<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Combine Ramblings: Friday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>the cards will be keeping both QBs
the only thing is weather warner returns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the cards will be keeping both QBs<br />
the only thing is weather warner returns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2746</guid>
		<description>Second rounder for Moore is pretty steep.  I like him but not that much.  At this point I dont see anyway we dont take Curry if he&#039;s there at 3.  St. Louis has screwed us the last two or three years with picks in front of us my three personal favorites: Tye Hill, Brian Leonard and Jon Greco.  So who knows maybe they screw us this year too.  If so we solidify our OL forever.  Win Win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second rounder for Moore is pretty steep.  I like him but not that much.  At this point I dont see anyway we dont take Curry if he&#8217;s there at 3.  St. Louis has screwed us the last two or three years with picks in front of us my three personal favorites: Tye Hill, Brian Leonard and Jon Greco.  So who knows maybe they screw us this year too.  If so we solidify our OL forever.  Win Win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zman</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>zman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>So did anyone else see Orakpo&#039;s Q&amp;A today, was that guy trying to sell himself or what.  After seeing what he did if we are switching to the 3-4 he could be another option, probably not at 3 though.  But could this be another option to look into??  Anyone really see much if this guy in person?  His stats were pretty good and for going against BIG 12 O-Lines they probably arent too inflated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did anyone else see Orakpo&#8217;s Q&amp;A today, was that guy trying to sell himself or what.  After seeing what he did if we are switching to the 3-4 he could be another option, probably not at 3 though.  But could this be another option to look into??  Anyone really see much if this guy in person?  His stats were pretty good and for going against BIG 12 O-Lines they probably arent too inflated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabtree_Michael</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Crabtree_Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>Henderson&#039;s barely better than Devard Darling. He&#039;s just fast. I&#039;m down with Lance Moore, but not for a second round pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henderson&#8217;s barely better than Devard Darling. He&#8217;s just fast. I&#8217;m down with Lance Moore, but not for a second round pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m already on the record for looking at Stinchcomb. I think he&#039;d nice get and probably fairly affordable. I wouldn&#039;t even bother with Barnes.

Pollard as the Jack in 3-4 makes a ton of sense.

What about Devery Henderson? He hasn&#039;t resigned has he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m already on the record for looking at Stinchcomb. I think he&#8217;d nice get and probably fairly affordable. I wouldn&#8217;t even bother with Barnes.</p>
<p>Pollard as the Jack in 3-4 makes a ton of sense.</p>
<p>What about Devery Henderson? He hasn&#8217;t resigned has he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zman</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>zman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>Pollard moving up sounds like a good idea, he&#039;s proven he can to be a capable blitzer and his coverage experiences could help us man up on guys like Gates and he would easily understand zone coverage schemes.

Im not sure about us signing Moore, nothing against him but it sounds as though we want to keep all of our draft picks and add some, not get rid of them.

The news this morning with crabtree was that he didnt measure out the way they thought.  Listed at 6&#039;3&quot; and measured in at just under 6&#039;1&quot;, also sounded as though he reinjured his foot and is going to need surgery to put a screw in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pollard moving up sounds like a good idea, he&#8217;s proven he can to be a capable blitzer and his coverage experiences could help us man up on guys like Gates and he would easily understand zone coverage schemes.</p>
<p>Im not sure about us signing Moore, nothing against him but it sounds as though we want to keep all of our draft picks and add some, not get rid of them.</p>
<p>The news this morning with crabtree was that he didnt measure out the way they thought.  Listed at 6&#8242;3&#8243; and measured in at just under 6&#8242;1&#8243;, also sounded as though he reinjured his foot and is going to need surgery to put a screw in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extrametal</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>Extrametal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>No Leinart.  Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Leinart.  Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>I agree with the pollard and morgan points.  What about Leonhard from Baltimore did they resign him?  Barnes, if we can get him, would be a huge pick up.

I dont think Leinart is going anywhere and with what weve seen so far I&#039;m not big on any of the QB&#039;s from that class so...

So with whats going on with Crabtree that takes him off the board for us and possibly falling to the Raiders now.  That sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the pollard and morgan points.  What about Leonhard from Baltimore did they resign him?  Barnes, if we can get him, would be a huge pick up.</p>
<p>I dont think Leinart is going anywhere and with what weve seen so far I&#8217;m not big on any of the QB&#8217;s from that class so&#8230;</p>
<p>So with whats going on with Crabtree that takes him off the board for us and possibly falling to the Raiders now.  That sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woody</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/combine-ramblings-friday/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2983#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>I dont think Warner returning to the Cards is for sure at all, especially with the report by PFT today that they were far apart in their rumored contract discussions...I don&#039;t want Matt Leinart anyway...(what would that do to Branden Alberts position? He would no longer be protecting the blindside....)

I like the idea of Pollard moving up, great point about Morgan....

I would look at Barnes for sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think Warner returning to the Cards is for sure at all, especially with the report by PFT today that they were far apart in their rumored contract discussions&#8230;I don&#8217;t want Matt Leinart anyway&#8230;(what would that do to Branden Alberts position? He would no longer be protecting the blindside&#8230;.)</p>
<p>I like the idea of Pollard moving up, great point about Morgan&#8230;.</p>
<p>I would look at Barnes for sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
