<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChiefStock: Is It Heyward-Bey Or Howard-Bay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:23:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2727</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2727</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the Carl thing, but I think he has rubbed off on a lot of Chief fans. My draft proposal does not equal what most trade charts demand. Our pick is worth 2200. This years NYG picks would equal 1390, and then we get a 2nd next year worth around 400-I&#039;m fine with taking a little less value.

If you would rather have Curry,Monroe or Crabtree then Larry English,Duke Robinson and Donald Brown then stay at #3.
By my calculations we need 4 starters on offense and 4-5 on defense. We will not get that in FA and our current picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the Carl thing, but I think he has rubbed off on a lot of Chief fans. My draft proposal does not equal what most trade charts demand. Our pick is worth 2200. This years NYG picks would equal 1390, and then we get a 2nd next year worth around 400-I&#8217;m fine with taking a little less value.</p>
<p>If you would rather have Curry,Monroe or Crabtree then Larry English,Duke Robinson and Donald Brown then stay at #3.<br />
By my calculations we need 4 starters on offense and 4-5 on defense. We will not get that in FA and our current picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>Word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbk301</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>dbk301</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>Baldy you are right on. All the trade down talk is a waste of time. The odds of it happening are slim to none. Even if we could trade down there is no way in hell I&#039;d want to trade down to 29th. This team needs a game changer and those guys are going to go in the top 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baldy you are right on. All the trade down talk is a waste of time. The odds of it happening are slim to none. Even if we could trade down there is no way in hell I&#8217;d want to trade down to 29th. This team needs a game changer and those guys are going to go in the top 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>Ya we do thats obvious.  But your delusional if you think anyone is going to give us what is worth for the #3 pick.  Come on.

And &quot;Carl&quot; is very offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya we do thats obvious.  But your delusional if you think anyone is going to give us what is worth for the #3 pick.  Come on.</p>
<p>And &#8220;Carl&#8221; is very offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>Baldy-I mean Carl,

Keep thinking what you want, but a trade down is very likely. I know it doesn&#039;t happen much, but this year is different. Crabtree is drawing a lot of interest, and after watching Fitzgerald in the SB, GM&#039;s will have a major hard on for that talent.
Many teams will have an interest in him like Oakland,Philly,NYG and Dallas.

From the Chiefs prospective, we need more picks!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baldy-I mean Carl,</p>
<p>Keep thinking what you want, but a trade down is very likely. I know it doesn&#8217;t happen much, but this year is different. Crabtree is drawing a lot of interest, and after watching Fitzgerald in the SB, GM&#8217;s will have a major hard on for that talent.<br />
Many teams will have an interest in him like Oakland,Philly,NYG and Dallas.</p>
<p>From the Chiefs prospective, we need more picks!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>Oh and before you start.  &quot;You dont spend top 5 money on a RT.&quot; Ya but would you spend that money on a #15 pick who will lock that up forever?  I would. And he would move over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and before you start.  &#8220;You dont spend top 5 money on a RT.&#8221; Ya but would you spend that money on a #15 pick who will lock that up forever?  I would. And he would move over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>As much as I hate hearing about the &quot;trade down&quot; is having to repeat myself.  For the love of god it wont happen this is non sense.

Curry, Crabtree or one of the OT&#039;s.  Today in the star they had that piece about Monroe.

I like Curry and he definitely fills a need.  Crabtree is sexy period.  But honestly who doesnt want to get back to the days of the best OL in the league and we are in the position to do so.  Offense gets you to the playoffs.  Defense wins Championships.  It all starts on both sides of the line.  Even with Crabtree if Pigpen doesnt get the time to throw it or a running game to fall back to it doesnt matter.  Curry will probably be great but rarely to LB&#039;s win championships.  So in conclusion Curry or OT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I hate hearing about the &#8220;trade down&#8221; is having to repeat myself.  For the love of god it wont happen this is non sense.</p>
<p>Curry, Crabtree or one of the OT&#8217;s.  Today in the star they had that piece about Monroe.</p>
<p>I like Curry and he definitely fills a need.  Crabtree is sexy period.  But honestly who doesnt want to get back to the days of the best OL in the league and we are in the position to do so.  Offense gets you to the playoffs.  Defense wins Championships.  It all starts on both sides of the line.  Even with Crabtree if Pigpen doesnt get the time to throw it or a running game to fall back to it doesnt matter.  Curry will probably be great but rarely to LB&#8217;s win championships.  So in conclusion Curry or OT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>If we did this trade we could get
#29 LB Larry English
#34 DE Michael Johnson
#45 OG Duke Robinson
#60 RB Donald Brown
#67  C Jonathan Luigs
#98 QB Nate Davis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we did this trade we could get<br />
#29 LB Larry English<br />
#34 DE Michael Johnson<br />
#45 OG Duke Robinson<br />
#60 RB Donald Brown<br />
#67  C Jonathan Luigs<br />
#98 QB Nate Davis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102win</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>102win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>I think it could happen if the Giants don&#039;t get a wr in fa. We really need extra picks, since FA is looking slim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could happen if the Giants don&#8217;t get a wr in fa. We really need extra picks, since FA is looking slim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiefs447</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/20/chiefstock-is-it-heyward-bey-or-howard-bay/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiefs447</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2980#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>“You are what you are. Last year the Kansas City Chiefs won two games. That’s what they were last year. This year is a new year.

&quot;I know we have a pretty good punter right now,” Haley said of Dustin Colquitt. “We’ve got some players in specific places that we probably are OK, but to comment further wouldn’t be fair to everyone involved.”

      -Todd Haley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“You are what you are. Last year the Kansas City Chiefs won two games. That’s what they were last year. This year is a new year.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know we have a pretty good punter right now,” Haley said of Dustin Colquitt. “We’ve got some players in specific places that we probably are OK, but to comment further wouldn’t be fair to everyone involved.”</p>
<p>      -Todd Haley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
