The Blueprint 2K9 V3: Raiding Arizona

by Draft

The first, and most crucial, step of my original The Blueprint 2K9 came true. Clark Hunt imported the best available young football mind in the game, Scott Pioli, to run his Chiefs, at least football wise.

Step two? That’s where things have gone wrong, forcing me to wad up my previous Blueprints, toss ‘em in the trash and start on a new draft. Josh McDaniels is now coaching the Broncos, Steve Spagnuolo the Rams. Maybe it’s for the best, as a new candidate has emerged that I’m sweeter on than either of my previous preferred head coaching choices.

That being said, let’s get this show on the road…

The Blueprint 2K9 V3: Raiding Arizona

Step 1: Pioli hires Arizona Cardinals offensive coordinator Todd Haley as the Kansas City Chiefs’ new head coach.

Every NFL team must have its own identity in order to be successful. Last year, the Chiefs didn’t have one. Well, a positive one anyway. No, I don’t consider “gimmick offense” a positive one. C’mon folks, that’s what the Arrowspread was. Don’t even get me started on the defense. That’s why it didn’t work in the second halves of games all season long. Still, the Chiefs are much, much closer to being an offensive powerhouse than they are to being a defensive one. And that is precisely why hiring Haley makes so much sense.

Haley is the hottest offensive coordinator in the game. He’s devised a deadly pass-first offense that has carried the Cardinals all the way to the Super Bowl. He has the temperament of a head coach. Like I recently stated in a comment thread, we need a boss — not a buddy. We need a Bill Parcells or a Mike Tomlin — not a Herm Edwards or Wade Phillips. This guy has shown that he can deal with the egomaniacs of the NFL; he didn’t take any lip from T.O. as an assistant coach with the Cowboys, and he put Anquan Boldin in his place last week while calling the NFC Championship-winning drive. That proved that he could not only handle the players and the pressure, but thrive in the hectic environment in which a head coach must operate. The Tuna made Haley one of his disciples for a reason.

Lastly, we want a young, hungry coach with lots to prove. Why? Because we want someone who can allow us to forge a coach-G.M.-owner triumvirate that can grow and win together over the course of the next decade or so. Something that lasts. That’s what we are trying to build here. With Hunt and Pioli both 43, and Haley 41, they have nothing but time. Hell, the Hunts kept Carl Peterson around for 20 years — Clark is going to want that same stability with this new regime. With a Haley-Pioli pairing — the two have known each other for a long time and reportedly have a good relationship — that kind of front office stability would be a real possibility.

The critics will have their gripes. They’ll say that he’s not proven. Um, leading an offensive-minded team to the Super Bowl as its offensive coordinator isn’t proving yourself? Then they’ll say why are we hiring an O.C. when our defense was so atrocious last year? Because Haley can mold an offense featuring some serious talent into something special. Because Haley, a Parcells disciple, won’t neglect the defensive side of the ball. Because Pioli, a Belichick disciple, won’t neglect the defensive side of the ball either. Because that’s why you hire the right defensive coordinator.

Step 2: Trade Larry Johnson for whatever we can get for him.

My stance on L.J. hasn’t changed one bit. Third-rounder, fourth-rounder, whatever. Get him out of town and that salary off the books. Houston, New England, New Orleans, Philly, Tampa Bay and others will be interested for sure.

Step 3. Keep Tony Gonzalez.

My stand on Tony G. hasn’t changed either. He may be 32, but he’s hauled in more receptions over the past two years than any other two-year block of his career. Tony has five more good years in him if he wants to play for that long. We’d have to be idiots to trade him for what’s bound to be no more than a third-round pick.

Step 4. Trade for Matt Leinart.

Update: The Cardinals cannot afford to pay Kurt Warner and Matt Lienart a billion-kajillion dollars. Especially with Dansby an UFA and so much money tied up in the two receivers. Oh yeah, and the Bidwells also have a history of being cheap. The Cards will resign the guy that took them to the Super Bowl and Leinart will likely demand a trade. Getting a lot of comments on this, so I wanted to tackle it and offer a rebuttal in the post…

Now this was a curveball lots of you probably didn’t see coming. But let’s face it — Tyler Thigpen isn’t a franchise quarterback. He only completed 54.8 percent of his passes in a spread offense featuring Dwayne Bowe and Tony Gonzalez when the Chiefs were consistently down facing prevent and soft defenses. We all laugh at JaMarcus Russell, but his completion percentage this season was 53.8 with a much, much worse compliment of receiving options. Sure, Tyler can run, but it’s not like he’s Michael Vick. Thiggy Smalls finished his second season playing small. Any hopes I had for him becoming a franchise quarterback basically went down the drain.

