Beware the Pied Piper of Arrowhead

by Chiefs

He is wearing red and gold. His music is intoxicating. It sweeps over the Arrowhead faithful like a warm blanket on a cold winter’s night. It dulls the senses and makes the eyelids heavy, unable to focus and see what is ahead. His music, his beautiful, soaring song, is much too splendid to be leading anywhere but heaven.

It sounds like this:

2-0.

For those seduced by the Piper’s song, 2-0 brings such comfort and complacency that they fail to see they are being led off a cliff, into a sweeping river or through the mouth of the darkest cave.

How quickly a little music has us changing our tune.

Just a couple of months ago, the music in Chiefs Nation sounded a little bit different. It reeked of optimism, sure, but there was a certain tempering of expectations. There were too many unknowns to make any concrete predictions but there were certain things that were understood, almost universally, by followers of the Red and Gold. These were commandments if you will, that I rarely if ever, saw questioned.

They went a little something like this:

Jamaal Charles is a budding super star. He saved our putrid offense in the second half of 2009. The old, unproductive Larry Johnson stunted our team’s offensive growth. 2010 would be the year the Chiefs set Charles lose upon the NFL.

Thomas Jones was a very shrewd pickup. He will be the perfect complement to Charles. After all, Charles isn’t a huge back and will need someone to come in and give him a rest. He is the clear and unquestioned lead back, but his touches will be supplemented in order to keep him healthy, fresh and productive. Jones will get 7 to 10 carries a game in relief of the team’s most dynamic player.

Matt Cassel struggled in 2009 because of a lack of talented playmakers, poor blocking, dropped passes and no real offensive coordinator or QB coach.  Cassel will have those things in 2010. We will be able to finally judge our QB.

Then 2-0 happened.

The tune has changed.

Now critics are being too hard on Cassel. Never mind that he has played horrible football for two weeks in a row. Never mind that he has led the team on zero touchdown drives in 8 quarters. And no, Jamaal Charles breaking off a huge run and a poor pass to Tony Moeaki in the endzone after acquiring field position off a turnover doesn’t count.

We’re hearing that a deep pass to Chris Chambers, who was never even close to being open that ends up getting picked off isn’t Cassel’s fault. It is the fault of Chambers for not trying harder to break up a play that never should have been thrown in the first place.

We’re hearing that tipped passes aren’t Cassel’s fault. Especially tipped passes that result in interceptions. It is the offensive line’s fault for not giving him enough protection. Never mind that Cassel has only been sacked twice in two games, a vast improvement from 2009 when the Chiefs QB’s were sacked 5 times. Incidentally, both 2010 sacks have come from the guy backup RT Barry Richarson was blocking. Nay. The 6-4 Cassel can’t be expected to throw his passes over the defensive lineman. His telegraphing where he is throwing the ball has nothing to do with 300 pound men being able to perfectly time a leap to bat down his passes.

Never mind that Thomas Jones is averaging 3.7 yards per carry. Never mind that Jamaal Charles is averaging 6.4 yards per carry. Charles is too small to be an every down back or the coaches are saving him for out Super Bowl run in 2012 or Jones’ smash mouth style at 3.7 yards a pop is better for milking clock and moving out offense than Jamaal Charles being more productive with less touches. Our coach is a genius and has some sort of brilliant plan that involves an anemic offense, a 32 year old running back and a defense that is going to be totally gassed by the 3rd quarter the first time they face an offense that isn’t being QB’d by Seneca Wallace or playing in a hurricane.

Anyone who speaks the truth about what they are seeing, not what they want to be seeing but what they are actually seeing, must be tarred, feathered and put on display in Scott Pioli’s office. They are doubters, haters and not real fans. They, with all their facts and evidence are clearly wrong because the only thing that matters is the win/loss column.

It isn’t true. None of it.

The truth is the Kansas City Chiefs are 2-0 not because of Matt Cassel, Thomas Jones and Todd Haley’s ridiculous personnel decisions. They are 2-0 because of Dexter McCluster, Derrick Johonson, Jamaal Charles, Tony Moeaki (because he is tall and caught a ball  3 feet over his head, in the rain when the pass should have hit him in the chest given that there wasn’t a defender within 5 feet of him in any direction), Brandon Flowers, Tamba Hali, Glenn Dorsey and Romeo Crennel. Honorable mentions go to Seneca Wallace, poor officiating, the Monday night Arrowhead crowd, Philip Rivers’ temper and the well documented fact that God hates the city of Cleveland.

