<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chiefs Links: Clayton Thinks Chiefs Could A Make Run At Peppers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:43:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raider Fan</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/comment-page-1/#comment-30450</link>
		<dc:creator>Raider Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=6853#comment-30450</guid>
		<description>To bad the raiders will pick him up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad the raiders will pick him up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timc</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/comment-page-1/#comment-30366</link>
		<dc:creator>timc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=6853#comment-30366</guid>
		<description>Wilfolk over Peppers.

I&#039;d be happy with both. It&#039;s essential that we find another edge rusher asap, via draft trade or Free egency. 

Peppers will be way to expnsive once the new system comes into place. He&#039;s just not worth it considering his age. If you  were a contender then yes, but for us at this point, the money would be better spent on younger players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilfolk over Peppers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy with both. It&#8217;s essential that we find another edge rusher asap, via draft trade or Free egency. </p>
<p>Peppers will be way to expnsive once the new system comes into place. He&#8217;s just not worth it considering his age. If you  were a contender then yes, but for us at this point, the money would be better spent on younger players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiefsfan567</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/comment-page-1/#comment-30362</link>
		<dc:creator>chiefsfan567</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=6853#comment-30362</guid>
		<description>To b honest id b happy with either. Vince seems more likely cheaper n younger plus the pioli factor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To b honest id b happy with either. Vince seems more likely cheaper n younger plus the pioli factor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdchief</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/02/09/chiefs-links-clayton-thinks-chiefs-could-a-make-run-at-peppers/comment-page-1/#comment-30361</link>
		<dc:creator>sdchief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=6853#comment-30361</guid>
		<description>yeah....I think we throw money at big vince wilfork...anything else would be the icing on the cake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230;.I think we throw money at big vince wilfork&#8230;anything else would be the icing on the cake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
