Bastille Day And The Reign of Terror

by Draft

I feel bad for Carl Peterson. I thought the way that fans and local pundits reacted to the announcement of his departure was embarrassingly over the top and way too personal in its tone. What’s next? A black and white photo of the dethroned and disgraced king walking along some lonely stretch of beach in his baggy shorts with his head hanging down?

I mean, come on. Say what you will about Carl Peterson, there is no denying that his tenure provided this city and the fans of this team everywhere with some pretty exciting football and that he, more than anyone, was responsible for creating the “Arrowhead Experience.” For that and a host of other reasons, on behalf of appreciative Chiefs fans everywhere, I salute and thank you Mr. Peterson for your many contributions and years of dedicated service to this fantastic organization. I am sure similar success will continue to follow you in Detroit or wherever you happen to land and I wish you only the best on that account.

On that note, I feel I must now move on to the accompanying mob frenzy calling for the head of Herm Edwards and presumably any and all other decision makers. Pretty much everyone I know, have read or listened to fundamentally agreed on what needed to be done with this team after last season. Blow it up and rebuild. Herm and the organization, for the most part, did what we asked of him on that account and there was negligible dissent about the fact that he and the Chiefs, in acing the draft, mastered the essential first step.

Yet, in spite of such universal acclaim and optimism, the dominant consensus about what should be reasonable in terms of a win-loss record for this season remained reservedly low. I believe 4-12 was the most favored prediction. At this point, I would guess the Chiefs stand about a 50-50 chance of going 4-12. But then, so what if they don’t?

Still, if we indeed hit or come close to that mark, I have to admit I will be particularly eager to see how people respond. Why? Because I can hardly wait to see how many people will continue to carry on in shrill fashion, making like this season ended up being some catastrophic disappointment for them. Based on what I see people writing and hear most people saying I totally see that happening. Results meeting expectations be damned apparently, the fevered mob will not be satisfied until it sees the head of Herm Edwards and his entourage roll.

I have a theory about all of this actually. I say that Edwards actually produced a product that was better than what most people expected. Because that product turned out better, expectations grew in kind. I also believe that the true source of frustration comes through the fact that those elevated expectations were rarely met as a result of an unusually high number of unanticipated injuries and even more by the fact this team came up on the short end of several winnable games. Last Sunday was just the latest chapter in that saga.

Say again? Indeed, those raised expectations along with the accompanying disappointment we all felt began in week 1 when we showed the world we could compete with the best but then somehow fail to make the kill when given the perfect opportunity. I remember being more than a little pissed about that myself. The problem is that most of us started out expecting a 4-12 team and then quickly saw that this team could actually be better than that. The realization and disappointment quickly set in (as early as week 2) that despite its potential, this team would, for whatever reasons, have a tendency to either disappear, beat itself, or let up.

Did our concerns about Croyle’s durability turn out for the worst? Absolutely. Did instability and poor performance at quarterback prove to be a major setback for this team? No disputing it. Did injuries and declining-to-poor play from our dbackers prove to be the Achilles heel of this defense? Profoundly so. Did the weak play of our linebackers negatively affect the play of the rest of the defense? Undeniably. Did our veterans fulfill their role as leaders? Mostly not. Did we miss what Jared Allen was able to do for this defense? Decidedly.

To what extent is Herm Edwards accountable for any or all of this? Completely? Forget about it. Some? Sure.

For example, Herm took a big gamble on Brodie and lost. Hindsight tells us that was a pretty big mistake. But there was a silver lining to that bad roll of the dice. We learned that Tyler Thigpen and the spread offense have a place in the NFL. We also learned that Damon Huard’s days as a Chief are most likely over and as a result, backup QB is a position we can ill afford to neglect during the offseason. As any addict will tell you, recognizing a problem is the first step towards fixing it.

Whether Herm is accountable for the plague of injuries that beset this team is arguable. I tend to fall into the camp of those who feel that improper conditioning leads to increased injuries. Given Herm’s storied history of being bitten by the injury bug on a fairly regular basis, I do wonder whether he’s going about things in the right way in that department. I have no specific evidence to say that he does or does not. I’m just looking at the results and asking.

Yes, there are a few things that I think Herm could have or should have done differently this season. I would say I have been at the forefront in pointing out several of those miscues in fact. Still, a 2-12 record has a tendency to make any mistake rise to the level of “glaring” for the agenda-driven mob leaders. I also suspect there is little that can be said to dissuade them from reconsidering their march to the guillotine.

I have alluded to this before and will say it once more. Despite their record, it would be pretty tough to convince me that the team we’re seeing this year is not better, lacks greater upside, or is further off the path of becoming a contender than the one we suffered through a year ago. As best I remember, most of us agreed with the need for a complete revamping and acknowledged it would take 2 to 3 years for this team to compete for a championship. How quickly we forget.

