<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kenny Smith? A Real Head Scratcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quazzimotto</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>Quazzimotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>Addressing the OL is a top priority but there is WAY too much talent on D to draft an OT in the 1st round. McNeill would be a monster addition and allow several moves that would bolster our line-up on both sides of the ball to be sure.

I watched the Tennessee/Bama game yesterday and Berry is a stud. I wouldn&#039;t be upset at all if they took him. Still like Mays, but Berry looked like a young Ed Reed out there and thats tough to pass on.

This team has an outrageous amount of things that need fixed and I don&#039;t know that they can do it all next season. But damn, they better at least be competitive. Today was truly awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addressing the OL is a top priority but there is WAY too much talent on D to draft an OT in the 1st round. McNeill would be a monster addition and allow several moves that would bolster our line-up on both sides of the ball to be sure.</p>
<p>I watched the Tennessee/Bama game yesterday and Berry is a stud. I wouldn&#8217;t be upset at all if they took him. Still like Mays, but Berry looked like a young Ed Reed out there and thats tough to pass on.</p>
<p>This team has an outrageous amount of things that need fixed and I don&#8217;t know that they can do it all next season. But damn, they better at least be competitive. Today was truly awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmills110</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator>hmills110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/#comment-8026</guid>
		<description>Good discussion, guys.

I&#039;m a big fan of left tackles, myself.  But I think Chiefs could do plenty to fix what&#039;s wrong without spending the 1st pick on OL.

I started this reply to disagree with picking up a LT in FA, but the more I think about it, the more it seems like a good idea to add a great LT and have another OL who can step in and be as great or nearly as great, and play G (or RT?) in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion, guys.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of left tackles, myself.  But I think Chiefs could do plenty to fix what&#8217;s wrong without spending the 1st pick on OL.</p>
<p>I started this reply to disagree with picking up a LT in FA, but the more I think about it, the more it seems like a good idea to add a great LT and have another OL who can step in and be as great or nearly as great, and play G (or RT?) in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmills110</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator>hmills110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/#comment-8025</guid>
		<description>Kenny Smith pickup is just a minor pickup.  I don&#039;t think they expect great things from him.  What&#039;s significant is parting ways with Tank Tyler.  Apparently they think they can get by just fine without him.

I expect it&#039;s either 3-4 with Edwards, or 4-3 hybrid without him.  It will be interesting to see just what transpires against the Chargers.  Likely to see a lot of 2-4-5.  Just not sure what the exact configuration will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenny Smith pickup is just a minor pickup.  I don&#8217;t think they expect great things from him.  What&#8217;s significant is parting ways with Tank Tyler.  Apparently they think they can get by just fine without him.</p>
<p>I expect it&#8217;s either 3-4 with Edwards, or 4-3 hybrid without him.  It will be interesting to see just what transpires against the Chargers.  Likely to see a lot of 2-4-5.  Just not sure what the exact configuration will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmills110</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-8024</link>
		<dc:creator>hmills110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/10/21/a-real-head-scratcher/#comment-8024</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s natural for there to be more players come in who have a Pioli/Haley connection, than otherwise.  It&#039;s not necessarily bad.

As for late pickups from New England and Miami, they were BOTH teams that brought in a lot of talent to address the right side of their respective o-lines.  And you look at Bobby Wade, from Minnesota.

So these were generally smart pickups, &lt;i&gt;considering the time of year they were made&lt;/i&gt;, targeting teams that had a surplus of talent in the position areas in question.  The &lt;i&gt;problem&lt;/i&gt; I have with Pioli is the time of year they were made!  Chiefs were &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; very aggressive at OL and WR in the offseason.  They did the best they could after the 53-man cutdowns, after it became abundantly clear that they hadn&#039;t done enough, already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s natural for there to be more players come in who have a Pioli/Haley connection, than otherwise.  It&#8217;s not necessarily bad.</p>
<p>As for late pickups from New England and Miami, they were BOTH teams that brought in a lot of talent to address the right side of their respective o-lines.  And you look at Bobby Wade, from Minnesota.</p>
<p>So these were generally smart pickups, <i>considering the time of year they were made</i>, targeting teams that had a surplus of talent in the position areas in question.  The <i>problem</i> I have with Pioli is the time of year they were made!  Chiefs were <i>not</i> very aggressive at OL and WR in the offseason.  They did the best they could after the 53-man cutdowns, after it became abundantly clear that they hadn&#8217;t done enough, already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
