Chiefs DVOA Rankings: Week 16

by Chiefs


Kansas City Chiefs AFC West Champs? Hosting a playoff game? I’m still in shock.

Based on this observer’s naked eye filter, the first half of last Sunday’s victory over the Titans was the most compelling and complete two quarters of football, in just about every facet, that the Chiefs have played all season. Although I would’ve loved for us to step on the gas even more in the second half, I can understand why we (apparently) chose not to do so. That second half was not very exciting, or impressive, but the way I see it we played well enough in the first half to all but guarantee the win and dulling it down with conservative, ball-control, clock-eating plays is what good strategy demands in that situation.

Yes, we are going to the playoffs. There is no disputing it. Such being the case, like every week, we still have some statistical post-mortem to attend to. The analytical questions for this week are:

1.Did the Chiefs show significant improvement in the way we handled the Titans?
2.What are our biggest weaknesses?
3.Are we ready for the rushing attack of the Raiders?
4.Finally, how do we stack up against the 5 other AFC teams destined (or in the Colts case, likely destined) for the playoffs?

We’ll find out if and/or how DVOA methodology breaks all that down right after the jump.

For anyone new to the subject of DVOA rankings and analysis, you can learn more about it at Football Outsiders. If you have not already done so, then I highly recommend you take time to visit them. They are among the best at what they do. Now for the updated stats –

The other stats -

For starters, I decided to introduce a new statistic this week, namely weighted DVOA. Weighted DVOA, simply put, assigns more statistical importance to the games a team has played more recently and lowers the importance of games that the team played early in the season. I believe this can provide a little more insight into how well (or how bad) the Chiefs are playing as they get ready to head into the post season. As you can see, the weighted results are not very reassuring. All indications continue to suggest that the Chiefs are in most aspects an average to below average team that has benefitted from one of the softest schedules in the NFL combined with trip ups of an otherwise better team within the division.

Over the past several weeks, I’ve repeatedly bemoaned how bad our special teams have become and how our defense is still not getting it done in some key areas so I won’t even bother going down that path this time. You can look at the stats yourself and form your own opinions. What I will instead draw attention to is that there are some really bright and promising things going on with our offense that deserve praise and comment. First off, our offensive line has made incredible improvement over the last year, particularly with its success in establishing the run. Secondly, because of the job our line is doing, we have seen increasing success and proficiency in the passing game. Cassel, Bowe, and to a lesser extent, Moeaki have started to make our passing attack something that other teams ignore at their peril. This was not the case earlier in the season and it makes our offense all that more dangerous – especially when we have somebody like Jamaal Charles to make you pay for only putting 7 in the box.

For all the good that our offense is doing, I also have a major bone to pick with one aspect of our offense, more specificially one person, that is underperforming and undermining our ability to move the ball and score points. The individual I am referring to is Thomas Jones. For all his “intangibles,” Jones actual production on the field has gone from bad to utterly atrocious. Jones is our offensive equivalent of an albatross, the Hindenberg, the iceberg standing before the Titanic. Make no mistake, he is the “anchor” of our offense – unfortunately, he continues to serve in that capacity when the ship is trying to leave the dock. Jones, more than any other player, is holding our offense back. He is the reason why our rushing offense is ranked 9th despite the fact that we posses the NFL’s #1 RB and NFL’s #2 run blocking line. If Charlie Weis and Todd Haley insist on using Jones the way and to the extent they have, I am convinced it will spell playoff disaster for us.

Now onto our next opponent, the hated Raiders.

Anybody that thinks we should mail this one in, protect our starters, or otherwise not worry about this game needs to think again. The Chiefs are still building something and this game represents a great opportunity to move forward with that construction project. Oakland’s rushing attack is better than ours and our defense needs to be able to stop a team like the Raiders if they expect to have any success in the playoffs. We know the Raiders will play physical and we need to not merely match their intensity, but exceed it. Losing to the Raiders is no way to keep improving, losing to Raiders will undermine our homefield confidence, and losing to the Raiders at home will provide ammunition for the argument that we are more lucky than good. Besides, who wants to spend the whole offseason hearing Raiders fan talk about how they proved they were best team in the division by going undefeated? Not me.

Lastly, we’ll take our first peak at how the Chiefs compare statistically to the 5 other AFC teams that have either earned a playoff or, in the case of the Colts, seem likely to do so this coming Sunday.