Pointing out obvious and glaring mistakes and flaws on your favorite football team, win or lose, is not being a bad fan. It is not hating. It is honest.

I know many of you are angry that some of the staffers here at AA are writing negative things about our 2-0 Chiefs. The corner stone of AA has and always will be that it is a place where we man up and say what we think. We offer up our opinions to you both good and bad, popular and unpopular and we sure as heck expect you to fire back. If someone’s opinion differs from yours, I welcome you to stick around and debate them. Tell them why you disagree with their perspective. Explain your side.  Don’t call them a “punk,” don’t resort to prodigious use of the CAPS LOCK key and don’t start cussing folks out.

The fact is that it is easy for us to agree on the bad stuff when the team is terrible.It is a lot harder to agree on the deficiencies when team is winning.

Fortunately, this 2010 edition of the Kansas City Chiefs isn’t terrible. They are clearly an improved football team. That means that the better the Chiefs get, the more important the their weaknesses are going to become. The fact that writers, not just for this site but across the net, are pointing to Matt Cassel’s performance and Haley’s misuse of Jamaal Charles and crying foul, shows that there are legitimate concerns about the Chiefs.

The idea that Cassel might not be the answer or that Haley is foolish in limiting his most dynamic offensive player shouldn’t ruin your enjoyment of the Chiefs last two victories. I cheered my head off on Monday night at Arrowhead and I watched wide-eyed and white knuckled as Thomas Jones soared over the Browns defensive line for a Kansas City Chiefs first down.

But I won’t make excused for mistakes. I won’t try to explain away every bad decision Haley makes just because I love the team.

Enjoy the wins. Really. You deserve it. It has been a long 3 years Chief fans deserve a little something to be proud of.

But beware of the Pied Piper of Arrowhead. His music may be nice to listen to but if you don’t watch where you are going, you could find yourself in for a very steep drop.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

question for RaiderHater, Is Jones really that much better than Charles at pass protection? have you spent a significant amount of time watching them do that, like with DVR or something? I would assume Jones would be a little, but Charles isn't terrible. I mean its not like he's an only-try-when-he-has-the-ball prima dona or anything. He might not have the technique, but the will is there.

Interesting read (albeit a little repetitive on Arrowhead Addict) overall. With that said, I struggled with a couple things...not impressed with criticizing Cassel's TD pass to Moeaki in the article. I'd lob that ball high every time since there weren't defenders within 5 yards of him...especially since it was raining. He didn't have to dive for it. It didn't cause him to fall down. I wouldn't call it great, but I wouldn't call it poor either. Also, I'm curious how many plays make up a "drive" in the NFL. I didn't realize there was a minimum. Do 5 plays make a drive?...6, 7, 8? I think I understand the heart of what you're saying. I'd say it more like..."I would like to see the Chiefs grind out a 12 play, 80 yard drive for 6 points, while the defense rests for 7 minutes." But I also wouldn't take away a TD drive from Cassel and the Chiefs even if it's only a few plays. I appreciate your insight and hard work though. Thanks for getting us talking Chiefs football!

You sir, are correct and I could not agree more.

great article Paddy!!!!

I have a few valid points to make here on this topic as well. We talk about our teams weakness in the passing game. I think we all agree that pass protection has become much improved this year. Why do you think this is? Well one main reason for this is that we have a good pass blocking RB in TJ that we didn't have last year including some free agent pick ups on the O line. I believe that this is why TJ is our starting HB. Although JC is a great runner he lacks in pass protection wich is a very important part of a HB skill set. This is why Haley gives the nod to TJ. If you haven't noticed that then you truly do not know football! Pass blocking is 50% of a HB's job. The negative talk of Cassel is truly a act of desperation by Cheifs fans as our offense stuggles to produce points. We are talking about a player that went 10-5 as a starter with NE, 21td's 11 ints. He has already proven to me he can win games with a good supporting cast. We are still in the process of rebuilding and do not have enough weapons for him just yet. To say he is not a franchise type QB is rediculious! Behind one of the worst offensive lines in history he still was able to stay at 500 with 16 td's and 16 int's. I'm just happy he didn't get seriously injured last year behind that line. Talk to T Green or B Croyle about that one. Give the guy a few more sure handed play makers at WR and another year in this system and you will all be eating your words, so mark mine.

