<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AADQ: Evaluating Bradford And Tebow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Gatorchomp penalties - very mature. /sarcasm off
Unless Mother Teresa can put on a helmet, stand in the pocket, make good reads, throw tight spirals, and take NFL hits, she&#039;s not much help on the franchise QB front.

Reality check - there are no Matt Ryans in this year&#039;s draft class. There could be a Joe Flacco, but that&#039;s a tough thing to predict. Is there a mid-to-late round gem? Probably but who that might be is anybody&#039;s guess.

Bradford is not ready for the NFL. Stafford falls under the heading &quot;&lt;b&gt;N&lt;/b&gt;ot &lt;b&gt;F&lt;/b&gt;or &lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;ong.&quot;

When/if we go to select a QB, we need to be thinking later rounds - Sanchez, Freeman, Cantwell, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gatorchomp penalties &#8211; very mature. /sarcasm off<br />
Unless Mother Teresa can put on a helmet, stand in the pocket, make good reads, throw tight spirals, and take NFL hits, she&#8217;s not much help on the franchise QB front.</p>
<p>Reality check &#8211; there are no Matt Ryans in this year&#8217;s draft class. There could be a Joe Flacco, but that&#8217;s a tough thing to predict. Is there a mid-to-late round gem? Probably but who that might be is anybody&#8217;s guess.</p>
<p>Bradford is not ready for the NFL. Stafford falls under the heading &#8220;<b>N</b>ot <b>F</b>or <b>L</b>ong.&#8221;</p>
<p>When/if we go to select a QB, we need to be thinking later rounds &#8211; Sanchez, Freeman, Cantwell, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Can we get back to football on this thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get back to football on this thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gump</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Gump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Tebow does a lot of things very well, but the one thing he does very very well on the football field is win.  He is not the prototypical NFL QB, everyone agrees with that, but a guy with his leadership qualities on any football team is worth it&#039;s weight in gold.  Did you see how he went after the DB that tweaked Harvins ankle?  OSUs big mistake was making Tebow mad.  He is not a first or probably second round pick as a QB, but he will be a steal for whatever team takes a gamble on him.  And I don&#039;t like the Gators or the SEC.

Now onto the Sheltered comment....  Anyone who thinks that homeschooling or missionary work in any way translates to being sheltered has a lot of homework to do. Most college recruiters are looking for Homeschooled kids because they are ust the opposite.  The kids in public school are the ones who, as a rule, are sheltered and not ready for the next level.  There are exceptions to every rule, and society tends to focus on the homeschooling exceptions.  The kids that do not get an education or who are stuck in a cult like religious experience by their parents.  But if yo look at the numbers and do the math homeschoolers as a demographic are far more prepared for life and more successful than public or private school kids.  Folks also want to focus on the big successes of the public and private schools kids which are statistically the exception once again.  In Chicago only 18% of 8th graders in the public school system can read at an 8th grade level. I gaurantee you that in Chicago more than 18% of the homeschooled kids in the 8th grade can read at their level and probably well beyond it.

Missionary work speaks for itself.  Most people who have been on a mission trips abroad or even domestically will tell you it is a lifetime memory.  what they learn about the world and themselves is unbelievable.

Adam, you have the right to say or type whatever you want.  But you have to deal with the consequences of your actions.  In this case the statement makes you look ill-informed, immature and bigoted.  Other also have the right to disagree with you and state their opinions.  Don&#039;t attack or retreat into a shell because someone disagrees with you.  If that is your opinion you could at least provide some insight, reason, personal experience, study, data, facts or whatever in defense.  I haven&#039;t seen it yet.

