<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jets Blog On New Chiefs RB Thomas Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/#comment-33803</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=7923#comment-33803</guid>
		<description>An example of this working the other way is SEA, CLE then OAK in round 1.  Round 2 is CLE, OAK then SEA.  As it should be.  Seems to me that KC is getting screwed there and should be picked 50th not 51st.  Is there some weird tie-breaker rule coming in to play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An example of this working the other way is SEA, CLE then OAK in round 1.  Round 2 is CLE, OAK then SEA.  As it should be.  Seems to me that KC is getting screwed there and should be picked 50th not 51st.  Is there some weird tie-breaker rule coming in to play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/#comment-33801</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=7923#comment-33801</guid>
		<description>Unrelated question here.  The Chiefs get ATL&#039;s pick in round 2.  The Falcons finished tied with PIT and HOU.  By tie-breaker the order of those 3 teams in the 1st round was PIT, ATL then HOU.  In all other tie-breaker situations in the NFL, the team that drafted 1st in the 1st round gets moved to the back of the pack in the second round.  So it should be ATL, HOU then PIT in round 2.  Meaning KC, HOU then PIT.  Why do most of the drafts orders (ESPN - NFL Network) show the 2nd round order as HOU, ATL then PIT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unrelated question here.  The Chiefs get ATL&#8217;s pick in round 2.  The Falcons finished tied with PIT and HOU.  By tie-breaker the order of those 3 teams in the 1st round was PIT, ATL then HOU.  In all other tie-breaker situations in the NFL, the team that drafted 1st in the 1st round gets moved to the back of the pack in the second round.  So it should be ATL, HOU then PIT in round 2.  Meaning KC, HOU then PIT.  Why do most of the drafts orders (ESPN &#8211; NFL Network) show the 2nd round order as HOU, ATL then PIT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/#comment-33796</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=7923#comment-33796</guid>
		<description>I am ecstatic about Thomas Jones. The fact that he will not be getting the majority of touches, I believe, will keep him performing when he does get them. Also we really need him to just be productive while charles takes his break and his leadership is the most important thing for the future backs of the franchise. $5 million for a rb coach that also plays is a great bargain lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am ecstatic about Thomas Jones. The fact that he will not be getting the majority of touches, I believe, will keep him performing when he does get them. Also we really need him to just be productive while charles takes his break and his leadership is the most important thing for the future backs of the franchise. $5 million for a rb coach that also plays is a great bargain lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremyriversideca</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/03/10/the-jets-blog-on-new-chiefs-rb-thomas-jones/#comment-33787</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremyriversideca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=7923#comment-33787</guid>
		<description>Sounds about right, but we need his leadership and ability to get tough short yards when needed.

Should we bring back Richardson?  Mike Cox is no Tony Richardson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds about right, but we need his leadership and ability to get tough short yards when needed.</p>
<p>Should we bring back Richardson?  Mike Cox is no Tony Richardson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