Through two games this season he looks worse than last year. With better protection, more receiving help and a running game. We can't hang our hat on what he did in NE two years ago any more.

You can't judge a player after 2 games this year. Farve is a prime example. And ask urself this. How long was it before Brees became an elite player? Pretty washed up in SD huh? Let's also not foget we had a leauge high in dropped passes last year and we still have those same two inconsistant WR's for him to throw to. Sure we added a TE that can catch and guess what, he's currently our leading reciever. Run DMC is more of a project slot due to him plaing HB in college. So other than the TE where did we sure up at? Exactly, nowhere! Protection is better not great. Unless Bowe and Chambers can get open sooner better just isn't good enough. I do agree that Charles should get more carries, but you have to also agree that Jones is better at pass protection. That is an important skill for a COMPLETE back to have. And lets be honest JC is not so good at that. Not just yet ne ways. So until he gets better in that aspect of the game I don't believe he is an every down back. He likes his role as a change of pace back and feels that is when he is most productive. I'm sure you've heard him say that before.

"I do agree that Charles should get more carries, but you have to also agree that Jones is better at pass protection. " That may be true but Haley is running Jones on first and second down and bringing in Charles on 3rd down. Not always of course, but often.

3rd down and distance is an obvious passing down. I think Haley brings him in on all 3rd downs as a catching/running threat due to lack of talent at our WR position. I also believe there is a means to Haleys madness, and we will soon see. Let me ask you this. On the 4-1 to ice the game would you have felt more confortable on giving the ball to JC? I wouldn't and maybe that's how Haley feels every down. Thoma Jones is and every down back and talented in all aspects of his skill set. I don't feel JC is there yet but confident he will be learning from Jones

Yeah.. I don't know if tears in my eyes during the first two games Cassel started last year clouded my judgment but I don't remember his Oakland game or the Philly game being pretty by any means. Honestly I forgot what number Cassel was during the Eagles game because he had so many green jerseys on him the whole game. UGLY I think last year through two he was worse. Don't get me wrong he is not playing well yet this year but last year was UGLY

He actually had a fairly productive day against Oakland last year. The Philly game he had a rough day but he didn't throw very much. He had a high completion percentage for almost no yards. If you remember, that is the game Haley lost his mind and stopped trying to wint he game. He seemed to think that if he just kept running LJ for 2 yards over and over again that he might magically create a running game.

I don't know that 24-39 for 240 with 2 picks against Oakland is all that great. Plus he had a straight up bone headed play passing the ball to his back in the flats with little time in the second half that cost us 3 points and an eventually the game.

im in school and we got a free hour! so im on AA. great article! i agree

I truly can't believe these articles. No wonder we have a fans crying on this site after a 2-0 start. 3 hours before Monday night kickoff there was an article front page on arrowheadaddict saying how badly we sucked and how "old chief" predicted we would go 5-11. Where is 'old chief' now? We GET that you want Charles to carry the ball twice as much as Jones. It's all you've talked about since the second game that the Chiefs won as a team. This isn't Madden and the coaches don't care about Charles letting your fantasy numbers down. We have the 5th ranked rushing attack in the NFL with 0 turnovers and have a 2-0 record. Who cares if Charles isn't running it 25 times a game. Someone on this site once told me if I didn't like what was being written then why not write my own article.. well if you don't like the way Charles is being used then why not go coach the Chiefs. What's that? You can't? Why? Because our coaching staff who have been to many Superbowls are better at coaching football than ANY of us? Exactly. I am not saying I don't want to hear counterpoints and how we could improve but Charles is all you talk about even on Berry's thread. I'm not crazy I know there is a long way to go in many areas. The Chiefs are winning because these guys believe as a team they will win. I believe we will beat the 49ers in a super hostile environment no matter who gets the most carries. The Chiefs WILL

How many points has our 5th ranked rushing attack netted us?

Enough to win 2 ugly games!

