<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Dr. Favrenstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/#comment-15868</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=1979#comment-15868</guid>
		<description>Adam&#039;s Schefter&#039;s commentary on NFL.com suggests that Favre has the leverage to veto any trade that  GB proposes if he doesn&#039;t like where the trade lands him.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8094bd7a&amp;template=with-video&amp;confirm=true

If Schefter is right, then it seems to me that a team like KC would be in a good position to play strawman for a deal that ultimately puts Favre in, say, Minnesota, and that would give GB&#039;s mgmt an out with fans/owners by pointing out that did everything they could to avoid dealing him directly to a division rival but that in the end they had no control over what another team did with him once he was gone.  GB saves face, Favre gets another shot with a contender, Chiefs get a high pick. Everybody wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam&#8217;s Schefter&#8217;s commentary on NFL.com suggests that Favre has the leverage to veto any trade that  GB proposes if he doesn&#8217;t like where the trade lands him.<br />
<a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8094bd7a&#038;template=with-video&#038;confirm=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8094bd7a&#038;template=with-video&#038;confirm=true</a></p>
<p>If Schefter is right, then it seems to me that a team like KC would be in a good position to play strawman for a deal that ultimately puts Favre in, say, Minnesota, and that would give GB&#8217;s mgmt an out with fans/owners by pointing out that did everything they could to avoid dealing him directly to a division rival but that in the end they had no control over what another team did with him once he was gone.  GB saves face, Favre gets another shot with a contender, Chiefs get a high pick. Everybody wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/#comment-15867</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=1979#comment-15867</guid>
		<description>Oh well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEANBCOOL</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/#comment-15866</link>
		<dc:creator>SEANBCOOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=1979#comment-15866</guid>
		<description>Read an article on Pro Football Talk that said a double trade of that nature was unlikely.  It said there would probably be some sort of clause that would increase that second day pick to a first rounder or something if Favre was traded to an NFC North rival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read an article on Pro Football Talk that said a double trade of that nature was unlikely.  It said there would probably be some sort of clause that would increase that second day pick to a first rounder or something if Favre was traded to an NFC North rival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/07/13/more-dr-favrenstein/#comment-15865</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/?p=1979#comment-15865</guid>
		<description>Scenario - Chiefs take Favre in exchange for day 2 pick, then immediately deal him to a team that is likely to give us 1st/2nd round pick for him (e.g., Minnesota, Chicago, Tampa Bay, etc).  Talk about pissing off some people in Wisconsin . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scenario &#8211; Chiefs take Favre in exchange for day 2 pick, then immediately deal him to a team that is likely to give us 1st/2nd round pick for him (e.g., Minnesota, Chicago, Tampa Bay, etc).  Talk about pissing off some people in Wisconsin . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 268/288 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-25 00:14:30 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        288
Cache hits:         268
Cache misses:       20
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
