had a decent season, gaining nearly 900 yards from 245 carries (15 more than Charles got) and 6 touchdowns, but he obviously is no longer a dynamic runner. He only averaged 3.7 yards per carry and had only three gains of more than 20 yards in 2010. He is also 33, and is will be one year slower in 2011. Even if you love Jones, he’s only under contract through to the end of the year and we need to start looking to the future at the #2 spot.

And, although I know his purpose was to provide some veteran leadership and keep Jamaal Charles fresh, every one of those 245 carries took the ball out of Charles’ hands, who, by the way, rushed for 6.4 yards per carry this year. Charles numbers were ridiculous and probably unrepeatable, but I think the Chiefs should think about signing themselves a solid number two runner so that a Charles injury won’t cripple the team. And, this is likely to be a free agency year for that.

Get the goods after the jump.

Option #1 – Mike Tolbert: I would love to snatch this guy from the ‘Bolts. While still being the big physical runner that we would need in order to properly compliment Charles, he also still has the skill to be able to step in as a #1 back when needed. That’s exactly what he did for the Chargers this year racking up 11 touchdowns with 4.0 yards per carry. Plus, he’s 25, so the best may yet be to come. San Diego direly needs him to be resigned, although they don’t like opening up their wallets to keep their stars. On the other hand, the Chiefs are $34.3 million under the cap going into this year, and if they can use that to take away San Diego’s only proven runner and make KC’s rushing offense even more dominant, I’m cool with spending the money.

Option #2 – Vonta Leach: If we want a masher, this guy is the best. Signing him would allow us to cut down our dead weight in the fullback position because that is what he really specializes in. Not only would he be great for short yardage situations, he would make for a deadly piece of our run blocking. Primarily for his blocking ability he was named #65 in the NFL’s top 100 players this year.

Option #3 – Le’Ron McClain: McClain is basically a younger version of Vonta Leach at 26. He currently wants to go somewhere where he could get more rushes and he would probably love to form a rushing pair for the long term with Charles. Not to mention, every time his name would be mentioned we could all show “Yippie cayey (expletive)!”

Option #4 – Ronnie Brown: This actually be my favorite choice out of the bunch. He had a bad season with injuries last year, but was also running for a team that had serious problems in the middle of their O-line. People consider him to be an old player, but he’s actually only 29 and has proven consistency when healthy. Plus, he has great hands and was singlehandedly the reason why the wildcat came back — he’s smart and a good passer while still being a legitimate run threat. This is important.

One of the Jones’ biggest drawbacks is the fact that he is one-dimensional while most of the rest of the Chiefs’ weapons are versatile. Both Jamaal Charles and Dexter McCluster are dynamic whether rushing or receiving, but whenever Jones was on the field, there was little mystery as to how he was getting the ball. If even our power runner is a legit pass catcher and can run trick plays, we will be able to keep the opposing team guessing regardless of who we have in the backfield. Jones is a player for a 20th-century offense. The Chiefs are clearly looking to be creative and cutting edge.

I have a strong feeling that Jones will be kept for his veteran presence and because he knows the offense, but we all know he’s a stopgap and unlikely we’re going to be in the Super Bowl this year. So why not shoot for a Super Bowl next year?

 

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@Erich There's a handfull of undrafted rookie free agent running backs that only went undrafted because this years draft class was full of an incredible amount of defensive talent top to bottom so the offensive players got pushed back and out of the draft but that leaves us multiple players to choose from and Pioli seems to be pretty good at signing quality undrafted free agents. Plus I hope we sign the undrafted Center out of Missouri I was shocked that he went undrafted and he's a home town guy too and we all know we need offensive line help

I wouldn't be up-set if we grabbed Tolbert though. I hate watching him run straight through our undersized d-line, but he'll be back in San Diego. Who would want to leave sunny San Diego anyways.

Can anyone say "Undrafted Rookie Free Agent". Today's NFL you either draft a RB or you pick up an undrafted rookie free agent RB. Look back at all the RB free agents that left for another team. They 97% of the time Their never worth the money and this year there's a lot of rookie RB's that went undrafted because the defense was really strong in this years draft therefor there's plenty of offensive players specially running backs. So since we didn't draft one, and there was a bunch of talent to choose from in the first three rounds we need to sign a rookie free agent to take some carries from Thomas Jones, who is a stud and great leader whom I want on our team this year but shouldn't get more than 150 carries and Jamal Charles should get close to the same number of carries than last year, so that leaves a little over 100 carries available for an up and coming rookie who could take over for Jones completely next year.

