Where It’s At With Big Matt: Week One Reactions

by Chiefs

This glorious headdress was a casualty to Mother Nature's fury monday night. Farewell, sweet headdress, you will be missed. (source: AA commenter Wild Ball's backyard)

I spent about twelve hours at the Truman Sports Complex on Monday.  When its all said and done and I’m cashing in my chips, I gotta think those 12 hours will be among the best I’ve ever spent.  Even watching the Royals lose was fun*.  And the tailgate between games could’ve gone on for another three days as far as I was concerned.  Good people, good food, good beer, good laughs, good everything.  When I put on my headdress and trekked across the parking lot to meet up with Paddy, I was stopped at least a dozen times for pictures.  Exchanged well over a hundred high-fives.  Our city was in high spirits.  It was a beautiful thing.

*Of course the Royals lost 3-1.  Of course they did.

I don’t need to describe what happened later, because you all know.  It was wonderful, it was magical, and I’ll remember it forever.  The Chiefs really started this season off on the right foot.  Seeing that dunce Rivers throwing temper tantrums was the icing on the cake.

But now that a few days have passed, I have to admit I’m back to wringing my hands and worrying about some of the things I saw.  Cassel was downright bad.  I’m not a subscriber to the “he played well enough to win” theory, particularly when the guy didn’t even sniff 100 yards.  I mean, 68 yards?  Rain or no rain, that is terrible.  Rivers threw for almost 300 in the same conditions.  And I know nobody wants to think about this, but Cassel was awful before the rain even started.  Those first two three-and-outs made me think Weis had ceded control of the offense to Mike Solari.

I’m not calling for Cassel’s job.  In fact, I can’t imagine doing that at any point this season no matter how bad he is.  But I’m definitely not seeing a future pro bowler here.  What I’m seeing is a backup-caliber quarterback getting paid like one of the best in the NFL.  What I’m seeing is further evidence that the Chiefs believe in intangibles over tangibles, and that its counterproductive.

Nowhere is this mindset more evident than in Todd Haley’s bizarre, inexplicable handling of our running backs.  I’ve been saying for the past month this was a problem, and everyone wanted to explain it away.  If you’re still trying to do that, its time to wake up.  Unbelievably, it seems Haley still doesn’t realize what he has in Charles.  Thomas Jones started, got half the carries, and rewarded Haley’s confidence in him to the tune of 3.5 yards per carry.  Charles, given the same number of carries, delivered 92 yards and a score. This isn’t a “thunder-and-lightning” situation.  Charles is a young star on the rise.  Jones is a 32-year-old back who, even at his best, never had a good YPC average.  He certainly won’t have one this year.  He should be the backup, plain and simple.

Look, I’m not hating on Jones.  He isn’t LJ.  I like having him around for a number of reasons.  But this 50/50 split is exactly what I feared (and predicted).  Haley needs to cut the crap and get Charles the damn ball.  The only way our offense will put points on the board is with Charles getting 20-plus touches per game.  There is no acceptable explanation for any other arrangement.

On the plus side, Glenngarry Glenn Dorsey finally had a good game.  His first real one as a Chief!  I watched him as much as I could while soaking wet in the top row, and he made some legitimate plays.  Consistency is definitely an issue, but if he can deliver a few good plays per game from that position he’ll be a valuable player.  What I liked most about his performance was the swagger.  That’s a quality I really want our defense to regain.

Tin Man also looked better, although there is no way he had six tackles.  It was disappointing to see the Chiefs assign him that many.  In one half, no less.  The stage has now been set for the “he started off great and an injury derailed it” storyline.  Seriously, get ready for that, because its right around the corner.

Ultimately, I’d say this game alleviated some concerns while highlighting others.  McCluster proved at least some of the hype has been justified, Dorsey had his best game as a Chief, Charles picked up where he left off, and Flowers and DJ were all over the field.  On the other hand, our pass rush was frighteningly ineffective, our non-Charles offense was horrendous, and Todd Haley appears to be repeating his worst mistake.  So much to think about.  This season is going to be awesome.

