Our friends at Pro Football Talk have uncovered this nugget of information regarding Herm, Carl and LJ.
“Edwards has wanted to clamp down on Johnson for weeks. Peterson, who pulled the trigger last year on a big-money extension for Johnson, resisted.
Peterson doesn’t want to look bad for making the investment in Johnson. Edwards doesn’t want to look bad in the eyes of an impressionable locker room made up of young players who were starting to wonder when/if the team was going to do anything about a guy who has been at times defiant in his refusal to comply with the team’s wishes.”
Usually, I am supportive of Carl. I think he is a good GM and generally makes good decisions. However, in this case I believe he is 100% wrong. He should not be interfering in how Herm handles the players. If Herm wants to suspend a player, that player is suspended. To resist undercuts Herm’s influence in the locker room. This is a young team and setting expectations early is very important. As a GM, Carl needs to stick to managing the coaches and personnel department and not telling his coaches how to manage players.
What do you think Addicts? Are you with Herm or Carl in this case?
Merlin