Once again, one can make a strong argument that the Chiefs are the underweights of the playoffs. We have some strengths but let’s face it, we are nowhere near as complete of a team as the Patriots (this year’s gold standard of NFL) or for that matter, the Steelers. I believe we can probably compete against teams like the Jets or the Colts if we catch a break or two but honestly, homefield advantage or not, the Chiefs are going to have improve over who they are now and moreover, will have to play like we’ve never seen them play this season if we’re to have any success in the playoffs. At this point, we should consider ourselves extremely lucky if we come away with even one playoff win. We’re just not there yet.

That’s this week’s Double Take. What are your takes Addicts?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I'm wondering if the DVOA formula has been tested against game results. In other words, has this ranking system been any better at predicting outcomes than, say, Las Vegas odds makers? Another consideration, it seems to me and others who have commented that Haley and crew have a tendency to shut down the offense & defense once they have a lead or are being blown out. We saw that against the Titans and the Chargers. I think Haley's approach is not only to work on running out the clock, but trying to avoid providing future opponents with a lot of tape on the Cheifs' more inventive plays(sticking with base offense of Jones up the middle and few blitzes on D). In other words, I think the Chiefs are a bit unusual in that they play less agressive offensively and defensively than do many other teams that rack up the stats. This might well explain their weaker ratings in some of these statistical categories. Of course, this is just a hunch but I think considerations like this might help explain why stats seem to matter so little after kick off. Anyway, thanks for putting together an intersting site.

brad, Thanks for the praise. Our staff works hard to keep it both fun and interesting around here. As far as scaling back on creativity when the game calls for it, I like the theory you put forth because it makes too much sense from the whole strategic perspective. I also agree that dumbing down the game when the outcome has essentially been decided can affect even DVOA stats even though they strive, in part, to minimize meaningless, garbage-time plays. Without really digging into them and understanding where each team's particular strengths and weaknesses lie, I think DVOA as a prognosticator of outcomes is probably about as hit and miss as Vegas. That said, I personally take a look at DVOA numbers when I can't figure out which way to go on a certain pick. If you read my DVOA post from last week, you'll discover that one of the things that I thought would be most important in beating the Titans would be our ability to spread out the Titans defensive line by taking the ball outside as much as possible. This is in fact exactly what the Chiefs did and it worked beautifully. Anecdotal perhaps, but still a pretty interesting result.

Thanks for the reply, Double D--interesting stuff.

Brad, I wish you were right, I really dont think so though. What if Thomas Jones was averaging 3.5 to 4.5 ypc? We would then be able to have a third down distance that we could routinely make and either go on long slow clock eating drives, or at least pin them deep in their territory where they have to go on a long drive to score themselves. I can only imagine that is the idea. TJ just doesn't have enough in the tank to do that with our smaller line.

Cory, you may be right about Jones. He shows flashes now and then, but I don't think he's in the same league with Charles and other top flight backs. In defense of him, the Chiefs tend to use him like a sacrificial lamb, setting up play action by running him into stacked lines. Still, my original point wasn't to defend Jones, but to suggest that the Chiefs low DVOA may have a lot more to do with Haley's strategy than being a weak or mediocre team. My impression is that once a game reaches a certain point, Haley shuts down the creativity of the offense and defense more so than other NFL coaches who tend to go for the jugular. Once the Chiefs got up on Tennessee at half, they went with base plays, especially on offense. This negatively effected their DVOA. I'm sure not everyone would agree with me, but I saw the same thing happen against SD, when the Chiefs got down. The exception to this was the Denver blow out, when the Chiefs did a lot of slop time passing, though even then the pass plays were not terribly inventive--basic patterns for the most part (and I think Haley was more willing to open up in a lost cause because of his dislike for McDaniels). The Chiefs have a much more conservative style than other teams and this negatively impacts DVOA. My final word: the rest of the league best not underestimate these Chiefs.

Don't forget, we use a lot of rookies and this is the first time they've played a 16 game schedule with playoffs. This could account for our decrease in defensive productivity since around week 9, but it could be a blessing come the playoffs... young guys with young legs and lots of energy!! GO AFC WEST DIV CHAMPS!!! It never gets old...