Enough to win the games. You play to win the games remember How many times has our 5th ranked rushing attack turned the ball over?

So everyone was perfect if we won and everyone was awful if we lost, is that it? Are we as fans not allowed to try to break this team down? I like to analyze how everyone did, and for me that goes beyond "team lost" or "team won". Haley is a part of the team. Some of us think he has been making some mistakes with his part. And by the way, it goes the other way too. Sometimes people do well in a loss. Neat, huh?

charles will be needed very much for the 49ers game. You know the 49ers are going to pin their ears down and come after Cassel. you know it. they know he cant read a D quickly and get ride of it. how do you combat that?? screens. when they come with everything but the kitchen sink we slip charles out in the flat pull line man and run that screen.

Excellent article...though, to be fair, I must make this point. During the second half of last season, when the offense was improving but we were still losing most games, there were the optimists who brought up the positive strides we had made, like Charles finally establishing our running game, and Cassel engineering drives to put us ahead in the 4th quarter. These arguments were often countered with, "Yeah, but it all comes down to wins and losses." Now, some of those very same people are claiming that the glaring flaws in the games overshadow the fact that we are 2-0. I agree that we should be wary, but wins are wins and I'll take them any way I can get them.

Soooooo...we're winning as a team?

yeah the 49ers are probably going to beat us pretty badly. good article, patrick. it's good to hear people raising their voices on this one.

The 49er's are coming to town, after having shot themselves in the foot in that game till the gun was was empty, yet still battled the superbowl champs till the last minute of the game winning field goal by the Saints. They looked like the gang that can't shoot straight at times. On the other hand they showed a very tough defense, particularly against the run, and a young offense that has talent and ability to move the ball. When you can do that against the Saints, what do you think that might pose in terms of challenges for the Chiefs? They are 0-2, but a damn strong team with a feisty couch. Cut the crazy mistakes and they are a very good team. No touchdowns by our offense will not cut it in this upcoming game. They are not the Browns.

Patrick Though I agree with alot of what you said. I have to defiend the fans on this one. You see for all of Haley's short comings, I welcome the thought of having an "All In" coach. As far back as I can remember the Chiefs have always had a head coach that stayed with the odds. On 4th and inches with the game on the line Haley pushed all his chips to the middle of the table and showed a pair. Say what you want but that was a very dangerous call. As you stated above, "the piper is playing in Kansas City" but even though alot of the notes are off key, I can't stop tapping my foot to the rythem of the music. Today I say to all my fellow Chiefs fans. Drink all the koolaid you can. Dance to the pipers tune for as long as he will play. Remember these days and rejoice. The dawn is comming and we may all have a hangover soon.

#4 would be awesome though...if KC could flip RBs lke some folks flip houses. win a couple games with a back...get a 3rd rounder for him. Pioli for GM of the Decade.

Okay. First off - if Thomas Jones is the better back or coach is really truly saving the Kid until the 2012 superbowl run then none of what I'm asking matters. so let me lay down some ground rules...points of departure if you will: 1) Charles is our best RB (both on paper and um..off paper) 2) Best RB should get more carries than non-best RB 3) Haley and Weiss both agree on this RB personnel decision to play Jones 4) Charles was the guy until training camp..when thom arrived. then at least one of these must be true: 1) our former superbowl offensive coordinator head coach and very seasoned offensive coordinator let a probowler slide right under their nose. 2) Charles is hurt... 3) Weiss has schemed and planned and we are going to completely revamp our offense on the bye week and catch indi and houston off guard w/ no film to study thus securing our playoff hopes. basically saving Jamaal until we absolutely need him. 4) we are boosting value for a TJ trade mid-season 5) haley wants Cassel to have to learn how to be a dependable QB without just leaning completely on Jamaal Charles. 6)the coaching staff still thinks it is preseason. there is absolutely no way any of these are true, so will somebody please tell me: WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?

Please tell me when you find out. I think it is possible the coaching staff still thinks it's the preseason. That just might be it. Good comment!

I couldn't be more thrilled at being 2-0 and I drink a lot of Kool-aid in the off season, but I would be lying to say that I wasn't scared about our future games. Patrick, you speak the truth. We escaped with both of those games by the skin of our teeth. Great things are happening with our defense and special teams but our offense definitely has problems. If anyone can't see it, they have blinders on or don't actually watch the games. Our winning ways won't last if we don't make some adjustments and play better offense.

