<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larry Johnson In&#8230;Diamonds Are Forever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:46:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xxxlp</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17934</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17934</guid>
		<description>Well, you may have a point in our easy schedule. But alot of those games we&#039;re playing against other young hungry teams. It typically comes down to who wants it the most, if our guys can step up and make plays, and get a winning swagger about them, who knows. But I still don&#039;t see us in the playoffs. We&#039;ll be fighting the Jags, possibly Titans, Jets, Bengals and/or Browns for wild-card spots. Do you honestly think we&#039;d beat out all those teams? I don&#039;t think we can harbor a better record than a few of those teams, in which case, we&#039;re screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you may have a point in our easy schedule. But alot of those games we&#8217;re playing against other young hungry teams. It typically comes down to who wants it the most, if our guys can step up and make plays, and get a winning swagger about them, who knows. But I still don&#8217;t see us in the playoffs. We&#8217;ll be fighting the Jags, possibly Titans, Jets, Bengals and/or Browns for wild-card spots. Do you honestly think we&#8217;d beat out all those teams? I don&#8217;t think we can harbor a better record than a few of those teams, in which case, we&#8217;re screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArkansasDave</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17933</link>
		<dc:creator>ArkansasDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Sudden on this one.

Quarterback play will be the same or better as it was when we were leading the division at 4 and 3;

The defense is young and hungry - I think we start slow and finish strong-(opposite of last year) because of the youth making mistakes and learning. Our &#039;backers are hungry and really not much worse than last year (Nap Harris underperforming) and their load will be lighter with improved corners, albeit young.

The team is much the same as last year
OFFENSE
+plus at OL 1
=even at QB 0
=even at WR 0  - actually probably better here.
+plus at RB 1
=even at TE 0
=========== 2 ======= gains
DEFENSE
-neg  at DE -1
+plus at DT 1
+plus at DB 1
=even at S  0
=even at LB 0
=========== 1 ======= gain
-/+   neg/plus  for the youth   0
+plus for strength of schedule  1

Not sure what all this means, but it makes me start thinkin&#039; playoffs... HOMER?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Sudden on this one.</p>
<p>Quarterback play will be the same or better as it was when we were leading the division at 4 and 3;</p>
<p>The defense is young and hungry &#8211; I think we start slow and finish strong-(opposite of last year) because of the youth making mistakes and learning. Our &#8216;backers are hungry and really not much worse than last year (Nap Harris underperforming) and their load will be lighter with improved corners, albeit young.</p>
<p>The team is much the same as last year<br />
OFFENSE<br />
+plus at OL 1<br />
=even at QB 0<br />
=even at WR 0  &#8211; actually probably better here.<br />
+plus at RB 1<br />
=even at TE 0<br />
=========== 2 ======= gains<br />
DEFENSE<br />
-neg  at DE -1<br />
+plus at DT 1<br />
+plus at DB 1<br />
=even at S  0<br />
=even at LB 0<br />
=========== 1 ======= gain<br />
-/+   neg/plus  for the youth   0<br />
+plus for strength of schedule  1</p>
<p>Not sure what all this means, but it makes me start thinkin&#8217; playoffs&#8230; HOMER?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JASON</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17932</link>
		<dc:creator>JASON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17932</guid>
		<description>PLAYOFF CONTENDAH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLAYOFF CONTENDAH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17931</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17931</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like our quarterback play and I think our defense will struggle at times. Our linebackers are weak (other than D.J.), and the rest of the defense is extremely young. I also think we&#039;ll lose a lot of close ones, because it typically takes a young team a while to figure out how to win. L.J. will give us a chance, though. But we won&#039;t be a playoff team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like our quarterback play and I think our defense will struggle at times. Our linebackers are weak (other than D.J.), and the rest of the defense is extremely young. I also think we&#8217;ll lose a lot of close ones, because it typically takes a young team a while to figure out how to win. L.J. will give us a chance, though. But we won&#8217;t be a playoff team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudden</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17930</guid>
		<description>Adam, one thing that I don&#039;t understand is how you can be so optimistic about LJ but still think we&#039;re a 6 or 7 win team at best.  With LJ starting last season, we were 4-4, probably would&#039;ve been 5-3 if he made it through that entire GB game.  All of that is in spite of all the other problems with our OL and OC last year and while we had a pretty daunting strength of schedule.  This season, we have a healthy LJ with a much improved OL, a proven OC, and an almost laughably easy schedule and, eventhough you think LJ is a 1,400 yard rusher this season, you&#039;ve been fairly pessimistic about our final record.  Healthy LJ getting 25 carries a game in a Chan Gailey offense with a much improved OL = playoff contender.  That&#039;s right, playoff contender.  I said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, one thing that I don&#8217;t understand is how you can be so optimistic about LJ but still think we&#8217;re a 6 or 7 win team at best.  With LJ starting last season, we were 4-4, probably would&#8217;ve been 5-3 if he made it through that entire GB game.  All of that is in spite of all the other problems with our OL and OC last year and while we had a pretty daunting strength of schedule.  This season, we have a healthy LJ with a much improved OL, a proven OC, and an almost laughably easy schedule and, eventhough you think LJ is a 1,400 yard rusher this season, you&#8217;ve been fairly pessimistic about our final record.  Healthy LJ getting 25 carries a game in a Chan Gailey offense with a much improved OL = playoff contender.  That&#8217;s right, playoff contender.  I said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxxlp</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17929</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17929</guid>
		<description>Sandya I don&#039;t know if it is much of an understatement as you think. I mean it&#039;s the pre-season, and any (good) coach will tell you the main priority during pre-season is to keep guys healthy. Of course LJ is going to run hard, but right now he&#039;s only been in the first couple of gears. Wait until the season starts to see him shift into something with a li&#039;l more giddy-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandya I don&#8217;t know if it is much of an understatement as you think. I mean it&#8217;s the pre-season, and any (good) coach will tell you the main priority during pre-season is to keep guys healthy. Of course LJ is going to run hard, but right now he&#8217;s only been in the first couple of gears. Wait until the season starts to see him shift into something with a li&#8217;l more giddy-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17928</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17928</guid>
		<description>I love all the running styles...the dead leg...the truck...the buck (Jim Brown)...the stiff arm (Sweetness, L.T.)...video game (Barry Sanders)...