Goal #1 Make the playoffs - accomplished Now starts the second season and while noting and agreeing that some statistical information is necessary and occasionally interesting, now the second season starts and anything can happen, just ask Kurt Warner and the Cards from a few years back, or for you Jet spies, Broadway Joe. Neither of them had a chance either, so all the statisticans and prediction gurus said, but it happened. One loss and out once the second season starts, much stranger things have happened in sports thats a fact. Will the "best" team win, not normally, the team that gets hot does, a big play or call one way or the other usually seals most teams fate in the playoffs, and KC has just a good a chance as anyone. Go Chiefs

All true in varying degrees.

I just wanted to let you all know that Matt Cassel was on inside the nfl on showtime. Chris Collinsworth has picked us to win the Super Bowl!!!

Only thing left to do then is prove Collinsworth right. Sounds simple enough.

The first thing that sticks out to me about the stats and rankings is they do not take into account our coaching experience in playoff games. Granted, not with this current roster but that has got to be a consideration? Anything can happen in a one game tournament, and I can guarantee, win or loose the Oakland game, you will see some new wrinkles and formations to make the Jets work OT in prep for there trip to KC...coaching,coaching,and coaching,the ultimate intangibles of the game!

I agree that coaching matters. Look at how much better Cassel got after working with Weis for instance. Having 3 coaches with playoff & Superbowl experience should help a lot.

One thing for sure, we'll find out how Cassel plays in a big game. He has NEVER had a BIG game. He could be very bad or very good. I have a hunch he's gonna show us some real good stuff. If the Chiefs don't get blown out in the first half (Denver, San Diego), we can and "CHIEFS WILL" go all the way!!

Now that you've brought us back to reality, I'm humbled a little bit. Every ship needs an anchor and Jones played an integral part in the Chiefs getting this far. We gotta have him. I wonder how often he hits the weights and bike?

Yeah, but when the Chiefs want to play great defense, they play great defense. I understand we aren't the best at run defense, but passing defense is a whole other story. It's amazing to me that we have such a young (and somewhat short) secondary, and they can step up and make those game changing picks! And our LBs are either coverage (DJ), pass rushers (Tamba), or have no idea where they are (Vrabel). Not a lot of run stoppers.

How on earth are we #26 in the weighted defense??? If anything, the Chiefs have been beasts lately on defense! How many PPG have we allowed recently? I'm willing to say, "Not a lot!"

Trey, The Chiefs played pretty good defense during the first half of the season and started to fall off somewhere around game 9. I think they played really well against Titans, but in general, our D has not been very effective against good running teams and not very effective at pressuring opposing QBs.

Two things, First I have no doubt that we are not as good as some of the other AFC teams. Fortunately the better team doesn't always win. Post season, all bets are off. Just ask the 18-1 Patriot team. I am hoping against hope here sir. Second, an albatross was a sign of good luck for a ship, but became a bad omen in an old English tale (The Rime of the Ancient Mariner) only after the captain killed it and thus was punished by his crew and had to wear the bird around his neck for the curse he brought upon them. Sorry to nitpick DD. I'm a nerd Playoffs baby!

Nick, I also believe that all bets are off in the playoffs and that some teams can show up in ways that they never did during the regular season. The 2006 Colts defense is one example, the 2008 Cards defense is another. In the playoffs, things rarely go exactly the way people think they will. I am both hopeful and cautious. If Jones brought any good luck to this ship, I'm afraid that luck turned sour when we started killing off TJ's value through continual, excessive misuse.

He still has sparks, but it doesn't seem like the line blocks for him like they do for Charles. Scheme? Jones ability? I don't know but the man runs into a lot of brick walls. Maybe he has just gone down hill. Kudos on scrambling and still putting out quality work sir! I know that it is difficult.

Why can't we run Jackie Battle in place of Jones more? Every time I mention this it is ignored by everyone as if I just said something totally ridiculous. I loved the guy in the pre-season. What's the problem here?

Nemoi... I totally agree with you. I think that TJ has worn down to an unusable nub at this point. His average is worse than LJ's (prob closer to equal...)and he just is not effective at all. I think that Battle would have to be an upgrade, but we are seeing the vermeil effect in play (Haley's man crush with TJ because of his leadership qualities). The lack of him being used at all also makes me believe that they are not just saving him.

I agree. If we need to spell Charles, then at least rotate between Jones, Battle and Castille/Cox, right?

