Comments on: AADQ: Boldin And Fitzgerald Present Case For Crabtree http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/aadq-boldin-and-fitzgerald-present-case-for-crabtree/ A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:42:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Merlin http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/aadq-boldin-and-fitzgerald-present-case-for-crabtree/#comment-52 Merlin Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:40:12 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2787#comment-52 Mike: We draft #3 because we had the tougher schedule. The theory goes as follows. If teams have the same record, the team with the weakest strength of schedule drafts first. The team with the strongest strength of schedule is assumed to be the stronger team. Between us and the Rams, the difference in strength of schedule was one, count it, one game. If the Rams grab someone you have your heart set on, think about it. It came down to one freeking game. Mike:

We draft #3 because we had the tougher schedule. The theory goes as follows. If teams have the same record, the team with the weakest strength of schedule drafts first. The team with the strongest strength of schedule is assumed to be the stronger team. Between us and the Rams, the difference in strength of schedule was one, count it, one game. If the Rams grab someone you have your heart set on, think about it. It came down to one freeking game.

]]> By: Vrod74-MikeSD http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/aadq-boldin-and-fitzgerald-present-case-for-crabtree/#comment-51 Vrod74-MikeSD Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:12:44 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2787#comment-51 Sorry Adam, I have to disagree. If Andre Smith is half as good as they say, he SHOULD definitely be our #1 guy. Has anyone heard, are we really #3 or do we do the coin flip with St. Louis? I thought we had the tougher schedule so I am not sure how they get to go ahead of us. If they do Andre Smith is gone and we should....TRADE DOWN!!!! If there isn't a true #1 defensive guy like Dorsey (I know the jury is out for some of you, but I still think he is going to be a stud, with some help!!) then we should trade down and get two or more picks in this years draft, get the Male dude or Laurent...whatever his freaking name is! We need LB and DL help bad! I wish we could get Suggs or Peppers (both in my dream land of course!), but don't see our beloved Cheaps paying that kind of dough for either of them. Sorry Adam, I have to disagree. If Andre Smith is half as good as they say, he SHOULD definitely be our #1 guy. Has anyone heard, are we really #3 or do we do the coin flip with St. Louis? I thought we had the tougher schedule so I am not sure how they get to go ahead of us. If they do Andre Smith is gone and we should….TRADE DOWN!!!! If there isn’t a true #1 defensive guy like Dorsey (I know the jury is out for some of you, but I still think he is going to be a stud, with some help!!) then we should trade down and get two or more picks in this years draft, get the Male dude or Laurent…whatever his freaking name is! We need LB and DL help bad! I wish we could get Suggs or Peppers (both in my dream land of course!), but don’t see our beloved Cheaps paying that kind of dough for either of them.

]]> By: Adam Best http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/aadq-boldin-and-fitzgerald-present-case-for-crabtree/#comment-50 Adam Best Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:48:39 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2787#comment-50 Detroit? What about the old St. Louis teams, or the Colts? That 15-1 Vikings team that was two games away from winning it all? Last year's Pats? Would the Bengals have even sniffed the playoffs without Housh and Ocho a few years back when they miraculously made it? Two great receivers can be a potent weapon. Additionally, Crabtree is more Calvin Johnson than he is Roy Williams (headcase), Mike Williams (slow) or Charles Rogers (brittle).People love pulling Detroit out, though. Thing is, Matt Millen's dumbass isn't going to be making the picks. Detroit? What about the old St. Louis teams, or the Colts? That 15-1 Vikings team that was two games away from winning it all? Last year’s Pats? Would the Bengals have even sniffed the playoffs without Housh and Ocho a few years back when they miraculously made it? Two great receivers can be a potent weapon.

Additionally, Crabtree is more Calvin Johnson than he is Roy Williams (headcase), Mike Williams (slow) or Charles Rogers (brittle).People love pulling Detroit out, though. Thing is, Matt Millen’s dumbass isn’t going to be making the picks.

]]> By: btag58 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2009/01/03/aadq-boldin-and-fitzgerald-present-case-for-crabtree/#comment-49 btag58 Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:36:41 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2787#comment-49 We've all seen a plethora of "#1 receivers" go through Detroit, and look how far that team has gone. Arizona is an exception, rather than the rule. Still, if Crabtree is the best available player when we draft, then I say take him. We’ve all seen a plethora of “#1 receivers” go through Detroit, and look how far that team has gone. Arizona is an exception, rather than the rule. Still, if Crabtree is the best available player when we draft, then I say take him.

]]>