It is criminal negligence for Jamaal Charles to only receive 11 carries in a game. He is a lottery ticket for a TD everytime he touches the ball regardless of where he is on the field. I think Patty and the boys have been spot on with their analysis. Keep up the good fight boys

Paddy: Are you trying to take my curmudgeon title away???

Cassel’s play over the last two weeks has been abysmal. Even his 2nd half in the Cleveland game wasn’t that good, it was better than what he has done so far, but it was by no means great. I have watched him closely for a while and I think he just makes bad decisions before he even snaps the ball. He locks onto a guy in his mind and, come hell or high water, he is going to force the ball to him. Sometimes it works, most of the time it doesn’t. The truly great quarterbacks in this league right now either have talent everywhere around them, or are better than average at the check down. You have to establish the run to pass and they have to respect the underneath to open up the down field shot. Cassel is always looking 30 yards down field. We don’t have that kind of receiver talent. He keeps looking down field like someone who keeps going back to refrigerator and opening it expecting something to be there wasn’t five minutes before. They are not open and won’t be until the run game is working better, and yeah it could be a lot better, and Cassel learns to look off receivers and check down. I don’t get it. Thigpen was better at that then Cassel.

Honstly, we won't have the downfield opportunity until Charles busts off a long 1 or two and is averaging about 10 per carry. Then get Moeaki, Bowe, and Dex in the short passes long run going. Then Chambers, Bowe, Dex, and Charles are going to be open 30 yards down field. Also, TJ will look like a better runner at that point. If someone is worried about saving Charles, do it after the texans game. If we use him to our full advantage and start 5-0, then we can think playoffs and saving this player for the long term. Until that happens....."WE HAVE TO PLAY TO WIN THE GAME". Lord help me I just quoted Herm. LMAO

Nice piece of writing, Patrickio. An article like this is good for the Chiefs blogosphere. It might sting a little, but its a service in the name of truth.

I totally agree,,,I have been a loyal Chiefs fan for 50 yrs, but I'm not blind yet.

Chris Johnson 5'11'', 191 lbs. Jamaal Charles 5'11'', 199 lbs. So tell me, exactly why can't Charles handle a normal workload? This whole Jones over Charles situation is a joke. Jones should be a short yardage goal line guy and Charles should be doing almost everything else. Haley isn't going to have to truly answer this debate until the Chiefs start losing due to their anemic offense. FGs are not going to get it done when they travel to places like Indy and Houston. Tennessee also has sub par QB play and lacks playmakers at the receiver position. However, their offense actually gets respect b/c they have one of the most dynamic RBs in the league and he is getting the ball in his hands 20-25 times a game. Get Charles the dang ball and give Cassel every possible chance to succeed.

Another interesting fact for everyone talking about how much more durable Jones will be. Jones: 5'10, 212

Jones is more durable because of his style and build and the fact that he always finishes plays. Charles doesn't always finish with his pads square to the defender. It's what makes Charles more illusive and slippery but what also makes me hold my breath at the end of every play he runs. Jones held up to a 1400 yard season of 3.9 per carry and almost more yards than anyone these past few years. He has proven he can take the punishment. We picked him up so we would share the punishment between the two and hopefully have them both at the end of the year. I don't and the Chiefs front office and coaching staff didn't think Charles could do it by himself this year. Why do you care after two wins who got the most carries? Isn't the point of games to win? We only needed 15 points to beat the Chargers and Browns and we accomplished that as a team. This whole who gets the ball more is crazy when our ground game is working and we are winning as a team.

Do you think that our offense has been effective? Win or not, our offense has not been effective. So what I am saying is that there is going to come a time when we need more offense. As it stands, I think the best way to get that offense is to give Jamaal Charles more touches than Thomas Jones. I believe that Charles is a more productive runner. He averages more yards when he touches the ball. I see no logic in giving the less productive guy more touches than the more productive guy. It goes against logic. You can throw a backetball over your left shoulder and get lucky and make a couple of shots but that doesn't mean it is the best way to do it.

