Double D’s Double Take: Chiefs 2010 DVOA Post Mortem

by Chiefs


Now that the dust of the 2010 season has settled for the Kansas City Chiefs, it’s time to assess how much, if any, real progress the team made this year. It is easy to say the team did better than last year simply by virtue of final record, securing the division title and the benefit of a playoff appearance which that brings. I think we can also admit that at least part of the reason for this year’s apparent success is the result of a soft schedule and the flaws of our division rivals. The only question that remains is whether we made meaningful progress and are we showing signs of being able to build on our success? This week, we’ll see if DVOA analysis offers any big picture insights into how far the Chiefs have come and hopefully where they’re headed. We’ll get to all that just beyond the jump.

As always, for an more in-depth explanation of what DVOA is and what it is designed to do, please be sure to check in with Football Outsiders for the full run down. Now for the stats –

The rest of the story –

As you can see, I am comparing 2009 regular season final results with 2010 regular season final results. Including this season’s playoff results was avoided because, well, doing so would have been considerably more complicated for me because of how playoff results are reported (most notably, weighted DVOA instead of cumulative DVOA). Nor do I think doing so would have helped any on the “overall progress” front if you catch my drift.

The Chiefs, weak schedule notwithstanding, definitely showed some improvement in a number of key areas. The things that probably stand out the most to me are the improvement of the offensive line, the improvement of Matt Cassel, the improvement of Dwayne Bowe, and the impact of Tony Moeaki. However, it appears that part of the price of getting a good receiver and a good tight end perhaps came at the expense of going without multiple ranked players in each category. Better targets, but not as many viable ones overall.

I think we can also say that TJ was an improvement over LJ, but not by much.

Special Teams did not really improve which, big picture-wise is not a good sign. Scott Pioli prides himself in building teams through Special Teams and it appears that this season’s effort was not successful. There definitely needs to be a high emphasis placed on this during the offseason and I believe a good way to approach might be to draft at least a couple fast receiver types to block and/or get down field more quickly – in other words, kill two birds – improve speed on ST and build up our receiver corps. On top of that, I was not all that impressed with the consistency of either Arenas or McCluster as far return duties go – besides, it’s not a bad idea to freshen up the “churn in your return” each year.

Defense also made some good progress against the pass but we are still down a ways in the run defense category. The same goes for our front 7′s (and more specifically our front 3′s) ability to disrupt the passing game but again not so much with the run. I believe the addition of a real NT and an ILB with true pass rushing skills would produce immediate results.

Lastly, let’s take a final look at how the season rankings played out on week-to-week basis.

Chiefs 2010 Weekly DVOA Progress


For all intents and purposes, we basically peaked around midseason and leveled off somewhere between declining and mediocre at the end. The declining part bothers me a lot and causes me to wonder whether this a pattern that will continue into next season? Is it a reflection of possible contentiousness among the coaching staff? A young team wearing out as the season wore on? Something more?

2011 looks to be pivotal year for Scott Pioli, Todd Haley and this team as a whole. Just as the final performance of 2009 appears to have been a positive sign for 2010, could the final performance(s) of 2010 similarly bode ill for 2011? If we start off poorly in 2011, we will possess what it takes to recover?

For 2010 I see some good, some good, and many concerns going forward.

That’s my Double Take. What are your takes Addicts?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Good news, is there is so much room for improvement special teams wise, maybe we part with the special teams coach? hmmm? Bad news, Defense did not improve as much as I thought. We have to get a true NT and a stud LB.

Agreed, but I think we start with a stud NT. The 3-4 D begins and ends with NT play

My second thought when looking at those numbers is that the defense was let down in some games by the offense. In some of the games the overall defensive numbers looked bad, but if you watched the entire game the defense held their own for 3/4 of the game and then when the offense couldn't stay on the field they finally gave out. I feel like even with our soft schedule the defense I watched was better then the 21st in the league.

Lyle you make a good point here, I think our D is probably better overall than the numbers indicate because a lot of the statistical data is skewed due to an abnormal amount of 3 and outs by the offense. I don't believe there is an algorithm used to smooth out or neutralize horrible offensive performance which directly impacts defensive indicators. We all know that even the stellar D units in the league suffer when they spend most of the game on the field

Lyle, I don't think that entirely explains why our defense couldn't seem to get off the field in the first half of the Ravens game, do you? I believe overall we were still generally soft on D and when we played against good offenses, especially in the latter half of the season, we really did get kind of exposed. We were much better on D in the first half of the season. I would point to the Colts and Jags games as examples of that.

Does not bode well for next season if we look at our opponents. Fortunately with the offseason there are lots of opportunities to fix things we lack. We have a good core group of players that know the system, now need a couple more and players that can be strong in supporting roles. I think it's encouraging looking at the graph that despite falling off a little at mid season we still won the division. For me it means there are some things still that numbers cannot tell you. Thats all the encouragement I need. Good review and breakdown DD

Thanks for the dap Nick. Concern about "lots of opportunities" though - I take it you're assuming no lock-out/strike?

