<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schedule Analysis: Week 1 &#8211; At Baltimore Ravens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hmills110</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/#comment-5073</link>
		<dc:creator>hmills110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3383#comment-5073</guid>
		<description>Ray-ray MIGHT be running out of gas, but the Baltimore D-Line has been getting it done in front of him, after a one- or two-year dip.  They&#039;ll be tough, because Ray-ray is still playing smart.  Had to take more conservative angles than in his prime, but still playing smart, aggressive LB.

Flacco is no joke.  If they address O-Line and WRs, that could be a great offense.

Having said all that, I care not at all about strength-of-schedule.  I care about how good the Chiefs will be.  Saw a lot of talent last year, and they should be more talented this year.  Question is whether they can translate spurts of dominance into W&#039;s in the W-L column.  As a player, I&#039;d WANT to face the very best.  As a fan, I want to watch the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray-ray MIGHT be running out of gas, but the Baltimore D-Line has been getting it done in front of him, after a one- or two-year dip.  They&#8217;ll be tough, because Ray-ray is still playing smart.  Had to take more conservative angles than in his prime, but still playing smart, aggressive LB.</p>
<p>Flacco is no joke.  If they address O-Line and WRs, that could be a great offense.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I care not at all about strength-of-schedule.  I care about how good the Chiefs will be.  Saw a lot of talent last year, and they should be more talented this year.  Question is whether they can translate spurts of dominance into W&#8217;s in the W-L column.  As a player, I&#8217;d WANT to face the very best.  As a fan, I want to watch the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/#comment-5061</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3383#comment-5061</guid>
		<description>ok food for fodder

2 senarios for you to ponder

1 Cleveland wants to trade B Edwards, a bit pricy as they want Tony and a switch of number ones this year, and edwards wouls still need a contract after next year.

2 Arizona has come out publicly today , as well as has Bolden...that they want a trade...
Arizona wants both a 1st and a 3rd pick this year.
Bolden wants 10 million a year for at least four years.

just saying with this one move they automatically
place the O over the top, minus mayby a lineman.
With what Bolden can do our wideouts counting Tony.
GIVE US A POSSABLE 40POINTS A GAME ON THE SCORE BOARD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok food for fodder</p>
<p>2 senarios for you to ponder</p>
<p>1 Cleveland wants to trade B Edwards, a bit pricy as they want Tony and a switch of number ones this year, and edwards wouls still need a contract after next year.</p>
<p>2 Arizona has come out publicly today , as well as has Bolden&#8230;that they want a trade&#8230;<br />
Arizona wants both a 1st and a 3rd pick this year.<br />
Bolden wants 10 million a year for at least four years.</p>
<p>just saying with this one move they automatically<br />
place the O over the top, minus mayby a lineman.<br />
With what Bolden can do our wideouts counting Tony.<br />
GIVE US A POSSABLE 40POINTS A GAME ON THE SCORE BOARD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/#comment-5072</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3383#comment-5072</guid>
		<description>And the Chiefs draft linebacker or wideout...

I only wish there was a top flight corner out there...but yet again there isnt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Chiefs draft linebacker or wideout&#8230;</p>
<p>I only wish there was a top flight corner out there&#8230;but yet again there isnt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/04/15/a-closer-look-week-1-at-baltimore-ravens/#comment-5071</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3383#comment-5071</guid>
		<description>Like I have said when speaking of the chiefs verses the bears...yes for all those years the bears had a good team, and paper wise a better team, but we matched up with them...

we match up against these guys as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I have said when speaking of the chiefs verses the bears&#8230;yes for all those years the bears had a good team, and paper wise a better team, but we matched up with them&#8230;</p>
<p>we match up against these guys as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