This is what rebuilding through the draft looks like folks. Admit it, we agreed to this deal and Herm and company have yet to renege on their end of the bargain. Such being the case, are we not similarly obliged to hold up our end and allow this process the fair amount of time it deserves, which, in turn, is what we said we expected?

Who knows? Depending upon what offseason moves are made, we may even come to learn that not only was the finished product delivered as promised but ahead of schedule.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

dakotadave - "a good teacher, an excellent motivator, and a good talent evaluator" . . . given where this team is in terms of development, wouldn't those be the exact attributes you'd want in a coach next year? I'll tell you one thing, no GM/coach/whatever is gonna come in and win a Superbowl with this team next year. Yes Herm seems to have a few issues on with his work on the sideline but for me sideline management is not the most critical strength to possess at this juncture.

In the end, there's no questioning that any new GM worth his salt will have considerable say on whether Herm stays or goes. The way I see it though there are few better than Edwards to continue, for another year, with the process that was begun at the end of last season. Beyond that, it would have to be year-to-year for me and I would not be opposed to the idea of bringing some fresh blood if it appears that Herm himself is not developing / improving in the areas he needs to.

Well this is one game Im ready to see rather than a game Im at. I can feel the excitement in the air everywhere I go Chiefs fans are bumping fists. Carl could have stepped down this was in my opinion so foreseable for him but it was his choice to hang on and hang on until fans were ready to hang him.

I think it is fair to say that Herm is a good teacher, an excellent motivator, and a good talent evaluator. But you also have to admit that he is a below average game-time coach. Yes teams come from behind to steal a win every week, but it should not happen to the same team 5 times (so far) in one season. In fact, below average is probably about the kindest category you could put Herm's game-time coaching in.

As I have said before, it is pointless to argue weather Herm deserves to keep his job or not. The new GM WILL make that decision. If Clark intended to keep him, he would already have said this much. I personally think Herm should reinterview with the new GM, and if he wins the job...who am I to argue.

DD - That is good to know, but I don't think Gonzo and Waters are the fragile minded players we should be concerned about.

kcdan - I get the sense that the players have a lot respect for and faith in Edwards and what's going on with the team. Gonz says he thinks Thiggy is the answer and Thiggy says he thinks Herm is the answer. I heard B. Waters say just today say that there is no other coach in this league who could have dealt with the type of adversity this team has seen and still be able to motivate his players every week in spite of that adversity better than Edwards. I'd call the support of the QB, a future HOF'r, and a perennial PB a pretty ringing endorsement.

Also, when you know down in your heart the lead won't last, or the clock will be managed poorly, or a dumb play call is coming, that means the coach probably isn't that great. I'm not shocked by anything poor because of his coaching. HE IS A JOKE!

People who are smarter than me, and who are paid to watch and talk about football, think that Herm is a terrible coach, and make jokes about him. On the other hand, Cowher had a reputation as being the best coach to never win a Super Bowl before winning. My two points, Herm should not be an NFL coach, and Bill Cowher deserves all the praise he has received throughout his career and retirement.

larryc - Schott was reportedly in KC. I don't see him as fitting the criteria that Clark has stipulated however. The grassy knoll in me thinks it's merely a smokescreen to get Cleveland to make their move.

I think patience is something we've all been lacking since stomaching all AFC West teams other than us make it to the big game. But, you're right. Substantial change doesn't happen over night. I think the far more important topic is not if us fans have lost faith in Herm, but if his players have. If they don't believe in him, there is no point in keeping him. Cowher is someone players believe in.

Crane, as I pointed out in another thread, this year's Miami team had the fortune of a higher draft picks combined with a path of lesser resistance. As fate would have it, we play them this Sunday and it seems to me that Miami needs this game a whole heck of a lot more than we do. It will be interesting to see if the Phins are up the task of taking down a down and out team that just so happens to be a little more battle-tested than they are.

Randy, in my opinion, Marty Schottenheimer was the closest we've ever come to having a GREAT coach. Hank Stram led us to a championship, true enough, but in my mind he was more of a sideline showman than an X's and O's guy. Pro football was a lot different in those days.

As far as whether Herm can ever be that coach? I tend to think probably not but that does not mean he's not the right coach for this team right now. As to what he could do if given enough time, I have to say the jury on that is still out.

Who was the last GREAT coach the chiefs had? Im tired of settling for good. I want GREAT. The KC fans deserve GREAT. I dont think Herm is even good but nobody would call im a great coach.