One last thing: how inspiring was that final goal line stand?  The secondary really came through in the clutch.  Is it possible the Chiefs are actually ahead of the curve in their focus on that unit?  Time will tell, but the week one results were pretty damn good.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

This was my first professional game. I payed out a months paycheck for a front row seat, with my two sons next to me. I am a changed man. Years of TV, widescreen or not, superbowl parties, blah blah. This game, this game and the Chiefs fans, the craziest I have ever met, dressed as fans, the loudest place I have ever been. The 96 yard carry that I was there for. Hearing and feeling the HITS, the effort, the CHANTS. I am no longer an innocent bystander. I stood in the POURING rain. I WILL BE BACK. CHIEFS !!!!!

I agree Charles needs majority of carries but maybe Haley/Weis have long term plan to keep him fresh all season. If its 50/50 all year between RBs then we have a huge fudgin problem. I personally think Cassel has the potential to be a game manager such as Trent Green once he gets fully acquainted with the offense and receivers. Just food for thought...Cassel's numbers vs. Cleveland last year, no one wants to talk or remember Cassel's good games Cassel 22/40 331 8.3 2 0 99.1

Big Matt I agree with most of what you say but have a different view of your runningback controversy and Studebaker. From the day Haley became the head coach he has preached roll players. T. Jones was brought here to be our power back and Monday night we went to a power running or conservative game plan. I would expect Jones to be the feature back in these games. Charles would be the change of pace. I do not believe that Jones was awarded any carries because of fear of Charles fumbling the ball. Jones was called on to play his roll and he did. This team has the tallant to score on a run from anywhere and the power to grind it out when needed. This could turn out real good for the Chiefs. While I agree Studebaker needs to be on the field moor, Vrable must remain on the field as much as possable. Vrable is the defensive coach on the field. This team has alot of young talent but needs leadership in the game on the field, that is his roll. Although his onfield leadership can't be seen and visably compaired to Studebakers speed, I believe it to be way more valuable. We saw one blown coverage monday night and that led to a wide open receiver. Rivers did not waste the opportunity and neither would most of the NFL QBs. Just my opinion, it's worth what you paid for it.

i'm pretty sure charles and jones had the same amount of fumbles last year

They did. 2 each I think.

Actually Charles had 4 fumbles last year and Jones had 2 fumbles. The more telling number is Charles averages a fumble every 47.5 carries whereas Jones averages a fumble every 165.5 carries.

Oh No! More rain predicted. T. Jones=14 carries 15 yrds, J. Charles=8 carries 75 yards, M.Cassel= 60-80yrds. Please GOD, give Cassel some sort of confidence and swagger to lead this team. PLEASE!

Is it seriously supposed to rain again? Christ. Just what we need: justification for Haley to make the same mistake he's already proven he loves to make.

There is a 40% chance of rain Sunday in Cleveland.

Wonderful and true take. I agree 100% that Jamaal should be getting majority of the carries. I am sorry to hear about the headdress. Where are you going to buy one of those on the east coast? Let me play devil's advocate here: How do we know it is not Weis who is not giving Chaarles the ball more. Haley is no longer calling the plays. Can Jamaal really handle 25-30 touches a game with his small stature? It is a long season. It was wet and rainy, Jones has arms of steel and maybe he provided better ball security than charles in the rain? Just throwing those out there. I have a really good suspicion that the Cleveland game is going to look completely different on offense.

If we're going to beat Cleveland, our offense will need to do a 180 from what they showed last week. With both Jackson and Gilberry likely out, along with Seneca Wallace in at QB, I have a bad feeling our DL is going to fighting an uphill battle all day against the Harrison-Hillis-Wallace rushing trifecta. We'll need to step up and be dominant on offense this Sunday (without any turnovers I made add) - I have a hard time seeing it work in our favor any other way.

