<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C4C (Case For Crabtree): The Next Fitzgerald?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: schmuck34</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>schmuck34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2823#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Adam, I said Calvin Johnson was a better prospect, not that he had better college stats.  Hmm let&#039;s see here receiver in Chain Gailey&#039;s offense (C.J. @ GT) receiver in Mike Leach&#039;s offense...  bad argument.  Crabtree isn&#039;t as big, probably not as fast, and not nearly as explosive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, I said Calvin Johnson was a better prospect, not that he had better college stats.  Hmm let&#8217;s see here receiver in Chain Gailey&#8217;s offense (C.J. @ GT) receiver in Mike Leach&#8217;s offense&#8230;  bad argument.  Crabtree isn&#8217;t as big, probably not as fast, and not nearly as explosive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2823#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Adam,

How we choose to resign Albert is the real rub I&#039;d say. If we select a top-flight LT with our first pick between now and then, that means we&#039;ll be carrying 2 expensive OL until Albert resigns. What&#039;s more he should be able to command LT money somewhere else if we&#039;re not willing to pony up for the kind of money he might rightly ask for. Very likely scenario I&#039;d say.

Ideal scenario: We pick up 2 top-name defenders in FA (DE &amp; LB) and a veteran QB, we select Crabtree or Curry with our first pick, Unger (who can play any of 4 OL positions) with our 2nd round pick, and Josh Freeman (as a development project) with our 3rd round pick.  Then in &#039;10, we use our 1st round pick on a QB if we need to - there should be several good ones available. This year&#039;s day one QB options are either not going to be ready to start in the NFL or just plain suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>How we choose to resign Albert is the real rub I&#8217;d say. If we select a top-flight LT with our first pick between now and then, that means we&#8217;ll be carrying 2 expensive OL until Albert resigns. What&#8217;s more he should be able to command LT money somewhere else if we&#8217;re not willing to pony up for the kind of money he might rightly ask for. Very likely scenario I&#8217;d say.</p>
<p>Ideal scenario: We pick up 2 top-name defenders in FA (DE &#038; LB) and a veteran QB, we select Crabtree or Curry with our first pick, Unger (who can play any of 4 OL positions) with our 2nd round pick, and Josh Freeman (as a development project) with our 3rd round pick.  Then in &#8217;10, we use our 1st round pick on a QB if we need to &#8211; there should be several good ones available. This year&#8217;s day one QB options are either not going to be ready to start in the NFL or just plain suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Best</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2823#comment-416</guid>
		<description>I would vehemently disagree that it is &quot;much easier&quot; to just find a guard to replace Brian Waters. And Albert isn&#039;t quite getting LT dough and he won&#039;t when he re-signs if he isn&#039;t playing LT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would vehemently disagree that it is &#8220;much easier&#8221; to just find a guard to replace Brian Waters. And Albert isn&#8217;t quite getting LT dough and he won&#8217;t when he re-signs if he isn&#8217;t playing LT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/11/c4c-case-for-crabtree-the-next-fitzgerald/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2823#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I agree woody.  I feel this year there will be some pretty decent OL talent still available after the first round - and quite likely at the top of the third as well. The way I see this draft shaping up is that most of top-notch talent (along with demand) will be with defensive players.

dbk - back to you, upon further review  . . . it looks to me like there may be at least one RT (Eben Britton) and a couple of G&#039;s (Robinson &amp; Johnson) that might go mid-to-late first round.

I say we need to take off the board whoever we think the best player available is.  As far as I&#039;m concerned, that&#039;s got to be either Michael Crabtree or Aaron Curry - either one looks to be a big get for our team.

I also believe that a team like Oakland would pay very handsomely for our #3 spot because of their 2 biggest impact needs (WR, SLB) and the strong likelihood that neither position will provide adequate talent for them at the #7 pick. Al Davis is crazy about going for impact players so I look for it to get pretty interesting for us this go round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree woody.  I feel this year there will be some pretty decent OL talent still available after the first round &#8211; and quite likely at the top of the third as well. The way I see this draft shaping up is that most of top-notch talent (along with demand) will be with defensive players.</p>
<p>dbk &#8211; back to you, upon further review  . . . it looks to me like there may be at least one RT (Eben Britton) and a couple of G&#8217;s (Robinson &#038; Johnson) that might go mid-to-late first round.</p>
<p>I say we need to take off the board whoever we think the best player available is.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, that&#8217;s got to be either Michael Crabtree or Aaron Curry &#8211; either one looks to be a big get for our team.</p>
<p>I also believe that a team like Oakland would pay very handsomely for our #3 spot because of their 2 biggest impact needs (WR, SLB) and the strong likelihood that neither position will provide adequate talent for them at the #7 pick. Al Davis is crazy about going for impact players so I look for it to get pretty interesting for us this go round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-25 03:56:55 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