Since it looks like we will be giving up roughly a 2010 first and a 2009 third to get Matt Cassel, why not go out and get the guy who beat him out in college? Either way, with Thiggy not the answer, we are going to have to surrender a first-round pick to find a good, young quarterback. I like Cassel and I love Mark Sanchez (regardless of whether I think Pioli would draft him — I don’t), but if we are going to go with a Trojan then why not go with the guy who led USC to a National Championship?

More importantly, Leinart has been in the league for three years. Haley has been grooming him for two of those years. He’s a smart kid, so I’m sure he knows Haley’s offense like the back of the hand (or Paris Hilton’s ass). He has the leadership ability and swagger that all the greats have as well.

For the record, Leinart had a 56.8 completion percentage in the only season he started 10 or more games, which was his true rookie season. Also, you can’t punish him for being stuck behind a two-time MVP QB, with a new coach who is obviously more interested in winning now and keeping his job than grooming a young QB. This step requires somewhat a leap of faith based on Leinart’s college career and combine performance, but it could be a homerun for a franchise that hasn’t had a good young QB in…forever.

I think Leinart and Haley could get off to a fast start in Kansas City, especially considering who this Blueprint calls for us to draft.

Step 5. Sign either Bart Scott or Karlos Dansby at linebacker.

These guys are playing outstanding. The Cardinals and Ravens will have a hard time re-signing them as well. Scott almost signed with the Browns back in 2006, and the Ravens have a ton of other free agents. As for Dansby, the Cards will likely re-sign Kurt Warner and have a ton of money tied up in the offense (Anquan Boldin, Larry Fitzgerald and possibly Edgerrin James, should he stay now). I am confident we can land one of these players. I prefer Dansby, but Scott is a helluva player, too, and will probably be easier for us to sign.

Step 7. Sign another linebacker.

Since we could use two linebackers, we need to bring in someone from this group as well: Angelo Crowell, Channing Crowder, Leroy Hill and Michael Boley. This free agent class is stacked when it comes to linebackers, and we need to take advantage by signing two to go with Derrick Johnson. Demorrio Williams can serve as quality depth.

Step 6. Sign Derrick Ward

I’m still extremely high on Ward. Again, according to the Football Outsiders, he performed better than any other back in football this season:

Top 5 running backs

1. Derrick Ward, Giants: 375 DYAR (274 rushing DYAR, 102 receiving)
2. Kevin Faulk, Patriots: 365 DYAR (180 rushing, 185 receiving)
3. DeAngelo Williams, Panthers: 361 DYAR (367 rushing, -6 receiving)
4. Clinton Portis, Redskins: 336 DYAR (285 rushing, 51 receiving)
5. Thomas Jones, Jets: 325 DYAR (253 rushing, 72 receiving)

Ward ahead of Williams?!? You can thank each player’s performance in the passing game. If we look strictly at how the running backs did carrying the ball out of the backfield, Williams is numero uno, with Brandon Jacobs (308 rushing DYAR) right behind him. Because those players had no impact in the passing game, though, guys like Ward and Faulk jumped ahead of them. A first down is a first down, regardless of whether it came through the air or on the ground, and Ward (58) grabbed enough of them to pull himself ahead of Williams (51). Ward was excellent as a receiver, averaging 9.4 yards per reception

Pretty impressive stuff. With Brandon Jacobs also a UFA and Ahmed Bradshaw in the fold, Ward is as good as gone. Ward also went to college at Kansas’ Ottawa University. I think this guy would be a perfect compliment to our passing game. He’s got Pro Bowl skills, I’m telling you. The Giants have a great O-line, but he was better than Jacobs this year, and that’s saying something.

Don’t give me this Jamaal Charles and Kolby Smith B.S. either. Neither of those guys have shown anything that should lead anybody to believe they can handle being a feature back. Honestly, I don’t even think those two make up a decent platoon. The more I think about it — and I have since the last version — the less I like them.