I just wish we would have drafted Mark Ingram at the end of the 1st round instead of Baldwin. We could have gone 1.Ingram 2.Hudson 3.Houston 3.Leonard Hankerson. I like that draft class better than ours, and if you thought Houston might fall further then you could of had your pick at a bunch of receivers at the beginning of the 3rd round then grab Houston if available or another Defensive player with the second of our 3rd round picks. Could you imagine Jamal Charles and Mark Ingram manning you backfield for the next five plus years, plus I really liked Leonard Hankerson coming into this draft so in my eyes it isn't much of a down grade from Baldwin

@NicholasAlanClayton I don't think we disagree on the O-line that much. I agree with what you said about the ZBS, but what I saw last year was that Waters, Wiegmann, and Lilja were not able to line up in short yardage and create any type of hole if the defense knew we were running it at them. That is not about the ZBS itself, that is about the guys that we currently have in our ZBS. We could trade for someone like Tolbert or Peyton Hillis and I would wager we would still struggle running right up the gut at someone if they knew it was coming. As far as the FB goes, I hope you're right. I think Leach or McClain would be great. I am just trying to anticipate what Pioli will do and I think that since the Chiefs don't use a FB as much as they used to they'll be content with a guy like Bannon who will also play ST like you mentioned, plus played some TE so has some ability to be kind of an H-back type, giving them more options. The Chiefs seem to value that kind of versatility.

Tolbert is a beast. I dreaded the Chargers giving the ball to him last year because he always seemed to get just enough. If we could add to our talent and take away from our most legit competitor for the number one spot in the West, I think it's worth top dollar.

@Big Matt If that's you're plan, we're better off waiting for him to retire and handing him a clipboard. He'll be 34 when the 2012 season starts, and a guy his age is just not going to be able to give us burst and consistency. Whereas, if we replace him with a guy like McClain or Tolbert, they'll be hitting their prime that year.

@LyleGraversen Yeah, I have a feeling Tolbert is a lost cause, but I disagree with you about the O-line and FB position. First, we have an undersized line not because we want nimble pass protectors as opposed to beefy run blockers, but because we do more zone blocking, which is just as effective and requires more athletic guys. As for our FBs, I've seen nothing to indicate that the staff see Bannon, a guy who wasn't on anyone's draft lists before hand, is viewed as anything more than a special teams monster, which is pretty much what all of the other FB's on the Chiefs' roster are. Plus, getting Leach or McClain would allow us to fill that spot AND still have a young consistent power runner.

Best option for replacing Thomas Jones: re-sign Thomas Jones. Think what a great leader he'll be in 2012!

I don't think Tolbert will be available and I can't see them spending money on a FB when they just drafted one. Usually if you spend a draft pick on a FB, he makes the team. Brown is interesting, but I don't think they'll go there. I've read some quotes about McCluster being used more as a RB this season. I think the reason for this is that our offensive line is not made for the power run game AT ALL. On the other hand, veteran players like Waters, Wiegmann, and Lilja showed they could open up creases for a speed back to slip through. So I think we'll see less carries by Jones and more from McCluster because he fits what the offensive line does better. With less carries, Jones shouldn't wear down like he did at the end last year. As far as just having a big body to try and pick up 1-2 yards in short yardage, I think Battle would be fine, and he'll be really cheap.

McClain would be my choice. He would be a quality long term signing. He would complement Charles extremely well as a runner and a blocker. His age means that he could be a five year plus player for us.

Good job Nick. I would love to replace Jones, but I don't think it will happen this season. My favorite on your list is Tolbert. SD tendered him, but I think a young, talented back, with a physical run style, is worth a second round pick. What about Undrafted FAs? Anyone know if there is any legit talent there?

FmsAmos 13 pts

I wouldn't be up-set if we grabbed Tolbert though. I hate watching him run straight through our undersized d-line, but he'll be back in San Diego. Who would want to leave sunny San Diego anyways.

FmsAmos 13 pts

Can anyone say "Undrafted Rookie Free Agent". Today's NFL you either draft a RB or you pick up an undrafted rookie free agent RB. Look back at all the RB free agents that left for another team. They 97% of the time Their never worth the money and this year there's a lot of rookie RB's that went undrafted because the defense was really strong in this years draft therefor there's plenty of offensive players specially running backs. So since we didn't draft one, and there was a bunch of talent to choose from in the first three rounds we need to sign a rookie free agent to take some carries from Thomas Jones, who is a stud and great leader whom I want on our team this year but shouldn't get more than 150 carries and Jamal Charles should get close to the same number of carries than last year, so that leaves a little over 100 carries available for an up and coming rookie who could take over for Jones completely next year.