I don't think anyone wants it to go that far, if one side gives in they lose some money. If both sides draw pines in the sand they lose a ton of money and risk losing fans for years. Has baseball ever really recovered from the strike in the 90's?

Great job as usual DD. Question for you about the special teams. I'll agree the return game was a bit of a let down. I was expecting more from Dex and Arenas. I do think the overall kick coverage was pretty good. I know the stats don't back that up, but I think that has more to do with the coaching staff's decision making then the actual coverage. We would often kick short on kick offs when the other team had a stud return man. Wouldn't you say that has a negative effect on our coverage numbers because the other team might be starting at the 30, but was more of a strategic move then bad coverage?

That might play into it some. I know that Football Outsiders eliminates onside kicks, blocked punts, and other oddities from their special teams stats but I don't know to what extent they are able to account for returner avoidance kicks. Bottom line, special teams is primarily about field position and if the price of not being able to tackle a guy at the 20 (or better) means you give your opponent the ball on the 30, then that should reflect negatively on your special teams.

I agree Lyle, I thought the coverage was good in the kick and punt game. I think our biggest concern was KO return and Punt Return.

Double D, Very insightful, and of course my favorite thing, (data supported) inferences.

What happened to Merlin's draft tek posting?

Merlin's post is supposed to go up tomorrow at 1. He accidentally scheduled it a day early. As other writers have work due today it has been pulled until tomorrow afternoon. Sorry for the inconvenience

Ahh I see. No worries

Good news, is there is so much room for improvement special teams wise, maybe we part with the special teams coach? hmmm?

Bad news, Defense did not improve as much as I thought. We have to get a true NT and a stud LB.

Agreed, but I think we start with a stud NT. The 3-4 D begins and ends with NT play

My second thought when looking at those numbers is that the defense was let down in some games by the offense. In some of the games the overall defensive numbers looked bad, but if you watched the entire game the defense held their own for 3/4 of the game and then when the offense couldn't stay on the field they finally gave out. I feel like even with our soft schedule the defense I watched was better then the 21st in the league.

Lyle you make a good point here, I think our D is probably better overall than the numbers indicate because a lot of the statistical data is skewed due to an abnormal amount of 3 and outs by the offense. I don't believe there is an algorithm used to smooth out or neutralize horrible offensive performance which directly impacts defensive indicators. We all know that even the stellar D units in the league suffer when they spend most of the game on the field

Lyle,

I don't think that entirely explains why our defense couldn't seem to get off the field in the first half of the Ravens game, do you? I believe overall we were still generally soft on D and when we played against good offenses, especially in the latter half of the season, we really did get kind of exposed. We were much better on D in the first half of the season. I would point to the Colts and Jags games as examples of that.

Does not bode well for next season if we look at our opponents. Fortunately with the offseason there are lots of opportunities to fix things we lack. We have a good core group of players that know the system, now need a couple more and players that can be strong in supporting roles.

I think it's encouraging looking at the graph that despite falling off a little at mid season we still won the division. For me it means there are some things still that numbers cannot tell you. Thats all the encouragement I need.

Good review and breakdown DD

Thanks for the dap Nick.

Concern about "lots of opportunities" though - I take it you're assuming no lock-out/strike?

I don't think anyone wants it to go that far, if one side gives in they lose some money. If both sides draw pines in the sand they lose a ton of money and risk losing fans for years.

Has baseball ever really recovered from the strike in the 90's?

Great job as usual DD.

Question for you about the special teams. I'll agree the return game was a bit of a let down. I was expecting more from Dex and Arenas. I do think the overall kick coverage was pretty good. I know the stats don't back that up, but I think that has more to do with the coaching staff's decision making then the actual coverage. We would often kick short on kick offs when the other team had a stud return man. Wouldn't you say that has a negative effect on our coverage numbers because the other team might be starting at the 30, but was more of a strategic move then bad coverage?

That might play into it some. I know that Football Outsiders eliminates onside kicks, blocked punts, and other oddities from their special teams stats but I don't know to what extent they are able to account for returner avoidance kicks. Bottom line, special teams is primarily about field position and if the price of not being able to tackle a guy at the 20 (or better) means you give your opponent the ball on the 30, then that should reflect negatively on your special teams.

I agree Lyle, I thought the coverage was good in the kick and punt game.

I think our biggest concern was KO return and Punt Return.

Double D,

Very insightful, and of course my favorite thing, (data supported) inferences.

What happened to Merlin's draft tek posting?

Merlin's post is supposed to go up tomorrow at 1. He accidentally scheduled it a day early. As other writers have work due today it has been pulled until tomorrow afternoon.

Sorry for the inconvenience

Ahh I see. No worries