The Case For Le’Ron McClain in Kansas City

by Chiefs

As Kansas City Chiefs fans wait out this off season they pass the time by discussing what the team needs are and how they can best improve the team through the draft and free agency. Most Chiefs fans agree on the top areas of need. The top positions listed are usually NT, WR, pass rusher, OL, etc. However, today this Armchair Addict is here to sell you on the idea that the best FA pick up out there might be a fullback.

That’s right a FB. The Baltimore Ravens Le’Ron McClain is set to become a free agent and has expressed his desire to play for a team that will use him more then what he was used the last two seasons by the Ravens.

Many of you might be thinking “Sure it would be nice to upgrade at FB, but that’s way down my list of needs.” After the break I’ll explain why I think McClain could be a HUGE asset to our offense and why the Chiefs should make signing him a priority.

Let’s start with the obvious. Le’Ron McClain has the reputation of being one of the very best blocking FB in the NFL. He would be a HUGE upgrade as a lead blocker over either Mike Cox or Tim Castille. He is only 26 years old so he has plenty of prime years left as many top FB play into their thirties.

Now let’s look at the benefits to signing McClain that aren’t as obvious. McClain is not just a good blocker. He’s a great power back. In 2008 he rushed for over 900 yards and 10 TDs. However, the acquisition of Willis McGahee and the rise of Ray Rice made McClain’s role in the offense little more then that of a blocker these last two seasons. It’s a job he does VERY well, but McClain is hungry for more. The National Football Post had this quote from McClain:

“When you feel like you can give a lot more and have proven you can do a lot more and all you’re doing is blocking, it’s a little frustrating at times when they’re telling you, ‘All you got to do is go block this guy.’ But I never let it get to me. I take pride in my game. I gave it my all. With all my heart and might and will, I blocked for Ray Rice. My frustration comes from wanting to do more. When we lost that game against Pittsburgh in the playoffs to not even get one attempt, it was pretty frustrating.”
From that quote it seems unlikely that McClain will resign with Baltimore. The fact that he hasn’t carried the ball very much the last two seasons mean that McClain won’t fetch a RB’s contract, but that of the better FBs. That means that the Chiefs could get a Pro Bowl caliber blocking fullback and a great between the tackles short yardage runner all in one without breaking the bank to do it.

Now I’ll admit that the quote above doesn’t scream “team first” like the Chiefs seem to believe in. However, McClain wasn’t known as a locker room problem. He just would like to go somewhere else now that he’s a FA where he can have a bigger role in the offense.

So could the Chiefs offer him that role?

If they were smart the answer would be yes. Let me start with the obvious again. Even these last two years where McClain wasn’t a featured runner he was still 10 times better then Cox and Castille. Combined over those two seasons the Chiefs fullbacks rushed for a total of 63 yards on 22 carries with one TD. During those same two seasons McClain had 265 yards on 74 carries and 2 TDs. When you look at those numbers they are clearly better then Cox and Castille but nothing to get excited about. However……….

Here’s the number that should move McClain to the top of the Chiefs get list.

Of his 74 carries during the last two seasons 37 went for first downs. I’m no math genius but I’m pretty sure that is 50%. If you dig into his numbers a little more and see that on those 74 carries he only averaged 3.6 yards per carry. When you average 3.6 yards per carry and 50% of you carries go for first downs that means you are getting the ball a lot in short yardage situations. That is one area where the Chiefs were flat out terrible these last two seasons.

The Chiefs don’t seem to like to run Jamaal Charles between the tackles on short yardage. Instead they often turned to Thomas Jones. Jones averaged 3.7 yards per carry but only 15.9% of his carries went for first downs. Think about this, Jones got a lot more short yardage carries then Charles but only 15.9% of Jones’ runs went for first downs compared to 30.4% of Charles runs. Jones just isn’t a good third down back anymore. McClain is. So when Charles is at HB McClain could be his lead blocker and then on short yardage they cut put McClain in the back field with Asamoah or Shaun Smith as the “jumbo” FB.

If you still need a little more convincing, how about this? The last two seasons the Chiefs fullbacks combined for 28 receptions for 186 yards. McClain in those same two seasons had 42 receptions for 275 yards. So McClain would be an upgrade as a blocker, short yardage back, and as a receiver out of the back field.

Yes, there may be other positions where the Chiefs have greater needs, but I’m not sure there are any other 26 year old free agents that would be as clear of an upgrade across the board as Le’Ron McClain.

Get on it Pioli. (As soon as there is a new CBA of course)

As usual, thanks for reading and GO CHIEFS!!!!!!

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

McClain or Tolliver, I'll take either one as a FA FB. The nice thing about Tolliver is that we would be weakening SD at the same time.

Tolbert? If so, then yes I agree he would be good, but I don't believe Tolbert is thought of as a first rate blocking FB, more of just a big power runner. If we were to replace Jones with Tobert I'd be thrilled, but I don't know if he gives us a great lead blocker for Charles too.

