Requiem For A Magee

by Chiefs

One of these guys can rush the passer, the other can't (source: zimbio.com)

As Mr. Beames reported last night, my boy Alex Magee has been traded to the Bucs.  Pioli’s secret police are going to do their best to keep the details from the public as long as possible (strategy!), but my guess is we didn’t get much for him.  I mean, he isn’t exactly lighting the world on fire right now. 

I actually did like Magee.  I know it must’ve seemed like a joke at times, but I thought the kid had potential.  Don’t forget, he had twice as many sacks as our entire starting line last season.  In what, one thousandth the snaps?  How is a pass rush starved team not interested in that?  How were no fans interested in that?  I started a Magee fan club, the Mageeks, and the only members were a commenter named Dusty who has since disappeared and a friend (AA commenter Sesame Cake) who I suspect joined out of pity. 

I need to stop getting behind young defensive linemen, because it inevitably means the end for them in a Chiefs uniform.  First Eddie Freeman, then Jimmy Wilkerson, Jared Allen, Turk McBride, and now Magee.  It’s like all my boys went away to college and I stayed behind to work at Red Lobster.  Sure, I might get 20% off select menu items, but at what cost?

It’s not hard to see why Magee was shipped off.  Glenngary Glenn Dorsey has one starting spot locked down, Romeo Crennel loves Perv Smith, and Tin Man is about to come back from his injury.  We already have one pass rush specialist in Wallace Gilberry.  The defensive end spot is crowded right now.  Still, I’m sad to see Magee go.  Best of luck to him in Tampa.  Hopefully he and Wilkerson will make beautiful music together.  I guess I’m a fan of that team now.  Because of their backup linemen. 

Is anyone else surprised Pioli was willing to give up on Magee so quickly?  That draft class is looking worse by the day*.  Here’s a question: who would you rather have, Tony Moeaki or the entire 2009 draft class?  If you take away Succop that becomes a really easy answer. 

*Yes, I know its too early for a final judgement.  But its never too early to make an educated guess based on the information available.  And really, that draft class obviously sucks.  We’re not going to get arrested for admitting that (are we?).  None of those picks look any better now than they did at the time.  In most cases they look significantly worse.

I’m not going to complain about this trade, but I am bummed.  Magee was the one guy I liked from that class.  People tried to blame him for Jerome Harrison going off on us last year, which is preposterous.  That was a team meltdown, and our run defense sucked all year anyway.  Maybe Magee is bad against the run, but that game can’t be taken as conclusive evidence of such.  My guess is Crennel just wasn’t high on him.  Where’s Clancy Pendergast when you need him, right? 

Oh well, Magee is gone.  Time to move on.  Good night, sweet prince.  You will be missed…..by me and maybe two other people.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags:

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The curse of Jimmy Wilkerson this does remind.

Didn't know you were a fan. I was really pulling for him. I thought he might have been a real steal. He might be with TB, we just didn't have the time to give him.

The 2009 draft was horrible for most teams. It was a pretty thin year. If Jackson proves to be a solid starter, Succop stays reliable, then you add Cassel and Vrabel via trade and Belcher as a rookie FA, we came away with more from that draft class then a lot of teams did. I'm by no means saying it was good and was no where near the 2008 or 2010 classes, but considering the overall talent of that class we at least got a couple players that are part of our future.

Succop was definitely a good pick. However, a few points: 1) Jackson becoming a solid starter is a pretty big "if". Half a decent game has not made a believer out of me. 2) The very fact that Belcher was a FA to me means he's not part of the draft class. If you're gonna count him you have to count every rookie FA every team signed. 3) Has Vrabel actually brought any value? He didn't rush the passer last year, he isn't doing it this year, and now he's actually blocking a younger, better player. You could make the case for him bringing negative value. I like intangibles as much as the next guy (I guess), but Vrabel has by no means been a good player. I know I know, locker room leadership, veteran presence, blah blah blah. 4) The jury is still very much out on Cassel. I get what you're saying though. We got more than it seems at first glance. Not a total failure.

Some good points, but I think you're selling Vrabel a little short. I don't think we can have any idea how much Crennel uses him as the leader on the field during a game. A huge part of the reason that we are better against the run is because guys are in their spots and hitting their gaps. Having a guy like Vrabel on the field to help them learn Romeo's system is a big plus. Once they all know what they're doing then we can turn things over to Studebaker.

Hahaha red lobster, nice analogy

Sure wished they could of come up with another reciever.we are very weak in that spot.dont know what happened to chambers this year,maybe his new bride has jinxed him.he is not showing much so far.

I figured Chambers would phone it in this year. Last big contract before retirement. Plus he's a guy who's usually good at first and then tails off. Miami, San Diego, etc.

The curse of Jimmy Wilkerson this does remind.

Didn't know you were a fan. I was really pulling for him. I thought he might have been a real steal. He might be with TB, we just didn't have the time to give him.

The 2009 draft was horrible for most teams. It was a pretty thin year. If Jackson proves to be a solid starter, Succop stays reliable, then you add Cassel and Vrabel via trade and Belcher as a rookie FA, we came away with more from that draft class then a lot of teams did. I'm by no means saying it was good and was no where near the 2008 or 2010 classes, but considering the overall talent of that class we at least got a couple players that are part of our future.

Succop was definitely a good pick. However, a few points:

1) Jackson becoming a solid starter is a pretty big "if". Half a decent game has not made a believer out of me.

2) The very fact that Belcher was a FA to me means he's not part of the draft class. If you're gonna count him you have to count every rookie FA every team signed.

3) Has Vrabel actually brought any value? He didn't rush the passer last year, he isn't doing it this year, and now he's actually blocking a younger, better player. You could make the case for him bringing negative value. I like intangibles as much as the next guy (I guess), but Vrabel has by no means been a good player. I know I know, locker room leadership, veteran presence, blah blah blah.

4) The jury is still very much out on Cassel.

I get what you're saying though. We got more than it seems at first glance. Not a total failure.

Some good points, but I think you're selling Vrabel a little short. I don't think we can have any idea how much Crennel uses him as the leader on the field during a game. A huge part of the reason that we are better against the run is because guys are in their spots and hitting their gaps. Having a guy like Vrabel on the field to help them learn Romeo's system is a big plus. Once they all know what they're doing then we can turn things over to Studebaker.

Hahaha red lobster, nice analogy

Sure wished they could of come up with another reciever.we are very weak in that spot.dont know what happened to chambers this year,maybe his new bride has jinxed him.he is not showing much so far.

I figured Chambers would phone it in this year. Last big contract before retirement. Plus he's a guy who's usually good at first and then tails off. Miami, San Diego, etc.