<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A.A.D.Q.: A Smorgasbord Of First-Day Picks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lobo48</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/#comment-20243</link>
		<dc:creator>lobo48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2369#comment-20243</guid>
		<description>But J.T. will get a new contract since he replaced their starter.
 I will also jump on the Losman wagon.  He may not be the qb of the future here but he could be the qb for right now; and who knows he may just turn out great.  At this point we are getting pretty desperate.  We can&#039;t suffer through a full season of Thiggy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But J.T. will get a new contract since he replaced their starter.<br />
 I will also jump on the Losman wagon.  He may not be the qb of the future here but he could be the qb for right now; and who knows he may just turn out great.  At this point we are getting pretty desperate.  We can&#8217;t suffer through a full season of Thiggy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IISaiNtII</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/#comment-20242</link>
		<dc:creator>IISaiNtII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2369#comment-20242</guid>
		<description>JT O&#039;Sullivan will be UFA next year too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT O&#8217;Sullivan will be UFA next year too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy5k</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/#comment-20241</link>
		<dc:creator>randy5k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2369#comment-20241</guid>
		<description>Yes it does</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/09/22/aadq-a-smorgasbord-of-first-day-picks/#comment-20240</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2369#comment-20240</guid>
		<description>I think him being a FA is exactly the reason to bring in Losman. The Bills would rather take like a fourth- or fifth-rounder than be stuck with nada. Trent Edwards is their guy. Meanwhile, we&#039;d have a legitimate prospect on our roster and a leg up on signing him if he worked out. If we didn&#039;t see enough to warrant keeping him, then we&#039;d let him go. We wouldn&#039;t have to splurge on a high-draft pick or even a decent contract on him, that is unless he played his way to a payday. Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think him being a FA is exactly the reason to bring in Losman. The Bills would rather take like a fourth- or fifth-rounder than be stuck with nada. Trent Edwards is their guy. Meanwhile, we&#8217;d have a legitimate prospect on our roster and a leg up on signing him if he worked out. If we didn&#8217;t see enough to warrant keeping him, then we&#8217;d let him go. We wouldn&#8217;t have to splurge on a high-draft pick or even a decent contract on him, that is unless he played his way to a payday. Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