I am out in So Cal and don't get the local media comments but appreciate all the statements here. Back in the early days when I lived in KC, there was something special going on. Carl was a part of that. However, there were too many years of mediocrity. I fully expect the new GM to due the dilligence in evaluating where Herm is going. If not in agreement, he'll be gone. My parents live in Platte City and reported Marty was in town over the weekend to meet with Clark. Can anyone confirm and if so, whats being reported? I assume some consulting at this point given the season isn't over and he is a free agent

Crane, you're seriously going to compare this year's offense with the one that Vermeil had at his disposal? And you're calling me certifiable? LOL!

Double D - as always you are right on the money... or as you so eloquently put it... ED Zachary!

"Come on now, Buffalo tied their all time scoring record in Arrowhead? A 21 pt lead blown v Tampa"

I'd cite those as examples of the team that most people expected to see.

"an 11 point lead blown in 72 seconds."

Elway acquired a knack doing that sort thing to us all the time against much better teams than the one we have now. Believe it or not, dramatic comebacks and endings have been a staple of NFL games particularly those with much greater significance than this year's Chiefs-Broncos matchup at Mile High.

Cut some slack.

Lol...quiet about fishy calls...thats nonsense...Though I dont care either way...

I am with Crane though, Herm should not remain the Head Coach of the Chiefs. He has worked great with our young players, but he has also single-handedly blown more than a few games this season by not being a good head coach...

http://www.kansascity.com/160/story/942059.html

Look at the chart on that page, that tells you everything u need to know about Herm.

DD and Woody some people would say that Superbowl win was a little shaky in a lot of people's eyes. There were some very fishy things going on in that game.

Maybe I should have said
We should have beat NE, TB, SD, OAK….but Herm's sucking kept us from doing so.

Hell Vermeil won without a Defense why can't Herm?

woody - you're right, he did make an appearance in '95. Still, had Cowher not won XXX, the ongoing knock about "not being able to win the big one" would have stuck. All I'm basically saying with that is that the good fortune of winning a Superbowl has a way of changing standing prejudices and perceptions rather quickly.

YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME DD

I mean seriously, your defenses of Herm are just...wow. I don't want to name call or get into all that.

Here's the bottom line, we had a schedule that had we won the games we should have won, and by having our tougher matchups at home like TB and NO, we had a cakewalk schedule to finish the year...Denver on their 7th string RB and over half their D starters and we can't beat them at their place? Come on now, Buffalo tied their all time scoring record in Arrowhead? A 21 pt lead blown v Tampa, an 11 point lead blown in 72 seconds. Give me a break dude, seriously. We could have easily been sitting with 7 wins at this point and had a 1 win team last year in Miami and then Cincinatti to finish the year and we could have been talking playoffs with a dangerous Thigpen. Instead we are defending a coach who has gotten worse and worse- year by year and your case for saving his job is, You can't deny there is progress.
Well blue star for Herm! Wowiewowowwow! Isn't that what is SUPPOSED to happen?! Aren't rookies supposed to look a little better? Of course they are, so lets not give Herm credit for things he is supposed to be doing. I will tell you what else he isn't doing, winning. And that is all that matters whether you stick a rebuilding sticker on it or not. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME...REMEMBER?!?

PS Admit it, we agreed to this deal.
NO I DIDN'T.

good points woody!

"The sad thing is, we could EASILY be contending for the down AFC West this year had we not blown so many games.

We should have beat NE, TB, SD, OAK…"

You seem to be making my point . . .

As far as the poor showing on D is concerned, I would attribute that almost entirely to the continual searching and recycling at LB as a result of injuries to key veterans in those positions. Once the veteran leadership at LB was gone, this defense was doomed.

Clark Hunt has said that he wants a GM who is on board with playing the young guys and developing through the draft. Like we did this year.

That sounds like "I want someone who can take what Herm was trying to do this year and improve upon it", either with Herm or without.

Herm is on thin ice. He could go either way.

The only thing I would hate to see is Chan gailey leave. He is the only coaching bright spot we have.

Also, I don't see Cowher coaching anywhere next year after some thought. If Cleveland pays him 10mil, he's going there period. We won't pay that, and I'm not totally sold on him coaching KC, but I know players will play for him more than they will Herm.

Oh and my expectations for Herm's team were about as low as possible. But what does that prove? They are only low because of Herm! Him meeting low expectations is not an achievement, its an indictment.

D - He had many many playoff wins in there along with SB loss. I wouldn't say that fans of the winningest franchise of the last 20 yrs are patient. (They are not as bad as spoiled ass Patriots fans tho, good lord)

Also, I was unable to respond in the other thread about how much credit Cowher even should get for his success in Pittsburgh, or coaches in general (not just Cowher.) You mentioned the franchise QB present in Pitt but I think it has much more to do with DIck LeBeau. He was there through Cowher's years of success and he is still there coaching a historically amazing defense right now (if they had Elvis in a pirate hat on their helmet we would be hearing about them non-stop on ESPN, disgusting). It is an interesting discussion to have...