Ok, you make a decent case for McClain. But why is everyone so eager to give up on Thomas Jones? This guy had a very productive season, AGAIN! Hes played well every where he went. His ypc may have not been spectacular, but what are you expecting for a guy that runs between the tackles in predictable situations. And the leadership he offers off the field outweighs his play. This guy is a winner. Mccalin is better than castille and cox, but don't throw tj under the bus, he's money and a big reason that jc lasted all season and made the pro bowl.

My only problem with Jones was that he was terrible in short yardage situations. If they want to keep him to spar with Charles I'm fine with that, but on 3rd and 2 he shouldn't get the ball, period. The 15.9% first down percentage is proof of that. If you take away all the short yardage runs where he got stuffed for no gain Jones' average whould have looked a lot better. That is why I'm so big on McClain. Adding a fantastic blocking full back who would also be a major upgrade as a short yardage back.

We all also need to remember tht the chiefs have more spending room than most.we can get mcclain wich wil make our offense much more effective and a top nt amd good wr if pioliwill spend some.jones was a fav of mine I was all for geting him but we were terrible on 3rd and short mcclain would not only give us tht but if (god forbid) anything happens to charles aneffective all round rb

you are so right bill. we need and can get both if the ravins dont sign mcc but the ravins did drop a back dont forget

i really believe your right but what will be the affect of the ravens dropping macgahee be. also we need someone to get after the qb dorsey just does't cut it. looking for a pass rusher would not have an effect on signing mac however

I do think we need a true FB that can block. Cox is not doing the job

Picking up mclain would b outstanding both for the team and fans. Please mr pioli go gt this guy it is like geting a great nose takle or hard hiting cb on defense. I am a life long chiefs fan and anything that can add toughness and add another weapon defenses have to prepare for is worth doing.

Picking up mclain would b outstanding both for the team and fans. Please mr pioli go gt this guy it is like gering a great nose takle or hard hiting cb on defense. I am a life long chiefs fan and anything that can add toughness and add another weapon defenses have to prepare for is worth doing.

Naturally, I was confused at first, but it would be a nice pick up. I wouldnt even mind him replacing Jones. Charles and McClain would be a dangerous backfield for years.

As long as McClain isn't asking for a RB contract or looking to be a #2 RB, I would love to sign him. He's a menace as a blocker and very powerful between the tackles. If he's too expensive, then I'd rather see the Chiefs pass him up and look for a guy like Owen Marecic from Stanford in the draft.

McClain or Tolliver, I'll take either one as a FA FB. The nice thing about Tolliver is that we would be weakening SD at the same time.

Tolbert? If so, then yes I agree he would be good, but I don't believe Tolbert is thought of as a first rate blocking FB, more of just a big power runner. If we were to replace Jones with Tobert I'd be thrilled, but I don't know if he gives us a great lead blocker for Charles too.

Ok, you make a decent case for McClain. But why is everyone so eager to give up on Thomas Jones? This guy had a very productive season, AGAIN! Hes played well every where he went. His ypc may have not been spectacular, but what are you expecting for a guy that runs between the tackles in predictable situations. And the leadership he offers off the field outweighs his play. This guy is a winner. Mccalin is better than castille and cox, but don't throw tj under the bus, he's money and a big reason that jc lasted all season and made the pro bowl.

My only problem with Jones was that he was terrible in short yardage situations. If they want to keep him to spar with Charles I'm fine with that, but on 3rd and 2 he shouldn't get the ball, period. The 15.9% first down percentage is proof of that. If you take away all the short yardage runs where he got stuffed for no gain Jones' average whould have looked a lot better. That is why I'm so big on McClain. Adding a fantastic blocking full back who would also be a major upgrade as a short yardage back.

We all also need to remember tht the chiefs have more spending room than most.we can get mcclain wich wil make our offense much more effective and a top nt amd good wr if pioliwill spend some.jones was a fav of mine I was all for geting him but we were terrible on 3rd and short mcclain would not only give us tht but if (god forbid) anything happens to charles aneffective all round rb

you are so right bill. we need and can get both if the ravins dont sign mcc but the ravins did drop a back dont forget

i really believe your right but what will be the affect of the ravens dropping macgahee be. also we need someone to get after the qb dorsey just does't cut it. looking for a pass rusher would not have an effect on signing mac however

I do think we need a true FB that can block. Cox is not doing the job

Picking up mclain would b outstanding both for the team and fans. Please mr pioli go gt this guy it is like geting a great nose takle or hard hiting cb on defense. I am a life long chiefs fan and anything that can add toughness and add another weapon defenses have to prepare for is worth doing.

Picking up mclain would b outstanding both for the team and fans. Please mr pioli go gt this guy it is like gering a great nose takle or hard hiting cb on defense. I am a life long chiefs fan and anything that can add toughness and add another weapon defenses have to prepare for is worth doing.

Naturally, I was confused at first, but it would be a nice pick up. I wouldnt even mind him replacing Jones. Charles and McClain would be a dangerous backfield for years.

As long as McClain isn't asking for a RB contract or looking to be a #2 RB, I would love to sign him. He's a menace as a blocker and very powerful between the tackles. If he's too expensive, then I'd rather see the Chiefs pass him up and look for a guy like Owen Marecic from Stanford in the draft.