<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chiefs Check Out A OT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: dubldug</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/#comment-34813</link>
		<dc:creator>dubldug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=8203#comment-34813</guid>
		<description>A suggestion to ponder; if Magee at DT or DE is stronger and able to play better, Donny Washington and P. Walters having a chance to be in a NFL environment start adding contributions wouldn&#039;t the D need less work? Last year we drafted heavy on D and still sucked big time and you want to repeat that draft? Ideally we trade out but if not we have 4 to 5 players to pick from. A cb.safety,ot,dt,or wr. Justification for any of the above can be made. Pioli gets to decide who is best, who is most talented and who is most needed? Who is the best football player?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A suggestion to ponder; if Magee at DT or DE is stronger and able to play better, Donny Washington and P. Walters having a chance to be in a NFL environment start adding contributions wouldn&#8217;t the D need less work? Last year we drafted heavy on D and still sucked big time and you want to repeat that draft? Ideally we trade out but if not we have 4 to 5 players to pick from. A cb.safety,ot,dt,or wr. Justification for any of the above can be made. Pioli gets to decide who is best, who is most talented and who is most needed? Who is the best football player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoCan2</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/#comment-34805</link>
		<dc:creator>MoCan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=8203#comment-34805</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s excellent, so we&#039;d be back to the good old days with Coach Vermeil. An excellent O-Line, a really good offense.....and an awful defense. Thats not going to win any championships. We&#039;ve got way too many holes on defense to use the first two (or in dubldug&#039;s &quot;alternate scenario&quot; three and one of our best defensive guys) picks on the O-Line. I know that our O-Line won&#039;t be perfect, but if we spend that much trying to make it perfect, we will have to watch teams set records and watch no names become superstars against our defense for another long year. You want to use the first pick on O-Line fine, its not my first choice but that&#039;s fine, but after that we better use the next two to get some defensive help. I don&#039;t want to watch anymore 41-34 games against the hapless Browns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s excellent, so we&#8217;d be back to the good old days with Coach Vermeil. An excellent O-Line, a really good offense&#8230;..and an awful defense. Thats not going to win any championships. We&#8217;ve got way too many holes on defense to use the first two (or in dubldug&#8217;s &#8220;alternate scenario&#8221; three and one of our best defensive guys) picks on the O-Line. I know that our O-Line won&#8217;t be perfect, but if we spend that much trying to make it perfect, we will have to watch teams set records and watch no names become superstars against our defense for another long year. You want to use the first pick on O-Line fine, its not my first choice but that&#8217;s fine, but after that we better use the next two to get some defensive help. I don&#8217;t want to watch anymore 41-34 games against the hapless Browns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubldug</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/#comment-34801</link>
		<dc:creator>dubldug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=8203#comment-34801</guid>
		<description>HAHAHA, with Pioli&#039;s unusual drafting history you need to consider alternate scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA, with Pioli&#8217;s unusual drafting history you need to consider alternate scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubldug</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/18/chiefs-check-out-a-ot/#comment-34795</link>
		<dc:creator>dubldug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=8203#comment-34795</guid>
		<description>You know if you liked Pouncy in the bottom third of the first, would you offer DJ and our (2b). Imagine the uproar after you drafted Baluga, Pouncy and Saffold. Imagine the O-LINE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know if you liked Pouncy in the bottom third of the first, would you offer DJ and our (2b). Imagine the uproar after you drafted Baluga, Pouncy and Saffold. Imagine the O-LINE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-25 17:18:33 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