FmsAmos 13 pts

I just wish we would have drafted Mark Ingram at the end of the 1st round instead of Baldwin. We could have gone 1.Ingram 2.Hudson 3.Houston 3.Leonard Hankerson. I like that draft class better than ours, and if you thought Houston might fall further then you could of had your pick at a bunch of receivers at the beginning of the 3rd round then grab Houston if available or another Defensive player with the second of our 3rd round picks. Could you imagine Jamal Charles and Mark Ingram manning you backfield for the next five plus years, plus I really liked Leonard Hankerson coming into this draft so in my eyes it isn't much of a down grade from Baldwin

ben_cartmill 7 pts

Tolbert is a beast. I dreaded the Chargers giving the ball to him last year because he always seemed to get just enough. If we could add to our talent and take away from our most legit competitor for the number one spot in the West, I think it's worth top dollar.

Big Matt 199 pts

Best option for replacing Thomas Jones: re-sign Thomas Jones. Think what a great leader he'll be in 2012!

NicholasAlanClayton 16 pts

Big Matt If that's you're plan, we're better off waiting for him to retire and handing him a clipboard. He'll be 34 when the 2012 season starts, and a guy his age is just not going to be able to give us burst and consistency. Whereas, if we replace him with a guy like McClain or Tolbert, they'll be hitting their prime that year.

LyleGraversen 313 pts

I don't think Tolbert will be available and I can't see them spending money on a FB when they just drafted one. Usually if you spend a draft pick on a FB, he makes the team. Brown is interesting, but I don't think they'll go there. I've read some quotes about McCluster being used more as a RB this season. I think the reason for this is that our offensive line is not made for the power run game AT ALL. On the other hand, veteran players like Waters, Wiegmann, and Lilja showed they could open up creases for a speed back to slip through. So I think we'll see less carries by Jones and more from McCluster because he fits what the offensive line does better. With less carries, Jones shouldn't wear down like he did at the end last year. As far as just having a big body to try and pick up 1-2 yards in short yardage, I think Battle would be fine, and he'll be really cheap.

NicholasAlanClayton 16 pts

LyleGraversen Yeah, I have a feeling Tolbert is a lost cause, but I disagree with you about the O-line and FB position. First, we have an undersized line not because we want nimble pass protectors as opposed to beefy run blockers, but because we do more zone blocking, which is just as effective and requires more athletic guys. As for our FBs, I've seen nothing to indicate that the staff see Bannon, a guy who wasn't on anyone's draft lists before hand, is viewed as anything more than a special teams monster, which is pretty much what all of the other FB's on the Chiefs' roster are. Plus, getting Leach or McClain would allow us to fill that spot AND still have a young consistent power runner.

LyleGraversen 313 pts

NicholasAlanClayton I don't think we disagree on the O-line that much. I agree with what you said about the ZBS, but what I saw last year was that Waters, Wiegmann, and Lilja were not able to line up in short yardage and create any type of hole if the defense knew we were running it at them. That is not about the ZBS itself, that is about the guys that we currently have in our ZBS. We could trade for someone like Tolbert or Peyton Hillis and I would wager we would still struggle running right up the gut at someone if they knew it was coming.

As far as the FB goes, I hope you're right. I think Leach or McClain would be great. I am just trying to anticipate what Pioli will do and I think that since the Chiefs don't use a FB as much as they used to they'll be content with a guy like Bannon who will also play ST like you mentioned, plus played some TE so has some ability to be kind of an H-back type, giving them more options. The Chiefs seem to value that kind of versatility.

merlin_AA 191 pts

McClain would be my choice. He would be a quality long term signing. He would complement Charles extremely well as a runner and a blocker. His age means that he could be a five year plus player for us.

Erich 123 pts

Good job Nick. I would love to replace Jones, but I don't think it will happen this season. My favorite on your list is Tolbert. SD tendered him, but I think a young, talented back, with a physical run style, is worth a second round pick. What about Undrafted FAs? Anyone know if there is any legit talent there?

FmsAmos 13 pts

Erich There's a handfull of undrafted rookie free agent running backs that only went undrafted because this years draft class was full of an incredible amount of defensive talent top to bottom so the offensive players got pushed back and out of the draft but that leaves us multiple players to choose from and Pioli seems to be pretty good at signing quality undrafted free agents. Plus I hope we sign the undrafted Center out of Missouri I was shocked that he went undrafted and he's a home town guy too and we all know we need offensive line help