<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merlin&#039;s Magic, Week Seven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aCalPF</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/#comment-24430</link>
		<dc:creator>aCalPF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2497#comment-24430</guid>
		<description>I think part of the reason Carl held out for that 2nd rounder was because he knew that those offers would still be available in the offseason, and if you&#039;re going to get a draft pick for a player whenever you want it, you might as well do it right before the draft and not miss out on any more games.

As for the draft itself, I think we&#039;re in agreement that this team has more holes than we can reasonably hope to fill in one year.  That being said, I think we need to take the best available talent at whatever spot we draft.  Simply put, no QB that is definitely coming out (Stafford, Painter, Boeckman) impresses me much so I think we need to look elsewhere with our early pick.  If McCoy, Bradford or to a lesser extent, Sanchez come out then I&#039;ll reevaluate.  MLB is more interesting but I think Maualuga and Laurinaitis will be mid first rounders and would be better targeted if we could trade back into the first round like we managed to do last year to pick up Albert.  Hali and Dorsey are a good start on the D line and I&#039;ve been satisfied if not thrilled with Mcbride.

So in my mind, the only real option for that first pick (presumably top 5 again) is an elite O lineman like Andre Smith or Michael Oher or a WR.  I wouldn&#039;t hate taking an OL but I think we need to at least consider both options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the reason Carl held out for that 2nd rounder was because he knew that those offers would still be available in the offseason, and if you&#8217;re going to get a draft pick for a player whenever you want it, you might as well do it right before the draft and not miss out on any more games.</p>
<p>As for the draft itself, I think we&#8217;re in agreement that this team has more holes than we can reasonably hope to fill in one year.  That being said, I think we need to take the best available talent at whatever spot we draft.  Simply put, no QB that is definitely coming out (Stafford, Painter, Boeckman) impresses me much so I think we need to look elsewhere with our early pick.  If McCoy, Bradford or to a lesser extent, Sanchez come out then I&#8217;ll reevaluate.  MLB is more interesting but I think Maualuga and Laurinaitis will be mid first rounders and would be better targeted if we could trade back into the first round like we managed to do last year to pick up Albert.  Hali and Dorsey are a good start on the D line and I&#8217;ve been satisfied if not thrilled with Mcbride.</p>
<p>So in my mind, the only real option for that first pick (presumably top 5 again) is an elite O lineman like Andre Smith or Michael Oher or a WR.  I wouldn&#8217;t hate taking an OL but I think we need to at least consider both options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/#comment-24429</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2497#comment-24429</guid>
		<description>aCalPF:

How do you know that Tony is leaving after this season? You are correct that we could use a second receiver to emerge. Perhaps Franklin could be that guy. You are also correct that keeping hyour opponent off balance is a key part of winning. However, you can not stretch the field without a QB that can get the ball downfield. Now that Brodie is gone, we no longer have that QB. Even with that QB, we can not stretch the field if our QB is on his butt because our line could not protect him. What yuo are looking at is step 3 or 4 in the offense rebuild, not step 1. Let&#039;s worry about building the O-line, D front 7 and QB before we worry about the second WR. You bring in a Crabtree with our current O-line and it will not make much of a difference. We need at least 5 players before we get to the second WR. Some of those 5 better already be on this roster or be vet FA pickups. If not, we could be looking at another long year next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aCalPF:</p>
<p>How do you know that Tony is leaving after this season? You are correct that we could use a second receiver to emerge. Perhaps Franklin could be that guy. You are also correct that keeping hyour opponent off balance is a key part of winning. However, you can not stretch the field without a QB that can get the ball downfield. Now that Brodie is gone, we no longer have that QB. Even with that QB, we can not stretch the field if our QB is on his butt because our line could not protect him. What yuo are looking at is step 3 or 4 in the offense rebuild, not step 1. Let&#8217;s worry about building the O-line, D front 7 and QB before we worry about the second WR. You bring in a Crabtree with our current O-line and it will not make much of a difference. We need at least 5 players before we get to the second WR. Some of those 5 better already be on this roster or be vet FA pickups. If not, we could be looking at another long year next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aCalPF</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/#comment-24428</link>
		<dc:creator>aCalPF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2497#comment-24428</guid>
		<description>While I do think the O line is our most pressing need (Would McSack even be a backup for a team with a decent line?) you guys are selling this Crabtree thing way too short.  Let me list the receiving stats of our non running backs as proof:

Bowe: 34
Tony G: 27
Darling: 5
Webb: 4
Franklin: 1

I&#039;m sure you all realize that we don&#039;t have good options after those two, but the way it is we don&#039;t even have bad options, we have nothing.  Guys we have a STARTING WIDE RECEIVER who averaging less than ONE CATCH PER GAME!!!

Merlin mentioned that football is won in the trenches... well after Tony leaves this offseason, we&#039;ll have exactly 1 player to throw the ball too.  Even if I&#039;m generous and assume that he&#039;ll be double covered for the rest of life, I still see no reason why every opponent we face wouldn&#039;t stack 8 in the box all day.  Merlin, I counter, the way you win football games is by stretching the field and keeping your opponents off balance.  Not only will Crabtree step in as a true #1 (Don&#039;t try to tell me Bowe&#039;s a #1, I saw the New England game) but having those two together will open up running lanes for whoever we have back there next season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do think the O line is our most pressing need (Would McSack even be a backup for a team with a decent line?) you guys are selling this Crabtree thing way too short.  Let me list the receiving stats of our non running backs as proof:</p>
<p>Bowe: 34<br />
Tony G: 27<br />
Darling: 5<br />
Webb: 4<br />
Franklin: 1</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you all realize that we don&#8217;t have good options after those two, but the way it is we don&#8217;t even have bad options, we have nothing.  Guys we have a STARTING WIDE RECEIVER who averaging less than ONE CATCH PER GAME!!!</p>
<p>Merlin mentioned that football is won in the trenches&#8230; well after Tony leaves this offseason, we&#8217;ll have exactly 1 player to throw the ball too.  Even if I&#8217;m generous and assume that he&#8217;ll be double covered for the rest of life, I still see no reason why every opponent we face wouldn&#8217;t stack 8 in the box all day.  Merlin, I counter, the way you win football games is by stretching the field and keeping your opponents off balance.  Not only will Crabtree step in as a true #1 (Don&#8217;t try to tell me Bowe&#8217;s a #1, I saw the New England game) but having those two together will open up running lanes for whoever we have back there next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/10/21/merlins-magic-week-seven/#comment-24427</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2497#comment-24427</guid>
		<description>Yet one more thing...

I think New England would be a wonderful destination for LJ. The powers that be in NE traded for the disgruntled Cory Dillon some years back.

Plus, much like Brodie Croyle, Lawrence Maroney is made of glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet one more thing&#8230;</p>
<p>I think New England would be a wonderful destination for LJ. The powers that be in NE traded for the disgruntled Cory Dillon some years back.</p>
<p>Plus, much like Brodie Croyle, Lawrence Maroney is made of glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/274 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-25 05:53:18 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        274
Cache hits:         274
Cache misses:       0
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