Step 7. Sign center/guard Jason Brown

This is an under-the-radar signing that could help bolster our line immediately. Brown has started every game for the Ravens over the course of the last two seasons. He’s also quick for an offensive lineman, which would lend versatility to the offense. Again, the Ravens basically have too many other free agents to make Brown a priority.

Step 8. Pass on Terrell Suggs and Julius Peppers, roll the dice on Kenechi Udeze.

I’m sticking to my guns on this one. Suggs is going to command outrageous money and the Ravens will want to keep him — especially if they lose Scott. Peppers isn’t a possibility here because he wants to play in a 3-4, and we don’t have the personnel to make that switch. Or at least I don’t think we do.

Meanwhile, Udeze is a former first-round pick and teammate of Matt Leinart. He sat out this year due to acute leukemia, which he apparently has made a full recovery from as he recently said “I’ll be back next year.” The Vikings are pretty well stocked at DE, and we might be able to get Udeze at a bargain basement price considering his recent health. He’s still only 25, and with his pedigree and the potential (4.7 range 40) he’s more than worth the gamble. Of course, we’d have to thoroughly, thoroughly check him out and clear him medically first.

Step 9. Draft Michael Crabtree with the No. 3 overall pick.

Crabtree is going to be the next Fitzgerald. Write it on the chalkboard 100 times, Addicts. 1,000 times if it doesn’t stick. Fitz has carried the Cards to the Big Game. Crabtree has similar talent and posted better college numbers in a stronger conference. Additionally, with Bowe and Crabtree in the fold, along with Leinart, Haley could pretty much run the same potent offense he is currently running in Arizona. One could argue that with Mark Bradley playing Steve Breaston and Tony Gonzalez blowing Ben Patrick and Leonard Pope out of the freakin’ water, that the Kansas City passing game would actually be more loaded.

Step 10. Draft UCONN OT William Beatty early in the second round.

This is the guy I like to round out the offensive line (Branden Albert, Brian Waters, Jason Brown, Wade Smith, Beatty). The way he is rising reminds me of Sam Baker last year and Tony Ugoh two years ago. That’s a good thing. He’s huge — 6-foot-6, just over 300 pounds — but has a frame that can carry about 20 more pounds or so. He has outstanding athleticism and feet as well. As I recently wrote over on NFL Mocks, “the big man moves like an NBA power forward.” I really, really like this kid. I think he’s just scratching the surface ability wise. Let’s face it; the Big East isn’t what it once was, so he wasn’t playing against the best of the best by any means. Also, where he went to school and played could cause him to slip just a bit. That’s not a guarantee (see Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie), but it could happen.

Step 11. Draft Defense, Defense, Defense.

Keep drafting players to play in the front seven. With what we have and what I have us signing, I’m confident Pioli could fill all remaining holes via the last five rounds of the draft.

Addicts, what do you think of the latest Blueprint?

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Mark my words we will pass on the first round pick and get two mid round picks and cassel will be our starting qb next year.

That spinning tag cloud -- all Zach. All Zach.

The other thing is that Clark Hunt is not going to cough up Julius Peppers money. I just don't see it. He'd rather get better deals on more players -- more cost efficient. That's what I think, anyway.

Ha...I actually agree with the direction (regarding avoiding those two) because like Adam said, there will be crazy money spent on them and its not the was Pioli has handled things in the past.

It is my duty to point out however that the "3-4" thing should not be an excuse as we may be headed that direction ourselves...

Bring on V4 already, Best...

Also, to Zach/Adam/Whoever...That thing at the bottom that spins and what not is sweet....good stuff

Again, more coming. Going to have to whip out a can of whoop-ass with my rebuttals.

With half the league throwing half the bank at those two, it would be much smarter to focus on good, cheaper options that we can actually get while the rest of the league focuses on those two. Makes complete sense to me. Peppers also says he wants to play in a 3-4.

Passing on Suggs and Peppers is kind of silly also.

The Blueprint 2K9 V3 Revisited is dropping soon to discuss this great comment thread...

Matt Leinart

Donovan McNabb

Michael Vick

Mark Sanchez

Adam, these are guys that you have wanted to be our QB.

Ok, I finally have a chance to comment on your blueprint, Batman

I like it...I like it all, alot....

