<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking News: LJ Inks Deal With Bengals will Play Chiefs Dec. 27th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:27:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 81cjones</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>81cjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>I second shane.smith&#039;s comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second shane.smith&#8217;s comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbq</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8412</link>
		<dc:creator>bbq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8412</guid>
		<description>The Bengals signing LJ was probably based on the realization that they have no depth at running back.  Also, they probably figure they had success with Cedric Benson, so why can&#039;t they do the same for LJ?

We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bengals signing LJ was probably based on the realization that they have no depth at running back.  Also, they probably figure they had success with Cedric Benson, so why can&#8217;t they do the same for LJ?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8411</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8411</guid>
		<description>Shane I think thats a good point, I think there was interest up to this point, we know where he landed and that we are playing him in December, Im done with the subject personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane I think thats a good point, I think there was interest up to this point, we know where he landed and that we are playing him in December, Im done with the subject personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cclary</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator>cclary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8410</guid>
		<description>Josh Looney at kcchiefs.com just reported that Dwayne Bowe has been suspended for 4 games for using a banned substance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Looney at kcchiefs.com just reported that Dwayne Bowe has been suspended for 4 games for using a banned substance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane.smith</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8409</link>
		<dc:creator>shane.smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8409</guid>
		<description>Who really gives a shit? I don&#039;t. He is gone and that is great. HE IS NO LONGER A CHIEF!!! If no one ever wrote another word about the prick it would be fine by me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who really gives a shit? I don&#8217;t. He is gone and that is great. HE IS NO LONGER A CHIEF!!! If no one ever wrote another word about the prick it would be fine by me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: November 17, 2009: Brady Quinn Cheapshot; Iverson in Limbo; Rodman Arrested &#124; FanSided</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8408</link>
		<dc:creator>November 17, 2009: Brady Quinn Cheapshot; Iverson in Limbo; Rodman Arrested &#124; FanSided</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8408</guid>
		<description>[...] The Bengals Have Themselves Another Tweeter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Bengals Have Themselves Another Tweeter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthill82</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/11/17/breaking-news-lj-inks-deal-with-bengals-will-play-chiefs-dec-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-8407</link>
		<dc:creator>matthill82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=4802#comment-8407</guid>
		<description>1. LJ is an insurance policy. He&#039;ll exhibit good behavior, with the exception of continuing to blast the Chiefs on his Twitter account, &quot;Gonna gallop all over the Chiefs. Cleat prints on the chests. Mud in the face masks.&quot; Indy and NE are the class of the AFC. The Bengals will probably win their division, but a divisional-round draw of either of those two teams will be the end of it.

2. Lewis doesn&#039;t really have a reputation for letting talent sit on the bench. He certainly hasn&#039;t used the bench as punishment for bad behavior, so even if LJ becomes a problem on that front, if he can contribute, he&#039;ll play.

3. Just like every other move in the NFL, I&#039;m sure this was a multifaceted decision-making process. Keeping him from another division foe is one thing, but they&#039;re already through 5 of their 6 division games (and they&#039;re 5-0). The biggest factors I see are: Cedric Benson&#039;s injury (even though Lewis said it wasn&#039;t a factor) and the &#039;thrifty&#039; pricetag. League minimum (for veterans) for a 2-time probowler? The Bengals can&#039;t lose on this deal. KC pays the majority of the high-dollar stuff, and they get 8 games to try him out before they have to fork out any real money.

I, for one, didn&#039;t need another excuse to cheer against the classless Bengals, but it looks like Christmas came early this year.

As a side note, how &#039;bout Jamaal Charles?

Against Oakland, Charles had 18 rushes for 103 yards (5.7 yards per carry - 3 more per carry than LJ had all season)and a TD (also the first 100-yard rushing game for a Chief&#039;s player this year, and the team&#039;s first rushing TD).

He also had 4 catches for 14 yards.

Compare those stats to LJ&#039;s best game of &#039;09 against Washington:

LJ had 23 carries for 83 yards for an average of 3.6 per carry. He had 3 receptions for 12 yards. No scores.

I&#039;ll take an up-and-coming vs. a malcontent any day of the week. Add actual PRODUCTION to the equation and we end up with the better end of the deal all the way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. LJ is an insurance policy. He&#8217;ll exhibit good behavior, with the exception of continuing to blast the Chiefs on his Twitter account, &#8220;Gonna gallop all over the Chiefs. Cleat prints on the chests. Mud in the face masks.&#8221; Indy and NE are the class of the AFC. The Bengals will probably win their division, but a divisional-round draw of either of those two teams will be the end of it.</p>
<p>2. Lewis doesn&#8217;t really have a reputation for letting talent sit on the bench. He certainly hasn&#8217;t used the bench as punishment for bad behavior, so even if LJ becomes a problem on that front, if he can contribute, he&#8217;ll play.</p>
<p>3. Just like every other move in the NFL, I&#8217;m sure this was a multifaceted decision-making process. Keeping him from another division foe is one thing, but they&#8217;re already through 5 of their 6 division games (and they&#8217;re 5-0). The biggest factors I see are: Cedric Benson&#8217;s injury (even though Lewis said it wasn&#8217;t a factor) and the &#8216;thrifty&#8217; pricetag. League minimum (for veterans) for a 2-time probowler? The Bengals can&#8217;t lose on this deal. KC pays the majority of the high-dollar stuff, and they get 8 games to try him out before they have to fork out any real money.</p>
<p>I, for one, didn&#8217;t need another excuse to cheer against the classless Bengals, but it looks like Christmas came early this year.</p>
<p>As a side note, how &#8217;bout Jamaal Charles?</p>
<p>Against Oakland, Charles had 18 rushes for 103 yards (5.7 yards per carry &#8211; 3 more per carry than LJ had all season)and a TD (also the first 100-yard rushing game for a Chief&#8217;s player this year, and the team&#8217;s first rushing TD).</p>
<p>He also had 4 catches for 14 yards.</p>
<p>Compare those stats to LJ&#8217;s best game of &#8216;09 against Washington:</p>
<p>LJ had 23 carries for 83 yards for an average of 3.6 per carry. He had 3 receptions for 12 yards. No scores.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take an up-and-coming vs. a malcontent any day of the week. Add actual PRODUCTION to the equation and we end up with the better end of the deal all the way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
