<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AADQ: Evaluating Bradford And Tebow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Blog, No 12-step program required.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22950</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22950</guid>
		<description>Gatorchomp penalties - very mature. /sarcasm off
Unless Mother Teresa can put on a helmet, stand in the pocket, make good reads, throw tight spirals, and take NFL hits, she&#039;s not much help on the franchise QB front.

Reality check - there are no Matt Ryans in this year&#039;s draft class. There could be a Joe Flacco, but that&#039;s a tough thing to predict. Is there a mid-to-late round gem? Probably but who that might be is anybody&#039;s guess.  

Bradford is not ready for the NFL. Stafford falls under the heading &quot;&lt;b&gt;N&lt;/b&gt;ot &lt;b&gt;F&lt;/b&gt;or &lt;b&gt;L&lt;/b&gt;ong.&quot;  

When/if we go to select a QB, we need to be thinking later rounds - Sanchez, Freeman, Cantwell, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gatorchomp penalties &#8211; very mature. /sarcasm off<br />
Unless Mother Teresa can put on a helmet, stand in the pocket, make good reads, throw tight spirals, and take NFL hits, she&#8217;s not much help on the franchise QB front.</p>
<p>Reality check &#8211; there are no Matt Ryans in this year&#8217;s draft class. There could be a Joe Flacco, but that&#8217;s a tough thing to predict. Is there a mid-to-late round gem? Probably but who that might be is anybody&#8217;s guess.  </p>
<p>Bradford is not ready for the NFL. Stafford falls under the heading &#8220;<b>N</b>ot <b>F</b>or <b>L</b>ong.&#8221;  </p>
<p>When/if we go to select a QB, we need to be thinking later rounds &#8211; Sanchez, Freeman, Cantwell, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22884</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22884</guid>
		<description>Can we get back to football on this thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get back to football on this thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gump</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22882</link>
		<dc:creator>Gump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22882</guid>
		<description>Tebow does a lot of things very well, but the one thing he does very very well on the football field is win.  He is not the prototypical NFL QB, everyone agrees with that, but a guy with his leadership qualities on any football team is worth it&#039;s weight in gold.  Did you see how he went after the DB that tweaked Harvins ankle?  OSUs big mistake was making Tebow mad.  He is not a first or probably second round pick as a QB, but he will be a steal for whatever team takes a gamble on him.  And I don&#039;t like the Gators or the SEC.

Now onto the Sheltered comment....  Anyone who thinks that homeschooling or missionary work in any way translates to being sheltered has a lot of homework to do. Most college recruiters are looking for Homeschooled kids because they are ust the opposite.  The kids in public school are the ones who, as a rule, are sheltered and not ready for the next level.  There are exceptions to every rule, and society tends to focus on the homeschooling exceptions.  The kids that do not get an education or who are stuck in a cult like religious experience by their parents.  But if yo look at the numbers and do the math homeschoolers as a demographic are far more prepared for life and more successful than public or private school kids.  Folks also want to focus on the big successes of the public and private schools kids which are statistically the exception once again.  In Chicago only 18% of 8th graders in the public school system can read at an 8th grade level. I gaurantee you that in Chicago more than 18% of the homeschooled kids in the 8th grade can read at their level and probably well beyond it.

Missionary work speaks for itself.  Most people who have been on a mission trips abroad or even domestically will tell you it is a lifetime memory.  what they learn about the world and themselves is unbelievable.

Adam, you have the right to say or type whatever you want.  But you have to deal with the consequences of your actions.  In this case the statement makes you look ill-informed, immature and bigoted.  Other also have the right to disagree with you and state their opinions.  Don&#039;t attack or retreat into a shell because someone disagrees with you.  If that is your opinion you could at least provide some insight, reason, personal experience, study, data, facts or whatever in defense.  I haven&#039;t seen it yet.  

