My Chief Concerns: Todd Haley Can Do Whatever He Wants To

by My Chief Concerns

A good coach is strictly defined by his win and loss record.  Nothing else matters.

There has been a lot of Haley bashing recently, and I think it is grossly misplaced.  Getting the Kansas City Chiefs, a perennial losing team, into the playoffs in your second year as a head coach is quite impressive.  I know you all agree with that, but I just wanted to remind you of that fact.

Has there ever been a Kansas City Chief Head Coach more polarizing than Haley?  I can’t think of one.  If I recall, of the most recent coaches, everyone loved Marty and everyone liked Vermeil too.  Generally speaking everyone disliked Edwards.  Am I wrong?  

Haley is different.  You either love him or hate him.  However, whether you like Todd Haley or not, is not important.  He does not have to answer to you.   He has to answer to his win and loss record.  If, or when, the hammer falls, it will fall squarely on him, and because of that Haley should be able to do whatever he wants to. 

More after the jump…

 

If Todd Haley wants to yell and scream at his players, he can.  If he wants to misuse his running backs, he can.  If he wants to bench and cut perfectly good players, he can.    If he wants to be the offensive coordinator, he can.  If he wants to give the most meaningless answers when answering media questions, he can.  If he wants to go for it on fourth down, he can.  If he wants to point his “mean finger” at other coaches, he can.  If he wants to emulate Bill Parcells, he can, and if he wants to run off good coaches, he can do that too. 

He can do all of those things as long as he does one thing: win.   And that is just what he did this year.

There are many NFL teams and NFL fans that would love to have a winning coach.   We now have one.  I am not trying to silence you or anyone; everyone has a right to criticize.  In fact, I have some criticism of Haley too, but as long as he is winning, and continues to do so, then everyone should keep that criticism in perspective.

Haley’s 2010 record was 10-6; and because of that he just bought himself another year.  He also bought himself even more pressure.  Now he has to have the same or better record, get the Chiefs to the playoffs (again), and win a playoff game (this time), otherwise the 2011 season would be considered a regression.   When the winning or improvement ends; so too will Todd Haley’s reign.  Just ask Josh McDaniels.

Good luck Todd, we are all rooting for you, (or should be).

Tags: , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

It is true that Haley was a success this year, but as Jeremy suggests, that will mean little next year. Herm made the playoffs his first year, and was gone two years later. It just does not appear that Haley is a top tier coach. Some suggest he will mature. That is possible. He won 10 games this year (easy schedule or not) and several players took steps up on performance. I just fear next season will be a disaster, and Pioli then will conclude it is time to move on to a top tier coach.

It's amazing how parallel everyone's thinking is around here; even if we don't agree. You said to Patrick you were just writing an article when he came out with his. I commented on that article and it seems like your article responded to some of the things I said, even though I know you published it before my previous comments. When it comes to the Chiefs, we are all more alike than we are different.

Steady improvement in the NFL doesn't always mean a better record. It'd be nice though. If Haley does get run out for a season falling short of 10-6 it'd be a mistake. Given their schedule, the Chiefs will need to get significantly better to have an 8-8 season. Next year will be tough. Hopefully they'll rise to the schedule.

And if all of those work for him and he gets AFC Coach of the year more power to him :) Check out the link 101 awards named him coach of the year. http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article-2/101-Awards-Honor-Todd-Haley-as-AFC-Coach-of-the-Year/6eef91e0-012f-477b-a46b-e2a84dd899bd

Good post, well said and to the point. As a fan I like to chip in my 2 cents worth, but at the end of the day, Haley must do what he thinks is best for the team. Leadership has the burden of creating a vision, and as often the case, we struggle as fans to accept that vision. But as you correctly posited, Haley will be judged ultimately by his won loss record. Right now he's looking pretty good.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with this post. In Kansas City, I want a perennial play-off contender and I realize that it takes time to build a program that will contend year after year. I won't be disappointed with Todd Haley if he goes 6-10 next year; as long as we see player development and evidence that the team is getting better. Also, I personally want a coach that I can be proud of. Yes, winning is important, but I want to do it with class. McDaniels is out in Denver, not because he lost, but because of all the stupid, polarizing mistakes that he made. I think that it will be difficult to build a perennial contender if the head coach was always running off assistant coaches and players. Now, I don't think Haley deserves a lot of the grief that he's been getting. I'm in complete agreement with Pat's opinions. I don't blame Haley for Gailey or Weis. And, I was very impressed to see Haley's 'maturity' on the sidelines. But to suggest that he should/will receive a pass if he 'just wins' seems a bit short-sided to me. For an argument to be true, then it's inverse also needs to be true... Fire him if he doesn't win. I'm sure that Pittsburgh is happy that they stood by Cowher when he suffered through losing seasons. By doing so, they've built a team that contends year in and year out. So, I hope to see Haley continue to mature and I hope to see him and Pioli put together a team that is continually in the hunt for the play-offs and a SUPERBOWL!

Point taken Hodson. Very well said. I am glad you don't agree, and I complete see and understand why. I don't want a polarizing jerk for a coach either, but......... I am willing to let it slide because if what he is doing is producing a winning product on the field, then he should get a pass. Why? Becuase we have not won a playoff game since 1993! Some of the greatest coaches were/are polarizing asses: Belichik, Parcells, Lombardi, and Cower. (They were all asses; just in their own way) I too want a consistent play off team, but if Todd Haley's 2011 Chiefs fall short of 10-6, it would be considered a regression. I am not saying he would be fired, (I would not want him to be either) but he cannot fall signficantly from 10-6. Except for me allowing him to slide, we are on the same page.

