<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T.O. = To Oakland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 2383</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>2383</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3031#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>In bowe&#039;s first year all we did was run.  Last year that had to change a quarter way through for obvious reasons.  And you said it yourself, we could not run the ball to save our lives.  Do you think that opens up a passing game?  Not likely.  I am also going as far as to say Bowe is going over 1000 this year, while moore will not, even if he ends up having breese hucking him the ball again.  This wadger is barring injury of coarse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In bowe&#8217;s first year all we did was run.  Last year that had to change a quarter way through for obvious reasons.  And you said it yourself, we could not run the ball to save our lives.  Do you think that opens up a passing game?  Not likely.  I am also going as far as to say Bowe is going over 1000 this year, while moore will not, even if he ends up having breese hucking him the ball again.  This wadger is barring injury of coarse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3031#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>2383,

I just have a different option on Bowe&#039;s skill level. He does make some great plays, however he had a TON of drops. We were not a run first team! We were not a good running team at all. I will call you on your bet. I am not saying Bowe sucks, I think he is good, I think Lance Moore is good as well. Due to our current position, I feel we have to explore everything available.

KC Mizzou,

I will try to ignore most of your banter and simply offer an explanation. First,it is a little irrational to belittle posting on a topic, while posting on a topic yourself?????

It is simple, would you trade Bowe to Indy for Manning,Wayne and Freeney? Of course anyone would! So much for your well thought out argument. Childish may have been harsh, similar to silliest and foolish, but harsh all the same. As far as small minded, refer to the Indy point.

9 out of 10 NFL receivers would have caught that onside kick. It should have been more of an eye opener for all Chief fans. I guess if it lost a game that mattered, we would have heard more.

To sum it up, a good GM would never exclude anyone for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2383,</p>
<p>I just have a different option on Bowe&#8217;s skill level. He does make some great plays, however he had a TON of drops. We were not a run first team! We were not a good running team at all. I will call you on your bet. I am not saying Bowe sucks, I think he is good, I think Lance Moore is good as well. Due to our current position, I feel we have to explore everything available.</p>
<p>KC Mizzou,</p>
<p>I will try to ignore most of your banter and simply offer an explanation. First,it is a little irrational to belittle posting on a topic, while posting on a topic yourself?????</p>
<p>It is simple, would you trade Bowe to Indy for Manning,Wayne and Freeney? Of course anyone would! So much for your well thought out argument. Childish may have been harsh, similar to silliest and foolish, but harsh all the same. As far as small minded, refer to the Indy point.</p>
<p>9 out of 10 NFL receivers would have caught that onside kick. It should have been more of an eye opener for all Chief fans. I guess if it lost a game that mattered, we would have heard more.</p>
<p>To sum it up, a good GM would never exclude anyone for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCMizzou</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>KCMizzou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3031#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>dbk301,

I never said that we should trade Bowe. My comments were merely intended to defend why we should not trade Bowe NOW. I don&#039;t want us to trade Bowe. I have a man crush on the dude.

102win,

All I am discussing with you is whether we should trade Bowe or not. I never engaged in conversations on how to improve the team. The reason that I did not come up with a solution for improving the team is because that wasn&#039;t the purpose of me posting. All I wanted to say was that I don&#039;t want us to trade Bowe. I&#039;m sorry that, at the time that I posted, I didn&#039;t want to talk to you about ways to improve the team. I reserve the right to take the time to talk about what I want, when I want. It does not mean that I am childish and small minded. It means that I&#039;m an adult and I had large amounts of things to do. I apologize for the any inconveniences that I may have caused you. If you would like, we can set up an appointment to discuss our improvement ideas. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dbk301,</p>
<p>I never said that we should trade Bowe. My comments were merely intended to defend why we should not trade Bowe NOW. I don&#8217;t want us to trade Bowe. I have a man crush on the dude.</p>
<p>102win,</p>
<p>All I am discussing with you is whether we should trade Bowe or not. I never engaged in conversations on how to improve the team. The reason that I did not come up with a solution for improving the team is because that wasn&#8217;t the purpose of me posting. All I wanted to say was that I don&#8217;t want us to trade Bowe. I&#8217;m sorry that, at the time that I posted, I didn&#8217;t want to talk to you about ways to improve the team. I reserve the right to take the time to talk about what I want, when I want. It does not mean that I am childish and small minded. It means that I&#8217;m an adult and I had large amounts of things to do. I apologize for the any inconveniences that I may have caused you. If you would like, we can set up an appointment to discuss our improvement ideas. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woody</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/03/05/to-to-oakland/#comment-3662</link>
		<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=3031#comment-3662</guid>
		<description>2383....Good post...

Ditto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2383&#8230;.Good post&#8230;</p>
<p>Ditto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