Disclaimer, just to avoid speculation - We homeschooled our 4 kids for 7 years, they were public school prior to that and all will actually graduate from public school.  They have all been very successful at school and while homeschooled.  Once put back in school they were tutors and mentors for their classmates, at the teachers request.  The real key to education is parental involvement regardless of the venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tebow does a lot of things very well, but the one thing he does very very well on the football field is win.  He is not the prototypical NFL QB, everyone agrees with that, but a guy with his leadership qualities on any football team is worth it&#8217;s weight in gold.  Did you see how he went after the DB that tweaked Harvins ankle?  OSUs big mistake was making Tebow mad.  He is not a first or probably second round pick as a QB, but he will be a steal for whatever team takes a gamble on him.  And I don&#8217;t like the Gators or the SEC.</p>
<p>Now onto the Sheltered comment&#8230;.  Anyone who thinks that homeschooling or missionary work in any way translates to being sheltered has a lot of homework to do. Most college recruiters are looking for Homeschooled kids because they are ust the opposite.  The kids in public school are the ones who, as a rule, are sheltered and not ready for the next level.  There are exceptions to every rule, and society tends to focus on the homeschooling exceptions.  The kids that do not get an education or who are stuck in a cult like religious experience by their parents.  But if yo look at the numbers and do the math homeschoolers as a demographic are far more prepared for life and more successful than public or private school kids.  Folks also want to focus on the big successes of the public and private schools kids which are statistically the exception once again.  In Chicago only 18% of 8th graders in the public school system can read at an 8th grade level. I gaurantee you that in Chicago more than 18% of the homeschooled kids in the 8th grade can read at their level and probably well beyond it.</p>
<p>Missionary work speaks for itself.  Most people who have been on a mission trips abroad or even domestically will tell you it is a lifetime memory.  what they learn about the world and themselves is unbelievable.</p>
<p>Adam, you have the right to say or type whatever you want.  But you have to deal with the consequences of your actions.  In this case the statement makes you look ill-informed, immature and bigoted.  Other also have the right to disagree with you and state their opinions.  Don&#8217;t attack or retreat into a shell because someone disagrees with you.  If that is your opinion you could at least provide some insight, reason, personal experience, study, data, facts or whatever in defense.  I haven&#8217;t seen it yet.</p>
<p>Disclaimer, just to avoid speculation &#8211; We homeschooled our 4 kids for 7 years, they were public school prior to that and all will actually graduate from public school.  They have all been very successful at school and while homeschooled.  Once put back in school they were tutors and mentors for their classmates, at the teachers request.  The real key to education is parental involvement regardless of the venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Color Red</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Color Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Adam, the reason your suggestion that Tebow might be sheltered is embarrassing is based only on what you said:  homeschooling + missionary work = being sheltered.  That is a hugely simplistic and judgmental conclusion.  Any of us can have any varying range of experiences that prepare us for the real world, but you believe that homeschooling and being a missionary apparently shelter a person from enough of these critical experiences.  Working with orphans and the world&#039;s poor actually would not be a sheltering, but a revealing experience to some of the worst experience on this planet.  So by definition, he sure wasn&#039;t sheltered.  But let me ask you:  what objective information do you have about Tim Tebow&#039;s life that demonstrates that he hasn&#039;t critically considered or faced experiences that could aptly prepare a young adult for life in the NFL or elsewhere?  Don&#039;t give me prejudiced opinion because you have a certain impression of homeschooling and missionary work, but give me actual objective information.  What objectively do you know about Tim Tebow&#039;s life?  Why don&#039;t you research it and get back to us, or don&#039;t load this site with your prejudice.

And yes, he in his short life has done &quot;Mother-Teresa like exploits&quot;.  I didn&#039;t say something stupid like he has done as much work as MT, or gone to the places that MT went, I said he has done Mother-Teresa like exploits.  He has worked with orphans in the Philippines and that is like the work that Mother Teresa spent her lifetime doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, the reason your suggestion that Tebow might be sheltered is embarrassing is based only on what you said:  homeschooling + missionary work = being sheltered.  That is a hugely simplistic and judgmental conclusion.  Any of us can have any varying range of experiences that prepare us for the real world, but you believe that homeschooling and being a missionary apparently shelter a person from enough of these critical experiences.  Working with orphans and the world&#8217;s poor actually would not be a sheltering, but a revealing experience to some of the worst experience on this planet.  So by definition, he sure wasn&#8217;t sheltered.  But let me ask you:  what objective information do you have about Tim Tebow&#8217;s life that demonstrates that he hasn&#8217;t critically considered or faced experiences that could aptly prepare a young adult for life in the NFL or elsewhere?  Don&#8217;t give me prejudiced opinion because you have a certain impression of homeschooling and missionary work, but give me actual objective information.  What objectively do you know about Tim Tebow&#8217;s life?  Why don&#8217;t you research it and get back to us, or don&#8217;t load this site with your prejudice.</p>
<p>And yes, he in his short life has done &#8220;Mother-Teresa like exploits&#8221;.  I didn&#8217;t say something stupid like he has done as much work as MT, or gone to the places that MT went, I said he has done Mother-Teresa like exploits.  He has worked with orphans in the Philippines and that is like the work that Mother Teresa spent her lifetime doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