Well said Jeremy. The thing that just boggles my mind is this rampant belief that "Haley should just hire an OC and butt out when it comes to the offense!" What?!?! I'm sorry, but does Rex Ryan "butt out" of the Jets defensive strategy? Does Shawn Peyton "butt out" of the Saints offensive game plan? Haley is the HEAD COACH, it's his team and he is an offensive minded coach. A coach that was a good enough OC to get his team to the Super Bowl. He SHOULD be the one that decides what the team's approach and game plan should be. If the OC doesn't want his input then that's his problem. It's not the OC's name that the record gets attached to. It's like if people said Pioli should "butt out" of the Chiefs draft selections and just let the scouts do it. Somebody has to make the ultimate decision. Somebody has to put their name and reputation on the line as THE one in charge. As far as the coaching staff goes that person is Haley, so Haley should run things as he wants them. If it doesn't work then he will be fired. Thats the NFL. Rant over.

Exactly Lyle, exactly!

Yes but Im his boss through my pocketbook JH!

When did you get your hands on millions Randy? :-)

It is true that Haley was a success this year, but as Jeremy suggests, that will mean little next year. Herm made the playoffs his first year, and was gone two years later. It just does not appear that Haley is a top tier coach. Some suggest he will mature. That is possible. He won 10 games this year (easy schedule or not) and several players took steps up on performance. I just fear next season will be a disaster, and Pioli then will conclude it is time to move on to a top tier coach.

It's amazing how parallel everyone's thinking is around here; even if we don't agree. You said to Patrick you were just writing an article when he came out with his. I commented on that article and it seems like your article responded to some of the things I said, even though I know you published it before my previous comments. When it comes to the Chiefs, we are all more alike than we are different.

Steady improvement in the NFL doesn't always mean a better record. It'd be nice though. If Haley does get run out for a season falling short of 10-6 it'd be a mistake. Given their schedule, the Chiefs will need to get significantly better to have an 8-8 season. Next year will be tough. Hopefully they'll rise to the schedule.

And if all of those work for him and he gets AFC Coach of the year more power to him :) Check out the link 101 awards named him coach of the year. http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article-2/101-Awards-Honor-Todd-Haley-as-AFC-Coach-of-the-Year/6eef91e0-012f-477b-a46b-e2a84dd899bd

Good post, well said and to the point. As a fan I like to chip in my 2 cents worth, but at the end of the day, Haley must do what he thinks is best for the team. Leadership has the burden of creating a vision, and as often the case, we struggle as fans to accept that vision. But as you correctly posited, Haley will be judged ultimately by his won loss record. Right now he's looking pretty good.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with this post. In Kansas City, I want a perennial play-off contender and I realize that it takes time to build a program that will contend year after year. I won't be disappointed with Todd Haley if he goes 6-10 next year; as long as we see player development and evidence that the team is getting better.

Also, I personally want a coach that I can be proud of. Yes, winning is important, but I want to do it with class. McDaniels is out in Denver, not because he lost, but because of all the stupid, polarizing mistakes that he made. I think that it will be difficult to build a perennial contender if the head coach was always running off assistant coaches and players.

Now, I don't think Haley deserves a lot of the grief that he's been getting. I'm in complete agreement with Pat's opinions. I don't blame Haley for Gailey or Weis. And, I was very impressed to see Haley's 'maturity' on the sidelines.

But to suggest that he should/will receive a pass if he 'just wins' seems a bit short-sided to me. For an argument to be true, then it's inverse also needs to be true... Fire him if he doesn't win. I'm sure that Pittsburgh is happy that they stood by Cowher when he suffered through losing seasons. By doing so, they've built a team that contends year in and year out.

So, I hope to see Haley continue to mature and I hope to see him and Pioli put together a team that is continually in the hunt for the play-offs and a SUPERBOWL!

Point taken Hodson. Very well said. I am glad you don't agree, and I complete see and understand why. I don't want a polarizing jerk for a coach either, but.........

I am willing to let it slide because if what he is doing is producing a winning product on the field, then he should get a pass. Why? Becuase we have not won a playoff game since 1993!

Some of the greatest coaches were/are polarizing asses: Belichik, Parcells, Lombardi, and Cower. (They were all asses; just in their own way)

I too want a consistent play off team, but if Todd Haley's 2011 Chiefs fall short of 10-6, it would be considered a regression. I am not saying he would be fired, (I would not want him to be either) but he cannot fall signficantly from 10-6.

Except for me allowing him to slide, we are on the same page.

Well said Jeremy. The thing that just boggles my mind is this rampant belief that "Haley should just hire an OC and butt out when it comes to the offense!"

What?!?!

I'm sorry, but does Rex Ryan "butt out" of the Jets defensive strategy? Does Shawn Peyton "butt out" of the Saints offensive game plan? Haley is the HEAD COACH, it's his team and he is an offensive minded coach. A coach that was a good enough OC to get his team to the Super Bowl. He SHOULD be the one that decides what the team's approach and game plan should be. If the OC doesn't want his input then that's his problem. It's not the OC's name that the record gets attached to. It's like if people said Pioli should "butt out" of the Chiefs draft selections and just let the scouts do it. Somebody has to make the ultimate decision. Somebody has to put their name and reputation on the line as THE one in charge. As far as the coaching staff goes that person is Haley, so Haley should run things as he wants them. If it doesn't work then he will be fired. Thats the NFL.

Rant over.

Exactly Lyle, exactly!

Yes but Im his boss through my pocketbook JH!

When did you get your hands on millions Randy? :-)