But the stiff arm is pretty. I love L.J.&#039;s style, however, because it so closely mimics Earl Campbell. Earl is the one running back that physically gets me jacked when I see his clips. You could rip that dude&#039;s jersey off and he would still stay up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the running styles&#8230;the dead leg&#8230;the truck&#8230;the buck (Jim Brown)&#8230;the stiff arm (Sweetness, L.T.)&#8230;video game (Barry Sanders)&#8230;</p>
<p>But the stiff arm is pretty. I love L.J.&#8217;s style, however, because it so closely mimics Earl Campbell. Earl is the one running back that physically gets me jacked when I see his clips. You could rip that dude&#8217;s jersey off and he would still stay up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JASON</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17927</link>
		<dc:creator>JASON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17927</guid>
		<description>man I LOVE THE STIFF ARM and lj is starting to pull it off. i would MUCH rather see a stiff arm than him running someone over B E A utiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man I LOVE THE STIFF ARM and lj is starting to pull it off. i would MUCH rather see a stiff arm than him running someone over B E A utiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXCHIEFAN</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17923</link>
		<dc:creator>TXCHIEFAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17923</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Larry is back with a vengance, rested, and has something to prove.  The O as a whole is better, so I see a better LJ than we have ever had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Larry is back with a vengance, rested, and has something to prove.  The O as a whole is better, so I see a better LJ than we have ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/08/21/larry-johnson-indiamonds-are-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17926</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=2172#comment-17926</guid>
		<description>L.J. also is an extremely low-mileage back considering his age. He&#039;s really only played three full seasons since high school. You can tack on a fourth if you combine the parts of other season, but not much more. I&#039;m telling everybody...

HE...IS...GOING...TO...BE...FINE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L.J. also is an extremely low-mileage back considering his age. He&#8217;s really only played three full seasons since high school. You can tack on a fourth if you combine the parts of other season, but not much more. I&#8217;m telling everybody&#8230;</p>
<p>HE&#8230;IS&#8230;GOING&#8230;TO&#8230;BE&#8230;FINE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