Disclaimer, just to avoid speculation - We homeschooled our 4 kids for 7 years, they were public school prior to that and all will actually graduate from public school.  They have all been very successful at school and while homeschooled.  Once put back in school they were tutors and mentors for their classmates, at the teachers request.  The real key to education is parental involvement regardless of the venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tebow does a lot of things very well, but the one thing he does very very well on the football field is win.  He is not the prototypical NFL QB, everyone agrees with that, but a guy with his leadership qualities on any football team is worth it&#8217;s weight in gold.  Did you see how he went after the DB that tweaked Harvins ankle?  OSUs big mistake was making Tebow mad.  He is not a first or probably second round pick as a QB, but he will be a steal for whatever team takes a gamble on him.  And I don&#8217;t like the Gators or the SEC.</p>
<p>Now onto the Sheltered comment&#8230;.  Anyone who thinks that homeschooling or missionary work in any way translates to being sheltered has a lot of homework to do. Most college recruiters are looking for Homeschooled kids because they are ust the opposite.  The kids in public school are the ones who, as a rule, are sheltered and not ready for the next level.  There are exceptions to every rule, and society tends to focus on the homeschooling exceptions.  The kids that do not get an education or who are stuck in a cult like religious experience by their parents.  But if yo look at the numbers and do the math homeschoolers as a demographic are far more prepared for life and more successful than public or private school kids.  Folks also want to focus on the big successes of the public and private schools kids which are statistically the exception once again.  In Chicago only 18% of 8th graders in the public school system can read at an 8th grade level. I gaurantee you that in Chicago more than 18% of the homeschooled kids in the 8th grade can read at their level and probably well beyond it.</p>
<p>Missionary work speaks for itself.  Most people who have been on a mission trips abroad or even domestically will tell you it is a lifetime memory.  what they learn about the world and themselves is unbelievable.</p>
<p>Adam, you have the right to say or type whatever you want.  But you have to deal with the consequences of your actions.  In this case the statement makes you look ill-informed, immature and bigoted.  Other also have the right to disagree with you and state their opinions.  Don&#8217;t attack or retreat into a shell because someone disagrees with you.  If that is your opinion you could at least provide some insight, reason, personal experience, study, data, facts or whatever in defense.  I haven&#8217;t seen it yet.  </p>
<p>Disclaimer, just to avoid speculation &#8211; We homeschooled our 4 kids for 7 years, they were public school prior to that and all will actually graduate from public school.  They have all been very successful at school and while homeschooled.  Once put back in school they were tutors and mentors for their classmates, at the teachers request.  The real key to education is parental involvement regardless of the venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Color Red</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22870</link>
		<dc:creator>Color Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22870</guid>
		<description>Adam, the reason your suggestion that Tebow might be sheltered is embarrassing is based only on what you said:  homeschooling + missionary work = being sheltered.  That is a hugely simplistic and judgmental conclusion.  Any of us can have any varying range of experiences that prepare us for the real world, but you believe that homeschooling and being a missionary apparently shelter a person from enough of these critical experiences.  Working with orphans and the world&#039;s poor actually would not be a sheltering, but a revealing experience to some of the worst experience on this planet.  So by definition, he sure wasn&#039;t sheltered.  But let me ask you:  what objective information do you have about Tim Tebow&#039;s life that demonstrates that he hasn&#039;t critically considered or faced experiences that could aptly prepare a young adult for life in the NFL or elsewhere?  Don&#039;t give me prejudiced opinion because you have a certain impression of homeschooling and missionary work, but give me actual objective information.  What objectively do you know about Tim Tebow&#039;s life?  Why don&#039;t you research it and get back to us, or don&#039;t load this site with your prejudice.

And yes, he in his short life has done &quot;Mother-Teresa like exploits&quot;.  I didn&#039;t say something stupid like he has done as much work as MT, or gone to the places that MT went, I said he has done Mother-Teresa like exploits.  He has worked with orphans in the Philippines and that is like the work that Mother Teresa spent her lifetime doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, the reason your suggestion that Tebow might be sheltered is embarrassing is based only on what you said:  homeschooling + missionary work = being sheltered.  That is a hugely simplistic and judgmental conclusion.  Any of us can have any varying range of experiences that prepare us for the real world, but you believe that homeschooling and being a missionary apparently shelter a person from enough of these critical experiences.  Working with orphans and the world&#8217;s poor actually would not be a sheltering, but a revealing experience to some of the worst experience on this planet.  So by definition, he sure wasn&#8217;t sheltered.  But let me ask you:  what objective information do you have about Tim Tebow&#8217;s life that demonstrates that he hasn&#8217;t critically considered or faced experiences that could aptly prepare a young adult for life in the NFL or elsewhere?  Don&#8217;t give me prejudiced opinion because you have a certain impression of homeschooling and missionary work, but give me actual objective information.  What objectively do you know about Tim Tebow&#8217;s life?  Why don&#8217;t you research it and get back to us, or don&#8217;t load this site with your prejudice.</p>
<p>And yes, he in his short life has done &#8220;Mother-Teresa like exploits&#8221;.  I didn&#8217;t say something stupid like he has done as much work as MT, or gone to the places that MT went, I said he has done Mother-Teresa like exploits.  He has worked with orphans in the Philippines and that is like the work that Mother Teresa spent her lifetime doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the hammer formerly known as g.l.</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22833</link>
		<dc:creator>the hammer formerly known as g.l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22833</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with not spending mega bucks for a top 3 quarterback pick.  Lets help our porous defense with a top pick (ala Neil Smith) and draft a quarterback in the later rounds.  Give Thigpen his chance, he&#039;s earned it, and see what he can do in only his second year as a starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with not spending mega bucks for a top 3 quarterback pick.  Lets help our porous defense with a top pick (ala Neil Smith) and draft a quarterback in the later rounds.  Give Thigpen his chance, he&#8217;s earned it, and see what he can do in only his second year as a starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMartigan</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22827</link>
		<dc:creator>MadMartigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22827</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t want either one. draft defense in the first and second rounds then a qb in 3,4, or 5. give thiggy and chan another year and blow the d staff up. no qb in first round period! no no no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t want either one. draft defense in the first and second rounds then a qb in 3,4, or 5. give thiggy and chan another year and blow the d staff up. no qb in first round period! no no no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Best</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22825</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22825</guid>
		<description>I agree with both of you guys -- no first round QB. I think Cassel-Thiggy would totally be the way to go if we could make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both of you guys &#8212; no first round QB. I think Cassel-Thiggy would totally be the way to go if we could make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy_Riverside_CA</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy_Riverside_CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22824</guid>
		<description>We already have a guy who looks like Bbradford and Tebow, his name is Tyler thigpen, (with a slightly weaker arm and less accuracy which will improve in time).  Tyler is only going to get better; should we stay in the same offense.

