Merlin's Magic: Cherm Versus Piolichick Edition

by Features

Every time a Carl/Herm draft pick gets cut or traded, some Chief fans use that event to piss on the previous regime and/or laud Pioli. Every transaction is viewed through the Pioli good, Carl bad filter. Frankly, it gets a bit old, but is it fair? Were the Carl/Herm drafts that much worse than the Pioli/Belichick drafts from the same period?

I decided to break it down for the 2006 – 2008 Herm era, but let’s first look at some factors that may influence the results.

One factor where you would expect that Carl would have more draft picks with the team is talent level on the team. Clearly, Pioli was drafting for a team with a higher talent level. This makes it harder for a player to make the Patriots, plus Pioli was drafting later in each round. Therefore, you would expect the Chiefs to have more draft picks on the roster than the Pats.

On the other hand, the Chiefs have undergone a major shift in philosophies. Talent drafted for one system doesn’t usually fit well with a very different system. This factor would lead to us expecting less draft picks on the Chiefs and more on the Pats (since they have not undergone such a radical shift). So, what to do? How do we get an accurate read on this? Well, the fairest way is to look at players on NFL rosters, not just the Chiefs and Pats rosters.

Just being on a roster is one thing, how about starting versus riding the pines? I decided to use a point system, Each player from a draft still on a NFL roster, but not starting, gets a single point. Starters get two points. Players are listed by round, player name and points and current team, if not on the drafted team’s roster. No points assigned means that player is not in the NFL.

2006 Draft

Cherm 7 picks total: (1) Tamba Hali (2 points) (2) Bernard Pollard (2 points, Houston) (3) Brodie Croyle (1 point) (5) Marcus Maxey, (6) Tre Stallings, (6) Jeff Webb, (7) Jarrad Page (2 points)

Cherm hit on three starters and a reserve player. Seven points total.

Piolichick 10 picks total: (1) Lawrence Maroney (1 point) (2) Chad Jackson (3) Dave Thomas (4) Garrett Mills (1 point , MN) (4) Stephen Gostkowski (2 points) (5) Ryan O’Callahan (2 points, KC) (6) Jeremy Mincey (1 point, Jax) (6) Dan Stevenson (6) Le Kevin Smith (1 point, Den) (7) Willie Andrews

Piolichick responds with two starters (ironically one in KC) and four reserves. Eight points total.

2007 Draft

Cherm 7 picks total: (1) Dwayne Bowe (2 points) (2) Turk McBride (1 point, Det) (3) DeMarcus Tyler (1 point, Car) (5) Kolby Smith (1 point) (5) Justin Medlock (6) Herbert Taylor (7) Michael Allen.

Cherm checks in with one starter and three reserves for five points.

Piolichick 9 picks total: (1) Brandon Merriweather (2 points) (4) Kareem Brown (5) Clint Oldenburg (6) Justin Rodgers (6) Mike Richardson (1 point, KC) (6) Justise Hairston (1 point, Buf) (6) Corey Hilliard (1 point Browns) (7) Oscar Lua (7) Mike Elgin

Piolichick scores one starter and three reserves for five points.

2008 Draft

Cherm 12 picks: (1) Glenn Dorsey (2 points) (1) Branden Albert (2 points) (2) Brandon Flowers (2 points) (3) Jamaal Charles (1 point) (3) Brad Cottam (1 point) (3) DaJuan Morgan (1 point) (4) Will Franklin (5) Brandon Carr (2 points) (6) Barry Richardson (1 point) (6) Kevin Robinson (7) Brian Johnston (7) Mike Merritt

Cherm got four starters and four reserves from this draft. Twelve total points.

Piolichick 7 picks : (1) Jerod Mayo (2 points) (2) Terrence Wheatley (1 point) (3) Shawn Crable (1 point) (3) Kevin O’Connell (1 point, Jets) (4) Jonathan Wilhite (1 point) (5) Matt Slater (1 point) (6) Bo Ruud

Piolichick scores with one starter and five reserves. Seven total points.

Totaling it all up, Cherm got eight starters and eight reserves for 24 total points with 26 picks. Piolichick also had 26 picks, and got four starters and twelve reserves for 20 total points. By looking at this, Cherm did a better job finding starters and Piolichick identified more reserve players. Total number of picks are the same, but does the round breakdown make a big enough difference? Obviously, not all picks are the same. Lets’ take a look:

Round

Cherm

Piolichick

One

4

3

Two

3

2

Three

5

3

Four

1

4

Five

4

3

Six

5

8

Seven

4

3

Here we see some explanation for why we would expect Cherm to outperform Piolichick. Cherm had an additional pick each in rounds one and two, plus two additional picks in round three. This is mitigated to a degree by Piolichick’s four picks in round 4 compared to Cherm’s single pick in that round. Still, Cherm has the positional advantage. However, it’s clear that Cherm edged out Piolichick, with a significant difference in identifying starters.

So, what have we learned? Well, for those that think Pioli is a genius and Carl drafted poorly, these stats do not support your position. Even if you look at late round picks (rounds 5-7) Cherm pulled more starters from there (Page in round 7 and Carr in round 5). Piolichick has one starter from those rounds. Interesting, it’s O’Callaghan in round 5 who is starting, not for the Patriots, but for the Chiefs.

If anything, Carl’s 2006-2008 drafting was better than Pioli’s. At worst, it’s a slight edge to Cherm. Sorry guys, Pioli may very well lead us to a Super Bowl, but you can’t hang your hopes on a superior record for the 2006-2008 drafts. That dog will not hunt.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Jared Allen trade was a symptom of deeper-rooted problems, not a blunder, in itself.