I hope the Cleveland game is different. I sort of doubt it will be. This win probably has Haley thinking he handled the situation perfectly, when really we won in spite of his "gameplan" thanks to Jamaal and McCluster's homerun ability. Some of the things you throw out there in your devils advocacy are valid, but Haley hasn't said any of them. What he has done, time and again, is prove he undervalues Jamaal Charles and DRASTICALLY overvalues Thom Jones. re: headdress I actually got it in a Halloween store in NYC. Might be headin' back there real soon.

Finally someone actually called like it is. Charles does need the ball more all the spelling him for the second half is bull crap. We have McCluster who can come in as the huge backfield threat if Charles sputters. Jones is a short yard back if you have third and one give it to Jones he needs to make it his specialty. What will help the pass rush on defense is getting Andy Studebaker in the ball game. What are they waiting on here. Why isn't Vrabel on the bench at least on third downs. The guy is great I like having him on the team but his talent is second to Stude's. Also Demarr proved himself this preseason dude needs to get on the field some how. I dont care if its at nose takle the guy has tenacity and fire which gets all of them working harder, kinda like Ray Lewis does for Baltimore. Matt Cassel is a hot and cold type guy. The saying every great man needs a woman well every good QB needs a reciever who will go get the ball. He is not Peyton Manning or Tom Brady or even Trent Green for that matter. If you want the passing game to work I think you have to mix it up and throw it early on the first two downs then let Charles or DMC get a screen ball or something, he is a guy who needs his confidence stirred before he will be accurate. Plus I really thought he was above average last year except for all the dropped passes. I am not one to call for his job once he gets hot he is hot.Dropped balls are confidence killers, until Bowe steps up and starts catching the football then were all gonna be wondering about Cassel. IMO

Nice comment. Love the long ones. Totally with you on everything you said about the linebackers. Studebaker should already be taking significant playing time away from Vrabel. He isn't, and I don't know if he ever will until Vrabel retires. Pioli and Haley just love him too much, results on the field notwithstanding. That old timer was on the field every single play while our second best pass rusher rode the pine. Unacceptable.

I have been waiting for your take on this game. In other articles since the game it appears that more and more Chiefs fans are starting to believe that Haley is developing a "running back controversy". You opened my eye to it in the preseason and it is proving true more and more every day. There are still plenty of Haley defenders on this issue. Be prepared for the "Thomas Jones doesn't fumble" or "muddy field takes away some of Charles' speed and cutbacks" arguments for why it was done. Neither one holds water to me, but that's what I have heard from some. Not only did McCluster earn some* of the hype, I actually thought Arenas looked better on defense than Berry or Lewis. He had a very good game and some good kick returns before McCluster broke the big one. *I want to see McCluster as an offensive weapon too before I'll say he has lived up to the hype. Paddy, what did you think of "home of the...CHIEFS!"? That give me goosebumps everytime I'm at Arrowhead stadium.

I couldn't see well enough to judge Arenas in the secondary, but he looked good on returns, I'll say that. But yes, we need to see McCluster on offense and Arenas on defense before we can determine whether those picks were worth it, return touchdown or no. People will continue to make excuses for Todd Haley no matter how obvious this running back controversy becomes. Its what Chiefs fans do, we make excuses for inept leadership. All I've done in this situation is believe what I've seen. And what I've seen is that Haley is seriously confused about how to handle these running backs.

Agreed on all except the pass rush. It wasn't great but it wasn;t bad either. We got 2 sacks on a good QB who usually does a nice job of getting rid of the ball. Dorsey got in to the backfield more than I have ever seen. He doesn't get there fast enough but any pressure from our D line helps.

We got the sacks, and I'm psyched about that. But most of the time Rivers just had all the time in the world to throw. That's why he was able to throw for so many yards despite the sloppy conditions. He'd be standing back there forever and a day. No matter how good our secondary is, they won't be able to contend with that for long. Possible answers? Studebaker, Gilberry, Magee. Tyson Jackson simply should not be in on passing downs. Ever.

