<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sproles&#039; Big Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gump</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Gump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2789#comment-74</guid>
		<description>If we go for a vet then it should be someone coming off their initial contract.  RBs don&#039;t last much past 30, need to stay young.  James hasn&#039;t been used very much all year, that&#039;s why he had good legs yesterday.  As posted earlier, RBs are a dime a dozen, if one doesn&#039;t work out you easily get another.  There are a bunch of really good backs available in this draft as well.  Back when the season started we were soooooooo deep at RB, LJ, Smith, Charles, Battle, Savage.  And Cox is gonna be a STUD FB!!!!

There are 5-6 really good RBs available in this draft, and probably more that have yet to declare.  Also a couple of really good FAs available if we want a few years experience in the backfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we go for a vet then it should be someone coming off their initial contract.  RBs don&#8217;t last much past 30, need to stay young.  James hasn&#8217;t been used very much all year, that&#8217;s why he had good legs yesterday.  As posted earlier, RBs are a dime a dozen, if one doesn&#8217;t work out you easily get another.  There are a bunch of really good backs available in this draft as well.  Back when the season started we were soooooooo deep at RB, LJ, Smith, Charles, Battle, Savage.  And Cox is gonna be a STUD FB!!!!</p>
<p>There are 5-6 really good RBs available in this draft, and probably more that have yet to declare.  Also a couple of really good FAs available if we want a few years experience in the backfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rihavens</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Rihavens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2789#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else wonder how much a power back like LJ would really do if we stuck with this spread offence?  Jamal Charles was fitting in better then LJ was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else wonder how much a power back like LJ would really do if we stuck with this spread offence?  Jamal Charles was fitting in better then LJ was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epic23</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Epic23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2789#comment-72</guid>
		<description>would we want to bring in a vet.? sayy Edgerrin James?
he showed up yesterday...but dont know if he is worth consideration...

Im more concered with getting a better line as well woody...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would we want to bring in a vet.? sayy Edgerrin James?<br />
he showed up yesterday&#8230;but dont know if he is worth consideration&#8230;</p>
<p>Im more concered with getting a better line as well woody&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woody</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/sproles-big-night/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2789#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is moving that way...But it is also moving away completely from paying backs much money. Because they are a dime a dozen...Sproles is small and fast and runs hard, but he would be nothing without his line. Put him behind our line and he won&#039;t do jack...he will be a screen guy and that is it...We can&#039;t afford to overpay RB&#039;s, we need linemen....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is moving that way&#8230;But it is also moving away completely from paying backs much money. Because they are a dime a dozen&#8230;Sproles is small and fast and runs hard, but he would be nothing without his line. Put him behind our line and he won&#8217;t do jack&#8230;he will be a screen guy and that is it&#8230;We can&#8217;t afford to overpay RB&#8217;s, we need linemen&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-25 13:06:07 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