BUT, the Leinart thing will not happen under any circumstances...I would like it to, as I believe he is not a bust and would be a solid QB here. I think he is maturing a lot behind Warner and learning how much work it takes to be a good QB. But, there is not a chance that Arizona gives him up. Warner is 37. I dont care if he lead them to a Superbowl, they will not risk being stuck in the middle of next season without their QBOTF and something happens. Remember Warner was close to retiring months ago. I think there is a chance he pulls the trigger on that if he wins the SB.

Everything else, I like alot...and see as being realistic...that, however...will not happen....

Hip Hip Hurray! Hip Hip Hurray!!!!!

Let the (even more) speculation begin.....

AWESOME!!!!!!

Chiefs | Edwards fired
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:56:13 -0800

ESPNews reports the Kansas City Chiefs have fired head coach Herman Edwards.

Herm Edwards fired it's official

As for Lienhart... you are welcome Adam. - Anymouse

No team in the NFL would give up a first round pick for Leinart. The guy is a bust. He doesn't seem to have the discipline and drive to be a great qb.

I also cannot imagine a scenario where we go offense with our first two picks of the draft. We were the worst defense in the NFL. It will take more the Scott and Udeze to turn this thing around.

There are several ways we could go in rounds 3-5 I am just throwing out possibilities

Depending on who we sign in free agency this is what i would do

1st Aarron Curry/ Michael Crabtree
2nd Max Unger/William Beatty i think we have a shot at wither one
3rd Paul Kruger- could go higher
4th- Rhett Bomar- could be a great pick if given two years to settle down and learn
5th-Glenn Coffee- He is not a dazzler but he gets the 4 yds and moves the chains, and could take a decent workload
6th-BPA
7th-BPA

The only thing that i have bad to say about Haley is that he probably is really good at his job but it doesn't hurt to have Anquan Boldin Larry Fitzgerald Kurt Warner, also i like the pick of William Beatty but i really would Prefer Max Unger in the second, and here is why. The guy can play any position on the line and in some mock drafts have him projected to play RT, I think he gives us more versatility on the line, Beatty would be a tremendous pick and i would be happy with either one but I would love Unger

Kiper's a moron. I prefer to just wait and see what Gosselin's mock looks like.

Crab - so you're talking about Leinart, not Freeman, when you say lacks NFL smarts, etc. correct? If so, I misunderstood you.

Ron Prince used a passing offense that hasn't been seen in Manhattan in maybe forever. He did so because of Josh Freeman. Freeman's college career sucked. Don't give me that "he had no help around him" excuse cause, judging by the bowl games, the Big 12 defenses were not up to par this season. Several QB's put up career numbers this year but Freeman sucked. He had Jordy Nelson till this past year and sucked. He couldn't win, and good QB's make the players around them better, which he did not. He's overhyped because he's big and athletic, with a strong arm.... typical BUST QB.

He hasn't played well and he got benched for Kurt who at the time hadn't been playing like the MVP. He obviously has a gun and he has athleticism so what is he missing? Smarts, motivation, or both.

D, What is interesting is Kiper has Freeman in the first round to the Bucs (inside the top 20 I believe)

I was on the cardinals website reading about Haley,and about how he might be persued as an NFL head coach. This is what Haley had to say! " I love my job here in Arizona, my wife and 5 kids love it here also. Moving to a new city with a new job is just not at the forefront of my life at this time." Sure hope he changes his mind!!

Crab - you're basing that fear on what?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^Leinart^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The kid's got talent, but I fear that he lacks NFL smarts and work ethic. I always thought he'd be good, but I'm just not buying it anymore.

Chiefs447 & Crabby - Freeman is the best raw prospect, development project out there. The program he was in at K-State hurt him and because of the messed-up situation there, he was completely right to enter the draft a year early. You give me 5 years and the right QB coach to develop his skills and Freeman has as good a chance as anybody to blow all these guys out of the water. Incidentally, most boards I've seen have him ranked as the 3rd best QB in the draft. If he falls to the 3rd round, he'll be the biggest steal of the draft.

And lest there be any confusion about loyalties/homerism, you're hearing this from a Jayhawk alum/fan.

Crabtree_Michael...

Leinart is better than people think. He had to learn something from Warner this year and, his last preseason game (yea I know preseason) was stellar and even raised questions in Zona as to would start. A signed Tony G. Jersey.... Genius, I love it.

Freeman is not the answer.

So Double D, should we be trading down to get Freeman? I've been going to K-State games for the past five years and I'm not convinced with the kid.