I like the weighted DVOA rankings and believe they confirm many KC fans' "gut." Something beyond-average will have to happen, starting with Oakland, I believe, and extending into the playoffs, in order for these stats to be less-than-predictive. On the other hand, I'm the eternal KC optimist. Really have to be... I was sitting on my dad's shoulders in IV and haven't stopped hoping ever since. Of course, there's that old definition of insanity, but I mostly ignore that.

Fellow Addicts, My apologies for posting this so late in the day - Tuesday night's game set Football Outsider's weekly DVOA update back almost a whole day and I had to scramble to get this all put together as a result. That said, I hope you enjoy the additional content.

is there any way to figure out if we play saturday or sunday next weekend.(lets assume the colts make it and we host the jets)

In talking with the Chiefs Ticket Office earlier in the week, they said the NFL tries to schedule top seeds on Sunday but there's no guarantee of that happening until they hear from the NFL. At this point, it seems more likely than not, that, assuming we are still the #3 seed, we will play on Sunday.

I'm wondering if the DVOA formula has been tested against game results. In other words, has this ranking system been any better at predicting outcomes than, say, Las Vegas odds makers? Another consideration, it seems to me and others who have commented that Haley and crew have a tendency to shut down the offense & defense once they have a lead or are being blown out. We saw that against the Titans and the Chargers. I think Haley's approach is not only to work on running out the clock, but trying to avoid providing future opponents with a lot of tape on the Cheifs' more inventive plays(sticking with base offense of Jones up the middle and few blitzes on D). In other words, I think the Chiefs are a bit unusual in that they play less agressive offensively and defensively than do many other teams that rack up the stats. This might well explain their weaker ratings in some of these statistical categories. Of course, this is just a hunch but I think considerations like this might help explain why stats seem to matter so little after kick off. Anyway, thanks for putting together an intersting site.

brad,

Thanks for the praise. Our staff works hard to keep it both fun and interesting around here.

As far as scaling back on creativity when the game calls for it, I like the theory you put forth because it makes too much sense from the whole strategic perspective. I also agree that dumbing down the game when the outcome has essentially been decided can affect even DVOA stats even though they strive, in part, to minimize meaningless, garbage-time plays.

Without really digging into them and understanding where each team's particular strengths and weaknesses lie, I think DVOA as a prognosticator of outcomes is probably about as hit and miss as Vegas. That said, I personally take a look at DVOA numbers when I can't figure out which way to go on a certain pick.

If you read my DVOA post from last week, you'll discover that one of the things that I thought would be most important in beating the Titans would be our ability to spread out the Titans defensive line by taking the ball outside as much as possible. This is in fact exactly what the Chiefs did and it worked beautifully. Anecdotal perhaps, but still a pretty interesting result.

Thanks for the reply, Double D--interesting stuff.

Brad, I wish you were right, I really dont think so though. What if Thomas Jones was averaging 3.5 to 4.5 ypc? We would then be able to have a third down distance that we could routinely make and either go on long slow clock eating drives, or at least pin them deep in their territory where they have to go on a long drive to score themselves. I can only imagine that is the idea. TJ just doesn't have enough in the tank to do that with our smaller line.

Cory, you may be right about Jones. He shows flashes now and then, but I don't think he's in the same league with Charles and other top flight backs. In defense of him, the Chiefs tend to use him like a sacrificial lamb, setting up play action by running him into stacked lines. Still, my original point wasn't to defend Jones, but to suggest that the Chiefs low DVOA may have a lot more to do with Haley's strategy than being a weak or mediocre team. My impression is that once a game reaches a certain point, Haley shuts down the creativity of the offense and defense more so than other NFL coaches who tend to go for the jugular. Once the Chiefs got up on Tennessee at half, they went with base plays, especially on offense. This negatively effected their DVOA. I'm sure not everyone would agree with me, but I saw the same thing happen against SD, when the Chiefs got down. The exception to this was the Denver blow out, when the Chiefs did a lot of slop time passing, though even then the pass plays were not terribly inventive--basic patterns for the most part (and I think Haley was more willing to open up in a lost cause because of his dislike for McDaniels). The Chiefs have a much more conservative style than other teams and this negatively impacts DVOA. My final word: the rest of the league best not underestimate these Chiefs.

Don't forget, we use a lot of rookies and this is the first time they've played a 16 game schedule with playoffs. This could account for our decrease in defensive productivity since around week 9, but it could be a blessing come the playoffs... young guys with young legs and lots of energy!! GO AFC WEST DIV CHAMPS!!! It never gets old...

