<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brown Over Pollard = Good News For The Chiefs? Um&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hmills110</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6569</link>
		<dc:creator>hmills110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6569</guid>
		<description>When healthy, Brown was a leader.  Some say his coverage skills have deteriorated, somewhat.

The thing about Pollard, to MY eye, anyway, was all those mistakes people&#039;re saying the LBs should&#039;ve been blamed for instead of him, just reinforces the fact that the LBs were giving (or trying to give) the DBs a lot more help.  It looked to me like Gun protected his safeties from having to think much.

I think Brown&#039;s a great insurance acquisition, and if he plays up to the level he did in Chicago, he SHOULD win the starting job, and it will mean that KC got BETTER at safety.  At 100%, Brown is about as good as it gets.  Having him on the roster at all should give the young safeties and corners a lot of veteran wisdom, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When healthy, Brown was a leader.  Some say his coverage skills have deteriorated, somewhat.</p>
<p>The thing about Pollard, to MY eye, anyway, was all those mistakes people&#8217;re saying the LBs should&#8217;ve been blamed for instead of him, just reinforces the fact that the LBs were giving (or trying to give) the DBs a lot more help.  It looked to me like Gun protected his safeties from having to think much.</p>
<p>I think Brown&#8217;s a great insurance acquisition, and if he plays up to the level he did in Chicago, he SHOULD win the starting job, and it will mean that KC got BETTER at safety.  At 100%, Brown is about as good as it gets.  Having him on the roster at all should give the young safeties and corners a lot of veteran wisdom, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfett81</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6568</link>
		<dc:creator>bfett81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6568</guid>
		<description>Bernard Pollard had the LOWEST stop rate against the run of any starting defender last season.

He has no business starting on an NFL defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard Pollard had the LOWEST stop rate against the run of any starting defender last season.</p>
<p>He has no business starting on an NFL defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6567</guid>
		<description>Granted, Crewes probably got more time to throw than a KC qb ever would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, Crewes probably got more time to throw than a KC qb ever would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>Zach Im with you, a guy does his time he should get a second chance I think, as long as the time fits the crime. That being said I would be very curious to see how he would be received by KC fans ( I know it wont happen probably). Id take Vick or Thigpen any day, I mean look how Paul Crewes played in &quot;The Longest Yard&quot; (either version).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach Im with you, a guy does his time he should get a second chance I think, as long as the time fits the crime. That being said I would be very curious to see how he would be received by KC fans ( I know it wont happen probably). Id take Vick or Thigpen any day, I mean look how Paul Crewes played in &#8220;The Longest Yard&#8221; (either version).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDChief</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>SDChief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>100 percent agree Adam.

Why Page is considered so much better? I think its just due to draft position, people got upset that we took pollard so early, he had an uphill battle from the start for a lot of fans, whereas page was looked at like this amazing pick due to position(which he was for a 7th rounder)

However, Page DOES get Beat more often, Page does well in the red zone, thats about it.

Pollard in my opinion is the better player, I dont understand how Teicher makes that statement

I actually think Brown is here for Page&#039;s Job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100 percent agree Adam.</p>
<p>Why Page is considered so much better? I think its just due to draft position, people got upset that we took pollard so early, he had an uphill battle from the start for a lot of fans, whereas page was looked at like this amazing pick due to position(which he was for a 7th rounder)</p>
<p>However, Page DOES get Beat more often, Page does well in the red zone, thats about it.</p>
<p>Pollard in my opinion is the better player, I dont understand how Teicher makes that statement</p>
<p>I actually think Brown is here for Page&#8217;s Job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>I am now hoping that Vick gets his chance and shows that he can do some good. I am pit bull owner and love my D-O-G. The dog thing I am sure we could talk about all day.

Why I am cheering from him is because now he can do a ton more good helping charities like the Humane Society and other organizations.

If no one gives Vick a second chance then he could end up in our prisons just wasting away tax payers money instead helping. He could help out more people then most people could ever have the opportunity too.

Now its up to Vick to show he has accepted that 2nd chance and is going to do something with it.

(Merlin, I still like your Cleveland comment!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now hoping that Vick gets his chance and shows that he can do some good. I am pit bull owner and love my D-O-G. The dog thing I am sure we could talk about all day.</p>
<p>Why I am cheering from him is because now he can do a ton more good helping charities like the Humane Society and other organizations.</p>
<p>If no one gives Vick a second chance then he could end up in our prisons just wasting away tax payers money instead helping. He could help out more people then most people could ever have the opportunity too.</p>
<p>Now its up to Vick to show he has accepted that 2nd chance and is going to do something with it.</p>
<p>(Merlin, I still like your Cleveland comment!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbq</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6563</link>
		<dc:creator>bbq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6563</guid>
		<description>I like Pollard.  Always have.  But whether he or Page is the better safety is really a question with no definitive answer at this point.

I think Page is probably a better defensive back.  Pollard would certainly fit much better than would Page in a sort of &quot;Loboback&quot; safety/linebacker hybrid position, though.

The bottom line is that Teicher is kind of right when he says it would be a good thing.  If Mike Brown wins, he was probably the better option and it was a good acquisition.  Pollard could still play a pretty big role in the defense with his skillset and he could also focus on making a big impact on special teams the way he has shown us all that he can.

ps. we don&#039;t need Vick, we have Thigpen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Pollard.  Always have.  But whether he or Page is the better safety is really a question with no definitive answer at this point.</p>
<p>I think Page is probably a better defensive back.  Pollard would certainly fit much better than would Page in a sort of &#8220;Loboback&#8221; safety/linebacker hybrid position, though.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that Teicher is kind of right when he says it would be a good thing.  If Mike Brown wins, he was probably the better option and it was a good acquisition.  Pollard could still play a pretty big role in the defense with his skillset and he could also focus on making a big impact on special teams the way he has shown us all that he can.</p>
<p>ps. we don&#8217;t need Vick, we have Thigpen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>HA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6561</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6561</guid>
		<description>I want Vick to go to Cleveland. Vick in the dog pound would just be to funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want Vick to go to Cleveland. Vick in the dog pound would just be to funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/07/23/brown-over-pollard-good-news-for-the-chiefs/comment-page-1/#comment-6560</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3859#comment-6560</guid>
		<description>Im gettin&#039; the crazy idea we could use Michael Vick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im gettin&#8217; the crazy idea we could use Michael Vick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