Matt Leinart will not be getting traded to ANYONE. Not the Chiefs, not anybody. What do you guys think, that Warner(age 37!) is gonna play forever and the Cards are gonna scrap their first round QB of the future? Unbelievable. Sorry but that might be even less likely to happen than the Chiefs drafting Michael Crabtree.

That's all cool with me. Except what is everyone's deal with busty qb's? Sanchez will be better than Thiggy in less than five years, but I don't think Leinart will ever be better than Thiggy. Leinart pretty much fucking sucks. I'd rather trade for Kurt. LJ AND our third? For Leinart? What the fuck? Let's trade a proven albeit dumb RB and our Third for a kid that hasn't proved a thing except he'll probably always ride the pine. Redonkulous. How about we trade them Jackie Battle, our fifth, and a signed Tony G. jersey for Leinart.

"Who’s gonna be the better QB in 5 years, Tyler Thigpen or Mark Sanchez?"

Answer: Josh Freeman

Jeremy - we'd be crazy not to jump all over that deal.

I actually love this scenario.

To make it even better, we can get Leinart pretty chgeap by packaging him with Larry Johnson to the Cards. LJ and our third round for Leinart. Would not be too risky then.

Who's gonna be the better QB in 5 years, Tyler Thigpen or Mark Sanchez?

I like it.

Bringing in Haley makes sense. I would trade LJ for ANYTHING. I would also keep TG since hes only playing one more season and has always been a Chief. I would PASS on Leinart unless he has matured, because IMO his biggest issue was maturity. I prefer to sign Dansby or Vilma, and agree Brown is a top priority in FA.

In the draft, I prefer to deal back, and take Cushing or Rey Rey, then in the 2nd can get either mack/unger if we dont get Brown, And I would keep an eye on Patrick Turner as a number 2 WR pushing bradley to 3 where he belongs...Also I think that English should be drafted in the 2nd round, hes a heck of a player.

At QB, see if Cassel becomes free, but dont overpay, otherwise play Thiggy and bring in a JP Losman type who can fill in on Injury. I also would look at a kicker if hes a sure thing since Barth is shaky. Finding a Dime back is key as well, and

Resigning Jared Page should be a top priority as well..hes turning into a leader in the secondary along with Flowers/Carr who are fantastic due to being able to play in the 4-3 or the 3-4.

"The way to build a foundation (and Pioli knows this) is to pick the best player available each time your name is called in the draft. If Pioli, the HC, and the scouts decide that Crabtree is the BPA at #3, they will draft him. Drafting based on need is what has made the Lions, Raiders, etc. the bottom feeders of the league."

Wow

One other comment re Step 7 - I say it could also be argued that Boiman is another guy that helps with depth.

Not bad Adam, not bad at all. Even though my response is going to seem a bit windy, I really only have a couple of nits with this blueprint.

1. I can understand at least giving this a try simply because of the situation - new, up-and-coming GM has opportunity to go with new, up-and-coming HC. Very palatable even if just from a PR standpoint alone.
Still, I'm not buying on your take of the Chiefs offense last season. Who cares about perceived identity or what name to give it, the fact of the matter is that it was Chan Gailey's wizardry that made it successful. If we had had an OL that allowed us to pound the ball in the red zone (and in every second half that we began with a lead) then the Chief's offense (along with a W-L record to go with it) would have been considered formidable by anyone's standard.
Speaking of Chan Gailey, I heard this morning that the Chiefs are preventing other teams from interviewing him for an OC job. If that's true, that would seem to limit the possibilities for where he ends up - either he's staying on as the Chiefs OC, or he ends up being somebody's new HC, and I wouldn't eliminate the Chiefs from the latter list.
Here's something to ponder - might Haley have an interest in working under Gailey? What if such an opportunity came attached with the title of "Asst HC"?
2. Yes, although I would not want to see him wind up with with a division rival.
3. Yes
4. Sure but I have major doubts about the Cards allowing this to happen. Suppose the Cards win the Superbowl and Warner announces his retirement. Then what?
5. Yes
6. No and you provided the reason why - "The Giants have a great O-Line." Charles fumbles the ball once and for some reason you've been down on him ever since. I don't get it. Say what you want, but I would maintain that we still possess a very talented "platoon" of RBs along with a QB who also happens to be a very potent threat when running the ball. Our running game will see dramatic improvement not by adding some FA standout but rather, on the day it has an OL that is ready and able to support it.
Also, it bears noting here that the trend in the NFL is moving steadily towards "running back by committee" and steadily away from the notion of "feature back."
7. This is not a bad option at all. At the same time, what is also imminently clear to me is that there will be some excellent offensive linemen available to us in the second round and that this is especially true in the case of Centers. There are 3 very good centers in this draft - Unger, Mack, and Luigs - I tend to think at least two of those names will still be on the board when the Chiefs select in the second round.
8. It's hard to argue with your reasoning here on Suggs and Peppers. The Udeze scenario could pan out nicely. The only tweak I might make to this is that if Step 7 happens then round 2 of the draft might be where we find our next RDE. I think there's a pretty good likelihood that at least one of the top four (those being Orakpo, Brown, Johnson, Maybin) will still be on the board in the second round.
9. This is contingent on a number of things I think - topmost on that list being that Step 5 (or some variation thereof) comes to fruition but yeah I can definitely see this happening unless of course somebody comes forward with a trade scenario that's too good to pass up. My only other comment about this is that for whatever reason you seem to believe that taking a LB here is horrible idea. I would counter that Jerod Mayo has already proven himself to be have been worthy of a top 5 pick and that Curry appears to be a better LB than Mayo.
10. Right concept but let's see if he's still there and if not, what other selections/options are still available. I have to think it will be pretty hard for us to screw up our second pick no matter what.
11. Defense, defense, special teams.