This was my first professional game. I payed out a months paycheck for a front row seat, with my two sons next to me. I am a changed man. Years of TV, widescreen or not, superbowl parties, blah blah. This game, this game and the Chiefs fans, the craziest I have ever met, dressed as fans, the loudest place I have ever been. The 96 yard carry that I was there for. Hearing and feeling the HITS, the effort, the CHANTS. I am no longer an innocent bystander. I stood in the POURING rain. I WILL BE BACK. CHIEFS !!!!!

I agree Charles needs majority of carries but maybe Haley/Weis have long term plan to keep him fresh all season. If its 50/50 all year between RBs then we have a huge fudgin problem.

I personally think Cassel has the potential to be a game manager such as Trent Green once he gets fully acquainted with the offense and receivers.

Just food for thought...Cassel's numbers vs. Cleveland last year, no one wants to talk or remember Cassel's good games

Cassel 22/40 331 8.3 2 0 99.1

Big Matt

I agree with most of what you say but have a different view of your runningback controversy and Studebaker.

From the day Haley became the head coach he has preached roll players. T. Jones was brought here to be our power back and Monday night we went to a power running or conservative game plan. I would expect Jones to be the feature back in these games. Charles would be the change of pace. I do not believe that Jones was awarded any carries because of fear of Charles fumbling the ball. Jones was called on to play his roll and he did.

This team has the tallant to score on a run from anywhere and the power to grind it out when needed. This could turn out real good for the Chiefs.

While I agree Studebaker needs to be on the field moor, Vrable must remain on the field as much as possable. Vrable is the defensive coach on the field. This team has alot of young talent but needs leadership in the game on the field, that is his roll. Although his onfield leadership can't be seen and visably compaired to Studebakers speed, I believe it to be way more valuable. We saw one blown coverage monday night and that led to a wide open receiver. Rivers did not waste the opportunity and neither would most of the NFL QBs.

Just my opinion, it's worth what you paid for it.

i'm pretty sure charles and jones had the same amount of fumbles last year

They did. 2 each I think.

Actually Charles had 4 fumbles last year and Jones had 2 fumbles. The more telling number is Charles averages a fumble every 47.5 carries whereas Jones averages a fumble every 165.5 carries.

Oh No! More rain predicted. T. Jones=14 carries 15 yrds, J. Charles=8 carries 75 yards, M.Cassel= 60-80yrds. Please GOD, give Cassel some sort of confidence and swagger to lead this team. PLEASE!

Is it seriously supposed to rain again? Christ. Just what we need: justification for Haley to make the same mistake he's already proven he loves to make.

There is a 40% chance of rain Sunday in Cleveland.

Wonderful and true take. I agree 100% that Jamaal should be getting majority of the carries.

I am sorry to hear about the headdress. Where are you going to buy one of those on the east coast?

Let me play devil's advocate here:

How do we know it is not Weis who is not giving Chaarles the ball more. Haley is no longer calling the plays.

Can Jamaal really handle 25-30 touches a game with his small stature? It is a long season.

It was wet and rainy, Jones has arms of steel and maybe he provided better ball security than charles in the rain?

Just throwing those out there.

I have a really good suspicion that the Cleveland game is going to look completely different on offense.

If we're going to beat Cleveland, our offense will need to do a 180 from what they showed last week. With both Jackson and Gilberry likely out, along with Seneca Wallace in at QB, I have a bad feeling our DL is going to fighting an uphill battle all day against the Harrison-Hillis-Wallace rushing trifecta. We'll need to step up and be dominant on offense this Sunday (without any turnovers I made add) - I have a hard time seeing it work in our favor any other way.

I hope the Cleveland game is different. I sort of doubt it will be. This win probably has Haley thinking he handled the situation perfectly, when really we won in spite of his "gameplan" thanks to Jamaal and McCluster's homerun ability.

