Comments on: Season With Extra Curry?

By: happym5555

happym5555 — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:10:14 +0000

I fully agree with the Curry move and especially agree with WtexKC on Olshansky! Appears we have close to the most money to spend along with a great number of holes to fill. No moves to be made? Would be nice to hear a whisper of something.

By: spyke

spyke — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:28:15 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUlagJNZSVg

this is in reference to the C.J. Johnson kid.

By: 2383

2383 — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:15:01 +0000

I think the cure for the droppsies is to feed the guy the ball more than three attempts in the fourth quarter. I imagine it is pretty easy to lose interest in a game being a raider. I really wouldn’t mind both engram and curry. Pretty well both bring a different kinda dance to the party.

By: BucktheFroncos

BucktheFroncos — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:41:25 +0000

Curry has huge upside and if he can figure out a cure for his dropssies he would be a nice pickup. Plus his price is right. Do it i say

By: KCMizzou

KCMizzou — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:31:49 +0000

I would fully support a move on Curry. I still wouldn’t mind Engram either, but I would take Curry over Engram. For the right price, of course. My buddy (who is a Raiders fan) has always been a supporter for Curry too, by the way. He’s always kind of been confused by how little the Raiders used him. And I will say it again, I will laugh at the team that drafts Maclin.

By: Chiefs447

Chiefs447 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:02:59 +0000

Did anybody else notice we brought in two new coaches this week? Hadn’t seen anything on here about it. Any thoughts? Wonder if we’re still waiting on Romeo.

By: Double D

Double D — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:00:00 +0000

Destined for the practice squad.

By: Coast515

Coast515 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:54:39 +0000

WR CJ JONES Who you ask? My thoughts too, but the Cheifs agreed to terms with him today. Any on have any idea on this one?

By: Chiefs447

Chiefs447 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:48:37 +0000

I’m on board with Curry. He would be cheap and is only 29. Hell of a lot better option than Bobby Engram.

By: Double D

Double D — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:21:36 +0000

Crabtree,

Over the life of his very long career, Engram has only managed to average around 5.5% on TDs/Catch. By contrast, Curry, working within a much less productive offense, averages 6.5% on TDs/Catch. In other words, Curry is more likely to score when he gets the ball. Curry also has a hell of a lot more tread left on his tires compared to Engram. Why any team still in the process of rebuilding would even consider Engram at this point in his career is utterly befuddling.

Many times the kind of numbers a player puts up has more to do with where he is than who he is. Don’t believe it? Go check out Randy Moss’ stats prior to, during, and after his stint with the Raiders. Mind boggling stuff.