Adam:

First it was McDaniel/Cassell, then Spags/Cassell, now Haley/Lienart. This time, you assure us, it's for real (based on your sweeter on than all the rest comment). You are starting to remind me of the guy who goes to the bar and finds 'the one' three different times in one night....... every night.

I don't know about Haley. Sure, he is on a great run right now. However, this offensive juggernaught went 3-7 this year outside of it's own, pathetic division. You would think with all these mad skill offensive players, they would have least been over 500. I do like Ward and I am warming up to Dansby. Dansby's injury history bothers me. Plus, I would prefer to bring in defensive leadership from teams with a track record of good defensive play.

Just a thought, but if you trade for Leinart, don't you have to draft another franchise "LT" as Lienart is a lefty? You'll now need someone on the right side to protect is blindside. Would that change any of your picks?

Matt Lientard are you freaky kidding me ? come on dude! does AA do UA's??

Ah, forgot -- Ward is a great pick. Also look at Philly's Buckhalter

Leinart is an idiot. He has no work ethic and no head game or leadership -- watch any tape of USC falling behind while he was there and you'll see him whining and pouting rather than motivating. Mistakes were -never- his fault. Warner's MVP numbers came -after- Leinart was benched for average to lousy play, completion percentage notwithstanding.

Other'n that, nice blueprint. I'm feeling all Matt Millen about Crabtree. We can stop after one, right? ... right?

hey whats up im new to this site
I like this blue print a lot, although I'd take Curry over Crabtree but I can get behind either one. Only problem I think is Arizonas willingness to trade Matt Leinart. Warner problem only has a year or two left after this year, so why would they trade away their future QB?

I like this blueprint, though I am a little skeptical of Leinart...

CUbuffalo,

"I do think Crabtree will be a great player but our dearly beloved Chiefs have (to me) more pressing needs, and a stud WR is more the last piece to the puzzle for a Super Bowl team while other positions are more of a foundation. (O- Line)"

The way to build a foundation (and Pioli knows this) is to pick the best player available each time your name is called in the draft. If Pioli, the HC, and the scouts decide that Crabtree is the BPA at #3, they will draft him. Drafting based on need is what has made the Lions, Raiders, etc. the bottom feeders of the league.

(I actually think Curry is the BPA in the entire draft, so it is entirely likely that we will pick him at #3).

The coaching situation aside, I agree with most of your post. There are a couple things I don't like. I have read Peppers has asked to be let go. If that is the case, jump at the chance to sign him. With him on the DL Dorsey becomes the Swamp Thing we were thinking he would be.

I like Crabtree, but don't see us taking him either. Something says Pioli will get what the team needs. Not that we couldn't use two studs on the WR front, Bowe and Crabtree. I don't see us getting Dansby or Scott or Suggs. If we don't I still say taking Curry at 3 is a great gamble. Unless of course someone has heard something bad about the kid that I have not.

Good post Adam.