Comments on: DeAngelo Hall Campaign Part II?

By: Ian316

Ian316 — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:09:07 +0000

Adam I will just sit here and tell you that really I laugh at you opinion some times. I mean seriously, Michael Vick? And to be honest with you your opinion on Matt Ryan doesn’t matter anyways man. He was taken two picks in front of us, and really wasn’t worth the risk of jumping up in front of the falcons to take him. don’t get me wrong he is doing great but we didn’t have a shot at him. And frankly he would be getting destroyed here. Now back to Chiefzilla I completely agree with you. Hall does have talent but he has no class what so ever and that’s not what we need to bring in to this young locker room, I mean you want to go to his interceptions I’ll point out just in the Broncos game he had two ridiculous penalties that cost them points. The guy is a cancer and I don’t care how good he is, cancers ruin teams.

By: Adam Best

Adam Best — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:41:05 +0000

Master,

I think I’ll stick with my assessment of Ryan over anyone. No offense, but you were the guy who preferred GB’s No. 3 QB, Brian Brohm, to Ryan.

And I agree with Double D that Hall is better than either of our corners. Faster, too.

By: chiefzilla

chiefzilla — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:39:49 +0000

#1 – The problem here is that you’re confusing athleticism with the ability to play. Hall is a good corner. But he has a terrible attitude. He struggles against top receivers because once he blows one coverage, he loses complete focus. Not just a little, I’m talking about a complete meltdown. Often times, he gets so frustrated that he gets tagged with really stupid personal fouls. He gambles way more than he should and gives up a LOT of big plays. That’s the story on his playing ability.

#2 – His locker room attitude is horrible. TO/Keyshawn level horrible. The Falcons couldn’t wait to get rid of him. One of the great things going for the Chiefs is they have an outstanding locker room. If any of you think signing LJ would be a mistake, double that for Hall

#3 – Hall would be extremely expensive. There’s no reason to pay that much money when you have two young corners who are playing outstanding and you have a system that doesn’t require much of their CBs

CBs are great to have, but they’re not thay important. I would MUCH rather spend huge dough on getting some LBs or defensive linemen. No point in bringing in yet another corner when the front 7 still doesn’t do their job.

By: Double D

Double D — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:03:44 +0000

Hall was in the wrong system (man-to-man). He thrives playing zone.

Who would he replace? Surtain would be at the top of my list.

Dude’s a 5 year veteran who’s still young (just this side of 25), blazingly fast with 2 pro bowls on his resume. Don’t be stupid, just like Moss, Allen, and Woodson, Oakland’s high-profile trash is generally somebody else’s high-profile treasure. No disrespect to Carr or Flowers but frankly I’d start Hall in a heartbeat over any of our current corners.