Comments on: AADQ: Offensive Tackle? http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/12/aadq-but-which-ot/ A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more Fri, 25 May 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: the hammer formerly known as g.l. http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/12/aadq-but-which-ot/#comment-2424 the hammer formerly known as g.l. Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:43:50 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2960#comment-2424 to your royal baldness and your royal woodiness, I was unaware that you guys had discussed people not trading out of the top five on a blog and had sent out a decree that teams no longer did this. I was laboring under the misapprehension that anything that has occurred in the NFL will occur again given enough time and the right set of circumstances. As to your assertion that I "suck it", I have no expertise or experience in that area unlike yourself who evidently has a great deal of experience. Perhaps you could find a partner whose online moniker is a euphemism for the erect male member. to your royal baldness and your royal woodiness,

I was unaware that you guys had discussed people not trading out of the top five on a blog and had sent out a decree that teams no longer did this. I was laboring under the misapprehension that anything that has occurred in the NFL will occur again given enough time and the right set of circumstances. As to your assertion that I “suck it”, I have no expertise or experience in that area unlike yourself who evidently has a great deal of experience. Perhaps you could find a partner whose online moniker is a euphemism for the erect male member.

]]> By: Chiefs447 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/12/aadq-but-which-ot/#comment-2423 Chiefs447 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:00:15 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2960#comment-2423 Your exactly right, how many games did the Lions win? Forget a receiver at the number 3 draft pick. It's absurd when you have as many holes to fill as the Chiefs do. Your exactly right, how many games did the Lions win? Forget a receiver at the number 3 draft pick. It’s absurd when you have as many holes to fill as the Chiefs do.

]]> By: baldy http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/12/aadq-but-which-ot/#comment-2422 baldy Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:52:01 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2960#comment-2422 Oh and sorry I forgot to mention with all those numbers Megatron racked up, how did that work out for the Lions record. Stats are junk information in some cases. Oh and sorry I forgot to mention with all those numbers Megatron racked up, how did that work out for the Lions record. Stats are junk information in some cases.

]]> By: baldy http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/02/12/aadq-but-which-ot/#comment-2389 baldy Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:48:34 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2960#comment-2389 Seriously. #'s? I dont care about how many yards he got. I'm more concerned with how many games he cost us. Pat's, chargers? Just for starters. Tell me how many games he won for us. So explain to me how if Sir Drops Alot is our best option at WR (which isnt saying alot) and Tony isnt there last year how his numbers are better when he's getting double teamed all game because we have no other receiving options and NO running game. Seriously. #’s? I dont care about how many yards he got. I’m more concerned with how many games he cost us. Pat’s, chargers? Just for starters. Tell me how many games he won for us. So explain to me how if Sir Drops Alot is our best option at WR (which isnt saying alot) and Tony isnt there last year how his numbers are better when he’s getting double teamed all game because we have no other receiving options and NO running game.

]]>