My point was, and I would debate this with the Star writer who discussed it, that Pioli is the safer bet I believe. Seeing how it is not clear who is responsible for the success Cowher had with the Steelers since that very success continues now without him. The arguement made in the Star mentions that noone who has ever left Belichick's shadow has ever done well in the NFL. The arguement misses a huge point though in that the biggest PERSONNEL guy to leave the shadow has completely turned around a franchise down south (Dimitroff, Falcons) and that is a very good sign of the ability of Pioli to be successful elsewhere...

Lastly, yes, the coverage has been kind of barbaric as far as destroying Carl...I was tempted to break my holdout and find tickets to the game just to go in and thank him personally. Then I saw the forecast and remembers Hagans taking direct snaps in the Raiders game I spent money to attend....and the holdout continues...God bless you Carl...Take your coach with you...

I thought we needed an overhaul after last season yes.

Which includes firing Herm Carl and Gun.

I put the bar as low as I could 4-12. We won't go 4-12. The sad thing is, we could EASILY be contending for the down AFC West this year had we not blown so many games.

We should have beat NE, TB, SD, OAK...off the top of my head- all were in the bag. That would have given us 6 wins and a chance to have 8-8 record, a solid improvement from last year. Herm blew that with his lack of halftime adjustments, poor decisions etc. Instead he has gotten worse, and blamed it on rookies. If he was the messiah the media thinks he is, he could have coached us up instead of making excuses. Our D is awful and most of the players we had on offense were Vermeil or older. Hit the bricks Herm, you are no longer needed.

Prior to Cowher, Noll coached the Steelers for 23 years! Granted he won a few Superbowls along the way but that kind of tenure rises to the level of mythical by KC standards.

Buck - If I'm not mistaken, Cowher led the Steelers for 15 year before he made it to (and won) the Super Bowl. Do you know many Chiefs fans possessing that level of loyalty / patience? I certainly don't. Let's further suppose that Cowher didn't have Big Ben and as a result didn't make it to, much less win Super Bowl XXX. Would you still be as high on him?

Crane - 2 questions. Were you not in agreement that the Chiefs needed a complete overhaul after last season? What were your expectations for this season going in?

You're certifiably insane if you want to keep Herm around.

That's all I got.

"Chiefs’ fan has lost what the typical Steelers fan has demonstrated for years, the virtue of patience."

No offense but how exactly are the Pittsburgh fans patient. 6 Super bowl appearances and who knows how many wins in the conference playoffs. I don't see that as something that would require a lot of patience. If our beloved Chiefs could have had even half of those results over the course of the last 3 decades then patience i would have. Funny how ONE playoff win can do that.

Jeremy, as far as Herm is concerned, I think the right thing to do at this point is to let him proceed with the next step in this important process. After that, I say year-to-year. It seems to me that today's typical Chiefs' fan has lost what the typical Steelers fan has demonstrated for years, the virtue of patience.

All coaches have occasions where they will make a bad decision of one kind or another. Nearly all good coaches tend to be stubborn about certain things. The humanity of all coaches (and people in general) tends to become a bit more magnified when they lose/fail.

Oh and excellent point D, but as they say if you do what you always do you get what you always get.

Carl Petersen has my applause for the good work he did in the beggingin, and my ire for the terible job he did in the end. I beleive he was resting on his laurels after doing so well in the begining. he stayed too long and underperformed in the end. I am sad that he is being ridiculed but he has no one else but himself to blame. Poor choices in the end.

DD: This team is better than last years, and it will get better, I agree. However, even if our team is awesome in the years to come, there will be games in which Herm is outcoached or makes poor clock management/play calling decsisions. If he stays so be it. But I do not think he is a super bowl coach. He plays too conservative. Keeps other teams in the game.

Ive come to the realization that my resentment for Carl Petersons current leadership is his refusal to step down amidst overwhelming public opinion that he was no longer wanted at the GM position. No argument that he brought the KC football program to the wonderful level it has been until recent years, but its for good reason that their are term limits on the US Presidency.

The problem with asking for and receiving change is that there are no guarantees that what you get will necessarily be better than what you had.

To me you can't convince qualified GM candidates to come aboard and not let them decide who the head coach will be. I've never really liked Herm as our coach, but my vote shouldn't count. Either way the moratorium on Chiefs gear/games has been lifted in my house. Sure Carl changed the atmosphere and made our Chiefs respectable. But he also ran off some quality players and alienated other Free agents by being such a known red-ass. So it's a push in my book. New Blood please. :) Plus I think I read that Leggett(luv the guy) is gonna play this week. So things are looking pretty nice for Christmas. Now if I can just get that 1st round playoff loss for Denver gift-wrapped, then my shopping is all done.