<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merlin&#039;s Magic: Post-Bills Draft Position Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/#comment-8781</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4968#comment-8781</guid>
		<description>102:

I don&#039;t see a QB being drafted. We have far too many needs. If we draft one, it might be a round 5 pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see a QB being drafted. We have far too many needs. If we draft one, it might be a round 5 pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/#comment-8780</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4968#comment-8780</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the Chiefs will draft a QB. I think the front loaded Cassel contract was a great idea. At the end of 2010 we will know what we have in Cassel, and if we draft well this year we could pick up a prime QB FA if needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Chiefs will draft a QB. I think the front loaded Cassel contract was a great idea. At the end of 2010 we will know what we have in Cassel, and if we draft well this year we could pick up a prime QB FA if needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/#comment-8777</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4968#comment-8777</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine the Rams not taking a QB. The Lions absolutely must take Okung if he&#039;s there. Tampa taking Suh makes sense.

This draft seems to be deep in talented QBs - I&#039;ll be especially interested to see who&#039;s available in 2nd round and whether we make any moves on that front. Unless we have a shot at Okung, I pray to God we don&#039;t go for a LT with our first pick - the talent level doesn&#039;t seem to be there this year.

I don&#039;t find the argument that we take a S with a top 5/6 pick very compelling personally. Having a solid front stopping the run and creating havoc in the pocket is way more important than good safety play.

Count me among the skeptics when it comes to the Chiefs trading out of their first pick. Besides, I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m particularly impressed with Pioli&#039;s drafting abilities thus far. If he had used that #3 pick last year on either BJ Raji or any one of the several talented LBs available, our defense would be miles ahead of where it is right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine the Rams not taking a QB. The Lions absolutely must take Okung if he&#8217;s there. Tampa taking Suh makes sense.</p>
<p>This draft seems to be deep in talented QBs &#8211; I&#8217;ll be especially interested to see who&#8217;s available in 2nd round and whether we make any moves on that front. Unless we have a shot at Okung, I pray to God we don&#8217;t go for a LT with our first pick &#8211; the talent level doesn&#8217;t seem to be there this year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find the argument that we take a S with a top 5/6 pick very compelling personally. Having a solid front stopping the run and creating havoc in the pocket is way more important than good safety play.</p>
<p>Count me among the skeptics when it comes to the Chiefs trading out of their first pick. Besides, I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m particularly impressed with Pioli&#8217;s drafting abilities thus far. If he had used that #3 pick last year on either BJ Raji or any one of the several talented LBs available, our defense would be miles ahead of where it is right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/12/16/4968/#comment-8779</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4968#comment-8779</guid>
		<description>102:

Always good to see your mocks. You toss out a ton of ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102:</p>
<p>Always good to see your mocks. You toss out a ton of ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