Goal #1 Make the playoffs - accomplished

Now starts the second season and while noting and agreeing that some statistical information is necessary and occasionally interesting, now the second season starts and anything can happen, just ask Kurt Warner and the Cards from a few years back, or for you Jet spies, Broadway Joe. Neither of them had a chance either, so all the statisticans and prediction gurus said, but it happened. One loss and out once the second season starts, much stranger things have happened in sports thats a fact. Will the "best" team win, not normally, the team that gets hot does, a big play or call one way or the other usually seals most teams fate in the playoffs, and KC has just a good a chance as anyone. Go Chiefs

All true in varying degrees.

I just wanted to let you all know that Matt Cassel was on inside the nfl on showtime. Chris Collinsworth has picked us to win the Super Bowl!!!

Only thing left to do then is prove Collinsworth right. Sounds simple enough.

The first thing that sticks out to me about the stats and rankings is they do not take into account our coaching experience in playoff games. Granted, not with this current roster but that has got to be a consideration? Anything can happen in a one game tournament, and I can guarantee, win or loose the Oakland game, you will see some new wrinkles and formations to make the Jets work OT in prep for there trip to KC...coaching,coaching,and coaching,the ultimate intangibles of the game!

I agree that coaching matters. Look at how much better Cassel got after working with Weis for instance. Having 3 coaches with playoff & Superbowl experience should help a lot.

One thing for sure, we'll find out how Cassel plays in a big game. He has NEVER had a BIG game. He could be very bad or very good. I have a hunch he's gonna show us some real good stuff. If the Chiefs don't get blown out in the first half (Denver, San Diego), we can and "CHIEFS WILL" go all the way!!

Now that you've brought us back to reality, I'm humbled a little bit. Every ship needs an anchor and Jones played an integral part in the Chiefs getting this far. We gotta have him. I wonder how often he hits the weights and bike?

Yeah, but when the Chiefs want to play great defense, they play great defense. I understand we aren't the best at run defense, but passing defense is a whole other story. It's amazing to me that we have such a young (and somewhat short) secondary, and they can step up and make those game changing picks! And our LBs are either coverage (DJ), pass rushers (Tamba), or have no idea where they are (Vrabel). Not a lot of run stoppers.

How on earth are we #26 in the weighted defense??? If anything, the Chiefs have been beasts lately on defense! How many PPG have we allowed recently? I'm willing to say, "Not a lot!"

Trey,

The Chiefs played pretty good defense during the first half of the season and started to fall off somewhere around game 9. I think they played really well against Titans, but in general, our D has not been very effective against good running teams and not very effective at pressuring opposing QBs.

Two things,

First I have no doubt that we are not as good as some of the other AFC teams. Fortunately the better team doesn't always win. Post season, all bets are off. Just ask the 18-1 Patriot team. I am hoping against hope here sir.

Second, an albatross was a sign of good luck for a ship, but became a bad omen in an old English tale (The Rime of the Ancient Mariner) only after the captain killed it and thus was punished by his crew and had to wear the bird around his neck for the curse he brought upon them. Sorry to nitpick DD. I'm a nerd Playoffs baby!

Nick,

I also believe that all bets are off in the playoffs and that some teams can show up in ways that they never did during the regular season. The 2006 Colts defense is one example, the 2008 Cards defense is another. In the playoffs, things rarely go exactly the way people think they will. I am both hopeful and cautious.

If Jones brought any good luck to this ship, I'm afraid that luck turned sour when we started killing off TJ's value through continual, excessive misuse.

He still has sparks, but it doesn't seem like the line blocks for him like they do for Charles. Scheme? Jones ability? I don't know but the man runs into a lot of brick walls. Maybe he has just gone down hill.

Kudos on scrambling and still putting out quality work sir! I know that it is difficult.

Why can't we run Jackie Battle in place of Jones more? Every time I mention this it is ignored by everyone as if I just said something totally ridiculous. I loved the guy in the pre-season. What's the problem here?

Nemoi... I totally agree with you. I think that TJ has worn down to an unusable nub at this point. His average is worse than LJ's (prob closer to equal...)and he just is not effective at all. I think that Battle would have to be an upgrade, but we are seeing the vermeil effect in play (Haley's man crush with TJ because of his leadership qualities). The lack of him being used at all also makes me believe that they are not just saving him.