I don't think the offense has been effective but I don't think it is because Jones has had 33 carries to JC's 22. I think it is because we are 30th in passing. And are you calling the last two games complete luck? Remember you have to play well during the game and be in a position at the end to have your "backetball over your left shoulder and get lucky" shot even matter.

I don't think we have won by luck..and any luck we have had has been because the team is well prepared. That is a tribute to the job Haley is doing. But when I look at the numbers and I see that Charles has gotten more yards with less carries, I can't help but wonder why, if the offense is struggling, why the coach wouldn't go with the more productive guy. I certainly agree with you that the passing game is a huge proble. If Cassel could open things up a little more it would make both Jones' and Charles' jobs easier.

Just for comparison lets look at last year's Dallas Cowboys. They finished 7th in rushing.. a team with Felix Jones averaging 5.9 yards per carry and Barber with 4 ypc you'd think that Jones would get the majority of the carries.. not true. 214 Barber and 112 Jones. Why do you think that is? Coaches in Dallas have it out for Felix Jones? They're stubborn? I mean he averages 5.9 yards per carry, he's obviously their best back? Lets look at 2010.. over two games the backs have split carries almost down the middle. 69 yards per game and 29th in the league in rushing and 0-2 record.. Wait.. But Jones averages 5.9 yards per carry and they're giving him the ball and they're not winning? There's more to being a good offensive team than giving the ball to a back that averages 5.9 yards per carry. Teams figure ways to shut it down. JC had a great game against the Donkeys last year because of his effort but mostly because we burned them with play action and they couldn't key on him. JC isn't the fix to this offense that's just sitting on the bench waiting for an injury so he can prove everyone wrong.

My argument is very simple. I think Jamaal Charlesis a better running back than Thomas Jones. I point to the numbers,which show when given the ball, Charles is more effective. Thus, I think the best player should get the ball. Now if you think Jones is a better back than Charles and thus deserves more carries, I am not going to change your mind.

Agreed! Pointing at the #s Charles is a better back in regaurds to big play ablility, but what u can point to is blitz pick ups. This will all come clear when we face Willis this week. Most Qb's in the NFL would rather have Jones as their blocker than Charles. This is an argument that can go either way, and neither of us can be proven wrong.

I think Charles is way more explosive I think Jones is more consistent and I trust him to make the right plays. I don't think it's a clear cut one is better than the other and I don't think either is bad. I also think that what we think isn't going to matter to the play callers. Injuries aside we will see both backs splitting carries all year long. I don't care who gets more as long as we win. Patrick don't get me wrong. Charles is my favorite Chief. He is an awesome player. I wouldn't trade him for any other back in the league. The Chiefs are my team, always have been, always will. Charles has his role in the team just like everyone else. He wants to win no matter how many touches he has a game. I agree

I can give you 100 different excuses as to personnel decisions to this point. I can only think of 2 that could in some way make sense. 1.) For some twisted reason Haley doesn't want Charles on the field because he is worried about giving the defense a break (I for one think that when Charles is not on the field you are taking points off the board). I do not know too many coaches that can justify taking points off the board. Haley is extremely stubborn if this is what he is thinking. 2.) They are trying to save Charles for our tougher games into our schedule. (also a complete joke) Personally, I hope that Charles got into trouble last week and was being punished. I hope our coaching knows what they are doing, Ireally do. But they are already making a lot of fans scratch their heads. And all this is going to accomplish is when the losing starts, the calling for heads will come that much faster.

Yes, the Chiefs are the weakest 2 and 0 team in the NFL and headed for 6 to 8 wins. But they are 2 and 0. They might get to 3 and 0. So let's enjoy it while it lasts. I saw Cassel is due a $7 Million roster bonus in March. If true, it will be an interesting February.

The Chiefs are 2-0. The defensive looks very impressive. The special teams looks very impressive. The pass offense looks anemic and needs a lot of work. The rush offense looks good, no matter who is running the ball. All of these areas could use improvement, though, if the Chiefs want to keep moving forward.

Right on. You know...if it wasn't for those two issues...Cassel's play and limited touches for Charles...I think the Chiefs could be twice as dangerous.

At the same time, if you take away 1 thing, Berry's blown coverages, the Chiefs win their games 16-7 and 21-7. So there is room for improvement in all aspects of the game for them.