Some of the things you throw out there in your devils advocacy are valid, but Haley hasn't said any of them. What he has done, time and again, is prove he undervalues Jamaal Charles and DRASTICALLY overvalues Thom Jones.

re: headdress

I actually got it in a Halloween store in NYC. Might be headin' back there real soon.

Finally someone actually called like it is. Charles does need the ball more all the spelling him for the second half is bull crap. We have McCluster who can come in as the huge backfield threat if Charles sputters. Jones is a short yard back if you have third and one give it to Jones he needs to make it his specialty.

What will help the pass rush on defense is getting Andy Studebaker in the ball game. What are they waiting on here. Why isn't Vrabel on the bench at least on third downs. The guy is great I like having him on the team but his talent is second to Stude's. Also Demarr proved himself this preseason dude needs to get on the field some how. I dont care if its at nose takle the guy has tenacity and fire which gets all of them working harder, kinda like Ray Lewis does for Baltimore.

Matt Cassel is a hot and cold type guy. The saying every great man needs a woman well every good QB needs a reciever who will go get the ball. He is not Peyton Manning or Tom Brady or even Trent Green for that matter. If you want the passing game to work I think you have to mix it up and throw it early on the first two downs then let Charles or DMC get a screen ball or something, he is a guy who needs his confidence stirred before he will be accurate. Plus I really thought he was above average last year except for all the dropped passes. I am not one to call for his job once he gets hot he is hot.Dropped balls are confidence killers, until Bowe steps up and starts catching the football then were all gonna be wondering about Cassel. IMO

Nice comment. Love the long ones.

Totally with you on everything you said about the linebackers. Studebaker should already be taking significant playing time away from Vrabel. He isn't, and I don't know if he ever will until Vrabel retires. Pioli and Haley just love him too much, results on the field notwithstanding. That old timer was on the field every single play while our second best pass rusher rode the pine. Unacceptable.

I have been waiting for your take on this game. In other articles since the game it appears that more and more Chiefs fans are starting to believe that Haley is developing a "running back controversy". You opened my eye to it in the preseason and it is proving true more and more every day.

There are still plenty of Haley defenders on this issue. Be prepared for the "Thomas Jones doesn't fumble" or "muddy field takes away some of Charles' speed and cutbacks" arguments for why it was done. Neither one holds water to me, but that's what I have heard from some.

Not only did McCluster earn some* of the hype, I actually thought Arenas looked better on defense than Berry or Lewis. He had a very good game and some good kick returns before McCluster broke the big one.
*I want to see McCluster as an offensive weapon too before I'll say he has lived up to the hype.

Paddy, what did you think of "home of the...CHIEFS!"? That give me goosebumps everytime I'm at Arrowhead stadium.

I couldn't see well enough to judge Arenas in the secondary, but he looked good on returns, I'll say that. But yes, we need to see McCluster on offense and Arenas on defense before we can determine whether those picks were worth it, return touchdown or no.

People will continue to make excuses for Todd Haley no matter how obvious this running back controversy becomes. Its what Chiefs fans do, we make excuses for inept leadership. All I've done in this situation is believe what I've seen. And what I've seen is that Haley is seriously confused about how to handle these running backs.

Agreed on all except the pass rush. It wasn't great but it wasn;t bad either. We got 2 sacks on a good QB who usually does a nice job of getting rid of the ball.

Dorsey got in to the backfield more than I have ever seen. He doesn't get there fast enough but any pressure from our D line helps.

We got the sacks, and I'm psyched about that. But most of the time Rivers just had all the time in the world to throw. That's why he was able to throw for so many yards despite the sloppy conditions. He'd be standing back there forever and a day. No matter how good our secondary is, they won't be able to contend with that for long.

Possible answers? Studebaker, Gilberry, Magee. Tyson Jackson simply should not be in on passing downs. Ever.