No Qb in first round if we stick with Gailey as Off. Cordinator, that is what I think, for what its worth....not much...lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already have a guy who looks like Bbradford and Tebow, his name is Tyler thigpen, (with a slightly weaker arm and less accuracy which will improve in time).  Tyler is only going to get better; should we stay in the same offense.</p>
<p>No Qb in first round if we stick with Gailey as Off. Cordinator, that is what I think, for what its worth&#8230;.not much&#8230;lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blairmeister</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22823</link>
		<dc:creator>blairmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22823</guid>
		<description>idk why we are even considering drafting a QB....unless we are just talking about what we thought of them

Thiggy is our guy, unless we land Cassel there shouldnt be anybody else behind center in 2009

tebow has a great love for the game but is just insane sometimes

bradford has a great O-line, you cant expect him to shine on a team like the chiefs that has a horrible line

maybe if you put him on a already successful team, yknow the lions are gonna draft him #1 and he will do nothing but sink</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idk why we are even considering drafting a QB&#8230;.unless we are just talking about what we thought of them</p>
<p>Thiggy is our guy, unless we land Cassel there shouldnt be anybody else behind center in 2009</p>
<p>tebow has a great love for the game but is just insane sometimes</p>
<p>bradford has a great O-line, you cant expect him to shine on a team like the chiefs that has a horrible line</p>
<p>maybe if you put him on a already successful team, yknow the lions are gonna draft him #1 and he will do nothing but sink</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Best</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/08/aadq-evaluating-bradford-and-tebow/comment-page-1/#comment-22822</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2810#comment-22822</guid>
		<description>BucktheFroncos,

That made my day, man. That&#039;s the very reason I do what I do. Or at least try to...lol...

By the way, this Mother Teresa of Calcutta stuff (thanks, bryman) has got to stop. He&#039;s not Gandhi or MLK, he&#039;s a football player who knows he has a reputation to uphold. Does that take away from what he&#039;s done? No. He seems like a great kid who&#039;s done some solid charity work. But let&#039;s try and keep some perspective on this. I knew people would get all bent out of shape and think that I was attacking his morals and/or religion -- I wasn&#039;t. All I was saying is that homeboy might be a little sheltered. 

And saying that expressing my honest opinion about Tebow possibly being sheltered is &quot;embarrassing&quot; is embarrassing. What happened to freedom of speech and press in this country? Besides, garyh and Co., who am I to judge him? Well, when he gets to his Pro Day and the Combine that&#039;s all people will do. I&#039;m not judging him as a person, I&#039;m evaluating him as a prospect. That&#039;s fair game in the big leagues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BucktheFroncos,</p>
<p>That made my day, man. That&#8217;s the very reason I do what I do. Or at least try to&#8230;lol&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, this Mother Teresa of Calcutta stuff (thanks, bryman) has got to stop. He&#8217;s not Gandhi or MLK, he&#8217;s a football player who knows he has a reputation to uphold. Does that take away from what he&#8217;s done? No. He seems like a great kid who&#8217;s done some solid charity work. But let&#8217;s try and keep some perspective on this. I knew people would get all bent out of shape and think that I was attacking his morals and/or religion &#8212; I wasn&#8217;t. All I was saying is that homeboy might be a little sheltered. </p>
<p>And saying that expressing my honest opinion about Tebow possibly being sheltered is &#8220;embarrassing&#8221; is embarrassing. What happened to freedom of speech and press in this country? Besides, garyh and Co., who am I to judge him? Well, when he gets to his Pro Day and the Combine that&#8217;s all people will do. I&#8217;m not judging him as a person, I&#8217;m evaluating him as a prospect. That&#8217;s fair game in the big leagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