Pioli's very much a collaborator on talent questions. Wants to be on the field with the coach in practice and keep an eye on the football end of things and wants to be on the same page with his HC on personnel. This can be construed as "rubber-stamping" what the HC wants. Myself, I'd want to be in agreemt with my HC, and I'd prob'ly have ideas he didn't that are pretty good and he'd have ideas I didn't.

The key is to have a HC who knows football and knows personnel, and a working relationship that makes those decisions the best that 2 (or more) minds can produce.

Hate to have a "me too" post, but I am with Max on this one...I will never forgive the trading of Jared Allen, no matter how much he and the GM did not get along. Peterson was a complete moron to let him go. And the D still suffers because of it.

huscarl

Also you must remember that Carl/Herm added 3 points to their drafts (using your scoring system) BY FREAKING TRADING JARED ALLEN, and keeping Larry Johnson.

That counts for -3,684 points in my system.

Merlin, thanks for taking the time to get this in depth about this very topic! Great Article! I personally am over the Carl/Herm era. I don't feel that it does any good to bitch about it. It is what it is. I hope Pioli & Haley are everything that they were hired to be. It is frustrating as a fan to see draft picks lost. It is said throughout the league that you build a team through the draft. We all know every stud in the draft can be a bust and that there are diamonds in the rough. But damn I hate seeing a mojority of our recent draft picks go packing. It feels like a waste. I do know certain players fit a certain team, but damn! I guess I will just have to set back and hope that Pioli & the boys are smart enough for all of us even when it feels like they are not. Either way there isn't shit I can do about it, besides set here and chat it up with you great Chief fans. Right?

Merlin my man you have gone above and beyond for this post. Nice read. Personally, due to astronomically differing philosophies, there is really no way to compare Pioli/Haley with Peterson/Edwards. I personally don't think Herm got a REAL fair shake. He was handed a drastically aging team and wasn't afforded the time to shake it up and bring on youth the first year. I truly believe our beloved Chiefs would be in a totally different spot roster wise had Herm been allowed to blow up the roster from the regime he took it over from. However, since Carl and our beloved owner Lamar, told him no, we have a good nucleus with which to build on, he didn't really get to institute HIS plan until we were in a 4-12 season. If Herm had been allowed to blow up the aging roster we had from the non-playoff 10-6 season, we might have been under five hundred the next year instead of sneaking into the playoffs with a 9-7 record. The bottom line or point I am trying to make is we need to forget the Herm and Carl era and stop comparing what Pioli and Haley are doing to what they did. These are two TOTALLY different types of thinking processes. Carl's thinking processes may not have ended up in a Super Bowl win, but if I am not mistaking we went to more playoff games with Marty/Carl than any other team in the 90's. Correct me if I am wrong on that. I believe we had a record streak of consecutive playoff appearances back then. Not sure what happened, but maybe Carl just wasn't able to work the same "magic" with any other coach that he had with Marty.

Ok roast me on this one!!! Love the debating that goes on at this AWESOME site!!!!

Makes you wonder how much of the Pat's drafts were BB and how much were Pioli. In the draft room, was it 'Bill, trust me on this,' or was it 'Scott, thanks for your input but I want this guy.' You always hear, especially in Boston that Pioli was just a pawn and BB was the real mastermind of the Pat's dynasty. If he doesn't get much credit for building that team, I don't think he should have to shoulder the blame for the weak drafts.

Merlin: WOW! Awesome data.
Some things will only be able to be seen over time.

Another angle might be an analysis of the play calling of Herm vs Haley. I have seen comments about the calling of plays like Herm by Haley.

I decided to scrub the Chiefs records looking for anti-Herm data. If he coached for us from 2006-8, I went looking to see if there was anything, good or bad left behind in the records, from Herm. I found nothing.

Now 2004 had lots of refferences both good and bad for records, and we went 7-9. In 2005 we went 10-6 and didn't make the playoffs and Coach Vermiel was gone. Next season 9-7 and a wildcard spot followed by a drubbing by the COlts. Then 4-12 and 2-14. Then bye Herm.

But Herm didn't kill in the negative stats like we might have thought. I couldn't find one reference to any of Herm's seasons in the CHiefs records.

Jeremy:
I did talk about that difference in this article and it's true. That's one reason why I looked at being on a NFL roster instead of just the Chiefs or Pats rosters. If you just looked at the Pats roster, it's pretty brutal. Basically, Pioli got two starters out of the first round and a kicker. That's it. I didn't think that was fair, so I looked at all of the NFL.

Merlin: I love this post. I love this effort. Love the ideas.

Quick question? Excuse me if I missed it, but Pioli's teams where loaded with talent. Not all draft picks were ever going to be starters. Herm started just about everyone. Sometimes, I feel just for the sake of starting them. Herm made a conscious effort to get the young guys playing, and letting go of the old guys. Do you agree? If you do agree, then of course he would have more starters than Pioli.

It really takes three years to grade a draft. Herm's draft years are almost completely lost due to change in coaching philosophy. We will never really know the true success of Herm's draft picks because they have had the plug pulled on them.

Herm's saving graces are Bowe, Flowers and Carr. He had plenty of misses. Pioli will too. It is a numbers game with the draft. You really do have to get lucky. Herm was only lucky a few times. We can only hope that Pioli is luckier; like the Pats have been.

I don't hate Herm, but he is not here for a reason. Before he was a head coach he was a db coach. He took over a good Jets team and ran it into the ground. He did the same with our beloved Chiefs.

I am glad he is gone.